コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 going total pancreatectomy (autologous islet transplantation).
2 ssue compared with lungs undergoing standard transplantation.
3 as to quantify the risk of SCI in pancreatic transplantation.
4 in situ and ex situ model of rat donor liver transplantation.
5 eatment strategy for infants undergoing lung transplantation.
6 PB were performed at least 1 year after transplantation.
7 with a reduced incidence of AKI after liver transplantation.
8 as an unavoidable consequence of solid organ transplantation.
9 drug use, radiation therapy, and solid organ transplantation.
10 munosuppressive drugs for use in solid organ transplantation.
11 to 1.3 x 1010 donor mononuclear cells before transplantation.
12 d, he proceeded to simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.
13 o confer survival advantage after intestinal transplantation.
14 ne in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
15 rs for GVHD development following intestinal transplantation.
16 ce and increased HSC activity in bone marrow transplantation.
17 ts at several timepoints up to 3 years after transplantation.
18 otherapy and the distribution of cells after transplantation.
19 ped, help revitalize the field of intestinal transplantation.
20 n other pathological conditions beyond organ transplantation.
21 the early 2000s followed by blood stem cell transplantation.
22 n can expand the therapeutic window for hNSC transplantation.
23 nitiation of maintenance dialysis, or kidney transplantation.
24 ifferent times during organ preservation and transplantation.
25 etected only in the minor antigen-mismatched transplantation.
26 gimen that can be applied to allogeneic cell transplantation.
27 al applications in cellular- and organ-level transplantation.
28 lude surgical resection, ablation, and liver transplantation.
29 gnosis, and future plans for chemotherapy or transplantation.
30 Most (93%) had undergone renal or liver transplantation.
31 nuation of immunosuppression following liver transplantation.
32 e to refer an affected individual for kidney transplantation.
33 at risk of ESRD should be identified before transplantation.
34 graft outcomes in experimental and clinical transplantation.
35 f ischemia-reperfusion injury in solid organ transplantation.
36 the forefront of innovation in modern liver transplantation.
37 e risk of complications still exists despite transplantation.
38 patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
39 f a dnDSA, 65.3 months (median) after kidney transplantation.
40 specific IgE or IgG responses 24 months post-transplantation.
41 ce cross-dressing following liver and kidney transplantation.
42 of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through organ transplantation.
43 ith grafts functioning at least 1 year after transplantation.
44 CD50 kidney that was eventually accepted for transplantation.
45 lution to improve equity in access to kidney transplantation.
46 s to assess the suitability of the organ for transplantation.
47 ue has gained interest in the field of organ transplantation.
48 sensorimotor (cylinder) test is reversed by transplantation.
49 ed for precise selection of HCC patients for transplantation.
50 cal outcomes, particularly surrounding liver transplantation.
51 timation of myocardial performance following transplantation.
52 nt prolongation of liver preservation before transplantation.
53 ryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, and hAFSCs transplantation.
54 cts enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-09 study in which we randomized stable k
57 ic syndrome is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, a therapy unavailable to many patients
58 r overcoming two major issues in human islet transplantation: (a) poor yield of islets from donated p
59 a from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALL) study, which represents the larg
61 Kingdom and resumption of living donor liver transplantation activity in India toward the end of the
63 acute rejection (BCAR) within 60 weeks after transplantation; adverse event coding was centralised.
66 kemia (AML) who undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), and carries a grave prognosis
67 s, with or without autologous haematopoietic transplantation and a plethora of new agents, the progre
68 equires expertise in both living donor liver transplantation and advanced laparoscopic liver surgery.
70 munocompromised zebrafish for xenograft cell transplantation and credentials the model as a new precl
71 HLA antibodies pose a significant barrier to transplantation and current strategies to reduce allosen
72 nt the first reported experience with kidney transplantation and donation in transgender patients.
73 nses in a variety of models, including organ transplantation and graft versus host disease (GVHD) but
76 rejection and allograft loss in solid organ transplantation and may act synergistically with HLA don
80 We enrolled patients who underwent kidney transplantation and were actively followed up in two hos
81 d received high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation and/or treatment with a proteasome inhib
82 ed from donor-recipient pairs at the time of transplantation, and from recipients at several timepoin
83 studied in AREG(-/-) mice after bone marrow transplantation, and in mice with myeloid cell-specific
84 in the busulfan group received treatment and transplantation, and in the treosulfan group 221 receive
85 cohort of patients with heart failure, heart transplantation, and left ventricular assist device.
