戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 emergency room visit, parenteral therapy, or tube feeding).
2 and long-term consequences of a trial of PEG tube feeding.
3 ng, and staff implicit values unfavorable to tube feeding.
4  performance in preterm infants with enteral tube feeding.
5 ormance in preterm infants receiving enteral tube feeding.
6 ) tolerated an oral diet and did not require tube feeding.
7 om parenteral nutrition to exclusive enteral tube feeding.
8  was slowly tapered while increasing enteral tube feeding.
9 liation or more aggressive measures, such as tube feeding.
10 are used to regulate the delivery of enteral tube feeding.
11 out mechanical ventilation, and in 43% about tube feeding.
12 f ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with tube feeding.
13 alysis, blood transfusion, vasopressors, and tube feeding.
14 er, 54% were noted to lose weight on enteral tube feeding.
15  nothing by mouth and were placed on enteral tube feeding.
16 dialysis and the use of food supplements and tube feeding.
17  analysis after 0, 2, 7, 14, 21, and 32 d of tube-feeding.
18 nth following the institution of gastrostomy tube feedings.
19 ents (27%) continued to require supplemental tube feedings.
20 wo patients (6%) had long-term dependence on tube feedings.
21 ion criteria were mechanical ventilation and tube feedings.
22 randomized to receive gastric or small-bowel tube feedings.
23                      Eight were converted to tube feedings.
24 d a significantly lower RR of infection with tube feeding (0.64; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.76) and standard car
25 onal supplements (ONS; 11 RCTs), and enteral tube feeding (1 RCT)] with a control comparison were ide
26 s: 98.5% [range 61.1% to 119.7%]; continuous tube feeding: 109.0% [range 86.2% to 142.1%]; p =.42).
27 2.74); length of stay (1.02, 1.01-1.02); and tube feeding (2.02, 1.44-2.82).
28            Of the women allocated to enteral tube feeding, 28 (47%) were treated according to protoco
29 lish whether the timing and route of enteral tube feeding after stroke affected patients' outcomes at
30 16 we randomly allocated 59 women to enteral tube feeding and 57 women to standard care.
31                                 HEN included tube feeding and complex monitoring by a nutrition suppo
32 clear when 2 types of enteral nutrition, ie, tube feeding and conventional oral diets with intravenou
33  organ dysfunction that included small-bowel tube feeding and propofol sedation.
34                                              Tube feeding and standard care are associated with a low
35 ce promotion in preterm infants with enteral tube feeding and summarize evidence on the effectiveness
36 ese findings suggest that glutamine-enriched tube feeding and TPN can result in similar profiles for
37 he patients with agenesis were discharged on tube feedings and 22% on oxygen therapy.
38 ystic fibrosis, patients receiving long-term tube-feeding and those with perceived or real food aller
39 , she was fed an elemental diet with enteral tube feeding, and her condition gradually improved.
40 f 9 patients no longer relied on jejunostomy tube feeding, and no adverse events were noted related t
41 ssium administered via parenteral nutrition, tube feeding, and replacement infusions were calculated
42 care units, the smell and taste of milk with tube feeding are not generally considered a regular comp
43 ents, especially those receiving postpyloric tube feeding, are at greater risk for the acquisition of
44 ot show the superiority of early nasoenteric tube feeding, as compared with an oral diet after 72 hou
45            Women were encouraged to continue tube feeding at home.
46                      Many women discontinued tube feeding because of discomfort, suggesting that it i
47 educing hospitalization, and reducing use of tube feeding, but it is rarely used.
48             Sixty-six percent of the enteral tube feeding cessations was judged to be attributable to
49 patients (52.3%) for a mean 38.2% of enteral tube feeding days.
50 gen, noninvasive ventilation, and/or enteral tube feeding decreased by 50%, 30%, and 50%, respectivel
51          Four patients (14.8%) had long-term tube feeding-dependency because of severe dysphagia (2 p
52                          Concomitant gastric tube feeding did not affect gatifloxacin bioavailability
53                         Although concomitant tube feeding did not affect gatifloxacin bioavailability
54 egular smell and taste of milk included with tube feeding did not improve weight at discharge in pret
55 ffects (34%).In women with HG, early enteral tube feeding does not improve birth weight or secondary
56 t risk for unusual pigmentation effects from tube feeding dyes.
57                  Given the widespread use of tube feedings, even a small percentage of such problems
58 gestation were randomly allocated to enteral tube feeding for >/=7 d in addition to standard care wit
59 c anastomosis or to receive nil-by-mouth and tube feeding for 5 days postoperative (control group).
60 , patients received a mean volume of enteral tube feeding for all 339 days of infusion that was 51.6%
61 llocated to early enteral tube feeding or no tube feeding for more than 7 days (early versus avoid).
62 ed on management of RV: cessation of enteral tube feeding for RV >400 mL in study patients or for RV
63 g the designated RV for cessation of enteral tube feeding from 200 mL to 400 mL did not increase the
64 rth weight was 3160 +/- 770 g in the enteral tube feeding group compared with 3200 +/- 680 g in the s
65 ea, but its role in diarrhea associated with tube feeding has not been rigorously investigated.
