ライフサイエンスコーパス: transcranial

1 Here, we performed high definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) o

2 timulation technology called high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS).

3 In this study, we tested whether transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) deli

4 Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a

5 cortical excitability.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a

6 sis on thirty-one healthy participants using transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) to e

7 Here we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to e

8 We applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to t

9 Here we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to t

10 ephalography (EEG), we applied 20 minutes of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to t

11 Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) uses

12 rticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

13 a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation-transcranial alternating current stimulation approach (i

14 To explore this we used transcranial alternating current stimulation over the le

15 that underlie the behavioral consequences of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

16 We combined non-invasive transcranial alternating-current stimulation (tACS) [8-1

17 characterizing the human sensation evoked by transcranial alternating-current stimulation, we observe

18 fields and to those produced by noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation, and therefore possibly a

19 cycloserine), electroconvulsive therapy, and transcranial brain stimulation.

20 Little is known, however, how transcranial current stimulation generates such effects,

21 We investigated this using transcranial current stimulation of the rat (all males)

22 er, have measured the neural consequences of transcranial current stimulation.

23 Here, we show that transcranial current stimulations (tCS) during sleep can

24 inusoids that delivered maximally ~1% of the transcranial current to the auditory nerve, which was su

25 hat brief application of 2 mA (peak-to-peak) transcranial currents alternating at 10 Hz significantly

26 modulate neural information processing using transcranial currents.

27 The present study used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and pr

28 hether individually-targeted high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) can re

29 this, we selectively applied high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to the

30 sions, we administered focal high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) while

31 in animals and humans provide evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) allows a

32 of the brain, and recent studies identified transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an eff

33 higher cognitive functions like reading with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can be ch

34 here report that application of non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during ad

35 Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been

36 interface-assisted motor imagery (MI-BCI) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been

37 Using bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in conjun

38 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a prom

39 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a well

40 ed to the aging brain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates

41 Following bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or sham s

42 stion by applying double-blind bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over both

43 We used bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over sens

44 that honesty can be increased in humans with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the

45 The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) placed ov

46 sorders and functions reported responsive to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) suggests

47 The goal of this study was to use transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to examin

48 the possibility of suppressing the DLPFC by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to facili

49 Anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was appli

50 We observed that bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with the

51 There has been growing interest in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-in

52 nce supports application of one type of tCS, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), for majo

53 During transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-induced a

54 lar manipulation of the dopaminergic system: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

55 we show that modulation of this region with transcranial direct current stimulation alters both acti

56 participants received 30 min of real or sham transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the l

57 High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation dynamically modu

58 we test the hypothesis that the response to transcranial direct current stimulation following trauma

59 ine working memory task performance, but the transcranial direct current stimulation group demonstrat

60 ced activation in the left cerebellum in the transcranial direct current stimulation group, with no c

61 cortex (PPC) using high-definition cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation impedes learning

62 PJ or dorsomedial PFC anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in a sham-contro

63 tory training, repetitive task training, and transcranial direct current stimulation may improve ADLs

64 nd randomized sham controlled pilot study of transcranial direct current stimulation on a working mem

65 However, only two studies on amantadine and transcranial direct current stimulation provided class I

66 We manipulated neural processing with transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the FP

67 alking speed and repetitive task training or transcranial direct current stimulation to improve activ

68 KEY POINTS: Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate huma

69 In the present study, we use high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to provide evide

70 problem-solving, by applying High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the rATL (act

71 Transcranial direct current stimulation was associated w

72 rformed phantom hand movements during anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

73 cant improvement in performance at 24 h post-transcranial direct current stimulation.

74 nipulation of cerebellar (CB) activity using transcranial direct current stimulation.

75 We compared transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) with a se

76 as is typical with transcranial magnetic or transcranial direct/alternating current electrical stimu

77 ty (FVsv), and methods derived from arterial transcranial Doppler (aTCD) on the middle cerebral arter

78 children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), high transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities are associated wit

79 g optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), venous transcranial Doppler (vTCD) of straight sinus systolic f

80 f MR angiography was contraindicated, and by transcranial Doppler and carotid ultrasound if CT angiog

81 c regression in a subgroup investigated with transcranial Doppler bubble screen.

