コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 TILs) could mediate regression of metastatic uveal melanoma.
2 umour regression in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
3 RAB31 was a predictor of metastasis risk in uveal melanoma.
4 lps determine the diagnosis and prognosis in uveal melanoma.
5 protein-1 gene (BAP1) predispose carriers to uveal melanoma.
6 ion retinopathy and alternative therapies of uveal melanoma.
7 etected in 2 of 8 families with a history of uveal melanoma.
8 ptomatic metastases in patients with primary uveal melanoma.
9 stemic surveillance in patients with primary uveal melanoma.
10 e, 2131 deaths were the result of metastatic uveal melanoma.
11 nti-cMET monoclonal antibodies in metastatic uveal melanoma.
12 embers of this kindred reported a history of uveal melanoma.
13 r exploited as a biomarker for monitoring of uveal melanoma.
14 the initiation and metastatic progression of uveal melanoma.
15 esized to play a role in the pathogenesis of uveal melanoma.
16 cificity in the identification of metastatic uveal melanoma.
17 protein 1 gene) are frequently identified in uveal melanoma.
18 edition of the AJCCCancer Staging Manual for uveal melanoma.
19 tient-specific data fields for patients with uveal melanoma.
20 ng the standard of care in the management of uveal melanoma.
21 overall survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
22 thought to occur early in the development of uveal melanoma.
23 ars to be a prognostic factor for death from uveal melanoma.
24 individual prediction model of survival from uveal melanoma.
25 -year period of 47 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma.
26 ng response to targeted molecular therapy in uveal melanoma.
27 e targeted molecular agents in patients with uveal melanoma.
28 ccination is feasible and safe in metastatic uveal melanoma.
29 n on 5-year risk of death after diagnosis of uveal melanoma.
30 is not recommended as a prognostic marker in uveal melanoma.
31 resolution after brachytherapy of posterior uveal melanoma.
32 cancer cells as well as Galpha(q/11) mutated uveal melanoma.
33 be made for or against specific therapy for uveal melanoma.
34 x of the GEP test in patients with posterior uveal melanoma.
35 hods in uveal tract disorders, especially in uveal melanoma.
36 ther showed that vitamin D is metabolized in uveal melanoma.
37 of BET inhibition in patients with advanced uveal melanoma.
38 sduction axis is crucial for tumor growth in uveal melanoma.
39 DOTA-MC1RL as a novel therapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.
40 of these targeted therapies in patients with uveal melanoma.
41 led for enucleation as primary treatment for uveal melanoma.
42 A total of 1059 patients with uveal melanoma.
43 a promising potential therapeutic target in uveal melanoma.
44 cinoma, mesothelioma and meningioma, but not uveal melanoma.
45 D147 and MMP-2 was analyzed in 49 samples of uveal melanomas.
46 d MMP-2 were expressed in 47 (96.0 %) of the uveal melanomas.
47 ha and RORgamma in the human uveal tract and uveal melanomas.
48 tely half of the patients died of metastatic uveal melanoma (10-year rate, 48.5%; 95% CI, 43.0%-54.4%
49 uveal melanoma xenografts, 57 patients with uveal melanoma (17 patients whose tumors metastasized an
51 atients treated with plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma, 73 (1%) developed radiotherapy-induced s
52 y period 515 enucleations were performed for uveal melanoma, 99 (19%) of which were secondary enuclea
53 aluated the mechanisms of BETi resistance in uveal melanoma, a disease with little treatment options,
54 ying YAP as a suitable therapeutic target in uveal melanoma, a GNAQ/GNA11-initiated human malignancy.
