戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n is shown to inhibit cancer cell growth and tumorigenicity.
2 A methyltransferases for CSC maintenance and tumorigenicity.
3  an important modulator and even a driver of tumorigenicity.
4 in C receptor (EPCR) in MPM cells suppresses tumorigenicity.
5 stic phenotype and contributes to epithelial tumorigenicity.
6 perties, thyrosphere formation, and enhanced tumorigenicity.
7 ion ultimately contributing to LMW-E-induced tumorigenicity.
8 he growth, invasion, migration, stemness and tumorigenicity.
9 ssive properties of hMSC and increased their tumorigenicity.
10 reduced stem marker expression and decreased tumorigenicity.
11 temness with higher angiogenic potential and tumorigenicity.
12 proteins BMI-1 and EZH2, which contribute to tumorigenicity.
13 eactivation of progenitor functions supports tumorigenicity.
14  a mechanism through which DAXX promotes PCa tumorigenicity.
15 in miR-21KD cancer cells restored their high tumorigenicity.
16 crophage ratios may account for the enhanced tumorigenicity.
17 th by coordinately linking immune escape and tumorigenicity.
18 nuated DCA-induced colorectal cancer or PDAC tumorigenicity.
19 latory promoter regions, leading to enhanced tumorigenicity.
20 n connection between CFIm25 and glioblastoma tumorigenicity.
21 a consequence of miR-9 inhibition, increases tumorigenicity.
22 , indicating regulation of proliferation and tumorigenicity.
23 creased cellular senescence, and/or enhanced tumorigenicity.
24 ssion of miR-9 upregulates FOXP1 to increase tumorigenicity.
25 miting oxygen conditions may be required for tumorigenicity.
26  whereas Prep1 overexpression inhibits Meis1 tumorigenicity.
27  by both altering the immunogenicity and the tumorigenicity.
28 ll growth, promigratory characteristics, and tumorigenicity.
29  cancer-specific epigenetic abnormalities on tumorigenicity.
30 to overexpress tissue factor increased their tumorigenicity.
31 n levels of RNAs and of their changes during tumorigenicity.
32 usly and demonstrates for the first time its tumorigenicity.
33 tissue factor did not increase their limited tumorigenicity.
34 gulator of stress responses, metabolism, and tumorigenicity.
35 e the epigenetic drivers causing the loss of tumorigenicity.
36 cers and its levels appear to correlate with tumorigenicity.
37 and selectively reduce mutant PIK3CA-induced tumorigenicity.
38 stic suppression of driver oncogenes and HCC tumorigenicity.
39 tion, single cell clonogenicity, and in vivo tumorigenicity.
40 g to enhanced STAT3 signaling activation and tumorigenicity.
41 in supporting RAS-induced transformation and tumorigenicity.
42 neage bias, proliferation, self-renewal, and tumorigenicity.
43 ion and have been implicated in Ras-mediated tumorigenicity.
44 regulate the induction of stiffness-mediated tumorigenicity.
45 lays compromised kinase activity and reduced tumorigenicity.
46 and/or pharmacological inhibition to reduced tumorigenicity.
47 ment without compromising tumour stemness or tumorigenicity.
48 ion, which is of importance for RAS-mediated tumorigenicity.
49 tion and induced apoptosis but also impaired tumorigenicity.
50 ollutants in Caco-2 cells and increase their tumorigenicity.
51 tumor cells and regulates their stemness and tumorigenicity.
52 induce gene expression programs essential in tumorigenicity.
53  cancer models displaying varying degrees of tumorigenicity.
54 thesis-that is important for prostate cancer tumorigenicity.
55 ing an STF program associated with increased tumorigenicity.
56 red proliferation but increased intracranial tumorigenicity.
57  the DAN family, neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1).
58 ed serine protease encoded by suppression of tumorigenicity-14 (ST14) gene, which is critical for epi
59 al motifs [reck; also known as suppressor of tumorigenicity 15 protein (ST15)], which encodes a membr
60        In the second example, suppression of tumorigenicity 18 (ST18) was activated by a tumor-specif
61 c changes in IL33 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) levels were measured in the plas
62 C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) and suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) also were measured on the basis o
63 the role of the IL-33 receptor suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) in the persistence of asthma in a
64                                Suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) was the only biomarker associated
65 ike 1 (IL1RL1), also known as suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), is the receptor for interleukin
66           The lead biomarker, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), was measured at the beginning of
67 litated tumor regression in a suppression of tumorigenicity 2 receptor (ST2) (IL-33 receptor)-indepen
68 acid-binding protein, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, and lipopolysaccharide were assessed.
