戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 linical settings (e.g., trauma, shock, major vascular surgery).
2 uction in morbidity for elective general and vascular surgery).
3 y, and 52,025 pairs of patients admitted for vascular surgery.
4  complications within 30 days of general and vascular surgery.
5 alth Foundation (UK) and European Society of Vascular Surgery.
6 up classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.
7  guidelines for risk stratification in major vascular surgery.
8 ients with a positive stress test undergoing vascular surgery.
9 up classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.
10 or alternatives to native vein or artery for vascular surgery.
11 e perioperative renal injury associated with vascular surgery.
12 n significantly improve outcomes after major vascular surgery.
13 on outcome in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery.
14 including the use and timing of prophylactic vascular surgery.
15 rts in preventing this major complication of vascular surgery.
16 are and cost after hospitalization for major vascular surgery.
17 plications in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery.
18 o ePTFE as a vascular conduit for peripheral vascular surgery.
19 r no revascularization before elective major vascular surgery.
20 omplex cases in pelvic, liver, pancreas, and vascular surgery.
21 rm the procedure: cardiology, radiology, and vascular surgery.
22 lity in patients undergoing major noncardiac vascular surgery.
23  peripheral arterial disease before elective vascular surgery.
24 and mortality in patients who have undergone vascular surgery.
25 rioperative myocardial infarction (MI) after vascular surgery.
26 ath after hospitalization for elective major vascular surgery.
27  using ultrasound in 187 patients undergoing vascular surgery.
28 ful in the management of patients undergoing vascular surgery.
29 th atherosclerosis and restenosis seen after vascular surgery.
30 mplete an additional year-long fellowship in vascular surgery.
31 icial in protection against restenosis after vascular surgery.
32 esults in outcome improvement after elective vascular surgery.
33 omes in a large population of candidates for vascular surgery.
34 njury (AKI) predicts death after cardiac and vascular surgery.
35 l, hepatobiliary, upper gastrointestinal and vascular surgery.
36 tion to ameliorate vascular remodeling after vascular surgery.
37 fy their priorities for outcome reporting in vascular surgery.
38 rombosis after endovascular interventions or vascular surgery.
39 s in patients undergoing non-cardiac and non-vascular surgery.
40 C transfusion throughout hospitalization for vascular surgery.
41 apaverine is used as an antispasmodic during vascular surgery.
42 ory capacity and AKI after major cardiac and vascular surgery.
43 ral surgery, and 42801 procedures (18.1%) in vascular surgery.
44 cations were the most common indications for vascular surgery.
45 ascular Surgery and the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
46 osclerotic cardiovascular disease undergoing vascular surgery.
47 nclude manual compression, stent grafts, and vascular surgery.
48 icoagulant of choice, such as for cardiac or vascular surgery.
49 uring a hospitalization for elective general/vascular surgery.
50 ted for preventing restenosis following open vascular surgery.
51 atients undergoing major elective general or vascular surgery.
52 up classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.
53  (without postoperative heparin) for cardiac/vascular surgery.
54 rectal, pediatric, neurological surgery, and vascular surgery.
55  in patients undergoing general elective and vascular surgery.
56 cal outcome in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery.
57 ong awaited and much anticipated advance for vascular surgery.
58 s in patients undergoing non-cardiac and non-vascular surgeries.
59 er C-indices (0.778, general surgery; 0.638, vascular surgery; 0.760, general plus vascular surgery)
60 6.8%; 95% CI, 28.3%-46.3%), those undergoing vascular surgery (45.8%; 95% CI, 37.7%-54.1%), and perso
61      Data from 2,747 (general surgery 2,251; vascular surgery 496) non-VA hospital cases were compare
62                Data included 2229 general or vascular surgeries, 699 of which were conducted after NS
63 to data from 41,360 (general surgery 31,393; vascular surgery 9,967) VA cases.
