ライフサイエンスコーパス: two-tailed

1 dopamine synthesis capacity at alpha = .05 (two tailed).

2 egatively correlated (rs = -0.72, P < 0.002, two-tailed).

3 ost severe impairment (rs = -0.57; P < 0.01, two-tailed).

4 orrelation coefficient rs = 0.59; P = 0.002, two-tailed).

5 on was statistically significant (P = 0.022, two-tailed).

6 ty (grade > or = 3) during cycle 1 (P = .51, two-tailed).

7 scores (mean rank=134.2), Z=-10.1, p<0.001 (two-tailed).

8 statistical analysis, and all P-values were two-tailed.

9 ening of the lyotropic liquid crystal by the two-tailed 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate is attrib

10 Effect sizes (ES) were computed and two-tailed a values < 0.05 and non-overlapping 95% confi

11 volves PCR amplification of genomic DNA with two tailed allele-specific primers that introduce primin

12 A two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals we

13 le subjects per arm to detect (80% power and two-tailed alpha of 0.05) an EBA at least 50% as large a

14 the predicted treatment effect was 0.83 with two-tailed, alpha = 0.05.

15 l by 25% (P<0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test, two-tailed) and of progesterone by 45% (P<0.0001) compar

16 Analyses were two-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p <

17 The probabilities were two-tailed, and the alpha level was set at P < 0.05.

18 This result was not significant (p = 0.09, two-tailed), but the trend was toward a greater number o

19 ty 78%, predictive value 93%, P = .0001 with two-tailed chi square analysis).

20 and sample proportions were compared using a two-tailed chi(2) test.

21 ch block were 8%, 12% and 20%, respectively (two-tailed chi-square test for trend 5.61, p = 0.02, OR

22 ompared with ovariectomized controls using a two-tailed Dunnets test.

23 us CNS tumors, P < 0.08 one-tailed; P < 0.16 two-tailed; ENU-induced CNS tumors, P < 0.08 one-tailed,

24 r section width were also evaluated with the two-tailed Fisher exact probability test to determine if

25 II (2 LVOT, 8 RVOT) (I vs. II NS; p = 0.11, two-tailed Fisher exact test).

26 nalyzed by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-tailed Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic

27 The two-tailed Fisher exact test, the Breslow-Day test, and

28 terval were measured and compared by using a two-tailed Fisher exact test.

29 f seven; 14%; P = 0.02; relative risk = 5.4, two-tailed Fisher test), as well as a significant surviv

30 ive patients (P = 0.02, relative risk = 1.8, two-tailed Fisher test).

31 in our combined analysis (p = 2.68 x 10(-4), two-tailed Fisher's exact test), indicating that the SLC

32 Ds and 1 subject without (p = 3.12 x 10(-3), two-tailed Fisher's exact test).

33 ed in subjects with CHDs (p = 3.30 x 10(-2), two-tailed Fisher's exact test).

34 s but negative for enterovirus D68 using the two-tailed Fisher's exact test, two-sample unpaired t te

35 r change from baseline, Fisher's exact test (two-tailed) for categorical comparisons, and Kaplan-Meie

36 A two-tailed Friedman test was used to evaluate difference

37 the RTN package, gene expression data, and a two-tailed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis.

38 ptan significantly (Students t-test, P<0.05, two tailed hypothesis, P<0.05) modulated this increase i

39 significant (P < 0.015 one-tailed, P < 0.03, two-tailed) in rats that received ENU and died prior to

40 A two-tailed independent sample t test statistic was used

41 that of control subjects (0.36 +/- 0.11 AU; two-tailed, independent Student's t-test, P = 0.005).

42 ognostic variables (Kaplan-Meier method with two-tailed log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards mo

43 We used two-tailed Mann Whitney U exact tests, chi(2), and Fishe

44 sons between groups were performed using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney Test and relationships between v

45 Differences among groups were tested with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test.

46 Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U and F tests were used to asses

47 as compared with that in control mice with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test.

48 lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) by using the two-tailed McNemar test.

49 Two-tailed McNemar tests were used to test differences i

50 stant; this unusual positive curvature for a two-tailed neutral lipid is likely associated with hydro

51 Comparisons were evaluated by using two-tailed nonpaired and paired t tests.

52 s, we conducted independent samples t-tests (two-tailed) on pre-post change scores.