82 sion therapy, for SCD patients with abnormal transcranial Doppler results, there is appropriate anxie

83 iddle cerebral artery (MCAv) was obtained by transcranial Doppler sonography and arterial pressure in

84 li burden, assessed noninvasively by bedside transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, correlates with ri

85 Blood flow was determined by transcranial Doppler ultrasound (cerebral blood flow) an

86 ars) receiving chronic hemodialysis, we used transcranial Doppler ultrasound to measure cerebral arte

87 We employed transcranial Doppler ultrasound to measure cerebral bloo

88 ry-evoked potentials, cerebral oximetry, and transcranial Doppler ultrasound) were used.

89 Recordings of CBFV (transcranial Doppler ultrasound), BP (Finometer) and end

90 ings of MAP (Finometer), CBF velocity (CBFV; transcranial Doppler ultrasound), end-tidal CO(2) (capno

91 T hypometabolism, and elevated velocities on transcranial Doppler ultrasound.

92 Cerebral blood flow velocities (transcranial Doppler) from middle cerebral artery and bl

93 In CBF velocity (CBFV) recordings with transcranial Doppler, evidence demonstrates that CVR sho

94 of blood transfusions, hydroxyurea therapy, transcranial Doppler-confirmed cerebral vasculopathy), g

95 d significant right-to-left shunt defined by transcranial Doppler.

96 lated vertebral artery injuries had positive transcranial Dopplers before stroke, and positive transc

97 I, 1.01-1.05) and with persistently positive transcranial Dopplers over multiple days (risk ratio, 16

98 cranial Dopplers before stroke, and positive transcranial Dopplers were not associated with delayed s

99 the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time cour

100 Noninvasive transcranial electric stimulation is increasingly being

101 rectly and objectively measure the amount of transcranial electric stimulation reaching the auditory

102 Transcranial electric stimulation with alternating curre

103 d evidence for activation of deep tissues by transcranial electric stimulation, its evoked human sens

104 Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a noninvasi

105 Transcranial electrical stimulation has widespread clini

106 A multiscale model of transcranial electrical stimulation including a finite e

107 Low intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (LIFU) is a promising me

108 Transcranial focused ultrasound is a non-invasive therap

109 nslation process, we used a novel technique, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation, to reversib

110 presented here will benefit the multitude of transcranial FUS applications as well as future human ap

111 above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS)

112 tion and viral titers postinfection in vitro Transcranial inoculation of C57Bl/6 mice with RSA59 (PP)

113 vestigated this using two protocols based on transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) in healthy

114 Delivering transcranial magnetic brain stimulation over the motor c

115 lating cortical activity, as is typical with transcranial magnetic or transcranial direct/alternating

116 Here, brain imaging and transcranial magnetic phosphene data show that lower res

117 Here, we use continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) to test this mo

118 following adaptation, continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) was delivered t

119 y study indicated beneficial effects of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) targeting the m

120 then temporarily inhibited PPC by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and hypothesize

121 fusion tensor imaging, and online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied during

122 cs following low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an inhibitor

123 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can alter neuro

124 Despite growing evidence that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be used as

125 roposed therapeutic potential for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in swallowing r

126 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a commonly-

127 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective

128 Critically, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on participants

129 r, and 1 hour after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the right PP

130 c.,) or need for retreatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

131 al-temporal cortex by delivering theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) concurrent with

132 Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) is a potential n

133 estingly, disrupting cerebellar activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) abolished the ad

134 By combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

135 Here, we combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and fMRI to test

136 the right or left speech motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and measured the

137 Here we used fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and simultaneous

138 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at beta frequenc

139 sity 500 kHz TUS transducer was coupled to a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil.