56 aluated 48 patients with local recurrence of uveal melanoma after primary treatment with brachytherap
58 52 studies, reporting on 1010 patients with uveal melanoma and 34 intraocular metastases, were eligi
59 ent selection criteria included diagnosis of uveal melanoma and adequate records to allow tumor stagi
60 ermline BAP1 mutations occur infrequently in uveal melanoma and are associated with larger tumors and
62 concepts of the cytogenetic pathogenesis of uveal melanoma and demonstrate the potential problems an
63 t is the most robust prognostic indicator in uveal melanoma and early studies of mostly larger tumors
64 responses were observed in one patient with uveal melanoma and four of 15 evaluable patients with RC
65 issense variants we identified are common in uveal melanoma and have been shown to constitutively act
66 between the BAP1 immunoreactivity of primary uveal melanoma and other clinicopathologic features.
71 is an efficacious primary method of treating uveal melanomas and intraocular metastases, with reliabl
74 ormed multi-region DNA sequencing of primary uveal melanomas and their matched metastases from 35 pat
75 alpha subunits, are the driver oncogenes in uveal melanoma, and mutations in Gq-linked G protein-cou
77 enase [LDH]) perform poorly in patients with uveal melanoma, and the search for new biomarkers is nee
78 uveal melanoma; iii) metastasizing disomy 3 uveal melanoma; and iv) monosomy 3 uveal melanoma with l
79 Recent advances in the molecular genetics of uveal melanoma are revolutionizing our understanding of
83 edictive of metastasis in patients harboring uveal melanoma associated with oculo(dermal) melanocytos
84 mber 2013 among 120 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma at 15 academic oncology centers in the Un
85 Sampling of a clinically diagnosed posterior uveal melanoma at a single site for prognostic GEP testi
86 treated with primary proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma at the oncology service at Charite-Berlin
88 lopment of a new molecular classification of uveal melanoma based on a widely available 15-gene expre
90 linical macular edema is common in eyes with uveal melanoma before and at 4 months after plaque radio
91 indicated only in case of re-recurrences of uveal melanoma, but not because of secondary complicatio
92 GNAQ and GNA11 are frequently mutated in uveal melanoma, but they remain difficult therapeutic ta
93 Quantification of the risk of developing uveal melanoma can enhance counseling regarding surveill
96 t was studied in the conditioned medium of 9 uveal melanoma cell lines and in the blood serum samples
99 resistance in newly characterized metastatic uveal melanoma cell lines to clinical-grade MEK inhibito
100 ARF6 with a small-molecule inhibitor reduces uveal melanoma cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in a
101 ere, in a series of experiments, using human uveal melanoma cells (MEL 270), human embryonic kidney c
106 bility and for MC1R-specific cytotoxicity in uveal melanoma cells, and the lanthanum-DOTA-MC1RL analo
107 Galphaq promotes the YAP-dependent growth of uveal melanoma cells, thereby identifying YAP as a suita
114 ic FNAB had an unequivocal primary posterior uveal melanoma clinically, while patients who underwent
116 From the Wills Eye Hospital Oncology Service Uveal Melanoma Cytogenetic Database (N = 1172), 128 pati
117 shed new light on the molecular genetics of uveal melanoma, delineating it as an atypical tumor of t
118 every 4 months after plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma demonstrated OCT-evident macular edema, c
119 , whereas somatic Galpha11 mutations mediate uveal melanoma development by constitutively up-regulati
123 high local tumor control rates in recurrent uveal melanoma, especially if the primary therapy was tr
124 ondition that can lead to the development of uveal melanoma, estimated at 1 in 400 affected patients.