69                           The suppression of tumorigenicity 2/IL-33 (ST2/IL-33) pathway has been impl
70 p < 0.0001) and day 3 soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (median, 7,678 mL [interquartile range,
71     We assayed plasma soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (n = 826) concentrations and interleuki
72  for reintubation for soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (odds ratio, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.04-10.07;
73                          High suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2) and T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3
74                Higher soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and interleukin-6 concentrations are ea
75 ay 0 and day 3 median soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and interleukin-6 concentrations had de
76                       Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and interleukin-6 concentrations have b
77 We determined whether soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and interleukin-6 levels can be used as
78     We tested whether soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and interleukin-6 levels were associate
79 , interleukin-33, and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 between matched patients who were treat
80                Higher soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations are associated with wors
81 nd day 3 (p < 0.0001) soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations.
82                       Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is a biomarker of myocardial strain and
83                       Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 showed excellent discriminative ability
84 nd interleukin-33 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2) within 24 hours of acute respiratory d
85 urther adjustment for soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2, elevated Gal-3 remained associated wit
86 75; p < 0.0001; day 3 soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2: hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.75;
87 tion over time (day 0 soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2: hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00;
88 eous breathing trial (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2: odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71; p
89  weaning assessments (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2: odds ratio, 0.62: 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; p
90 hich is accompanied by a substantial loss of tumorigenicity and a switch from canonical to noncanonic
91 ibits uncontrolled proliferation and reduces tumorigenicity and aggressiveness of HCC cells through R
92 cer cells, influence mammary epithelial cell tumorigenicity and aggressiveness, and increase breast c
93 levels of GHCer displayed relatively greater tumorigenicity and angiogenesis compared with cells expr
94 stable, not consistently linked to increased tumorigenicity and associated with genetic heterogeneity
95                 Here we describe preclinical tumorigenicity and biodistribution safety studies that w
96  in vivo assays to determine acute toxicity, tumorigenicity and biodistribution.
97       Cancer stem cells (CSCs) with enhanced tumorigenicity and chemoresistance are believed to be re
98 ividual components significantly impairs the tumorigenicity and CRPC development.
99 OSIC-like properties of self-renewal, strong tumorigenicity and differentiation to CD49f(+) progeny.
100 fect) to support anabolic growth and promote tumorigenicity and drug resistance.
101 ng cascade, the inhibition of which promotes tumorigenicity and drug-resistant survival.
102 polymorphisms in stroma significantly affect tumorigenicity and experimental lung metastasis.
103 e of the side population (SP) and in vivo as tumorigenicity and experimental metastatic potential in
104   Let-7 targets Imp1-3 are required for this tumorigenicity and feed back to reinforce and sustain ex
105                                    Increased tumorigenicity and gemcitabine resistance decrease after
106  epigenetic abnormalities that could promote tumorigenicity and immunogenicity in vivo.
107 ovel mechanism by which Vav1 can enhance the tumorigenicity and invasive potential of cancer cells.
108 sion of miR-141 is inversely correlated with tumorigenicity and invasiveness in several human cancers
109  indicate the importance of this pathway for tumorigenicity and invasiveness of KDM2A-overexpressing
110 hip between YAP/TAZ levels and melanoma cell tumorigenicity and invasiveness.
111 ndent suppression of melanoma cell invasion, tumorigenicity and lung colonization.
112  the major role of PTGES/PGE(2) signaling in tumorigenicity and lung metastasis is through immunosupp
113      Because N2P2 has been shown to increase tumorigenicity and M3P6 to decreases it, we sought to de
114 esis, arguing that separate pathways mediate tumorigenicity and metastasis by c-Kit.
115 sional cultures in vitro and more aggressive tumorigenicity and metastasis in vivo.
116 nd invasive potential in vitro, and enhances tumorigenicity and metastasis in vivo.
117 state cancer (PCa) cell migration, invasion, tumorigenicity and metastasis using a human PCa progress
118  proteolysis has been strongly implicated in tumorigenicity and metastasis.
