戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 scillometric cuff (at the lower leg then the upper arm).
2 surrounding sensory surfaces (e.g., chin and upper arm).
3  AVFs created (342 of 535 [64%]) were in the upper arm.
4 red 12-month protection and injection in the upper arm.
5  taken at the lower leg, the finger, and the upper arm.
6  body or responded to the stimulation of the upper arm afferents that enter the spinal cord rostral t
7 ute ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion in one upper arm after induction of anesthesia) or sham remote
8 stulas and 51 grafts that were placed in the upper arm after primary failure of an initial forearm fi
9 2)-PP-Dol prior to the addition of the final upper-arm alpha1,6-linked Man.
10  of the ulnar and radial wrist, forearm, and upper arm also lie within the homogeneously stained fiel
11  and bovine bile, was applied to skin on the upper arm and covered with a dressing.
12  by an automated cuff-inflator placed on the upper arm and inflated to 200 mm Hg, with an intervening
13                    Participants trained both upper arm and leg muscles to failure at 60% of one-repet
14             The combined sensitivity for the upper arm and leg with a sponge was 89.1%.
15 e recorded electromyograms (EMGs) from 12-16 upper arm and shoulder muscles from both the unaffected
16 d, mean AP measurements were reliable at the upper arm and the finger, not the lower leg.
17 n all subjects, and cross-sectional areas of upper arm and thigh muscles were determined in some subj
18 s implanted in the nerves and muscles of the upper arm and was anchored to the humerus through osseoi
19 itute of India; 0.5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm) and an HPV booster at week 28.
20  with separate rayon swabs and the forehead, upper arm, and thigh with separate sponges.
21 ning stiffness of the neck, shoulders, hips, upper arms, and thighs.
22 , estimated dry weight, weight/height index, upper arm anthropometry, head circumference, and the pro
23 d injection sites (i.e., abdomen, thigh, and upper arm) are usually based on experience from phase 3
24  Upper-arm fat area estimate (UFE) and total upper arm area (TUA) were found higher among children of
25 ia, Pune, India; 0.1 mL intradermally, right upper arm) at week 0.
26 ahway, NJ, USA; 0.5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm) at week 4; and toxoid vaccines (tetanus-dipht
27 CI: 0.82, 0.98]; P = .01) and forearm versus upper arm AVF (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI: 0.27, 0.95];
28 articipants (180 women and 422 men, 459 with upper-arm AVF and 143 with forearm AVF) from seven clini
29 al cutoff point of 1120 mL/min (P = .03) for upper arm AVFs.
30 r AVF intervention prior to week 2, 70% with upper-arm AVFs (302 of 433) and 77% with forearm AVFs (9
31 n 55% of forearm AVFs (68 of 124) and 83% of upper-arm AVFs (341 of 411) in surviving patients withou
32 ), 91% (419 of 459), and 87% (401 of 459) of upper-arm AVFs and in 40% (58 of 143), 73% (104 of 143),
33 adings from 4 different locations (bilateral upper arm, bilateral wrist) and, when available, intra-a
34 les of RIC were performed by inflation of an upper arm blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes followed by
35 RmuCT) to visualize the histology of humeri (upper arm bones) and infer their growth histories, we sh
36 muscle attachment processes on small humeri (upper arm bones) resembles that in "fish" members of the
37 fants whose mothers were undernourished (mid upper arm circumference <23.5 cm) or anaemic (haemoglobi
38 0.15 kg, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.24; P < 0.001), mid-upper arm circumference (0.20 cm, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.37; P
39 ls 1.4 cm, 0.5 to 2.3, p=0.002), smaller mid-upper arm circumference (adjusted difference vs communit
40  11,826), and 15.3% among women with low mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC <23 cm) at enrollment comp
41  nutritional status (BMI >=21.0 kg/m2 or mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) >=23 cm).
42 t: weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) < -3, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 11.5 cm and/or edema) a
43 eutic food (RUTF) per day for those with mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 11.5 cm and/or edema, a
44  210 children aged 6-59 months with SAM [mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 11.5 cm] without medica
45 n children aged 6-59 mo included with 1) mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) <125 mm or edema who achi
46                             Women with a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) 23.0 cm presenting for an
47 eatment did not reduce overall weight or mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) gain velocity nor affect
48                                 Although mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a potential marker of
49 ere screened for wasting malnutrition by mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurement.
