戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eterm infants who are typically supported by total parenteral nutrition.
2 ation predicts the duration of dependence on total parenteral nutrition.
3  who were provided nutritional support using total parenteral nutrition.
4  transpyloric feeding tubes, and 7% received total parenteral nutrition.
5 ng bone marrow transplantation and receiving total parenteral nutrition.
6 tion included short-bowel syndrome requiring total parenteral nutrition.
7 ilure who experience severe complications on total parenteral nutrition.
8 y, evidence of bowel obstruction, and use of total parenteral nutrition.
9 ction, malabsorption and the requirement for total parenteral nutrition.
10 tically ill neonates, and patients receiving total parenteral nutrition.
11 ged conservatively with dietary measures and total parenteral nutrition.
12 mia during intensive insulin therapy than is total parenteral nutrition.
13 ne dose typically administered with standard total parenteral nutrition.
14 ial barrier function that is associated with total parenteral nutrition.
15 icantly increased with the administration of total parenteral nutrition.
16 antly lower than in wild-type mice receiving total parenteral nutrition.
17 t-bowel syndrome, which required him to have total parenteral nutrition.
18 surviving graft recipients are weaned off of total parenteral nutrition.
19 asis remain complex problems for patients on total parenteral nutrition.
20 with (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]): total parenteral nutrition (2.79 [1.26-6.17]), dialysis
21  (3.9% vs 17.5%, RR: 0.2, CI: 0.09-0.5), and total parenteral nutrition (3.9% vs 22.5%, RR: 0.2, CI:
22 .9% vs 17.5%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, .09-.5]), and total parenteral nutrition (3.9% vs 22.5%; RR, 0.2 [95%
23 9418], P<0.001), and the incidence of use of total parenteral nutrition (31 percent vs. 55 percent, P
24 nical ventilation (67.0% vs 44.1%), received total parenteral nutrition (63.6% vs 45.1%), and were on
25 dence interval, 1.8 to 148.1) and receipt of total parenteral nutrition (adjusted odds ratio, 9.2; 95
26                                              Total parenteral nutrition administration was associated
27 ion, alcohol use, use of medications, recent total parenteral nutrition, age at symptom onset, recent
28                                Seven days of total parenteral nutrition alone enhanced plasma GSH lev
29 studies indicate that copper requirements in total parenteral nutrition amount to 0.3 mg/day in the a
30                                  Presence of total parenteral nutrition and Candida albicans was asso
31 o distinct physiological differences between total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition that ar
32 de malabsorptive disorders, gastric surgery, total parenteral nutrition and excessive zinc intake.
33 thers do not, and why some patients tolerate total parenteral nutrition and others develop liver dysf
34                                     Avoiding total parenteral nutrition and prophylactic antibiotics,
35                                 All required total parenteral nutrition and repeated albumin infusion
36 ediate care unit, chronic care requirements (total parenteral nutrition and tracheostomy), specific d
37 l of villus atrophy by the administration of total parenteral nutrition, and a model of villus hypert
38 Nonimmune animals were randomized to chow or total parenteral nutrition, and after 5 days of diet wer
39 ain triglycerides, therapeutic paracentesis, total parenteral nutrition, and somatostatins.
40                                   Sepsis and total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis remain
41 ytosterols in parenteral lipid solutions and total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis.
42 hionine are the most promising treatments of total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis.
43 tohepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, total parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease, and
44 Patients with short-gut syndrome may develop total parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease, whi
45            All surviving patients weaned-off total parenteral nutrition at a median time of 32 days a
46 d glucose into the systemic circulation with total parenteral nutrition at rates that approximate usu
47                             Repeat sepsis on total parenteral nutrition before transplant (hazard rat
48 e premature infants, patients with long-term total parenteral nutrition, Crohn's disease, cystic fibr
49 art disease (HR 3.70; 95% CI 1.97-6.95), and total parenteral nutrition dependence (HR 4.02; 95% CI 2
50                 A total of 500 patients with total parenteral nutrition-dependent catastrophic and ch
51 lbumin to hypoalbuminemic patients receiving total parenteral nutrition does not improve morbidity or
52 tter define the parameters that best predict total parenteral nutrition failure and the unique mechan
53 isease complicated by short gut syndrome and total parenteral nutrition failure.
54 following an active infection, seven of nine total parenteral nutrition-fed animals continued to have
55 ore than or equal to 13, expected to require total parenteral nutrition for at least 5 days.
56 ept for a recipient of CLDILTx, currently on total parenteral nutrition for late fistula.
57  by carbachol and glucose were higher in the total parenteral nutrition group compared with the contr
58                         Ion transport in the total parenteral nutrition group was significantly incre
59                                              Total parenteral nutrition has significant effects on in
60 atio, 5.8 [95% CI, 3.0 to 11.3]), receipt of total parenteral nutrition (hazard ratio, 4.1 [CI, 2.3 t
61  intra-abdominal abscess in 23 patients, and total parenteral nutrition in 74 (36%).
62          Our understanding of the effects of total parenteral nutrition in critical illness has been
63 osing cholangitis, cholestasis of pregnancy, total parenteral nutrition-induced cholestasis, and drug
64 o assess the role of interferon-gamma on the total parenteral nutrition-induced loss of epithelial ba
65 ple, we addressed critical care therapy use (total parenteral nutrition, invasive mechanical ventilat
66 y injured patients compared with intravenous total parenteral nutrition (IV TPN) or no nutritional su
67                                              Total parenteral nutrition led to a loss of EBF, and thi
68                  Investigations suggest that total parenteral nutrition may compromise bactericidal a
69 al permeability in interferon-gamma knockout total parenteral nutrition mice was significantly lower
70   Although there is evidence to suggest that total parenteral nutrition more effectively spares prote
71                       These factors may make total parenteral nutrition more efficacious, at least in
72 reased dependence on enteral tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition [odds ratio (OR) 4.30, 95% co
73 rition: odds ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.93-3.63; total parenteral nutrition: odds ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.
