コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ated PDE5A1 catalytic domain in complex with vardenafil.
2 effect on affinity for cAMP, sildenafil, or vardenafil.
3 .60, 1.9 +/- 0.37, and 2.7 +/- 0.25 nM); and vardenafil (0.091 +/- 0.031, 0.38 +/- 0.07, 0.27 +/- 0.0
7 ertional angina due to ischemic CAD received vardenafil 10 mg or placebo, followed by ETT (5 to 10 me
8 ed mild major depression received placebo or vardenafil, 10 mg/day, for 4 weeks, with the option to t
11 method was applied in a formal synthesis of vardenafil, a well-known representative of this class of
13 binding affinity of [(3)H]tadalafil or [(3)H]vardenafil, an effect presumably mediated by cGMP bindin
15 cGMP signaling pathways, FASS-LTP identified vardenafil and Bay-73-6691 (phosphodiesterase-5 and -9 i
17 nding of two phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, vardenafil and sildenafil, to the retina rod phosphodies
19 erase-5 (PDE5) is the target for sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil, which are drugs for treatment
20 major determinant of potency, especially for vardenafil, and that binding of vardenafil and sildenafi
21 PDE5) inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) are agents currently in clinical use for non
22 phase binds selectively to a PDE5 inhibitor, Vardenafil, as well as its molecular variant, but not to
23 GAF-B had 7- to 18-fold higher affinity for vardenafil-based compounds compared with those lacking a
25 f membrane-associated PDE6 holoenzyme, [(3)H]vardenafil binding increases in proportion to the extent
26 e filtration assay we used to quantify [(3)H]vardenafil binding to PDE6 required histone II-AS to sta
28 amma1-60 binding to the GAF domain increased vardenafil but not cGMP affinity, indicating that substr
31 the conformation of the H-loop in the PDE5A1-vardenafil complex is different from those of any known
32 otherapy response in ependymoma patients and vardenafil, currently used to treat paediatric pulmonary
33 In addition, the molecular configuration of vardenafil differs from that of sildenafil when bound to
34 gy of tadalafil to mouse PDE5A compared with vardenafil, due to steric clashes of vardenafil with a s
41 nt study assessed the safety and efficacy of vardenafil in men with erectile dysfunction and untreate
42 hosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors sildenafil and vardenafil induces a parallel release of Abeta due to a
43 analogs demonstrated that higher potency of vardenafil is caused by differences in its double ring.
46 mice with the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor vardenafil (Levitra) mobilized FoxO3a to the nucleus of
47 al administration of sildenafil (Viagra) and vardenafil (Levitra), inhibitors of cGMP-specific PDE5,
49 s (PDE-5i, such as Sildenafil, Tadalafil and Vardenafil, mainly prescribed to treat erectile dysfunct
50 terminal ends of Galpha(T) and the inhibitor vardenafil occupying the active sites on the PDEalpha an
51 addition, prolonged incubation of PDE6 with vardenafil or sildenafil (but not 3-isobutyl-1-methylxan
55 and nonselective inhibitors, and that higher vardenafil potency over sildenafil and tadalafil results
58 in, which forms bidentate bonds with 5'-GMP, vardenafil, sildenafil, and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine
63 erapy agent, adriamycin, in combination with vardenafil survived significantly longer than rats treat
64 urthermore, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, vardenafil, synergizes with EGCG to induce cancer cell d
65 se-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, such as sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, mirodenafil, and udenafil, and ho
66 rugs for erectile dysfunction, tadalafil and vardenafil, trigger bone gain in mice through a combinat
70 ed with vardenafil, due to steric clashes of vardenafil with a single methionine residue at position