50                                        A mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) of >=28.1 cm was associat
51 low weight-for-length z-score (WLZ), low mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) or both.
52 cumference (HC) from birth to 12 mo, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) through 3 mo.
53 y weight-for-length z score (WLZ) and/or mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was 406 (1,098/2,704) per
54 ing complete (weight-for-length z score, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and edema) and partial (
55 e investigated body mass index (BMI), middle upper arm circumference (MUAC), and hemoglobin (Hgb) con
56 g weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) and/or mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC).
57 (WLZ), length-for-age Z-score (LAZ), and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC).
58                                      Low mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC; <125 mm) was found in 80.
59  Anthropometric indices (weight, height, mid-upper arm circumference [MUAC], oedema) and haemoglobin
60  the MQ-LNS arm had significantly higher mid-upper arm circumference at 24 mo than children in the MM
61        Acute malnutrition was defined as mid-upper arm circumference below 12.5 cm, capturing both se
62 erved in the rates of weight, length, or mid-upper arm circumference gain.
63 luded in this post-hoc analysis if their mid-upper arm circumference had been measured and if they we
64 ollected from participants enrolled with mid-upper arm circumference of <12.1 cm.
65 ending to breastfeed their newborns with mid-upper arm circumference of <23 cm and live infants betwe
66 ute malnutrition was defined as having a mid-upper arm circumference of less than 125 mm, a weight-fo
67  greater gains in body weight (P = 0.01) and upper arm circumference than placebo.
68           Children's weight, height, and mid-upper arm circumference were measured and converted to a
69 ve nodal disease, 95% of the patients had an upper arm circumference within 2 cm of the unaffected si
70 opometric parameters (weight, height, middle upper arm circumference) and edema to evaluate malnutrit
71 ool, vomiting, breastfeeding status, and mid-upper arm circumference) as well as location-specific vi
72 ted (ie, low weight for height, or small mid-upper arm circumference) or stunted (ie, low height for
73 nversely correlated with CD4 cell count, mid-upper arm circumference, and body mass index.
74 r bacillary burden, younger age, larger mean upper arm circumference, and host inflammatory profiles,
75 evel (PAL), platelet distribution width, mid-upper arm circumference, systolic blood pressure, age, r
76 ined by weight-for-height z score and middle upper arm circumference, were 75-81 days and 101-116 day
77 ircumference-for-age Z-scores (HCZ), and mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-scores (MUAC), and stu
78 tting oedema of nutritional origin, or a mid-upper-arm circumference of less than 110 mm in children
79 for-age, and length-for-age z scores and mid-upper-arm circumference values at baseline and every 2 w
80 -age, length-for-age, weight-for-length, mid-upper-arm circumference, and head circumference were cal
81                                          Mid-upper-arm circumference, triceps skinfold, and immune fu
82  Medaval database to determine the number of upper arm cuff and wrist cuff blood pressure measuring d
83 y contraction was performed with progressive upper arm cuff inflation (0, 80, 100 and 120 mmHg) to el
84 s assessed by reactive hyperemia index after upper arm cuff occlusion.
85 ries before and after a 5-min supra-systolic upper-arm cuff occlusion were successfully obtained in 1
86 uring lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of left upper arm edema.
87 s commonly used sites (left upper arm, right upper arm, etc.) and methods have not been established.
88 s for weight, height, arm circumference, and upper arm fat and muscle areas.
89                             Low z scores for upper arm fat area indicate deficits in fat (energy) sto
90                                              Upper-arm fat area estimate (UFE) and total upper arm ar
91 clusion, as compared with grafts, subsequent upper arm fistulas are associated with a higher primary
92  blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg around the upper arm, followed by 5-minute intervals of reperfusion
93 ue dye (5 mL) is injected in the ipsilateral upper arm for localization of nonbreast lymphatics.
94                     T2 maps of the shoulder, upper arm, forearm, thigh, and calf were generated from
95            We identified hip, vertebral, and upper arm fractures using ICD-9-CM codes.
96                      MNs were applied to the upper arm; impedance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL
97 d ear in men compared with women, and on the upper arm in women compared with men.