74                 To investigate the effect of total parenteral nutrition on intestinal ion transport,
75                      Wild-type mice received total parenteral nutrition or enteral diet (control grou
76 ointestinal complications (P = 0.03), use of total parenteral nutrition (P < 0.001), and lung transpl
77 or/current hepatitis C diagnosis (P = .044), total parenteral nutrition (P = .0028), complicated diab
78                                   The use of total parenteral nutrition (p = 0.03), longer duration o
79                            Seven were put on total parenteral nutrition plus octreotide.
80                                              Total parenteral nutrition (PN), including fat administe
81                            Patients received total parenteral nutrition prepared either with a lipid
82 en are noted with stones in association with total parenteral nutrition, prolonged fasting, or ileal
83  comparable with patients given conventional total parenteral nutrition regimens, even when criticall
84 derwent multivisceral transplantation due to total parenteral nutrition-related liver disease.
85 oped computing anatomy of reconstructed gut, total parenteral nutrition requirements, cause of GF, an
86                                              Total parenteral nutrition should be considered only in
87                                              Total parenteral nutrition significantly increased small
88 de shortage of injectable zinc available for total parenteral nutrition supplementation over the last
89                                              Total parenteral nutrition support of sham animals follo
90 uding much higher serum insulin responses to total parenteral nutrition than with enteral nutrition t
91  400 IU of vitamin D(3) and was dependent on total parenteral nutrition that contained 200 IU of vita
92             Enteral nutrient deprivation via total parenteral nutrition (TPN) administration leads to
93       Lipid emulsions are a key component of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and are administered to
94 d male rats (approximately 235 g) were given total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and treated with recomb
95 ntrations in hospitalized patients beginning total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and whether a 3-d regim
96 erative length of stay, ventilator days, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) days.
97  medium-chain triacylglycerols (MCTs) during total parenteral nutrition (TPN) enhanced macrophage res
98          Then the animals were maintained on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for 10 days, after whic
99  40% to 60% of infants who require long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for intestinal failure
100 cadaver donors have become an alternative to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for the treatment of ir
101       Prior research has shown that mice fed total parenteral nutrition (TPN) have reduced GALT T and
102                                              Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a life-saving treatm
103                                              Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is an invasive and adva
104                                              Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is commonly used clinic
105                                              Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) leads a loss of epithel
106  showed that enteral nutrient deprivation or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) led to a loss of intest
107 t bowel syndrome are maintained on long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or more frequently cons
108 G), dialysis for acute kidney failure (AKF), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or tracheostomy.
109            Both intravenous and intragastric total parenteral nutrition (TPN) produce GALT atrophy, b
110 e lipid emulsions in modern formulations for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) provide essential fatty
111 cine tracer technique after 24 h of a stable total parenteral nutrition (TPN) regimen.
112 ich involved removal of amino acids from the total parenteral nutrition (TPN) solution for 8 h before
113               Prior work shows that mice fed total parenteral nutrition (TPN) solutions either intrav
114 ed to receive for > or = 5 d tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) that had identical ener
115 aper we show that feeding chemically defined total parenteral nutrition (TPN) to genetically normal,
116 birth weight (VLBW) infants are dependent on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) to prevent hypoglycemia
117 e enteroplasty [STEP]) in terms of survival, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) weaning, and complicati
118 nit and receiving mechanical ventilation and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were measured for > or
119                            Patients received total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with caloric intake 20%
120 nts were females with a history of long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with TPN-related choles
121 jejunal early enteral nutrition (NJEEN) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN), after pancreaticoduode
122 essional interest, with special reference to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), an area in which I hav
123 occurrence of significant infection, days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and days of injectable
124 ics and antifungals, and ICU factors such as total parenteral nutrition (TPN), blood product transfus
125      In several models, including rats given total parenteral nutrition (TPN), IGF-I more potently st
126 on of antibiotic administration, duration of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN), mother age, birth orde
127                       We utilized a model of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), or enteral nutrient de
128  a model of enteral nutrient deprivation, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN), resulting in intestina
129                           Mice that received total parenteral nutrition (TPN), which deprives the ani
130 inal failure patients do well with long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN), while others develop l
131                                              Total parenteral nutrition (TPN), with the complete remo
132         He recovered from PTLD but developed total parenteral nutrition (TPN)-induced liver failure.
133 liver disease (one), A-1-A deficiency (one), Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)-related (one), cryptoge
134 ied in a model of mucosal atrophy induced by total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
135 opment of gut failure (GF) with the need for total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
136 ctly into the veins of rats by the method of total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
137 nal inflammation are common complications of total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
138 thyroid gland function in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
139 port was provided to rats for 7 days by oral total parenteral nutrition (TPN; elemental diet) 307 kca
140 , and judicious jejunostomy tube feeding, or total parenteral nutrition usage may reduce morbidity.
141 oplasms, bone marrow/organ transplantations, total parenteral nutrition, vaccinations, oral contracep
142 3.8 years, and time from ITx to cessation of total parenteral nutrition was 31 days.
143                                              Total parenteral nutrition was discontinued 1 week postt
144   The percentages of infants who depended on total parenteral nutrition were 17 of 36 (47.2 percent)
145 , tumor size larger than 10 cm, and need for total parenteral nutrition were shown to further define
146 standard therapy for short bowel syndrome is total parenteral nutrition, which is expensive and assoc
147                            Patients received total parenteral nutrition with standard (1.5 g . kg(-1)

 
Page Top