119 thereby increasing cell migration, invasion, tumorigenicity and metastasis.
120 ulated in numerous cancers and implicated in tumorigenicity and metastasis.
121 rs and mitochondria as critical modifiers of tumorigenicity and metastasis.
122 ulated in several cancers, where it promotes tumorigenicity and metastasis.
123 riptase activity and significantly decreased tumorigenicity and metastatic capability in orthotopical
124 itochondrial SNPs regulate mammary carcinoma tumorigenicity and metastatic potential in genetic cross
125                                              Tumorigenicity and metastatic potential of colorectal tu
126 of the spliceosome in vivo impairs survival, tumorigenicity and metastatic proclivity of MYC-dependen
127  Sod2 has a dual function in supporting OCCC tumorigenicity and metastatic spread.
128 ivated in TNBC and has a pivotal role in the tumorigenicity and progression of this human breast canc
129 n increased cell motility, invasiveness, and tumorigenicity and provides a valuable model for studyin
130 s important for GSCs, thereby increasing GSC tumorigenicity and resistance to therapies.
131 n hNCPCs(V600E) dramatically increased their tumorigenicity and resulted in fully transformed tumor c
132 ulting in a more effective inhibition of the tumorigenicity and self-renewal ability of BCSCs.
133 ch when deleted leads to increased stemness, tumorigenicity and shortened patient survival.
134 yglucose, a glycolysis inhibitor, to reverse tumorigenicity and sorafenib resistance mediated by PRMT
135 B enhances the several phenotypes, including tumorigenicity and sphere-forming ability, which are ind
136 FGFR3 mutations have very limited urothelial tumorigenicity and that these mutations must collaborate
137 ays an integral role in enhancing pancreatic tumorigenicity and the function of cancer stem cells in
138 ay for in vivo evaluation of CTCL cell lines tumorigenicity and therapeutic response in preclinical s
139 ene-expression profiles that could influence tumorigenicity and therapeutic response, and we therefor
140 s, regulation of metastases genes, increased tumorigenicity and was important for BCSC invasion and m
141 ltaEGFR access to the nucleus attenuates its tumorigenicity and, conversely, that promoting nuclear a
142 sed in GSCs, play a key role in glioblastoma tumorigenicity, and are potential therapeutic targets ag
143  aberrant FBP1 expression contributed to CRC tumorigenicity, and decreased FBP1 expression coupled wi
144  the long-term (>5 weeks) effects, potential tumorigenicity, and fate of transplanted CPCs are unknow
145 ited a relative reduction in glucose uptake, tumorigenicity, and metastasis.
146 ifferences in self-renewal, gene expression, tumorigenicity, and metastatic potential of spheres at g
147 ibility to nevus initiation, transformation, tumorigenicity, and metastatic potential.
148 h to regulate glioma stem cell self-renewal, tumorigenicity, and progression.
149  associated with increased EGFR activity and tumorigenicity, and we found that Rak/Frk associates pre
150 targets of EWSR1-FLI1 that are essential for tumorigenicity are incompletely defined.
151 lanoma-specific PD-1 overexpression enhances tumorigenicity, as does engagement of melanoma-PD-1 by i
152 can prevent teratoma formation in an in vivo tumorigenicity assay.
153                                      In vivo tumorigenicity assays demonstrate that miR-122* is capab
154 ed a remarkable increase in self-renewal and tumorigenicity associated with long-lasting gene express
155  contrary to expectations, the mechanisms of tumorigenicity associated with mutations in different ge
156 ted in vivo, we did not find a difference in tumorigenicity between high and low Wnt activity, while
157 , TbetaRIII-SS (EMT) cells exhibit decreased tumorigenicity but increased growth rate in vitro and in
158 NG functions to drive transformed growth and tumorigenicity by activating PKCiota-dependent cell auto
159 atory network revealed that XBP1 drives TNBC tumorigenicity by assembling a transcriptional complex w
160 esults in an increased CSC-like property and tumorigenicity by enhancing the interaction of beta-cate
161 iate into quasi-normal cells with suppressed tumorigenicity by selective inhibition of the MAPK/ERK/M
162 ell (iPSC), makes a critical contribution to tumorigenicity by suppressing Let-7.