98 nic hgbA-inactivated mutant (FX504) on their upper arms in a double-blinded, escalating dose-response
99 ody parts proximal to the deafferented hand (upper arm), in the absence of excitability changes in ot
100 ylate N-glycans lacking the alpha1,6-mannose upper arm, indicating that a specific alpha-mannosidase
101                                     When the upper arm is inaccessible for measurements of arterial p
102 measured at the four most common sites (left upper arm, left wrist, right upper arm, right wrist) had
103                Sitting height, thigh length, upper arm length, forearm length, and arm span of 1899 m
104 m; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.99 (P-trend = 0.006)] and upper arm length.
105  contrasts with their interdependence in the upper arm, likely reflecting the special functional impo
106 , Lyon, France; 0.5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm), live oral typhoid vaccine (Ty21a; PaxVax, Lo
107 e of the proximodistal segments of the limb (upper arm, lower arm and hand).
108  adjust for the associations of stature with upper arm measures.
109  using the Jebsen-Taylor hand-function test, upper arm motor coordination with the finger-nose test,
110 energy) stores, and low FFM coupled with low upper arm muscle area indicate muscle wasting and low pr
111 1rho) magnetic resonance (MR) mapping of the upper arm muscles to quantify GAG content in patients wi
112 ness and wasting of the facial, shoulder and upper arm muscles, frequently accompanied by hearing los
113  11) and site-matched seronegative controls (upper arm, n = 10; upper leg, n = 10).
114 eficiency virus-associated xerosis patients (upper arm, n = 12; upper leg, n = 11) and site-matched s
115           Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after upper arm occlusion was defined as the percent change in
116   Skin biopsy samples were obtained from the upper arm of 11 patients with diffuse SSc (clinically un
117 patial gene expression were derived from the upper arm of 6 healthy control (HC) donors and 7 AD pati
118  population gave a rough map position on the upper arm of chromosome 5, and deep sequencing of DNA fr
119 ted with delivery of electrical shock to the upper arm on 50% of trials.
120 , when possible, a preferable alternative to upper arm ones.
121   Brachial circumference (BC), also known as upper arm or mid arm circumference, can be used as an in
122                                              Upper arm or proximal forearm transplantation is a recon
123 e at the lower leg than that observed at the upper arm or the finger (for mean AP, bias +/- sd of 6.0
124 at deposition (ie, waist and hips instead of upper arm or thigh) proved to be the most reliable.
125 ons of a standard blood-pressure cuff on the upper arm) or sham conditioning (control group).
126                      We obtained single-cuff upper arm oscillometric measurements thrice in 129 maste
127 t change in melanin level on their protected upper arms (P < .001 for skin type 1, P = .008 for skin
128 ely correlated with cross-sectional areas of upper arm (r = 0.85) and thigh (r = 0.88) muscles, and t
129 ckness (hands: r = 0.58, forearms: r = 0.63, upper arms: r = 0.40; P < or = 0.001 for all).
130 that within-representation plasticity of the upper arm representation occurs when repetitive transcra
131 representations on the motor output from the upper arm representation.
132 y radial wrist, radial forearm, and anterior upper arm representations; and on dorsal side by the dor
133 by ulnar wrist, ulnar forearm, and posterior upper arm representations; on the lateral side by radial
134 BP measures across commonly used sites (left upper arm, right upper arm, etc.) and methods have not b
135 mon sites (left upper arm, left wrist, right upper arm, right wrist) had adequate correlation coeffic
136                   Neurons with proximal RFs (upper arm/shoulder) and pyramidal tract-projecting neuro
137 ly by inflating a blood pressure cuff on the upper arm to 200 mm Hg for 3x5 minutes, with 5 minutes r
138 rmining whether training paradigms involving upper arm training in concert with lower extremity train
139 or 0 mug of HA to the FA or 15 mug HA to the upper arm (UA), or IM injection of QIV.
140 pproach (radial artery diagnostic access and upper-arm vein for temporary pacing lead placement) and
141 ssure in a congesting cuff placed around the upper arm was deflated from 40 to 0 mm Hg.
142 actility, a sphygmomanometer cuff around the upper arm was inflated to 60 mmHg (Pcuff) before 99mTc-H
143 d Dixon water-fat MR imaging of the affected upper arms were performed before and after off-label tre
144 y controls were recruited for imaging of the upper arm with 3D-T(1p) mapping.
145  Seven healthy adults were challenged on the upper arm with the isogenic isolates in a double-blinded
146        Human subjects were challenged on the upper arm with the isogenic isolates in a double-blinded

 
Page Top