66             We found no data to suggest that tube feeding improves any of these clinically important
67 hesized that in women with HG, early enteral tube feeding in addition to standard care improves birth
68 h March 1999, to identify data about whether tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia can prev
69 - 0.27 kPa) (p = .003) after the addition of tube feedings in the samples from those patients who wer
70  resusitation [CPR], mechanical ventilation, tube feeding) in their current condition (all P >.12).
71 e day) within 72 hrs of the start of enteral tube feeding infusion.
72                                Early enteral tube feeding (initiated within 48 hrs of intensive care
73                                      Enteral tube feeding is commonly used in preterm infants to prov
74          The current manner in which enteral tube feeding is delivered in the ICU results in grossly
75                      Nasogastric/nasoenteral tube feeding is often complicated by diarrhea but the co
76                                              Tube-feeding is of questionable benefit for nursing home
77                                        Early tube feeding might reduce case fatality, but at the expe
78 , and nutritional supplementation, including tube feeding, might be needed to prevent malnutrition.
79           Despite this, cessation of enteral tube feeding occurred in 83.7% of patients for a mean 19
80                                  Postpyloric tube feeding (odds ratio, 3.14 [CI, 1.008 to 9.77]) and
81            These data indicate that in rats, tube feedings of diets containing sesamin exerted antiin
82  of critical illness and concomitant gastric tube feeding on gatifloxacin bioavailability.
83  and taste and smell exposure before gastric-tube feeding or no taste and smell exposure.
84 ion were randomly allocated to early enteral tube feeding or no tube feeding for more than 7 days (ea
85 either the smell and taste of milk with each tube feeding or routine care without the provision of sm
86  randomly assigned to receive for > or = 5 d tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) that ha
87 ociated with increased dependence on enteral tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition [odds ratio (
88                                              Tube feeding or TPN began on postoperative day 1 and adv
89 nd 3.69 mumol/L in subjects receiving 5 d of tube feeding or TPN, respectively.
90 centrations were restored with 5 d of either tube feeding or TPN.
91 ve gatifloxacin concurrently with continuous tube feeding or with interrupted tube feeds.
92 tritional rehabilitation with either jejunal tube feedings or parenteral nutrition until weight gain
93 regarding preferences for initiation of CPR, tube feeding, or mechanical ventilation in the patient's
94 , alvimopan usage, and judicious jejunostomy tube feeding, or total parenteral nutrition usage may re
95       Any use of oxygen therapy, nasogastric-tube feeding, or ventilatory support was recorded.
96                              Rate of enteral tube feeding ordered, actual volume delivered, patient p
97 e last hour of life (p = .01), withdrawal of tube feeding (p = .04), family presence at time of death
98 Declining albumin levels through the enteral tube feeding period correlated significantly with decrea
99 s after presentation (on-demand group), with tube feeding provided if the oral diet was not tolerated
100 nts based a priori on the ability to reach a tube feeding rate of 40 mL/hour.
101                                              Tube-feeding rates ranged from 0% in 5 low-intensity fac
102 nced dementia based on hospital transfer and tube-feeding rates.
103 s not a major contributor to the etiology of tube feeding-related diarrhea.
104 number of ventilator days, and discharged on tube feedings remained significant predictors of mortali
105  depression, osteocutaneous flaps, prolonged tube feeding requirements, and any recurrent or persiste
106                   The widespread practice of tube feeding should be carefully reconsidered, and we be
107                        Our data suggest that tube feedings should be temporarily discontinued for at
108 or nil-by-mouth for 5 days postoperative and tube feeding (standard of care, control group) following
109                                      Enteral tube / feeding supplies (19.8%), diapers (19.2%), lower
110   Previous investigations suggest continuous tube feeding (TF) schedules do not suppress appetite and
111 potheses showed a lower RR of infection with tube feeding than with parenteral nutrition, regardless
112 cians ordered a daily mean volume of enteral tube feeding that was 65.6% of goal requirements, but an
113 are hospital, placed on intragastric enteral tube feeding through nasogastric or percutaneous endosco
114 , use of oxygen supplementation, nasogastric-tube feeding, ventilatory support, and relative improvem
115     In the multivariable model, the need for tube feeding was a risk factor for having an abnormal de
116                                        Early tube feeding was associated with an absolute reduction i
117      Supplemental nasogastric or gastrostomy tube feeding was carried out during the blood flow study
118                                      Enteral tube feeding was discontinued within 7 d of placement in
119 ger hospital stay, poorer linear growth, and tube feeding were associated with worse outcomes in all
120 Duration and reason for cessation of enteral tube feeding were documented.
121  performance in preterm infants with enteral tube feeding were included.
122                                     Finally, tube feedings were retarded and the data set was repeate
123                                              Tube feedings were supplemented with arginine, RNA, and
124                                          The tube feedings were then withheld for 2 hrs.
125 itional support in the form of early enteral tube feedings, will decrease the hypermetabolic response
126 randomized trial comparing early nasoenteric tube feeding with an oral diet at 72 hours after present
127  no published randomized trials that compare tube feeding with oral feeding.
128 tients were randomly assigned to nasoenteric tube feeding within 24 hours after randomization (early

 
Page Top