140 exposure group (N=17) underwent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) concurrent with

141 eceived brief patterns of rhythmic or random transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to the

142 plitude, and timing of beta events preceding transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) each significant

143 e feasibility, safety, and efficacy of 10-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for adolescents

144 rts of patients who received left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for treatment of

145 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been suggest

146 ese neural oscillations, we applied rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in either theta

147 The development of the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the study of

148 ous, causal test by combining the FCM with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intervention tha

149 order (MDD) has become a particular focus of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) investigational

150 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive

151 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an accessible

152 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective

153 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of cort

154 interval between trigeminal stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of fM1 was 15-30

155 xcitability and neural plasticity often used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of hand motor co

156 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human occipit

157 f motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 using an o

158 r or extensor muscle at the motor point with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cor

159 Probing corticospinal excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary m

160 stimulation in combination with directional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1.

161 ere we explored this possibility by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

162 r (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary

163 11 healthy controls, we applied paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols to eva

164 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) represents a nov

165 been at the forefront of advancing clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) since the mid-19

166 Here we employed fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whethe

167 In the current study, we used MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whethe

168 Here, by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to block consoli

169 e areas and attentional modulations, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to briefly alter

170 halography (EEG) to record brain signals and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to deliver infor

171 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evaluate the

172 ht be possible to use MI in conjunction with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to induce plasti

173 e and female participants using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere wit

174 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure corti

175 ale and female) brain noninvasively, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the exc

176 ity was modulated with 5 days of twice-daily transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the cerebella

177 We delivered double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while moving a s

178 ronometry of the process by combining online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with computation

179 Measuring the brain's response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroence

180 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked

181 f the first corticospinal volley elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), by interacting

182 itative real time polymerase chain reaction, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), functional magn

183 increased resting motor threshold (RMT) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is known to be

184 rk in prediction of response to both ECT and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), offering a new

185 ed by beta activity and is readily probed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

186 circuit is to probe candidate regions using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

187 vide such evidence, using fMRI-guided online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

188 ted the dynamics of relevant processes using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

189 he neural basis for contagious yawning using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

190 revealed by investigative techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

191 e and corticospinal excitability (CSE) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

192 om neuropsychology [5], neuroimaging [6-11], transcranial magnetic stimulation [12, 13], single-unit

193 Transcranial magnetic stimulation altered size perceptio

194 In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and demonstrated that

195 ural responsivity, as measured by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG.

196 We used a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogr

197 asive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), single-transcranial magnetic stimulation and external trigemina

198 Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and fMRI in healthy pa

199 efined electrophysiological method involving transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve s

200 ked potentials (MEPs) evoked by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and short-interval int

201 itude of corticospinal responses elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and the magnitude of m

202 s that can be probed by the onset latency of transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to primary mot

203 Finally, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to the human P

204 Therefore, motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation are larger when a cort

205 In this Neurology Grand Rounds, we use transcranial magnetic stimulation as a model to explore

206 plying a uniform spatial sampling procedure, transcranial magnetic stimulation can produce cortical f

207 Transcranial magnetic stimulation can show changes in fo

208 that effective connectivity, as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroe

209 Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroe

210 ar inhibition (CBI): a conditioning pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the cereb

211 ssible region of the hippocampal network via transcranial magnetic stimulation during concurrent fMRI

212 A subsequent fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment confirmed d

213 Further support was obtained by a transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment, where subj

214 This is further supported by our transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment: subjects w

215 Transcranial magnetic stimulation focused on either the

216 Here, we use 180 pairs of transcranial magnetic stimulation for approximately 30 m

217 nical neurophysiology of the brain employing transcranial magnetic stimulation has convincingly demon

218 nge to dIPL node with continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in a randomized, sham-

219 rticospinal conduction failure assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the right upper lim

220 associative stimulation (cPAS) is a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation in which paired pulses

221 oups: piTBS monotherapy (n = 35), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation monotherapy (n = 35),

222 mpact the activity of brain regions, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation or rapid-acting antide

223 Here, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation over four frontopariet

224 d motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm represent

225 SICI was obtained by delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left motor co

226 d motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the leg represent

227 imed to have corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor

228 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor

229 nderlying plasticity induction by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols such as inte

230 sent a promising target for novel repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols.