64 r in the 66.7% of 13,863 patients undergoing vascular surgery (95% CI, 65.9%-67.5%) than in the 37.4%
65 OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.58-4.89) patients and in vascular surgery, a high-intensity specialty, for very f
66 e-specific mortality for patients undergoing vascular surgery, a proportional subdistribution hazards
67 captures information on patients who undergo vascular surgery across 796 academic and community hospi
68                              The decrease in vascular surgery also began before DHR but continued aft
69 ary-artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery among patients with stable cardiac symp
70 ospinal fluid (CSF) cytokines increase after vascular surgery and 2.
71 py to prevent limb amputation, and both open vascular surgery and endovascular therapy play a key rol
72 uthors initiated an integrated fellowship in vascular surgery and interventional radiology and now re
73                             The attitudes of vascular surgery and interventional radiology faculty an
74                                              Vascular surgery and interventional radiology faculty me
75 fellowship provides exceptional training for vascular surgery and interventional radiology fellows in
76                               Integration of vascular surgery and interventional radiology fellowship
77 erative AKI is common in patients undergoing vascular surgery and is associated with a high risk for
78 n elderly patients recovering from inpatient vascular surgery and nosocomial infections did not occur
79 ial for automating patient identification in vascular surgery and other medical registries, reducing
80 y receiving such medications; interestingly, vascular surgery and patients with known cardiac history
81 re was no significant difference between the vascular surgery and radiology fellows in either the spe
82                       During the fellowship, vascular surgery and radiology fellows perform both vasc
83                                         Both vascular surgery and radiology-based fellows spend one q
84 ed treatment guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery and the European Society for Vascular S
85 C-indices of 0.942 (general surgery), 0.915 (vascular surgery), and 0.934 (general plus vascular surg
86  for general surgery, 15.5% (128 of 828) for vascular surgery, and 10.7% (36 of 336) for gynecologic
87  of angina or dyspnea, hemoglobin <12 mg/dl, vascular surgery, and emergency surgery.
88  however, rates of AKI were high (24%) after vascular surgery, and increased steadily after gastroint
89 tions such as stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular surgery, and organ transplant.
90 , general anesthesia, head and neck surgery, vascular surgery, and prolonged surgery.
91 hopedic surgery, general surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and urologic surgery.
92 al fellowship in plastic, cardiothoracic, or vascular surgery; and had an active email address on fil
93                   Hospitalizations requiring vascular surgery are associated with high in-hospital mo
94                 Single-quality indicators in vascular surgery are often not distinctive and insuffici
95 l paradigms may be necessary in which either vascular surgery as an essential component is abandoned
96 gery procedures that required intraoperative vascular surgery assistance between January 2010 and Jun
97                    Exposures: Intraoperative vascular surgery assistance stratified by need for vascu
98                          The indications for vascular surgery assistance were 156 spine exposure (52%
99 pectrum of cases that require intraoperative vascular surgery assistance.
100 of 1,226,479 patients undergoing general and vascular surgery at 263 hospitals participating in ACS N
101 ta for 48,720 patients undergoing general or vascular surgery at 52 hospitals between July 2012 and A
102 ted within the TDCJ and underwent general or vascular surgery at the University of Texas Medical Bran
103 owship program in July 2016, the Division of Vascular Surgery at the University of Vermont Medical Ce
104 o were incarcerated and underwent general or vascular surgery at UTMB from 2012 to 2021.
105 ts (n = 184,843) undergoing major general or vascular surgery between October 1, 2001, and September
106                        Similarly, older age, vascular surgery, bleeding event, and renal dysfunction
107 sion in patients undergoing non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery, but the evidence is very uncertain abo
108  used in general surgery, and to some extent vascular surgery, but this was not apparent in orthopedi
109 on sutured inguinal incisions after elective vascular surgery can decrease the incidence of surgical
110       The cohort comprised 1,081 consecutive vascular surgery candidates at five medical centers.
111 ostic impact, will reliably stratify risk in vascular surgery candidates referred for dipyridamole-th
112 perfusion and dobutamine echocardiography in vascular surgery candidates, a synopsis of predictive es
113 alidate a Bayesian risk prediction model for vascular surgery candidates.