163               Both miR-185 and 342 inhibited tumorigenicity, cell growth, migration and invasion in p
164 identify OSIC-like cells that possess strong tumorigenicity correlated with an impaired osteogenic fa
165                          We demonstrate that tumorigenicity depends on individual cells residing in t
166 governs epithelial cell plasticity, EMT, and tumorigenicity during breast cancer initiation and progr
167 ced proliferation, apoptosis resistance, and tumorigenicity, effects rescued by estrogen supplementat
168 ghly metastatic and showed long-term in vivo tumorigenicity, even at the single-cell level.
169 D24, ALDH-1, EpCAM, Lgr5), multipotency, and tumorigenicity following injection in immunodeficient mi
170 en adapted for in vivo experiments and their tumorigenicity has not been adequately assessed, hamperi
171 R gene itself is a proto-oncogene possessing tumorigenicity has not been firmly established.
172 ling regulates cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenicity, Hh inhibitors have the potential to trea
173                                              Tumorigenicity, however, was increased with myofibroblas
174 carefully monitor for the potential risks of tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and arrhythmogenicity.
175  use, including their inherent properties of tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and heterogeneity.
176 re associated with poor cancer prognosis and tumorigenicity, implying its pro-survival role.
177 ancer cell (TNBC) death in vitro and reduced tumorigenicity in a xenograft TNBC mouse model in vivo.
178 r B (IL-17RB) and its ligand IL-17B promoted tumorigenicity in breast cancer cells and impeded acinus
179     P5P6 transforms NIH3T3 cells and induces tumorigenicity in HPDE cells.
180 uces apoptosis, inhibits growth, and reduces tumorigenicity in HPV-positive cell lines.
181 STAT3 signaling, cell-cycle progression, and tumorigenicity in human colorectal cancer and pancreatic
182 azolium bromide (MTT) assays and significant tumorigenicity in in vivo allografts.
183 einase (MT1-MMP) is associated with enhanced tumorigenicity in many cancers.
184 ockdown of TLX expression inhibits human GSC tumorigenicity in mice.
185 ion for malignant transformation, as well as tumorigenicity in mice.
186  and colony formation in culture and reduced tumorigenicity in mice.
187 s polycomb-like 3), as a crucial mediator of tumorigenicity in multiple myeloma (MM).
188 cer stem cells in vitro, as well as enhanced tumorigenicity in murine models of primary tumour growth
189 affecting their ability for self-renewal and tumorigenicity in NOD/SCID mice.
190 orted ALDH(+) populations markedly inhibited tumorigenicity in nude mice.
191 ssociated with morphological alterations and tumorigenicity in orthotopic transplants.
192 s a regulator of chemotherapy resistance and tumorigenicity in this context.
193 ally and significantly reduced viability and tumorigenicity in TNBC cell lines.
194                            miR-145 regulates tumorigenicity in various cancers but the breadth of its
195 orrelated with chemoresistance and increased tumorigenicity in vitro and in vivo accompanied by incre
196 y, that this overexpression is essential for tumorigenicity in vitro and in vivo.
197 eased prostate cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in vitro and in vivo.
198 educed cell proliferation, cell invasion and tumorigenicity in vitro, but also inhibited tumor growth
199 ion, and drug resistance in vitro and higher tumorigenicity in vivo than those constitutively express
200  endometrial cancer cell growth in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo, as a result of inhibition of cel
201 e adenocarcinoma-like histology in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo, recapitulating multi-hit models
202 iferation in vitro and suppressed orthotopic tumorigenicity in vivo.
203 ivity did not affect radiation resistance or tumorigenicity in vivo.
204 s associated with greater aggressiveness and tumorigenicity in vivo.
205 mpt mesenchymal transformation, and enhanced tumorigenicity in vivo.
206 RC amplicon, inducing dysplasia in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo.
207 cells attenuates CSC phenotypes in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo.
208 tro proliferation, and markedly enhanced the tumorigenicity in vivo.
209 sion of colon cancer cells, as well as their tumorigenicity in vivo.
210 reactivation of PP2A significantly inhibited tumorigenicity in vivo.
211 protein and promoted PrP(C) accumulation and tumorigenicity in vivo.
212 nnotated lncRNA that regulates apoptosis and tumorigenicity in well-differentiated CRC cells.