125 astatic death in 299 patients with posterior uveal melanoma evaluated by fine-needle aspiration biops
127 ent selection criteria included diagnosis of uveal melanoma from April 1, 2001, to April 1, 2011, ade
129 All patients with a clinical diagnosis of uveal melanoma from May 2009 to July 2013 who underwent
132 ing brachytherapy in patients with posterior uveal melanoma, given that an understanding of the recur
133 One patient without a family history of uveal melanoma had a single nucleotide substitution in t
137 The techniques for assessing prognosis in uveal melanoma have evolved from simple physical feature
139 r molecular prognostication in patients with uveal melanoma; however, class 1 and class 2 test result
140 te four clinically well-defined subgroups of uveal melanoma: i) disomy 3 uveal melanoma with long-ter
141 his analysis, we included 3088 patients with uveal melanoma, identified from a hospital-based cohort
142 etecting metastases in patients with primary uveal melanoma, if combined with LFT and, in case of any
143 -term survival; ii) metastasizing monosomy 3 uveal melanoma; iii) metastasizing disomy 3 uveal melano
145 se patients from 6 families had a history of uveal melanoma in 1 relative, and 2 patients from 2 addi
147 nhance the host's antitumor immunity against uveal melanoma in approximately one third of patients.
149 ons between vitamin D signaling elements and uveal melanoma in comparison to uveal tract encourage fu
152 ents who underwent secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma in the London Ocular Oncology Service, be
153 naling pathways in the human uveal tract and uveal melanoma, including analysis of the expression of
154 d, repeatable system for dividing metastatic uveal melanoma into distinct prognostic subgroups, espec
159 pression of the oncoprotein c-Met in primary uveal melanoma is associated with metastatic progression
161 loss following episcleral brachytherapy for uveal melanoma is difficult to predict for individual pa
162 results challenge the belief that metastatic uveal melanoma is immunotherapy resistant and support th
168 ion regarding the long-term risk of dying of uveal melanoma may be useful to clinicians when counseli
171 ted protein-1 (BAP1) gene has been linked to uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, meningioma, renal cell car
172 tin 1 receptor (MC1R) is expressed in 94% of uveal melanoma metastases, and a MC1R-specific ligand (M
177 lignancies among BAP1 mutation carriers were uveal melanoma (n = 60 [28%]), mesothelioma (n = 48 [22%
179 tosis group was matched with 2 patients with uveal melanoma not associated with ocular melanocytosis
181 of certain heterotrimeric G proteins, drive uveal melanoma oncogenesis by triggering multiple downst
184 egate the clinical outcomes of patients with uveal melanomas or intraocular metastases treated primar
185 onsecutive patients diagnosed with posterior uveal melanoma over a 5-year period who were evaluated w
189 rm outcomes concerning globe preservation in uveal melanoma patients after proton beam therapy with t
190 in vivo and a subset of liver metastases of uveal melanoma patients express activated forms of ERBB2
192 The age at diagnosis and the gender of the uveal melanoma patients with BAP1 germline pathogenic va
196 on exists was derived from the prevalence of uveal melanoma, prevalence of germline BAP1 pathogenic v
197 ecent discovery of major driver mutations in uveal melanoma provide a rational basis for development
198 ee on Cancer's 7th Edition Classification of Uveal Melanoma," published online January 2, 2015, in JA
201 e 3, 2003, and March 18, 2008, patients with uveal melanoma received SDRT monotherapy (group 1, 60 pa
205 of proinflammatory genes in freshly cultured uveal melanoma samples was studied in an in vitro 24-hou
206 s-generating study of patients with advanced uveal melanoma, selumetinib compared with chemotherapy r
210 edle aspiration biopsy for cytopathology and uveal melanoma-specific GEP testing for molecular progno
215 tereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma that cannot be handled with ruthenium-bra
219 e after I-125 brachytherapy in patients with uveal melanoma treated and followed in a Spanish referra
220 ospective chart review of 7872 patients with uveal melanoma treated at the Ocular Oncology Service, W
221 dy reviewing data from patients with primary uveal melanoma treated between October 2003 and October
222 nd histology slides of patients with primary uveal melanoma treated by enucleation were reviewed.
