戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 he interpretation of subsequent words in the utterance.
2 re processed by the brain at the time of its utterance.
3  their dynamic interpretation of the current utterance.
4 ng) from the coded meaning of the linguistic utterance.
5 e goal, meaning, and affective subtext of an utterance.
6 h typically involving one to three words per utterance.
7  intensity, for example, the loudness of the utterance.
8 eded to interpret the intended meaning of an utterance.
9 ese elementary building blocks into coherent utterances.
10 e syntactic complexity of naturally produced utterances.
11 oice clips and for speakers across different utterances.
12  minute when residents did not make positive utterances.
13 cing study of participant ratings of officer utterances.
14 as correlates with the sound envelope of the utterances.
15  isomorphism in the mapping from meanings to utterances.
16 se these predictions to monitor the upcoming utterances.
17 sk of recovering intended meaning from noisy utterances.
18 imized for processing meaningful conspecific utterances.
19 s) that describe the acceptable structure of utterances.
20  ironic comments or interpreting non-literal utterances.
21 the production of increasingly refined vocal utterances.
22 ngths, and higher likelihoods of single-word utterances.
23 back perturbations applied to two classes of utterances: (1) those that fell nearer to the category b
24 tivity simply because we rarely know all the utterances a child has experienced.
25 endency length is actually minimized in real utterances across many languages; previous work has focu
26 d with the repetition of the nonsense speech utterance "ah-wah." This speech task involved the recrui
27 ction (full contextual applicability) of the utterance and actively engaged the subject in learning (
28  and structure of articulatory events before utterance and reflected the segmentation of phonetic seq
29 that linguistic markers such as word choice, utterance and sentence structures can potentially serve
30 ordings to detect when they heard or said an utterance and to then decode the utterance's identity.
31 e resting lip shape from articulation of the utterances and accounted for 17.2% of the total variance
32 as significant in discriminating between the utterances and accounted for 72.8% of the total variance
33 k-specific processes (including attention to utterances and attempts to overcome pre-response conflic
34 typically consists of a combination of vocal utterances and body language.
35 ith speakers making predictions of their own utterances and comprehenders making predictions of other
36  for residents who made one or more negative utterances and decreased for residents who made no negat
37   Alterations occurred in 56% of interpreted utterances and included additions, omissions, substituti
38 so found that increased noise led to shorter utterances and increased gaze to the speaker's mouth.
39 , describers produced increasingly efficient utterances and matchers made increasingly accurate selec
40                               Staff positive utterances and resident positive and negative utterances
41 ic space for vocalisations that elicit adult utterances and vice versa, inspired by research on anima
42 oal), repetitiveness (recurrent behaviors or utterances), and rigidity (emphasis on fidelity and inva
43 , such as syntactic complexity and length of utterance, and decreased by changes in perception, such
44 nted into 4 basic levels - Discussion, Goal, Utterance, and Speech Task.
45 t it means for speakers to predict their own utterances, and how prediction during production can be
46 onal turns, parent verbal responses to child utterances, and words produced by parents in 3 different
47 ice box, and it is thought that more complex utterances are produced solely by dynamic changes in lar
48 dings' origins reliably perceived chimpanzee utterances as syllabic utterances, primarily as "ma-ma",
49 henders making predictions of other people's utterances at different linguistic levels.
50 dition, in which speakers repeated the study utterances at test, and a "different sentence" condition
51 e has a distinct systematic structure, where utterances break into individually meaningful words that
52 ard speech, that is, the capacity to produce utterances by reversing the order of phonemes while reta
53 el linguistic features resulting from verbal utterances could aid diagnosis of patients with probable
54 CG occurred only during articulation of long utterances due to a continuous mismatch between produced
55 vements, can lead to illusory agency over VB utterances even though the participant does not speak.
56 y meetings, physicians should speak in short utterances (fewer than 20 words) and ask interpreters to
57 rammars to parse all of the unique multiword utterances from transcriptions of separate recordings of
58  to five synthesized CVC_CV (e.g., /dad_da/) utterances have been examined using information-theoreti
59 lyzed to generate seven ALMs: mean length of utterance in morphemes, number of different word roots (
60 e plausible meaning is close to the observed utterance in terms of the number of edits; (ii) this pro
61 ed, adjusted, and shifted the signs in their utterances in conversationally appropriate rejoinders.
62  human brain must resolve variability across utterances in intonation, speech rate, volume, accents a
63 c role for the cerebellum in enabling fluent utterances in persons who stutter.
64 decreased for residents who made no negative utterances in the videos.
65 the place of words, and function as complete utterances in their own right.
66 hildren, as well as characteristics of their utterances in which the determiner was omitted.