213 gnaling in cancer cells to promote decreased tumorigenicity, increased immunogenicity, and enhanced i
214  subpopulations in its cell surface markers, tumorigenicity, invasion and metastatic capability.
215  promotes malignant progression of HBECs and tumorigenicity, invasion, and metastases in non-small ce
216 bit functional plasticity, and their role in tumorigenicity is controversial.
217 phere-forming ability, and exhibit increased tumorigenicity, known characteristics of cancer stemness
218 o immune rejection, genetic instability, and tumorigenicity must be solved.
219  774 of c-Cbl, but is also essential for the tumorigenicity observed in the presence of CTEN.
220 e importance of PAR1 to the self-renewal and tumorigenicity of A2B5-defined glioma TPCs; as such, the
221 of A549 lung cancer cells and suppresses the tumorigenicity of A549 cells in severe combined immunode
222 rotein alone, significantly enhances in vivo tumorigenicity of AGS gastric cancer cells and correlate
223         Thus DOT1L selectively regulates the tumorigenicity of AR-positive prostate cancer cells and
224 e also associated with the proliferation and tumorigenicity of bladder cancer cells.
225  cancer stem cell (CSC)-like properties, and tumorigenicity of BLBC cells.
226 nst IL-17RB or IL-17B effectively attenuated tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells.
227 hermore, blocking RSPO signaling reduced the tumorigenicity of cancer cells based on serial transplan
228 ever, the molecular mechanisms promoting the tumorigenicity of cancer cells undergoing an EMT and of
229                                          The tumorigenicity of cells in severe combined immunodeficie
230                                       Higher tumorigenicity of cells is associated with earlier tumor
231 effects of GRM3 knockdown and suppresses the tumorigenicity of colon cancer cells in vivo.
232  transformed cells, we compared the relative tumorigenicity of Cre-LoxP conditional disruption of the
233 l transcription factors that drives the high tumorigenicity of CRPC cells.
234 f KLK7 increased proliferation, invasion and tumorigenicity of EACC.
235 ibitor of ATG4B suppresses autophagy and the tumorigenicity of glioblastoma (GBM) cells.
236  whose expression levels directly impact the tumorigenicity of glioblastoma (GBM) in vitro and in viv
237 potentials of glioblastoma cells and reduced tumorigenicity of glioblastoma.
238 ase (MAGL), to regulate the self-renewal and tumorigenicity of GSCs through production of prostagland
239 y, and NAMPT knockdown inhibited the in vivo tumorigenicity of GSCs.
240        Furthermore, trisomy 12 increases the tumorigenicity of hPSCs in vivo, inducing transcriptiona
241 ombination with HER2 inhibitors, reduced the tumorigenicity of HR(-)/HER2(+) breast cancers, opening
242 t studies, we demonstrate that DAXX promotes tumorigenicity of human ALVA-31 and PC3 prostate cancer
243 ibition of glycolysis preferentially impedes tumorigenicity of human lung cancer cells bearing KMT2D-
244 actor SOX2 is essential for self-renewal and tumorigenicity of human melanoma-initiating cells.
245                           Immunogenicity and tumorigenicity of human PSCs remain the bottleneck for s
246 IKBKE-associated cytokine signaling promotes tumorigenicity of immune-driven TNBC and identify a pote
247 that are important for the proliferation and tumorigenicity of KEAP1-mutant non-small cell lung cance
248 al inhibition of CaMKK2 with STO-609 impairs tumorigenicity of liver cancer cells in vivo.
249 N axis synergistically suppresses growth and tumorigenicity of lung cancer cells, our findings may op
250 L-1 is able to promote the proliferation and tumorigenicity of lung cancer cells.
251 ptor-beta may contribute to the survival and tumorigenicity of MPNST cells.
252  interference inhibits the proliferation and tumorigenicity of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cell line
253 the processed product of p105), inhibits the tumorigenicity of NF-kappaB1-deficient lung tumor cells.
254 IKKalpha induces differentiation and reduces tumorigenicity of NPC cells without activating NF-kappaB
255 ux and function underlie enhanced OXPHOS and tumorigenicity of NSCLC cells.