87 lowed by autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and prospective trials have demonstrate
89 ancies or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are vulnerable to colonization and infec
91 se report of simultaneous liver and pancreas transplantation as treatment of WRS in a small child in
92 ed the incorporation of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) into a carfilzomib-lenalidomide-d
96 ese recommendations, the American Society of Transplantation (AST) facilitated a consensus workshop t
98 mother had died of the disease, proceeded to transplantation at age 49 with a 12/12 human leukocyte a
99 eir home institution versus those who sought transplantation at an alternative institution (55.3% ver
102 ion in a man, 8 years after his first facial transplantation because of extensive disfigurement from
103 n therapy for presumed HCC followed by liver transplantation between January 2011 and December 2015 a
104 s, who were referred and evaluated for liver transplantation between January and June 2012 were studi
105 lts (age >=18) who underwent first-time lung transplantation between March 2018 (when united network
106 t advances in adult stem cell enrichment and transplantation, bioengineering, and gene transfer have
107 ic malignancies treated with blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) and that inclusion of these SNPs i
109 rodents using human neural stem cell (hNSC) transplantation, but the procedure is invasive, requires
110 5% CI -50.4, -8.5, p<0.006), and referral to transplantation by 115.1 days (95% CI -179.5, -50.7, p<0
111 ronment delayed hematopoietic recovery after transplantation by decreasing endothelial proliferation
112 novel means to perform VSP and virtual face transplantation by interacting with and manipulating pat
113 These findings demonstrate that interneuron transplantation can exert therapeutic behavioral effects
116 (SRTR) data to identify 92 081 adult kidney transplantation candidates who were offered a DCD50 kidn
118 els were history of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, cumulative alkylating drug dose, and an
120 The success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation depends heavily on the delicate balance
121 and transplant center levels to ensure safe transplantation despite significant redirection of resou
123 l and sex disparities in living donor kidney transplantation do not appear to be related to network s
124 To identify changes to organ donation and transplantation during this time, an anonymous web-based
125 testing capacity can support continued organ transplantation, even in a SARS-CoV-2 hyperendemic area.
130 e safety and feasibility of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and reinduction of anti-PD-1 immun
131 to properly evaluate the candidate to liver transplantation for alcoholic liver diseases and severe
132 ased assessment of patients undergoing heart transplantation for early risk stratification, patient m
133 oing chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancy at St.
134 deceased donor kidneys but reduces access to transplantation for older patients and results in greate
136 e curative effect of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the hematopoietic features of SMARCD
138 712 patients with CGD who underwent allo-HCT transplantation from March 1993 through December 2018.
139 ILD referred or on the waiting list for lung transplantation from May 2013 to December 2017 underwent
141 ite International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines, a significant proportion ind
143 otherapy and subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Gro
145 reconstitution after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been observed, we hypothesized that
147 igation of these processes in clinical organ transplantation has, however, been hampered by the lack
148 who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation have poor outcomes and few treatment opt
149 ite of death/ventricular assist device/heart transplantation (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.94];
150 higher risk of nonarrhythmic death or heart transplantation (hazard ratio, 11.01 [95% CI, 2.96-40.95
152 ies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for difficult-to-control infection
155 reventing acute GvHD post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), its efficacy and long-term outcom
157 I) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute
160 g immunosuppression such as, diabetes, organ transplantation, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infe
161 associated side effects preclude intestinal transplantation if motivated only by an expectation of i
162 has enabled incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) across HLA/ABO barriers, but add
164 rmone levels both in serum and saliva during transplantation in 7 postmenopausal female patients with
165 logy, visual outcome and survival of corneal transplantation in children and to identify the risk fac
166 tudy was to compare the preparation time for transplantation in children of different weights and to
169 ysis, adjusted risk of death 12 months after transplantation in recipients with a kidney from donors
170 patients should be considered for intestinal transplantation in the event of progressive intestinal f
171 of ageing, sex, the gut microbiome and organ transplantation in this complex interplay are also discu
172 of acute liver failure (ALF) requiring liver transplantation in USA and its frequency is increasing i
175 SC self-renewal defect is rescued after cell transplantation into a normal microenvironment, thus pro
176 port mature T cell development in vivo after transplantation into humanised immunodeficient mice.
177 sence of an effective treatment, direct cell transplantation into the CNS to restore myelin has been
182 ent, prognosis remains poor, and double-lung transplantation is an option for eligible patients.
183 ll, the 1-year survival rate following liver transplantation is lower than that seen in patients who
186 ing and patient risk stratification in renal transplantation is the single antigen bead (SAB) assay.
