ライフサイエンスコーパス: urologist

1 cancer varies by the characteristics of the urologist.

2 nical management challenges to the pediatric urologist.

3 s of a very experienced endoscopic pediatric urologist.

4 tients can be a challenge for the practising urologist.

5 cant number of visits to a medical doctor or urologist.

6 still presents a challenging problem for the urologist.

7 ails were deemed inoperable by the referring urologist.

8 ation of an interventional radiologist and a urologist.

9 ewpoint presents the experiences of 10 Black urologists.

10 imilar which may be attractive to practising urologists.

11 nvestigated the billing practices of several urologists.

12 identified from referral-based practices of urologists.

13 has become the treatment of choice for most urologists.

14 re and bring it within the grasp of ordinary urologists.

15 anning of surgery and the training of future urologists.

16 cele continue to be a management dilemma for urologists.

17 urinary tract and was practiced primarily by urologists.

18 lity-improvement collaborative of practicing urologists.

19 geons and subspecialists, neurosurgeons, and urologists.

20 dder hyperactivity, opposing expectations of urologists.

21 vey of primary care practitioners (PCPs) and urologists.

22 rature regarding the use of chaperones among urologists.

23 tor infertility that might be encountered by urologists.

24 are numerous datasets available to pediatric urologists.

25 creasing urologist density) relative to zero urologists.

26 0 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists.

27 nasteride as a chemopreventive agent by most urologists.

28 ts, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists.

29 syndrome is within the scope and training of urologists.

30 rection is a topic of relevance to pediatric urologists.

31 In 2019, there were 13 044 urologists (11 758 men [90.1.%]; 1286 women [9.9%]; medi

32 ciated with counties that had more than zero urologists (16% to 22% reduction for prostate cancer, 17

33 ticipants were oncologists and one-half were urologists (18 urologists and 18 oncologists in phase 1,

34 By 2019, 63% of medical oncologists, 20% of urologists, 29% of infectious disease specialists, 21% o

35 0:14 min, p < 0.01) and for overall time per urologist (39.45 min and 02:20 min, p < 0.01).

36 phyicians and 1 physician assistant) and 32 urologists (45 of 63 aged 30-59 years [71.4%]; 40 male [

37 These new surgical enhancements will give urologists a greater choice in the surgical management o

38 he study included a representative sample of urologists across practice settings and nationally repre

39 34-week randomized trial enrolled practicing urologists across the globe.

40 effective therapies that would persuade most urologists actively to screen for and treat patients who

41 Practicing, experienced urologists, after the US Food and Drug Administration ap

42 Change in median biopsy and RP volume per urologist and national procedural volume.

43 ed of the available treatment options by the urologist and received an information leaflet describing

44 rrent guidelines leave such decisions to the urologist and the patient.

45 etail the different options available to the urologist and we highlight a treatment algorithm that we

46 rologists and 18 oncologists in phase 1, 151 urologists and 151 oncologists in phase 2, and 7 urologi

47 oncologists and one-half were urologists (18 urologists and 18 oncologists in phase 1, 151 urologists

48 One-hundred sixty urologists and 320 urology residents were randomized to

49 ogists and 151 oncologists in phase 2, and 7 urologists and 7 oncologists in phase 3).

50 The ISE program was completed by 71% urologists and 83% residents.

51 ikingly variable use of observation among US urologists and establishes a framework for the use of ur

52 rize the burden of musculoskeletal injury in urologists and focus on various ergonomic considerations

53 hat is rapidly gaining popularity among both urologists and gynecologists.

54 tigations resulted in guilty pleas from both urologists and industry employees relative to the Prescr

55 d colleagues, to support and encourage Black urologists and lead to a more diverse field of urology i

56 US-based urologists and oncologists who were primary treaters for

57 nt of bladder cancer remains a challenge for urologists and oncologists.

58 crease TI uptake, as cocreated and ranked by urologists and oncologists.

59 le manner, is attracting more attention from urologists and parents alike.

60 proach involving nephrologists, oncologists, urologists and pathologists.

61 While both urologists and PCPs were highly aware of US Preventive S

62 Based on this study, while urologists and radiation oncologists do agree on a varie

63 s of renal masses is now more commonplace as urologists and radiologists become familiar with its ind

64 which is gathering a growing interest among urologists and radiologists.

65 sexual function in men is important to both urologists and their patients, and is the focus of this

66 Participants were enrolled by urologists and urogynecologists at academic medical cent

67 ts, endocrinologists, nurse practitioners, a urologist, and a radiation oncologist, is responsible fo

68 disease pose a significant challenge to the urologist, and possibly as a consequence, the literature

69 , ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, urologists, and patients should be aware of the potentia

70 mary care physicians to medical oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists.