67 ounts propose that the prosodic structure of utterances (including their syllabic rhythm and speech m
68  a listener's ability to predict a speaker's utterance increases such neural coupling between speaker
69 tterances and resident positive and negative utterances (independent variables) and food intake (depe
70     The ontology also defines core low-level utterance interaction for communicating human papillomav
71 ign of the ontology and the execution of the utterance interaction.
72  sound when language is generated before any utterance is produced or heard.
73 or effects based on features of the produced utterance itself or on idiosyncratic features of the add
74       In addition, the use of text-dependent utterances leads to more consistent and accurate models.
75                   To minimize repetition and utterance length, languages use pronouns, like the word
76 ulting in reduced lexical diversity, shorter utterance lengths, and higher likelihoods of single-word
77 novel SER model based on the learning of the utterance-level spectrogram.
78 that is part of the ability to construct new utterances minimally requires a 'context-free' grammar t
79 n linguistic features such as Mean Length of Utterance (MLU) and Mean Length of Turn Ratio (MLT Ratio
80 nce even the earliest and most simple verbal utterances must have increased the versatility of vocal
81    Time-frequency analysis revealed that the utterance of fillers, compared to that of ordinary words
82  which brain networks are engaged during the utterance of fillers.
83 arning linguistic biomarkers from the verbal utterances of elderly individuals could help the clinica
84 tax-lexicon trade-off is also present in the utterances of healthy speakers (n = 99) taking part in a
85 pecific role of the cerebellum in the fluent utterances of persons who stutter.
86       In non-human animals, variation across utterances of vocal signals also carries behaviorally re
87 f positive utterances with resident positive utterances (p=.030), the interaction effect of staff pos
88 ated with increased number of staff positive utterances per minute when residents did not make positi
89 ated with increased number of staff positive utterances per minute, especially when residents made be
90 when residents made between 0 and 3 positive utterances per minute.
91 y completed more sessions and generated more utterances per session, their completion rate (0.35) was
92  the nature of sequencing of subgoals during utterance planning in language production.
93 of amplitude-frequency combinations in human utterances predicts both the structure of the chromatic
94  perceived chimpanzee utterances as syllabic utterances, primarily as "ma-ma", among foil syllables.
95 lyses were used to quantify the coherence of utterances produced in the scanner, allowing identificat
96 roca's area correlates with the sound of the utterances produced.
97 yses of how visible bodily action is used in utterance production is reexplained.
98 red with abrupt stopping in the middle of an utterance, rather than naturally completing a phrase.
99        She was unable to track multisyllabic utterances reliably and was insensitive to vision when i
100                 For a bilingual human, every utterance requires a choice about which language to use.
101  or said an utterance and to then decode the utterance's identity.
102 he situation in which speakers fashion their utterances so as to cater to the needs of their addresse
103 am correlates with the sound envelope of the utterances, starting before any sound is produced and ev
104 production or comprehension of single speech utterances such as syllables, words, or sentences.
105 nversational turns from listeners' secondary utterances, such as backchannels, brief interjections, a
106  total adult speech and child speech-related utterances, suggesting a specific role for interactive l
107 ecognize familiar human voices from variable utterances, suggesting the acquisition of speech-invaria
108                 Humans regularly produce new utterances that are understood by other members of the s
109         Using a method involving "composite" utterances that include normal words alongside novel non
110 ive system--we routinely produce well-formed utterances that we have never heard before.
111 he vowel sound and playing back the modified utterance to the subject through headphones.
112 -modulation was imposed on target and masker utterances to enhance perceptual fusion between the two
113 ted the fundamental frequency of their later utterances toward the stimulus voice.
114 how personality impressions for brief social utterances transfer across languages and whether acousti
115 select and extract linguistic information as utterances unfold.
116 cortex controls the initiation of volitional utterances via a dedicated network of vocal selective ne
117                                       Longer utterances were associated with more alterations.
118             We decode produced and perceived utterances with accuracy rates as high as 61% and 76%, r
119 0), the interaction effect of staff positive utterances with food type (p=.027), and the interaction
120 es: the interaction effect of staff positive utterances with resident positive utterances (p=.030), t
121 tical recordings while 14 participants spoke utterances with varying phonemic and syllabic sequence c
122  the interaction effect of resident negative utterances with video duration (p=0.002).
123 lves identifying the emotional state of each utterance within a dialogue, plays a vital role in devel
124 ware of the overall meaning of the speaker's utterance without the need to direct attention to indivi
125 ed in a picture-book activity; the number of utterances, word tokens, and word types used by parents
126 ary results raise the hypothesis that filler utterance would often occur when large-scale networks ac

 
Page Top