ライフサイエンスコーパス: tympanostomy

1 common cause of hearing loss in children and tympanostomy to alleviate the condition remains the comm

2 of adenoidectomy on otologic outcomes after tympanostomy tube (TT) insertion is unclear.

3 erforation requiring tympanoplasty following tympanostomy tube (TT) placement in children.

4 idence interval [CI], 1.2-53.8) and previous tympanostomy tube insertion (OR, 30.9; 95% CI, 2.4-394.8

5 The first 4 cases required tympanostomy tube insertion after additional unsuccessfu

6 Tympanostomy tube insertion, the placement of a small dr

7 rated from 36 patients during insertion of a tympanostomy tube performed particularly for OME.

8 n age, 2.5 [range, 0.5-14] years) undergoing tympanostomy tube placement for treatment of otitis medi

9 Of the 26 children undergoing tympanostomy tube placement, 13 (50%) had OME, 20 (77%)

10 Subjects who had tympanostomy tube surgery for COME/ROM (probands) and th

11 during a 2-year period was 1.48 0.08 in the tympanostomy-tube group and 1.56 0.08 in the medical-man

12 Because 10% of the children in the tympanostomy-tube group did not undergo tympanostomy-tub

13 hildren, 1 to 10 years of age, who had acute tympanostomy-tube otorrhea to receive hydrocortisone-bac

14 the tympanostomy-tube group did not undergo tympanostomy-tube placement and 16% of the children in t

15 en in the medical-management group underwent tympanostomy-tube placement at parental request, we cond

16 Official recommendations differ regarding tympanostomy-tube placement for children with recurrent

17 in the preceding 6 months, to either undergo tympanostomy-tube placement or receive medical managemen

18 year period was not significantly lower with tympanostomy-tube placement than with medical management

19 Favoring tympanostomy-tube placement were the time to a first epi

20 Using tympanostomy tubes (ear tubes) as an exemplary case, we

21 , 0.61; 95% CI, 0.60-0.62), and insertion of tympanostomy tubes (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.78) but hig

22 were assigned to undergo early insertion of tympanostomy tubes did not differ significantly from the

23 prompt as compared with delayed insertion of tympanostomy tubes did not result in improved cognitive,

24 ffusion that we studied, prompt insertion of tympanostomy tubes does not improve developmental outcom

25 as defined in our study, prompt insertion of tympanostomy tubes does not improve developmental outcom

26 persistent otitis media, prompt insertion of tympanostomy tubes does not measurably improve developme

27 andomly assigned to undergo the insertion of tympanostomy tubes either promptly or up to 9 months lat

28 pairments, myringotomy with the insertion of tympanostomy tubes has often been undertaken in young ch

29 prompt as compared with delayed insertion of tympanostomy tubes in children with persistent effusion

30 A main indication for the insertion of tympanostomy tubes in infants and young children is pers

31 tent effusion were randomly assigned to have tympanostomy tubes inserted either as soon as possible o

32 -ear effusion were randomly assigned to have tympanostomy tubes inserted either promptly or up to nin

33 anagement of acute otorrhea in children with tympanostomy tubes is based on limited evidence from tri

34 nd evidence is lacking that the insertion of tympanostomy tubes prevents developmental impairment.

35 ics and initial observation in children with tympanostomy tubes who had uncomplicated acute otorrhea.

36 ative otitis media, 335 949 (6.95%) received tympanostomy tubes, and 10 975 (0.23%) had severe compli

37 ative otitis media in children, insertion of tympanostomy tubes, and treatment for severe complicatio

38 in healthy chinchillas compared with current tympanostomy tubes, without resulting in ototoxicity at

39 in the delayed-treatment group had received tympanostomy tubes.

40 te-treatment group (34 percent) had received tympanostomy tubes.