71 ate dehydrogenase), and prompt referral to a urologist are indicated when testicular cancer is suspec

72 wo of the most common problems presenting to urologists are benign prostatic hyperplasia and sexual d

73 Urologists are faced with difficult management decisions

74 Urologists are increasingly managing urinary incontinenc

75 This has led to the belief that urologists are overdetecting and overtreating clinically

76 Urologists are well positioned to champion the integrati

77 rded if they do not add significantly to the urologists' armamentarium.

78 e condition is predominantly assessed by the urologist as a consequence of incontinence surgery.

79 treamlined men's health programme - with the urologist as the gatekeeper of men's health - is needed

80 We used urologists as a test case because they are the first car

81 Urologists aspiring to best clinical practice should enc

82 Ten urologists assessed ten clinical cases (screening and lo

83 There is a continued decrease in per capita urologists at each time point, with 13.1 urologists per

84 Improved collaboration between urologists, basic scientists and veterinarians is warran

85 fect, and severe postoperative dysuria, many urologists became disinterested in this procedure.

86 rtunity for the involvement of the pediatric urologist because of the high incidence of associated ur

87 ing (paediatric) nephrologists, (paediatric) urologists, biochemists and geneticists from OxalEurope

88 Two urologists blinded to the clinical outcome in these pati

89 lae of injury related to urological surgery, urologists can be more mindful of their operating room e

90 Urologists can play an integral role in affecting the pa

91 Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours a

92 characteristics, tumor characteristics, and urologist characteristics (eg, board certification, acad

93 linked database, we examined how individual urologist characteristics influenced the use of androgen

94 a more than 10-year life expectancy, 93% of urologists chose radical prostatectomy as the preferred

95 Urologists continue to strive towards improved kidney fu

96 well as close interventional radiologist and urologist cooperation.

97 Urologists currently have multiple tools to aid in the m

98 STF recommendation, median biopsy volume per urologist decreased from 29 to 21 (interquartile range [

99 USPSTF recommendation, median RP volume per urologist decreased from 7 (IQR, 3-15) to 6 (IQR, 2-12)

100 rosurgeons and otolaryngologists, funding to urologists decreased significantly from 14.9% of all gra

101 logic cancers in that county, but increasing urologist density does not yield further improvements.

102 dy was to determine the effect of increasing urologist density on local prostate, bladder, and kidney

103 reduction for kidney cancer with increasing urologist density) relative to zero urologists.

104 ancer mortality, controlling for categorized urologist density, county demographics, socioeconomic fa

105 clinic staffed by a pediatric nephrologist, urologist, dietitian, and clinical nurse.

106 Here, 2 experts-an internist and a urologist-discuss the key points of a shared decision-ma

107 th routine prebiopsy use being shown to help urologists distinguish between clinically significant an

108 and the other comprising non-self-referring urologists employed at 11 National Comprehensive Cancer

109 9 urologists per 100 000 persons and 311 new urologists entering the workforce.

110 Nine urologists evaluated these reports.

111 and adult nephrologists, pediatric and adult urologists experts in cystinuria, and the Metabolic Neph

112 a PSA above 4 ng/ml should be referred to a urologist for further discussion of the risks and benefi

113 techniques have been increasingly adopted by urologists for reconstruction of the upper urinary tract

114 physicians, with referrals to ultrasound and urologists for suspicious findings.

115 This has been recognized by urologists for years; it is a new concept in the gynecol

116 on the urinary tract and worked closely with urologists forged major advances in urinary tract imagin

117 In phase 2, urologists found decision-support tools most helpful (Co

118 dural volumes of certifying and recertifying urologists from 2009 through 2016 were evaluated for var

119 ical techniques and materials will allow the urologist greater treatment options.

120 ected; therefore many specialists, including urologists, gynaecologists, geriatricians, paediatrician

121 e evaluation and treatment of such patients, urologists have applied a system of staging paradigms an

122 The vast majority of urologists have experienced work-related musculoskeletal

123 ulates an anti-tumour immune response, which urologists have harnessed for the treatment of non-muscl

124 Urologists have requested more imaging studies than expe

125 al practice.For generations, oncologists and urologists have used androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

126 iation oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, urologists, hematologists, pediatric oncologists, and su

127 my; procurement by transplant surgeon versus urologist; history of previous renal transplantations; t

128 ciated with more complications compared with urologists (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.83-1.08]; P = .38).

129 f renal cell carcinoma and should assist the urologist in educating affected patients as well as prov

130 s paper reviews the options available to the urologist in the treatment of ureteric colic as well as

131 s in different types of stones may guide the urologist in treating stones and may lead to further res

132 iterature provides information that will aid urologists in (1) minimizing the need for disfiguring tr

133 The cohort included practicing urologists in 2019.

134 The rate of IMRT use by self-referring urologists in private practice increased from 13.1 to 32

135 with Klinefelter syndrome seen by practicing urologists in the near future.

