コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ostasis of the forelimb zeugopod (radius and ulna).
2 radius with dorsal subluxation of the distal ulna).
3 uscle tendon and connects the humerus to the ulna.
4 detachment from the sublime tubercle of the ulna.
5 ny elements, rather than a normal radius and ulna.
6 c between the medial epicondyle and proximal ulna.
7 steps during the formation of the radius and ulna.
8 ion that included portions of the radius and ulna.
9 ements at the distal and proximal radius and ulna; 2) classification of bone quality and quantity at
12 short stature with hypoplasia/aplasia of the ulna and fibula, has been postulated to be the homozygou
17 developmentally pattern the zeugopod (radius/ulna and tibia/fibula), remain regionally expressed in t
18 limb zeugopod skeletal elements, the radius/ulna and tibia/fibula, as well as transformation of the
19 sitional values of the zeugopod (i.e. radius/ulna) and then autopod (i.e. wrist/digits) segments duri
23 establish that although the majority of the ulna develops in response to paracrine SHH signalling in
24 re requiring surgery, or humerus, radius, or ulna fracture requiring intervention within 30 days.
25 e formation on the periosteal surface of the ulna, however the addition of vibration noise with exerc
29 erozygosity on six diverse fitness measures (ulna length, asymmetry, weight-at-weaning, testes volume
30 he response to mechanical loading in vivo by ulna loading and ex vivo by measuring the response of is
31 year history of Tetrapoda, with a radius and ulna made up of elongate, paralleling shafts contacting
32 the development of the zeugopod (radius and ulna of the forearm, tibia and fibula of the leg) are no
35 d ratios for any fracture, hip fracture, and ulna or radius fracture in the celiac disease cohort com
36 95% confidence interval, 1.20-3.02), and for ulna or radius fracture was 1.77 (95% confidence interva
39 the risk of any fracture, hip fracture, and ulna/radius fracture for the PBC cohort compared with th
41 d ratios for any fracture, hip fracture, and ulna/radius fracture in the PBC cohort compared with the
42 1000 person-years (95% CI: 0.3-3.5); and for ulna/radius fracture, 3.4 per 1000 person-years (95% CI:
46 gate, shaft-like carpal bones contacting the ulna that are proximodistally longer than the radius.
47 XA t-score at proximal and distal radius and ulna, the risk for a patient to lose at least one implan
48 ogenic response to mechanical loading of the ulna was reduced by 88 to 99% in Lrp5-/- mice, yet osteo
49 specimens have a flattened, crescent-shaped ulna with a long axis perpendicular to that of the radiu