ライフサイエンスコーパス: unpaired t-test

1 0.48 +/- 0.13, WT: 0.65 +/- 0.10, P = 0.017, unpaired t test).

2 0.49-0.86) microL/min at 4 weeks (P = .001, unpaired t test).

3 [94] mum; P = .004, determined by use of an unpaired t test).

4 1.11 +/- 0.04, WT: 1.15 +/- 0.02, P = 0.033, unpaired t test).

5 (HAZ) -0.81 vs -0.51, respectively, P < .05, unpaired t test).

6 ith ANXA7 wild-type glioblastomas (P = .004; unpaired t test).

7 ncreased by plasma (p < 0.0001 vs control by unpaired t test).

8 dence interval, 1.9-15.9 minutes; p = 0.014, unpaired t test).

9 u A, SNI: 49 +/- 4 mu A; P < 0.01, Student's unpaired t test).

10 rsus -EX: -93 +/- 3 beats min(-1); P < 0.01, unpaired t test).

11 ater in +EX compared to -EX atria (P < 0.05, unpaired t test).

12 erence -3.3 [95% CI -5.3 to -1.3]; p=0.0013, unpaired t test).

13 was higher than benign specimens (p < 0.05, unpaired t test).

14 mean +/- S.E.M., n = 74; P < 0.01; Student's unpaired t test).

15 versus 90 +/- 14 mm Hg in whites (P < 0.006, unpaired t test).

16 n the white matter in controls (P = 0.029 by unpaired t-test).

17 respectively, with fold change >/=2, p<0.05, unpaired t-test).

18 the difference was significant (P < 0.0001, unpaired t-test).

19 e was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, unpaired t-test).

20 ting state, to 0.018+/-0.002 (n=3, P<0.05 by unpaired t-test).

21 y 0.29 in the placebo patients (p < .0001 by unpaired t-test).

22 rs with intestinal versus diffuse histology (unpaired t-test).

23 fication of N-myc alone (P = 0.0056, Welch's unpaired t-test).

24 001 for term [n = 6] v premature [n = 11] by unpaired t-test).

25 pective interpretation of group differences (unpaired t tests).

26 are expressed as mean +/- SEM (ANOVA, paired unpaired t tests).

27 C avg) were calculated and compared using an unpaired t test.

28 compared piecewise along tracks by using an unpaired t test.

29 measured and compared between groups with an unpaired t test.

30 ared between breathing protocols by using an unpaired t test.

31 sessed by using analysis of variance and the unpaired t test.

32 nces between groups was determined using the unpaired t test.

33 erformed with Prism 7 software and student's unpaired t test.

34 se ratios were measured and compared with an unpaired t test.

35 the same Gleason grade were compared with an unpaired t test.

36 Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test.

37 th CR was assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum or unpaired t tests.

38 m baseline between groups was assessed using unpaired t tests.

39 ted during the postintervention period using unpaired t tests.

40 t-reversible groups were determined by using unpaired t tests.

41 with exercise were analysed using Student's unpaired t tests.

42 Statistical analysis consisted of paired and unpaired t tests.

43 t tests; possible sex differences, by using unpaired t tests.

44 tman agreement method, kappa statistics, and unpaired t tests.

45 opy number and tested for significance using unpaired t-tests.

46 type melanoma cells; P = 0.04 by two-tailed, unpaired t-test].

47 peated-measures two-way ANOVA and paired and unpaired t-tests (alpha = 0.05, alpha = 0.025).

48 The unpaired t test and chi(2) analysis were used to determi

49 d SRU criteria-negative cancers by using the unpaired t test and the chi(2) test.

50 and in healthy volunteers by using paired or unpaired t tests and a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

51 The data were compared by using unpaired t tests and analysis of variance with Tukey pos

52 Unpaired t tests and chi(2) tests were used for group co

53 image noise and SSDE were compared by using unpaired t tests and F tests.

54 and clinical covariates was performed using unpaired t tests and Fisher exact tests.

55 te, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein).Unpaired t-test and Chi-Square test were used to analyze

56 uantitative and qualitative data was done by unpaired t-test and Chi-Square test, respectively.

57 Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-tests and a p-value < 0.05 was considered sta

58 en response (median, 70% vs. -5%; P < 0.001; unpaired t test) and longer biochemical progression-free

59 CRL, namely 24+/-19 mmHg (P=0.014, Student's unpaired t test), and correlated negatively with the deg

60 e two-tailed Fisher's exact test, two-sample unpaired t test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

61 en the male and female patients by using the unpaired t test, and the correlation between FDG uptake

62 The Fisher 2-tailed exact test, unpaired t tests, and age- and sex-adjusted standardized

63 expressed as mean +/- SEM (ANOVA, paired and unpaired t tests, and chi 2 test).