53 Cochran's Q test and the I(2) metrics, with two tailed P values.

54 Two tailed p<0.05 was considered statistically significa

55 ce interval, -0.94 to -0.69; r(<60) = -0.74; two-tailed P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, -0.88 to

56 ion uptake across countries (r(60+) = -0.86; two-tailed P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, -0.94 to

57 rence was significant for stage IV patients (two-tailed P = .0002).

58 stage III, and 82% for 50 stage IV patients (two-tailed P = .0075, chi 2 test).

59 tes (risk ratio, 1.92; 95% CI: 1.001, 3.695; two-tailed P = .064, one-tailed P = .038).

60 o-tailed p = 0.004) and IL-10/IL-6 (U = 6.0; two-tailed p = 0.003), whereas IL-6 levels were more ele

61 ymphoma had higher levels of IL-10 (U = 7.0; two-tailed p = 0.004) and IL-10/IL-6 (U = 6.0; two-taile

62 nts with uveitis than in lymphoma (U = 15.0; two-tailed p = ns).

63 ce algorithms by analyses of variance, and a two-tailed P value less than .05 indicated statistical s

64 A two-tailed P value of .008 or less, which accounts for m

65 A two-tailed P value of less than .05 indicated a signific

66 Mann-Whitney test, where appropriate, with a two-tailed P value of less than .05 used as the criterio

67 for conventional urography examination, and two-tailed P value significance test was used to evaluat

68 l from zero were judged significant when the two-tailed P value was less than .05.

69 A two-tailed P value was used.

70 Two-tailed P values were calculated for the Student t te

71 NN (two-tailed p-value = 0.0010) and ANNNCN (two-tailed p-value <0.0001).

72 rpin loops contain both 5'GC and 5'CG steps (two-tailed p-value <0.0001).

73 otides from a cytosine, for example, ANNCNN (two-tailed p-value = 0.0010) and ANNNCN (two-tailed p-va

74 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.95 [two-tailed P=0.04 for superiority]).

75 g 0-90% Robusta), no significant difference (two-tailed P=0.817) was registered between the claimed a

76 tly methylated tumors (Fischer's exact test, two-tailed; P = 0.008).

77 tion mutations at p53 (Fischer's exact test, two-tailed; P = 0.01).

78 ol cohorts, were identified by using Student two-tailed paired and unpaired t test, respectively, wit

79 st for comparison of CT fluoroscopy times, a two-tailed paired t test for comparison of age and tumor

80 as estimated with the DBM method and Student two-tailed paired t test.

81 the two modalities were determined with the two-tailed paired t test.

82 l 4D flow and 5D flow using a signed-rank or two-tailed paired t test.

83 Two-tailed paired t tests were used for statistical anal

84 Two-tailed paired t tests were used to compare change in

85 mphysema, and mean values were compared with two-tailed paired t tests.

86 both the CMTESv2 (mean change 0.97 +/- 1.77; two-tailed paired t-test P = 0.003) and the CMTESv2-R (m

87 both over 1 year (mean change 2.24 +/- 3.09; two-tailed paired t-test P = 0.009) and over 2 years (me

88 nd the CMTESv2-R (mean change 1.21 +/- 2.52; two-tailed paired t-test P = 0.009) increase significant

89 and over 2 years (mean change 4.00 +/- 3.79; two-tailed paired t-test P = 0.031) with respective stan

90 l dominant CMT2A (mean change 0.84 +/- 2.42; two-tailed paired t-test P = 0.039).

91 red the normalized size of the pupils with a two-tailed paired t-test within groups and a two-tailed

92 sed among both radish (p = 0.016, p = 0.017, two-tailed paired T-test) and carrot (p = 0.005, p = 0.0

93 Among radish group, WBCs (p = 0.002, two-tailed paired T-test) decreased, whereas neutrophils

94 ed T-test) and carrot (p = 0.005, p = 0.006, two-tailed paired T-test) groups after intervention.

95 lobin (MCH) increased (p < 0.001, p = 0.022, two-tailed paired T-test).

96 c walking economy by 15.6 2.9% (mean s.e.m.; two-tailed paired t-test, P = 0.002) in six individuals

97 hose determined at 40 degrees contralateral (two-tailed paired t-test, P<0.0001).

98 ning of frequency tuning (i. e. Q(n) values, two-tailed paired t-test, P<0.01).

99 -measures analysis of variance with post hoc two-tailed paired t-tests.

100 c stimulation in essential tremor, P=0.0137; two-tailed paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests).

