ライフサイエンスコーパス: unprotected sex

1 have sex with men (MSM) who have engaged in unprotected sex.

2 -3, and interleukin 8 levels decreased after unprotected sex.

3 , but clients paid on average 42.9% more for unprotected sex.

4 hat are attributed to injecting drug use and unprotected sex.

5 ed having used emergency contraception after unprotected sex.

6 of transmitting HIV to someone else through unprotected sex.

7 oach to engage adolescents in RSE to prevent unprotected sex.

8 dies containing 32 857 participants reported unprotected sex; 11 studies containing 16 138 participan

9 rence in the primary outcome of avoidance of unprotected sex: 2648 (86.62) of 3057 in the interventio

10 remained low at the visit 10-14 hours after unprotected sex (6% [range, -19% to 92%]; P = .02).

11 y from baseline at the visit 2-6 hours after unprotected sex (63% [range, -34% to 99%] vs 5% [range,

12 ty of heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 per unprotected sex act in adults.

13 duals, the risk of HIV transmission during 1 unprotected sex act with an HIV-infected person under co

14 ose-response relations between the number of unprotected sex acts and infection were stronger in the

15 as estimated based on the number and type of unprotected sex acts carried out in defined time periods

16 11, but the effect was small (average of 6.8 unprotected sex acts per year vs 6.2 acts in a predicted

17 The number of unprotected sex acts was significantly associated with i

18 riods with reported numbers of protected and unprotected sex acts.

19 transmission risk for protected relative to unprotected sex acts.

20 om men to women: 28.5 transmissions per 1000 unprotected sex acts.

21 practices (adjusted HR, 44.35; P = .004) and unprotected sex (adjusted HR, 9.91; P = .002) were signi

22 ncy virus (HIV) infection is associated with unprotected sex among multiple anonymous sex partners.

23 7) reported >or=1 occasion on which they had unprotected sex and 22 (23% of 97) reported that in the

24 t women aged 18 to 44 years who recently had unprotected sex and had 1 or more additional personal or

25 liefs about HAART and viral load may promote unprotected sex and may be amenable to change through pr

26 ated with HIV risk behaviors, such as having unprotected sex and multiple sex partners.

27 as a score based on lifetime experiences of unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners.

28 (HAART) became available, the prevalence of unprotected sex and the incidence of sexually transmitte

29 tigated this hypothesis in people practising unprotected sex and those using protection.

30 29 monogamous heterosexual couples having unprotected sex; and 15 women and 10 men having condom p

31 hat as they become sexually active, rates of unprotected sex are reduced.

32 likely to engage similarly in serodiscordant unprotected sex as other MSM.

33 self-reported condom use, and self-reported unprotected sex at 3 months or more after baseline.

34 ly 52% of PSA-positive participants reported unprotected sex during the previous 2 days.

35 es' HIV-1 exposures were quantified based on unprotected sex frequency and viral load of the partner

36 who have sex with men, better educated, have unprotected sex, have a HIV-positive partner, have a low

37 effect on the primary outcome of preventing unprotected sex (increasing sexual abstinence or use of

38 isk-taking, available research suggests that unprotected sex is reduced among HIV-infected individual

39 reported that in the last 3 months they had unprotected sex "most of the time." No women reported ha

40 nce of transactional sex, age-disparate sex, unprotected sex, multiple partners, and sex while drunk

41 viral therapy adherence <90% (OR, 0.18), and unprotected sex (OR, 0.18), as well as less fatty food c

42 interval {CI}, 1.3-29.4]; P = .02) or having unprotected sex (OR, 75.5 [95% CI, 6.9-820.6]; P < .001)

43 isk because of high exposure to violence and unprotected sex, particularly during the early months of

44 couples reported that they continued to have unprotected sex, resulting in an incidence of HIV infect

45 imary outcome was self-reported avoidance of unprotected sex (sexual abstinence or use of reliable co

46 Higher prices for unprotected sex threaten the high levels of condom use t

47 mmendations that male survivors refrain from unprotected sex unless their semen is confirmed to be EB

48 2) of 3057 in the intervention group avoided unprotected sex versus 2768 (86.41%) of 3203 in the cont

49 The prevalence of unprotected sex was elevated (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.52-2.1

50 Unprotected sex was lower in participants receiving ART

51 The prevalence of unprotected sex was not higher among persons with the hu

52 infection among men aged 20 to 44 years were unprotected sex with a commercial sex worker (odds ratio

53 ts attending STD clinics in India identified unprotected sex with a CSW and a genital ulcer as indepe

54 exually transmitted infection testing before unprotected sex with a new partner.

55 T, we compared proportions of risky sex (ie, unprotected sex with a partner of negative/unknown HIV s

56 Unprotected sex with an HIV discordant or status unknown

57 the per-act risk of HIV transmission through unprotected sex with an HIV-infected person on cART for

58 The per-act risk of HIV transmission through unprotected sex with HIV-infected individuals on cART in

59 14.52; 95% confidence interval, 9.92-21.26), unprotected sex with occasional partners (2.01; 1.36-2.9

60 median value, and the number of episodes of unprotected sex with occasional partners during the prec

61 Patients reporting unprotected sex with occasional partners were offered a

62 We identified a significant increase in unprotected sex with outside partners after July, 2011,

63 The average frequency of unprotected sex with the HIV-infected study partner was

64 varying measures of pregnancy, self-reported unprotected sex with the study partner, sperm present on

65 aring the infectivity in participants having unprotected sex with those practising protected sex.

66 majority of the injection drug users had had unprotected sex with women (48%) or with men (10%).

67 exposure was best quantified by frequency of unprotected sex with, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels among, and