ライフサイエンスコーパス: urinalysis

1 iate-negative urine specimens (thrice weekly urinalysis).

2 .18 mg/dl with protein (30 mg/dl) present in urinalysis.

3 its remote detection of HIRI-induced AKI via urinalysis.

4 benefit in samples with a negative dipstick urinalysis.

5 rescence (NIRF) in vivo imaging and in vitro urinalysis.

6 plex chemo-fluorescence imaging and in vitro urinalysis.

7 ) admissions, with 584438 (13%) including >1 urinalysis.

8 ch illicit opioid use was measured by weekly urinalysis.

9 uped according to symptoms, bacteriuria, and urinalysis.

10 r lung disease was assessed by histology and urinalysis.

11 primary exposure was pyuria on preoperative urinalysis.

12 d chemistry, complete blood count (CBC), and urinalysis.

13 primary exposure was pyuria on pre-operative urinalysis.

14 All volunteers had negative results of urinalysis.

15 treptococcal tests, and improved methods for urinalysis.

16 ally missed timely follow-up percentages for urinalysis (0.3-percentage point reduction [95% CI, -0.6

17 (65%), prostate-specific antigen test (65%), urinalysis (40%), blood glucose measurement (41%), fecal

18 Finally, the use of an augmented urinalysis and a discussion of imaging for first febrile

19 tion (including digital rectal examination), urinalysis and bladder diary as being essential in the a

20 blood count with differential, chest x-ray, urinalysis and culture, electrolyte panel, liver enzymes

21 no alternative diagnosis) UTI on pretherapy urinalysis and culture.

22 re 2,247 nondiabetics and 537 diabetics with urinalysis and follow-up data available (proteinuria n =

23 Renal disease was assessed by regular urinalysis and histologic evaluation.

24 Urinalysis and rheumatoid factor (RF) tests were conduct

25 ustrated by applying it to data collected by urinalysis and self-report in 1992-1993 in a national mu

26 ance with the CM groups as indicated by both urinalysis and self-reported cocaine use data.

27 ety and efficacy were assessed on retention, urinalysis and self-reported drug use, symptoms, and pat

28 ectal exam should be performed, as well as a urinalysis and serum creatinine.

29 eteral obstruction underwent contemporaneous urinalysis and unenhanced CT.

30 n model was used to examine the incidence of urinalysis and urine culture testing for select diagnose

31 Traditional diagnostic methods, like urinalysis and urine culture, have limitations-urinalysi

32 use of standard diagnostic tools, including urinalysis and urine culture.

33 on with possible laboratory assessment using urinalysis and urine culture.

34 ters at our EDs that included results from a urinalysis and urine cultures.

35 complete blood cell count with differential, urinalysis, and biochemistry, were collected as possible

36 y, echocardiography, haematological testing, urinalysis, and blood chemistry.

37 raditional UTI diagnosis relies on symptoms, urinalysis, and culture which are interpreted based on h

38 logic analysis, analysis of blood chemistry, urinalysis, and electrocardiographic parameters; these m

39 ising candidate for the clinical blood test, urinalysis, and fermentation monitoring.

40 ory assessments (ie, blood count, chemistry, urinalysis, and HIV), and solicited and unsolicited adve

41 actate dehydrogenase, proteinuria on routine urinalysis, and hypertension were the earliest markers o

42 Complete blood cell count, urinalysis, and viral studies were obtained weekly.

43 ion (N-telopeptide of collagen cross-links); urinalysis; and phosphate, calcium, and creatinine level

44 al examination, hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis, antibody titers, and radiographic evaluation

45 otocols contingent upon a screening dipstick urinalysis are a safe and effective platform for diagnos

46 y taking, physical examination, and dipstick urinalysis are not able to reliably lower the posttest p

47 uria (ie, any number of white blood cells on urinalysis) assessed every 2 months over the 1-year stud

48 pients remain with normal renal function and urinalysis at 3 years after the transplant.

49 erve as a low-cost, point-of-care, sensitive urinalysis biosensor to monitor UTI and gonorrhea from h

50 tion must be undertaken, including screening urinalysis, blood chemistries, and renal sonography.

51 stem comprises an easy-to-use, multianalyte, urinalysis cartridge, and an instrument, which incorpora

52 ADCs) on MRI were analyzed and compared with urinalysis, clinical chemistry and bacteriology, and bio

53 panel, routine haematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis, coagulation, and complement variables.