256       YAP depletion sharply reduces CSCs and tumorigenicity of osteosarcomas.
257    FGF18 controlled migration, invasion, and tumorigenicity of ovarian cancer cells through NF-kappaB
258                    KDM2B silencing abrogated tumorigenicity of PDAC cell lines exhibiting loss of epi
259                                 Importantly, tumorigenicity of PPCLs expanded from patient-derived xe
260 lifelong phenotype correction and reduce the tumorigenicity of progressive familial intrahepatic chol
261 s, promoted radiosensitization, and hindered tumorigenicity of radioresistant prostate cancer cells.
262 pathway-regulated cofactor YAP1 supports the tumorigenicity of RAS mutations but requires both inacti
263 mately beta) inhibited the proliferation and tumorigenicity of Ras(V12)-transformed NIH 3T3 cells, ac
264 r transformation; however, the importance to tumorigenicity of RNA 3'-end-processing factors that pot
265 cells eliminates the structures and inhibits tumorigenicity of some cancer cell lines.
266 s for regenerative medicine therapies is the tumorigenicity of stem cells.
267 can be correlated to a limited degree to the tumorigenicity of that virus.
268 nd in vivo tumor phenotyping to identify the tumorigenicity of the CCSCs.
269 linical safety studies showed no toxicity or tumorigenicity of the HSC-iNKT cell therapy.
270  found to correlate reasonably well with the tumorigenicity of the respective virus.
271 ation, should be established to minimize the tumorigenicity of transplanted cells.
272 is essential in maintaining self-renewal and tumorigenicity of TRCs both in vitro and in vivo.
273 er, the V777L mutation did not alter in vivo tumorigenicity or sensitivity to HER2-directed therapies
274  polarity and its potential to regulate cell tumorigenicity or stemness.
275  into nude mice resulted in markedly reduced tumorigenicity (P < 0.001) and distant metastases.
276 n of cancer cells endowed with self-renewal, tumorigenicity, pluripotency, chemoresistance, different
277  macroH2A1 in bladder cancer cells increased tumorigenicity, radioresistance, degeneration of reactiv
278 1) can cause tumors in newborn rodents, with tumorigenicity related to the presence of a unique space
279 er, the mechanism by which CDK5 promotes GBM tumorigenicity remains largely unknown.
280 nstrated enhanced T-IC properties, including tumorigenicity, self-renewal, and invasiveness.
281  cells, and provide a mechanistic link among tumorigenicity, sorafenib resistance, and glucose metabo
282 UC1-C decreases PC self-renewal capacity and tumorigenicity, suggesting a potential therapeutic appro
283 to be ganglioside deficient exhibit impaired tumorigenicity, supporting a link between ganglioside-de
284  Those findings are here extended to in vivo tumorigenicity testing by employing orthotopic xenotrans
285 ESA(hi)PROCR(hi)SSEA-3(+) markers had higher tumorigenicity than those with conventional markers in v
286 12(R) had faster proliferation with stronger tumorigenicity that was caused by the reactivated KIT ki
287    We here report that EMT confers efficient tumorigenicity to murine breast cancer cells by the upre
288 is Dicer-resistant epigenetic switch confers tumorigenicity to these cells.
289 s deprived of nutrients but suppressed their tumorigenicity, together suggesting the cancer cells ent
290 survival adaptation, in vitro migration, and tumorigenicity under hypoxic conditions.
291 nally, autophagy-deficient A549 cells regain tumorigenicity upon SMAD4 knockdown.
292                                  We assessed tumorigenicity using limiting dilution analysis.
293 r verify the importance of heme in promoting tumorigenicity, we generated NSCLC cell lines with incre
294 h a significant growth delay and the loss of tumorigenicity when 10(4) cells were injected into mice.
295 rvival of NCI-H460 cells and inhibited their tumorigenicity when engrafted in nude mice.
296  RSPO2 suppresses CRC cell proliferation and tumorigenicity, whereas the depletion of RSPO2 enhances
297 cks its proteasomal destruction and enhances tumorigenicity, which could be reversed by Usp9x knockdo
298 h factor receptor) marks cells with enriched tumorigenicity, which would compel their specific target
299 to a striking inhibition of EGFRvIII-induced tumorigenicity, while increasing EGFRwt or HB-EGF levels
300 ived cancer cells, with simultaneous loss of tumorigenicity, without the need to revert to an embryon

 
Page Top