戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 with urease is not compatible with classical uncompetitive inhibition.
2  could be fit with the equation for complete uncompetitive inhibition and that the mechanism may be a
3                                          The uncompetitive inhibition and the substrate-dependent bin
4 re also provided for competitive inhibition, uncompetitive inhibition, and mixed inhibition of ordere
5                               Theoretically, uncompetitive inhibition arises from preferential intera
6 ated the experimental data and verified that uncompetitive inhibition arose from preferential binding
7                                              Uncompetitive inhibition by arabinose 5-phosphate (Ara5P
8  pentameric complex, which suggests that the uncompetitive inhibition by BFA and the nucleotide allos
9           Finally, we note that the apparent uncompetitive inhibition by fluoride as reported for sev
10  constant (K(ic)) of 0.12 +/- 0.02 mM and an uncompetitive inhibition constant (K(iu)) of 3.04 +/- 0.
11 how unimpaired inhibition by triclosan, with uncompetitive inhibition constants (K(i)') of 0.18+/-0.0
12 etitive inhibition (decreased V max), whilst uncompetitive inhibition (decreased V max and K m ) occu
13    Compound 4 shows a mix of competitive and uncompetitive inhibition for both the yeast and the huma
14 utant protease showed mixed-type competitive-uncompetitive inhibition for darunavir and the chemicall
15                            The appearance of uncompetitive inhibition, however, suggests that a more
16                                 RFA-P showed uncompetitive inhibition, K(i) = 0.210 mm, under varied
17                                 CO(2) showed uncompetitive inhibition, K(i) = 0.990 mm, under varied
18        Biochemically, the isoxazoles display uncompetitive inhibition kinetics that are similar to an
19 inding of agonists to Epac1 and suggested an uncompetitive inhibition mechanism with respect to Epac1
20 yl-PP-GlcNAc(2)-Man(9)-Glc(3), suggesting an uncompetitive inhibition mechanism.
21  ligand binding and kinetic data best fit an uncompetitive inhibition model in which the binding of t
22 lowed by naphthol substrate, as shown by the uncompetitive inhibition of 3HNR by tricyclazole with re
23 o importantly, binding to this pocket causes uncompetitive inhibition of KSP ATPase activity.
24                       For this purpose, only uncompetitive inhibition of pyruvate export proves effec
25                                           An uncompetitive inhibition of the anaerobic reaction catal
26 m and Vmax values, suggesting a mechanism of uncompetitive inhibition on GlyT1-mediated glycine uptak
27       At the concentrations corresponding to uncompetitive inhibition, PDPA shows positive cooperativ
28  for Ca(2+) that mediated noncompetitive and uncompetitive inhibition, respectively.
29                                         This uncompetitive inhibition suggests that the probe can int
30 -L-arginine was synthesized and demonstrated uncompetitive inhibition versus ATP and competitive patt
31 d competitive inhibition vs saccharopine and uncompetitive inhibition vs NADP.
32                                              Uncompetitive inhibition was also observed with the synt
33 ns of agonist for "pure' non-competitive vs. uncompetitive inhibition was computer simulated.
34  is unknown, the structural requirements for uncompetitive inhibition were investigated by applicatio
35 ding a series of parallel plots, typical for uncompetitive inhibition with a Ki for inhibition of app
36                                          The uncompetitive inhibition with respect to ATP is also con
37  calpains relative to other proteases, (iii) uncompetitive inhibition with respect to substrate, and