54 The urinalysis combined with the history and physical examin

55 ere referred to a hospital laboratory for an urinalysis, complete blood count, and a standard blood c

56 n that includes motivational interviewing, a urinalysis contingency, and social skills training.

57 ere retrospectively compared with results of urinalysis, cystoscopy and/or ureteroscopy, and/or surge

58 Self-report and urinalysis data are consistent with a greater than 90% r

59 study include retrospective design, lack of urinalysis data, and low ethnic diversity of the region.

60 lassified as low risk if they had a negative urinalysis/dipstick test result, serum procalcitonin les

61 res used included self-report of relapse and urinalysis drug and alcohol screenings.

62 gative specimens for street heroin on weekly urinalysis during weeks 14-26.

63 gs of hematologic analysis, blood chemistry, urinalysis, electrocardiography, or physical examination

64 DVICE 2: Clinicians should not use screening urinalysis for cancer detection in asymptomatic adults.

65 creatinine (glomerular defects), microscopic urinalysis for hematuria (hemorrhagic cystitis, bladder

66 urine screening studies, including dipstick urinalysis for nitrite and leukocyte esterase and urine

67 counts (therapy-related leukemia), dipstick urinalysis for proteinuria and serum blood urea nitrogen

68 strate that bioplasmonic paper enables rapid urinalysis for the detection of kidney cancer biomarkers

69 des two functions (photoacoustic imaging and urinalysis), for assessing intraplaque and urinary malon

70 Serum chemistries, hematology, urinalysis, gastrointestinal complications, liver and re

71 A negative dipstick urinalysis had a negative predictive value of 98% for cl

72 rine microscopy (>=1 S. haematobium egg) and urinalysis (haematuria).

73 m cholesterol level, urinalysis proteinuria, urinalysis hematuria, and serum creatinine level.

74 Microscopic urinalysis, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC

75 n in water, and resazurin assay in milk) and urinalysis (i.e., nitrite, urobilinogen, and pH assays i

76 ted (fewer antibiotic prescriptions and less urinalysis in tested patients).

77 e as a cocktail sensor for multiplex optical urinalysis in the mouse models of drug-induced acute kid

78 Comprehensive blood chemistry and urinalysis indicate that Hpse2 mutants have renal dysfun

79 ortant factors, such as specimen collection, urinalysis interpretation, culture thresholds, and antim

80 Urinalysis is a readily available test often used for sc

81 inalysis and urine culture, have limitations-urinalysis is fast but lacks sensitivity, while urine cu

82 A urinalysis is now clear without traces of inflammation,

83 ility of using these MIPs as part of a total urinalysis MIP system.

84 le it was suggested utilizing the "enhanced" urinalysis, not as a replacement to culture but as a pot

85 tion), the reporters can be used for optical urinalysis of immunoactivation simply by detecting the s

86 tudy intended to evaluate bacteriuria in the urinalysis of patients with C1-INH-HAE.

87 of the 3D paper-based microfluidic system, a urinalysis of protein and glucose assays is conducted.

88 heal administration but also permits optical urinalysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

89 A normal urinalysis on day 7 had a 97% (confidence interval 90 to

90 cipants with cocaine abstinence (by negative urinalysis or self-report) during weeks 7 to 26 (ie, the

91 No significant difference on urinalysis or self-reported cocaine use was observed bet

92 clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, orthostatic vital signs, WSF, or 12-lead ECG

93 Combined urinalysis parameters (pyuria or nitrite) performed bett

94 ital cohort study of 3392 patients, positive urinalysis parameters had poor positive predictive value

95 However, performance of all urinalysis parameters was poor in older women.

96 ng the period from 10/1/08-9/30/13 who had a urinalysis performed during the 30-day pre-operative per

97 d 1 October 2008-30 September 2013 who had a urinalysis performed during the 30-day preoperative peri

98 Of 750 urinalysis-positive urine samples from urgent care patie

99 , diabetes, or urinary catheter), 24% of all urinalysis-positive urine samples yielded H30, with a 92

100 cardial infarction, serum cholesterol level, urinalysis proteinuria, urinalysis hematuria, and serum

101 ar profile, serum haematology, biochemistry, urinalysis, PSA, and Adverse Events (AEs).