231 Results showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation reduced classification

232 aging studies of phonological processing, or transcranial magnetic stimulation sites that did not use

233 ted by redefining the borders of each of the transcranial magnetic stimulation sites to include areas

234 Here, we used a dense grid of transcranial magnetic stimulation spots covering the who

235 Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have highlight

236 nts and increased cortical excitability in a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in healthy volun

237 primary motor and sensory cortices by using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques.

238 They also predict responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (n = 154).

239 ly well to two different forms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for MDD.

240 applying excitatory or inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to a subject-specific

241 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to inhibit the right f

242 We used fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the neu

243 he conditional stop-signal task, and applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to the motor cortex, t

244 pre-SMA is a potential target for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in OCD, thes

245 y and related differentially to a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment outcome.

246 g changes in motor-cortical excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 2 h after stimul

247 Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied 100 ms aft

248 Inhibitory theta-burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation was applied to the lef

249 Diffusion and perfusion MRI, and transcranial magnetic stimulation were used to study str

250 we measured motor cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation while female and male

251 tency of motor-evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation with an anterior-poste

252 ency of motor-evoked potentials generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation with an AP orientation

253 combining inhibitory continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation with model-based funct

254 peripheral nerve electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) combined with electro

255 rd protocol is an updated form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and it is an effectiv

256 We combined transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroencephalograph

257 s should use individualized therapies (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, intracerebral stem/pr

258 c options such as electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, ketamine infusions, a

259 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation, paired-pulse intracor

260 use of brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, the therapeutic effic

261 Finally, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we found that during

262 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we investigated the r

263 sing a motoric incentive motivation task and transcranial magnetic stimulation, we studied the motor

264 lly compensate for the contribution that the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions make to

265 The classification accuracy of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions was val

266 ween those with and without damage to these 'transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided' regions remain

267 A combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced muscle relaxat

268 Overall baclofen did not alter transcranial magnetic stimulation-measured GABA(B) inhib

269 Using a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation-transcranial alternati

270 -interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

271 e of which muscle was stimulated paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

272 stimulating with theta versus beta rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation.

273 ctural brain MRI, magnetoencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

274 measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation.

275 y, and motor evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

276 target selection and neuro-navigation of the transcranial magnetic stimulation.

277 ose using region-specific therapies, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

278 We recorded myogenic MEPs after transcranial motor cortex stimulation in 6 lambs aged 1-

279 te that relatively low power continuous wave transcranial MRgFUS in conjunction with 5-ALA can produc

280 o optimize the ultrasound parameters of SDT, transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) and

281 B) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) de

282 Yet, transcranial neuromodulation using low-frequency piezo-b

283 rons located in deep mouse brain regions via transcranial optical stimulation and elicit behavioral c

284 ic implantation; that is, this opsin enables transcranial optogenetics.

285 e potent channelrhodopsin ChRmine to achieve transcranial photoactivation of defined neural circuits,

286 als in mice following exposure to a train of transcranial pulses above normal clinical parameters.

287 at just 10 d of visual training coupled with transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over visual

288 Meanwhile, transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a painless

289 We demonstrate that transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) ov

290 Plasticity-induction following theta burst transcranial stimulation (TBS) varies considerably acros

291 de first time evidence that slow oscillatory transcranial stimulation amplifies the functional cross-

292 es sensory adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial stimulation has been claimed to improve per

293 Transcranial two-photon imaging showed that deficits in

294 Using transcranial two-photon microscopy, we examined the effe

295 Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound (TUS) can non-invasively modulat

296 to ascertain if a novel operator-independent transcranial ultrasound device delivering low-power high

297 are useful for describing the upper limit of transcranial ultrasound protocols, and the neurological

298 Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising

299 Here, we demonstrate that a focused transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) protocol impac

300 We use focused transcranial ultrasound to selectively and effectively s