64 Repeated measures analysis of variance, unpaired t tests, and correlation analysis were used.

65 s were performed with the Fisher exact test, unpaired t tests, and multiple logistic regression.

66 Groups were compared using unpaired t-test, and potential predictors of IMT and PWV

67 Univariate analyses (chi(2) test; 2-tailed, unpaired t test; and analysis of variance) as well as mu

68 Paired and unpaired t tests, as well as parametric Pearson tests, w

69 5% CI, 3.19-5.95] microL/min) GDDs (P = .28, unpaired t test) at 4 weeks without aqueous exposure.

70 re compared by analysis of variance or by an unpaired t test before and after adjustment for confound

71 Statistical analysis was performed with an unpaired t test by using unequal variance.

72 Data were analyzed with unpaired t-tests, Chi-square test and Receiver Operating

73 n of HEI scores in pregnancy and postpartum; unpaired t-tests compared usual mean HEI scores by covar

74 vival (median, 4.1 mo vs. 1.6 mo; P = 0.005; unpaired t test) compared with patients whose mean AD wa

75 Unpaired t tests (corrected for multiple comparisons wit

76 /-1.7%, respectively [mean+/-SEM]; Student's unpaired t-test df=10, t=-1.357, p=0.453); this was conf

77 ough decreased in 12 regions at P<0.01 by an unpaired t test, did not survive the false-discovery-rat

78 ntly higher in women than in men (P = 0.007, unpaired t test; female, 22.0 +/- 16.8 blinks/minute; ma

79 exact test for categorical variables and an unpaired t test for continuous variables.

80 heir children's salivary cortisol (P < .001, unpaired t test, for comparisons of child vs parent at T

81 6 versus 360 +/- 7 beats min(-1); P < 0.05, unpaired t test) However, in +EX atria, HR responses to

82 anges in SNR were assessed with a two-tailed unpaired t test in three regions of the Achilles tendon:

83 r cells from the fourth ventricle (P<0.01 by unpaired t-test), indicating that cells from the lateral

84 etween continuous data were tested using the unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney rank-sum test, or the Krus

85 For statistical analysis, unpaired t test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson c

86 nces between groups was determined using the unpaired t test or the Mann-Whitney test.

87 wth was compared between conditions using an unpaired t-test or ANOVA, as appropriate.

88 ifferences between groups were calculated by unpaired t test (or Mann-Whitney U test in nonparametric

89 Group differences were assessed with the unpaired t test (P < 0.05).

90 n doses, and serologic liver function tests (unpaired t test, P = 0.05) and 2) assessed tumor respons

91 n = 6) and was not significantly different (unpaired t test; P > 0.10) from that measured in the con

92 SD, n = 6), which was significantly higher (unpaired t test; P < 0.01) than that measured in the con

93 in asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects (unpaired t test; P<0.0001).

94 peatability, inter-observer reproducibility, unpaired t-test, paired t-test, and Bland-Altman analyse

95 e in-office VA test results using paired and unpaired t tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, anal

96 Student's unpaired t-test performed on the eye inflammation freque

97 on received (ie, per protocol) by paired and unpaired t test, respectively, and cumulative incidence

98 ified by using Student two-tailed paired and unpaired t test, respectively, with a 5% level of signif

99 Using a variant of the unpaired t-test, selected genes were ordered according t

100 o calculate the whole brain, voxel-by-voxel, unpaired t-tests Statistical non-Parametric Maps.

101 is of continuous data with use of paired and unpaired t tests, the Bonferroni correction, and multiva

102 = 0.009 respectively, Mann-Whitney test and unpaired t test used).

103 An unpaired t test was used for comparing (13)C data among

104 Unpaired t test was used for comparison of patient age w

105 AI-to-expert variability and expert IOV, an unpaired t test was used to compare internal and externa

106 A two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare metabolite concentra

107 etermined and pathologic tumor size, and the unpaired t test was used to compare MR imaging-pathologi

108 Unpaired t-test was carried out in the analysis to deter

109 Also, an unpaired t-test was used to obtain concordance between t

110 Paired and unpaired t tests were performed between various tissue t

111 Likelihood ratio tests and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analyses as a

112 Unpaired t tests were used to compare data in patients w

113 the cardiac cycle for each patient, and then unpaired t tests were used to determine which parameters

114 Unpaired t-tests were used to compare (31)P-MRS and (31)

115 known and synchronous nodules via paired and unpaired t tests, when appropriate.

116 esponses were compared utilising a two-sided unpaired t test with Bonferroni correction.

117 n a priori power analysis was performed, and unpaired t tests with Welch correction were used to comp

118 Results were analyzed by unpaired t-test with Welch's correction or 2-way ANOVA w

119 Unpaired t tests, with Bonferroni correction, were used