102 ical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis; psychomotor functioning (using the Wayne Sac

103 of the odds ratio (OR) of having a negative urinalysis result for the presence of cocaine metabolite

104 uid (CSF) testing on the basis of a positive urinalysis result to exclude bacterial meningitis as a c

105 infants older than 28 days with an abnormal urinalysis result, LP remains controversial.

106 3%-0.76%) among 10 032 infants with negative urinalysis results (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.39-1.38).

107 ng 20 637 infants with positive and negative urinalysis results (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48-1.68).

108 e decision to use LP should not be guided by urinalysis results alone.

109 patient-level data could be ascertained for urinalysis results and meningitis status were included.

110 .25%-0.78%) among 2703 infants with positive urinalysis results compared with 0.50% (95% CI, 0.33%-0.

111 Urinalysis results during the 16-week treatment period s

112 for retail items contingent on cocaine-free urinalysis results during treatment weeks 1 to 12.

113 ze, treatment duration, retention rates, and urinalysis results for the presence of cocaine metabolit

114 ior in-treatment urinalysis results, whereas urinalysis results from participants in the CBT group we

115 come Measure The primary outcome measure was urinalysis results from twice-weekly treatment sessions.

116 at baseline and (2) it reported only pooled urinalysis results indicating the presence of multiple s

117 e infants 29 to 60 days of age with positive urinalysis results ranged from 0.25% to 0.44% and was no

118 ng/mL [normal range, 0.00-4.00 ng/mL]), and urinalysis results were negative.

119 respectively (high dose vs low dose, P<.05); urinalysis results were similarly dose related.

120 0 had normal serum creatinine levels, normal urinalysis results, and normal quantitative proteinuria.

121 g CM had significantly superior in-treatment urinalysis results, whereas urinalysis results from part

122 ot higher than that in infants with negative urinalysis results.

123 erial meningitis among infants with positive urinalysis results.

124 Urinalysis revealed haematuria and proteinuria, suggesti

125 Urinalysis revealed moderate blood.

126 vital signs; haematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis; rice protein-specific serum IgE antibody con

127 R 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96; I2 = 32%), but not urinalysis (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-w1.07; I2 = 20%).

128 Digital rectal examination and urinalysis should be performed.

129 obial identification (ID) agreement, whereas urinalysis showed 37% ID agreement with the gold standar

130 However, urinalysis showed increased albumin excretion by 4 weeks

131 test result was negative for pregnancy, and urinalysis showed no leukocyte esterase or nitrites.

132 Urinalysis showed proteinuria.

133 traces red-green-blue values from images of urinalysis strips, calculates the flow rate and volume o

134 Here, medical grade Urinalysis strips, used to detect an array of disease ma

135 creased between 3 to 7 percentage points for urinalysis suggestive of bladder cancer, 12 to 14 percen

136 test result was negative for pregnancy, and urinalysis testing showed no leukocyte esterase or nitri

137 signals of concern from laboratory blood or urinalysis tests.

138 results of dipstick testing with microscopic urinalysis that demonstrates 3 or more erythrocytes per

139 Urinalysis then discriminates the onset of rejection wit

140 Urinalysis (UA) has routinely been used as a screening t

141 the utility of urine Gram stain relative to urinalysis (UA) is unclear.

142 itivity based on macroscopic and microscopic urinalysis (UA) parameters, was developed in support of

143 Sensitivity and specificity of 216Dx and urinalysis (UA) were determined against urine culture.

144 se both are associated with abnormalities on urinalysis (UA).

145 The routine performance of urinalysis, urine culture, or both during subsequent feb

146 A dipstick urinalysis was considered negative only if leukocyte est

147 did not report any urinary symptoms and the urinalysis was within normal limits.

148 BUN, serum creatinine concentration and urinalysis were normal in all subjects.

149 Charges for urinalysis were present for 2086697 (47%) admissions, wi

150 or presumed urinary tract infection based on urinalysis, which demonstrated few bacteria and was nega

151 f the uterus and ovaries (ages 30-35 years); urinalysis with cytology (ages 25-35 years); history, ex

152 58 098 urine cultures with a paired dipstick urinalysis with or without urine microscopy was performe

153 essential, often encounter challenges where urinalysis yields positive results, but subsequent cultu