136 Ureteral stents have assisted urologists in the performance of surgery of the urinary

137 At the dawn of the 20th century, urologists in the United States and around the world qui

138 treatment options as confirmed by surveys of urologists in the USA and the Netherlands.

139 eviously have reported wide variations among urologists in the use of androgen deprivation for prosta

140 The urologist involved in the management of genitourinary tr

141 evidence to suggest the favorable effect of urologist involvement in tobacco cessation.

142 Therefore, referring these patients to a urologist is advised during their first visits as they b

143 Finally, initial access obtained by the urologist is associated with less bleeding and higher st

144 The presence of a urologist is associated with lower mortality for urologi

145 It is important, therefore, that urologists keep abreast of the new technologies, their l

146 and high-risk disease were correlated at the urologist level (Spearman rho = 0.17; P < .001).

147 e variation in the use of observation at the urologist level by disease risk strata and to evaluate t

148 27.8%; range, 5.1%-71.2%) at the individual urologist level.

149 ts with prostate cancer is correlated at the urologist level.

150 and to evaluate the association between the urologist-level rates of observation for men with low-ri

151 s and establishes a framework for the use of urologist-level treatment signatures as a quality measur

152 However, few studies have examined the urologist-level variation in the use of observation acro

153 Considerable urologist-level variation is seen in the use of observat

154 Considerably less urologist-level variation was seen in the use of observa

155 ement in endourologic skills among pediatric urologists make endoscopic treatment of pediatric urolit

156 guidelines from the European Association of Urologists make no mention of the possible therapeutic r

157 Follow-up consisted of a visit to the urologist, measurement of prostate-specific antigen leve

158 Urologists more commonly reported barriers to intensific

159 As such, the urologist must be actively involved in tract placement.

160 Urologists must provide patients with up-to-date informa

161 = 14 836), neurological surgeons (n = 7481), urologists (n = 4544), and plastic surgeons (n = 4060).

162 fessionals (nephrologists [n = 21], surgeons/urologists [n = 17], coordinators [n = 7], social worker

163 Urologists need to be cognizant of these associations as

164 hat an exciting tool this represents for the urologist not only in terms of qualitative and quantitat

165 sion for having at least one board-certified urologist (odds ratio [OR], 9.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 45.0), a

166 Urologists often face a diagnostic dilemma, as men with

167 ontrolled trials conducted by secondary care urologists on selected populations of patients, who are

168 n the work-up of renal masses, an area where urologists once held forth.

169 alyses answered the 3IQ questionnaire, and a urologist or urogynecologist who was blinded to the resp

170 Ts often are treated by medical oncologists, urologists, or gynecologic oncologists.

171 pment of KTP laser technology and its use by urologists over the years and describe why its physical

172 'reconstructive ladder' has served to guide urologists over the years.

173 commendation was developed by nephrologists, urologists, paediatric radiologists, interventional radi

174 inicians (N = 40, including medical doctors (urologists), pelvic-floor physical therapists, and nurse

175 ita urologists at each time point, with 13.1 urologists per 100 000 persons aged 65 years and older b

176 There are 23.8 urologists per 100 000 persons aged 65 years and older i

177 s and older in 2020, which decreases to 15.8 urologists per 100 000 persons aged 65 years and older i

178 ]; median age range, 55-59 years), with 3.99 urologists per 100 000 persons and 311 new urologists en

179 ued decrease of urologists per capita to 3.1 urologists per 100 000 persons by 2060.

180 owest number of urologists per capita of 3.3 urologists per 100 000 persons, and recovery to baseline

181 However, increasing density greater than two urologists per 100,000 people had no statistically signi

182 h model, 2030 will have the lowest number of urologists per capita of 3.3 urologists per 100 000 pers

183 model, there will be a continued decrease of urologists per capita to 3.1 urologists per 100 000 pers

184 ere will be an exaggerated shortage of total urologists per persons aged 65 years and older in both m

185 One experienced urologist performed all US examinations that were then d

186 One hundred twenty-six urologists performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 98

187 ts, including novices, residents, and expert urologists, performed standardized robotic tasks (suturi

188 en pediatric urology specialists and general urologist performing the same operation; within a health

189 the American Board of Urology and identified urologists performing at least 1 prostate biopsy (n = 51

190 the frequency of imaging is dictated by the urologist preference.

191 agnosis and management of prostate cancer by urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologis

192 An independent panel with a urologist, radiologist, and nuclear physician reviewed a

193 pite this growing evidence on effectiveness, urologists rarely recommend conservative treatment to pa

194 The reporting of individual urologist rates of observation for localized prostate ca

195 suggest that whereas orthopedic surgeons and urologists received higher payments than they would have

196 ans in the United States, who were listed as urologists (response rate 64%, n=504) and radiation onco

197 ician-patient visits in the practices of 339 urologists, rheumatologists, and general internists.