101 A two-tailed, paired Student t test was used to determine

102 Two-tailed Pearson correlation analysis was performed to

103 This first reported crystal structure of a two-tailed peptidic bilayer reveals similarities in thic

104 E. coli expressing only the two-tailed SSB recovers faster from exposure to DNA dama

105 ified analysis was performed with the paired two-tailed Student t test to compare opacification score

106 Two-tailed Student t test was used for statistical analy

107 An unpaired, two-tailed Student t test was used to compare groups; Sp

108 The two-tailed Student t test was used to compare the mean d

109 A two-tailed Student t test was used to compare the T1 and

110 Two-tailed Student t test was used to compare values bet

111 The two-tailed Student t test was used to determine differen

112 A two-tailed Student t test was used to determine if signi

113 A paired two-tailed Student t test was used to evaluate significa

114 For pairwise group comparisons, an unequal two-tailed Student t test was used.

115 microg . g(-1) +/- 0.95) (P < .001, unpaired two-tailed Student t test).

116 e level was significantly elevated (unpaired two-tailed Student t test, P <.002) in those biopsy samp

117 essures at failure were compared by means of two-tailed Student t test, with differences considered s

118 cs, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and a paired two-tailed Student t test.

119 ders and nonresponders was calculated with a two-tailed Student t test.

120 uni- and bipediculate approaches by using a two-tailed Student t test.

121 e compared with analysis of variance and the two-tailed Student t test.

122 ablation at 1 month after therapy by using a two-tailed Student t test.

123 tical significance was tested using a paired two-tailed Student t test.

124 Two-tailed Student t testing was used to determine diffe

125 Two-tailed Student t tests and repeated-measures analysi

126 Two-tailed Student t tests were used to evaluate the dat

127 the receiver operating characteristic curve, two-tailed Student t tests, prevalence- and bias-adjuste

128 the pre-occlusion value (P < 0.05, ANOVA and two-tailed Student's t test) indicating localised reacti

129 SEM (P < .05 versus baseline, ANOVA, paired two-tailed Student's t test).

130 ference between groups was assessed with the two-tailed Student's t test.

131 ical analysis was done by employing unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test and the p-value of < 0.05 wa

132 tween different groups was evaluated using a two-tailed Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

133 ntrol subjects (24%; P = 0.001; independent, two-tailed Student's t-test).

134 LOH (ovarian, P = 0.0004; breast P < 0.0001, two-tailed Student's t-test).

135 and number of vascular risk factors using a two-tailed Student's t-test.

136 Paired, two-tailed Student's t-tests were used for statistical a

137 We then demonstrate a two-tailed swimmer swimming at 81 mum s(-1).

138 Specificities were compared by using a two-tailed t test (P < .05) and sensitivities were compa

139 and qualitative data were analyzed with the two-tailed t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respective

140 A two-tailed t test comparison revealed significantly grea

141 istically analyzed by performing an unpaired two-tailed t test for labeled versus unlabeled cells by

142 h the computer aid was determined by using a two-tailed t test for paired data.

143 A two-tailed t test was incorporated to compare independen

144 to compare values between groups, and paired two-tailed t test was used to assess changes within subj

145 Two-tailed t test was used to compare the three experime

146 A paired two-tailed t test was used to compare wall thickening fr

147 The independent samples t test, and a two-tailed t test with equal variance were utilized to d

148 tatistically highly significant (P = 0.0001; two-tailed t test), whereas the difference in FDHM is no

149 For statistical analyses, an unpaired two-tailed t test, analysis of variance, and linear regr

150 The comparative study, carried using a two-tailed T test, demonstrated that virtual screening w

151 ly higher than that with conventional grids (two-tailed t test, P < .05).

152 ysis, using the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected two-tailed t test, was used to identify differentially e

153 n the volunteers with an independent samples two-tailed t test.

154 of both tumor types were compared by using a two-tailed t test.

155 of the STROME-ID guidelines was done using a two-tailed t test.

156 re compared using the Dice coefficient and a two-tailed t test.

157 and compared between trials using a paired, two-tailed t test.