187 liver is the primary site for clinical islet transplantation, it poses several restrictions, especial
190 d-stage renal disease is longer after kidney transplantation (KT) compared with those remaining on di
191 clinical rejection (SCR) screening in kidney transplantation (KT) using protocol biopsies and noninva
192 erstand the impact of the epidemic on kidney transplantation (KT), at both the national and center le
194 tudied outcomes following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) post-PVTT downstaging (DS) with s
195 robust microvasculature in lung grafts after transplantation, leading to better posttransplant outcom
196 an increasingly common indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States and in many pa
198 omic signature in the first week after liver transplantation (LT) that is associated with graft loss
199 paucity of data on the outcome of DCD liver transplantation (LT) utilizing livers with macrosteatosi
200 llular carcinoma (HCC) recurring after liver transplantation (LT) when HCC is unsuitable for surgical
206 ficant regional variations in COVID-19, lung transplantation (LTx) remains a critical life-saving ope
207 these results suggest that fecal microbiota transplantation may be a treatment option in sepsis asso
213 were identified in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing
214 virus (HIV)/AIDS, cancer, stem cell or organ transplantation, nonsteroid immunosuppressive therapy, i
215 er trial demonstrated safety and efficacy of transplantation of 30 HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-negat
220 B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia and underwent transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from his hum
230 ade on the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on allergy transfer or cure of the disea
231 tment with either a healthy fecal microbiota transplantation or defined commensal bacterial taxa can
233 rgery (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.30-0.32), corneal transplantation (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.49), and retin
234 th type 1 diabetes mellitus (allogenic islet transplantation), or the prevention of surgical diabetes
235 matologic neoplasm, after hematopoietic cell transplantation, or as a result of germline testing for
236 ained by exposure to chemotherapy, stem-cell transplantation, or rituximab, except for IRRs for humor
237 occurs as a result of traumatic injury, cell transplantation, or tumor growth, among many others.
238 idence of EBV reactivation and its impact on transplantation outcomes in 71 patients undergoing haplo
239 ole of patient socioeconomic status (SES) in transplantation outcomes is poorly understood because of
240 djusted probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation persist under KAS, even between centers
241 comorbidities, dialysis vintage, and kidney transplantation, PH was associated with twice the 5-year
244 poietic reconstitution following bone marrow transplantation provide a window of opportunity whereby
247 er peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation, rarely occurs in kidney and pancreas tr
248 d gene expression analyses revealed that VAT transplantation recapitulated the effects of obesity on
250 ogical approaches are ineffective, and liver transplantation represents the only curative option.
251 (AST) launched the Outstanding Questions in Transplantation Research forum to stimulate a community-
253 e increasing reports of combined heart-liver transplantation resulting from advanced liver disease, i
254 iplines (hematology, nephrology, obstetrics, transplantation, rheumatology, and neurology), and (d) t
256 Frailty Heart Workgroup (American Society of Transplantation's Thoracic and Critical Care Community o
257 f the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Carroll; Hand Transplantation Score System; Short Form-36; and Kapandj
258 In the presence of 2 factors or more upfront transplantation should be probably preferred to resectio
259 poral region (i.e., the location of HuCNS-SC transplantation) showed a significantly slower progressi
262 ly excluding patients with prior solid organ transplantation (SOT) and posttransplant lymphoprolifera
266 autologous and allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation suggest that HIV status does not adverse
267 he authors demonstrated that, following skin transplantation, the donor mast cell-mediated senescence
269 itled "Evidence-Based Treatment Decisions in Transplantation: The Right Dose & Regimen for the Right
270 iption factor TWIST1 for an efficacious cell transplantation therapy to induce neovascularization-med
273 trials in autoimmunity and heart and kidney transplantation to determine effectiveness of inhibiting
275 irs and patients undergoing fecal microbiota transplantation to evaluate the patterns of acquisition,
276 nhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) after cardiac transplantation to identify antibodies associated with a
278 we employ a sensitized murine model of islet transplantation to test strategies that promote long-ter
279 tolerant alloreactive B cells contribute to transplantation tolerance by foregoing germinal center r
280 infection on: (a) disruption of established transplantation tolerance during tolerance maintenance;
281 Here we used an allogeneic murine islet transplantation tolerance model to examine the impact of
282 den of nosocomial Pneumocystis infections in transplantation units in France was evaluated through a
284 fter explantation survival free from LVAD or transplantation was 90% at 1-year and 77% at 2 and 3 yea
289 yndrome treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was referred for decreased vision relate
290 hazard model, HLA class II antibodies before transplantation were associated with increased adjusted
292 patic decompensation, or liver-related death/transplantation) were assessed, using Cox regression ana
293 n invaluable resource in kidney and pancreas transplantation when vascular reconstruction is needed a
294 ndings could improve graft survival after SL transplantation, which would encourage programs to opt i
295 ificantly (p = 0.026) elevated at day + 7 of transplantation, while salivary progesterone increased a
296 Many children who have undergone solid organ transplantation will require additional support in medic
297 lied in AD+ mice: (i) ACE10/GFP+ bone marrow transplantation with head shielding; and (ii) adoptive t
298 mes in 71 patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation with posttransplantation cyclophosphamid
299 astomosis within the first 3 days after lung transplantation, with more numerous and complex lymphati
300 e percentage of patients referred for kidney transplantation within 1 year of dialysis at the 690 dia