225 onic lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer and uveal melanoma tumor samples, we show that hundreds of c
226 Severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing uveal melanoma tumors or engineered MC1R-positive and -n
228 e of genetic risk factors in the etiology of uveal melanoma (UM) has been strongly suggested, the gen
229 ound Overall survival (OS) for patients with uveal melanoma (UM) hepatic metastases is extremely poor
245 eration (SCD) has been observed in eyes with uveal melanoma (UM), but, to our knowledge, a definitive
246 n 1 (BAP1) are associated with metastasis in uveal melanoma (UM), the deadliest adult eye cancer.
247 11) proteins, occur in about 85% of cases of uveal melanoma (UM), the most common cancer of the adult
251 e been described in the following 5 genes in uveal melanoma (UM): BAP1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, and SF3B
252 Comprehensive multiplatform analysis of 80 uveal melanomas (UM) identifies four molecularly distinc
254 is associated with more benign behavior for uveal melanomas (UMs) with an otherwise high risk of met
255 BASE for studies reporting survival data for uveal melanoma undergoing prognostic testing with chromo
256 sc-Met levels in patients with nonmetastatic uveal melanoma vs patients with metastatic uveal melanom
258 quencing from blood samples of patients with uveal melanoma was correlated with clinical characterist
260 Two hundred fifteen patients whose primary uveal melanoma was managed in the Helsinki University Ho
261 nts aged 45 to 79 years with newly diagnosed uveal melanoma was recruited between 2002 and 2004 from
262 EER database, the median age at diagnosis of uveal melanomas was 63 (range 3-99 years) with a male-to
264 Main prognostic factors for the death of uveal melanoma were ciliary body involvement (HR: 1.7 (9
265 l of 21 consecutive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled between June 7, 2013, and S
266 y, patients with melanocytosis who developed uveal melanoma were found to have double the risk for me
270 tant Galpha11 proteins causing FHH2, ADH2 or uveal melanoma were transfected in CaSR-expressing HEK29
272 Indications for secondary enucleations for uveal melanoma were tumor recurrence, neovascular glauco
273 ntroduce the first transgenic mouse model of uveal melanoma, which develops cancers induced by expres
274 therapies are greatly needed for metastatic uveal melanoma, which has a very poor prognosis with a m
275 ariants in consecutive Finnish patients with uveal melanoma who come from a high-risk region for the
276 logy referral center among 507 patients with uveal melanoma who consented for collection of blood sam
277 ic variants of BAP1 in Finnish patients with uveal melanoma who live in a high-risk region for this c
278 survival in high-risk patients with primary uveal melanoma who received adjuvant sunitinib with inst
279 ce of 96 patients with clinical diagnosis of uveal melanoma who underwent prognostication at the time
281 cutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of uveal melanoma who were treated at the Cleveland Clinic
283 metastasis differs in patients with primary uveal melanoma with different grades of nuclear BAP1 imm
284 sion was found to be a peripapillary primary uveal melanoma with distinct non-pigmented and pigmented
286 al was significantly longer in patients with uveal melanoma with high nuclear BAP1 stain (P = 0.004).
287 in patients treated with proton therapy for uveal melanoma with ischemic retinal detachment prevente
288 Ninety-six patients affected by posterior uveal melanoma with large exudative retinal detachment (
290 ned subgroups of uveal melanoma: i) disomy 3 uveal melanoma with long-term survival; ii) metastasizin
291 sforming our understanding and management of uveal melanoma with the ultimate goal of improving patie
292 nal experience with plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanomas with a focus on local control rates, fac
293 iogenesis was present in the ciliary body in uveal melanomas with and without extraocular extension,
295 ilimumab demonstrates activity in metastatic uveal melanoma, with deep and sustained confirmed respon
296 iated protein-1 (BAP1) expression of primary uveal melanomas without and with metastasis, and to anal
297 nes and the blood serum samples of mice with uveal melanoma xenografts contained significant levels o
299 d in the blood serum samples of 24 mice with uveal melanoma xenografts, 57 patients with uveal melano
300 c uveal melanoma vs patients with metastatic uveal melanoma yielded an area under the curve of 0.82 (