158 Two-tailed t testing and Pearson correlation testing wer

159 Statistics included univariate analysis, two-tailed t testing to evaluate statistical significanc

160 hree subject groups were calculated by using two-tailed t tests (with P < .05 indicating significance

161 Data were compared by using two-tailed t tests after normal distributions were confi

162 andard deviations and were compared by using two-tailed t tests and analysis of variance for selected

163 Two-tailed t tests and Pearson chi(2) tests were used to

164 Two-tailed t tests were performed for continuous variabl

165 Two-tailed t tests were used and P values less than .05

166 Two-tailed t tests were used for statistical analysis.

167 Two-tailed t tests were used to compare price measures b

168 d-measures analysis of variance and unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to evaluate differences in

169 e were compared with control values by using two-tailed t tests, and transit time was correlated with

170 and post-drug CPTs separately using paired, two-tailed t tests.

171 stologic active inflammation grades by using two-tailed t tests.

172 atistical significance was assessed by using two-tailed t tests.

173 ompared with analysis of variance and paired two-tailed t tests.

174 Results were averaged and evaluated by using two-tailed t tests.

175 Means were compared by use of independent two-tailed t tests.

176 ft hippocampus decreased significantly using two-tailed t-test (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01 respectively) c

177 two-tailed paired t-test within groups and a two-tailed t-test between groups.

178 es penetrated through the Matrigel (P<0.001, two-tailed t-test), although both RB+ and RB- cells migr

179 nce was statistically significant (P < 0.02, two-tailed t-test).

180 e counts were 19% higher in adults (P < .01, two-tailed t-test); and data obtained by using the physi

181 Results were compared using unpaired, two-tailed t-test.

182 by morphometric techniques and evaluated by two-tailed t-test.

183 whole retinas at 1 week, but not at 2 weeks (two-tailed t-test; P = 0.04, P = 0.36, respectively).

184 fMRI data were compared using group-level two-tailed t-tests in the BioImage Suite.

185 Repeated-measures ANOVAs and Student's two-tailed t-tests were used for statistical comparisons

186 analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA or two-tailed t-tests.

187 was performed using a non-parametric paired two-tailed test of significance with the Wilcoxon matche

188 nd subsequent pairwise t tests (alpha = .05, two-tailed test) were performed.

189 ciency of nonheme-iron absorption (P = 0.06, two-tailed test), but not of heme-iron absorption, tende

190 compared with those without (P = .04, exact two-tailed test).

191 f human complement (r(2) = 0.994, P = 0.003, two-tailed test).

192 Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed test.

193 ignificant differences were determine with a two-tailed test.

194 cted controls by log-rank or Fisher's exact (two-tailed) test and logistic regression analyses.

195 using chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact two-tailed tests.

196 ed CNS tumors, P < 0.08 one-tailed, P < 0.16 two-tailed), the trend was significant (P < 0.015 one-ta

197 The exact two-tailed trend test showed a significant association o

198 ontinuous variables were compared by using a two-tailed two-sample t test or a Wilcoxon two-sample te

199 e for normal tissue were assessed by using a two-tailed two-sample t test.

200 y significant differences (student's t-test, two-tailed unequal variance p-value < 0.05) between spec

201 analysis, including geometric fold analysis, two-tailed unequal variance t test, hierarchical cluster

202 Results were compared by using a two-tailed unpaired Student t test.

203 The changes in SNR were assessed with a two-tailed unpaired t test in three regions of the Achil

204 A two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare metabolit

205 or the wild-type melanoma cells; P = 0.04 by two-tailed, unpaired t-test].

206 ORF145 from the temperate Acidianus two-tailed virus (ATV) forms a high-affinity complex wit

207 The Acidianus two-tailed virus encodes the RIP factor that binds insid

208 The chi(2) or Fisher exact test (each two-tailed) was used to compare nominal and ordinal vari

209 tween timepoints were determined by use of a two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

210 elated samples; p<0.0001) and Nurick scores (two-tailed Wilcoxon p<0.0001) postoperatively.

211 cle (e.g. P=0.0002 for tremor amplification, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test).

212 ference across these five approaches using a two-tailed Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (p <= 0.05).

213 d 3He and 129Xe imaging were compared with a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test and analysis of var

214 Two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test showed the median d

215 The two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect

216 in the whole brain and were compared (with a two-tailed Wilcoxon test) as a function of clinical outc

217 Two-tailed Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison ( fiv

218 Two-tailed Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison (>=fi

219 e was also a significant improvement in MDI (two-tailed Wilcoxon, related samples; p<0.0001) and Nuri

220 and control groups were analyzed by using a two-tailed Z test to compare proportions with a threshol

221 Two-tailed z tests of percentages and means and multiple