198 h focal therapy as an important asset in the urologist's armamentarium against prostate cancer.

199 zable segments are a substantial part of the urologist's armamentarium for providing bladder drainage

200 omy continues to be an important part of the urologist's armamentarium.

201 me being it remains an essential part of the urologist's armamentarium.

202 Urologists serve as the primary and most influential phy

203 Urologists should be familiar with currently available i

204 All urologists should have a working knowledge of these adju

205 Practicing urologists should seek to become involved in the evidenc

206 A case review by a board-certified urologist suggested they could be IC.

207 Among non-self-referring urologists, the rate of IMRT use increased from 14.3 to

208 Following early acceptance by urologists, the use of surgical robotic platforms is rap

209 This will aid the ability of the urologist to tailor the therapy necessary for each indiv

210 These interventions have enabled the urologist to treat a problem whose management was once l

211 aphy, it has become a logical choice for the urologist to use the technique as a diagnostic tool for

212 pair and is now considered by many pediatric urologists to be the best approach for midshaft and dist

213 guidelines, PCPs were much less likely than urologists to believe in the value of PSA testing or the

214 r patients with serious illnesses - can help urologists to care for patients with unmet symptom, copi

215 /AR/lncRNA-p21/EZH2/STAT3 signaling may help urologists to develop a treatment for better suppression

216 r urinary tract dysfunction is important for urologists to diagnose these conditions or initiate an a

217 to urology training is essential, empowering urologists to make a difference in improving sexual heal

218 its effect in functional urology could help urologists to maximize the positive effects of this phen

219 In order for urologists to optimize their care of patients, there is

220 Fusion of MRI with ultrasound allows urologists to progress from blind, systematic biopsies t

221 ient populations have allowed reconstructive urologists to remain committed to rehabilitating the low

222 Allowing urologists to self-refer for IMRT may contribute to incr

223 vic LN dissections, PSMA RGS could guide the urologist toward PSMA-expressing LNMs as identified on p

224 A total of 124 urologists treated 1069 and 197 kidneys or ureters with

225 One uncooperative urologist was found guilty of violating the Federal Fals

226 as a risk factor for bladder cancer when the urologist was the source of their understanding.

227 patient safety and providing support for the urologist, we decided to assess our performance as per t

228 adder cancer diagnosis and the advice of the urologist were the reasons cited most often for cessatio

229 en with prostate cancer with 1884 diagnosing urologists were identified.

230 ar procedures performed by gynecologists and urologists were partially corrected in 1997; however, se

231 Patients of non-academically affiliated urologists were significantly more likely to receive pri

232 Urologists who acquired ownership of IMRT services incre

233 This problem is of particular importance to urologists who are trained in nearly all operative appro

234 fines and restitution to the government for urologists who cooperated with federal investigations.

235 ed their use of IMRT substantially more than urologists who did not own such services.

236 92, through December 31, 2002, and the 2,080 urologists who provided care to them.

237 Urologists who use radiographic imaging in the care of t

238 Several months later he saw an urologist, who palpated a suspicious mass on the left te

239 As urologists will continue to rely on percutaneous nephrol

240 In light of these findings, pediatric urologists will need to reexamine treatment modalities f

241 is review is aimed to provide the practicing urologist with an important source of clinically relevan

242 opic and laparoscopic techniques provide the urologist with the best opportunity to individualize tre

243 g affected patients as well as providing the urologist with the current evidenced-based data regardin

244 us disease physicians, urogynecologists, and urologists with expertise in rUTI, highlighting updated

245 able correlation was likewise observed among urologists with high-volume prostate cancer practices (S

246 a substantial number of men still present to urologists with locally advanced or metastatic disease.

247 iliation and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.85) for urologists with minor versus major academic affiliations

248 context were 1.66 (95% CI, 1.27 to 2.16) for urologists with no academic affiliation and 1.45 (95% CI

249 urve, reported to be less than five cases in urologists, with previous transurethral resection experi

250 ility of observation was calculated for each urologist within each risk stratum, and the association

251 s significantly greater for patients who saw urologists without an academic affiliation.

252 , an ear, nose, and throat specialist, and a urologist; women were systematically seen by a gynecolog

253 The rate of IMRT use by urologists working at National Comprehensive Cancer Netw

254 first or second-line therapy for practicing urologists would be well accepted.

255 e percent of radiation oncologists vs 16% of urologists would recommend routine prostate-specific ant

256 ed whether or not knowledgeable in the field urologists would use gene transfer in their patients onc