114 diction models tend to underestimate risk in vascular surgery candidates.
115 udy of patients who underwent elective major vascular surgery - carotid endarterectomy, EVAR, open AA
116  costs of emergency and elective general and vascular surgery cases (N = 190,826) within 34 hospitals
117 ft repair of the thoracic aorta at the local vascular surgery clinic.
118 trial, 235 patients were randomized at 22 VA vascular surgery clinics.
119                                 A Society of Vascular Surgery comorbidity score >15 was the primary p
120                                              Vascular surgery continues to rapidly evolve, most notab
121 with a positive stress test undergoing major vascular surgery demonstrated significantly fewer periop
122 eon charges, and the collection rate for the vascular surgery division (30.2%) obtained from the Facu
123 inguinal interventions performed by a single vascular surgery division.
124 ary-artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery does not significantly alter the long-t
125  more relevant in the field of angiology and vascular surgery due to their potential benefit in the i
126 rth American and European sites, we compared vascular surgery (e.g., thrombectomy or bypass surgery)
127 mortality, patient risk profile, Society for Vascular Surgery-endorsed diameter compliance, off-label
128 ing chief general surgery resident (GSR) and vascular surgery fellow (VSF).
129 ogy fellows there was uniform agreement that vascular surgery fellows benefit from training in nonvas
130 erformed by all interventional radiology and vascular surgery fellows from a prospectively maintained
131                                              Vascular surgery fellows then complete an additional yea
132 er of years of training) and the traditional vascular surgery fellowship program (5 + 2, with 5 indic
133 linical practice as compared to graduates of vascular surgery fellowships (VSF).
134 mbers wanted additional training in clinical vascular surgery for the radiology-based fellows.
135 ents who had undergone inpatient general and vascular surgery from 2005 through 2007, using data from
136 lt patients undergoing elective or emergency vascular surgery from 2005 to 2010.
137  44,567 patients undergoing major general or vascular surgery from 2008 to 2012.
138  cohort of 3646 patients underwent inpatient vascular surgery from January 1, 2000, to November 30, 2
139              Nonadherence to the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for post-EVAR imaging was no
140 above age 65 years undergoing elective major vascular surgery had far worse 30-day outcomes when comp
141 ng procedure categories, patients undergoing vascular surgery had greater odds of smoking (OR, 3.24;
142                               Reconstructive vascular surgery has become increasingly common.
143       Patients with ESRD undergoing elective vascular surgery have a significantly elevated risk of p
144                   The functional benefits of vascular surgery have been traditionally assessed by tre
145                    Technological advances in vascular surgery have changed the field dramatically ove
146 aining (as both interventional radiology and vascular surgery have done with a resultant increase in
147 ggest that patients with DGIs at the time of vascular surgery have increased risk of cardiovascular m
148 iency (HR: 2.26; 95% CL: 1.51 to 3.39]), and vascular surgery (HR: 1.48; 95% CL: 1.02 to 2.15]) were
149                                There were 59 vascular surgeries in the cohort, with one death during
150 r disease studies in vitro and as grafts for vascular surgeries in vivo, possibly serving broad biome
151              Patients undergoing general and vascular surgery in high-mortality hospitals have simila
152 ytopenia (HIT) IgG antibodies before cardiac/vascular surgery in patients who have serologically-conf
153 h multiple sources chronicle the practice of vascular surgery in the North African, Mediterranean, an
154 cardiac complications in patients undergoing vascular surgery in this retrospective study.
155                                              Vascular surgery in World War II has long been defined b
156 counts to determine the American practice of vascular surgery in World War II.
157 have evaluated the use of fibrin sealants in vascular surgery, including aortic anastomosis in an ani
158                  Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to
159 irs and acquiring clinical experience in the vascular surgery inpatient and outpatient services.
160 f 995 patients who had undergone general and vascular surgery investigated the association of periope
161                              Lower-extremity vascular surgery is most often indicated for patients wi
162 tery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery is unclear.
163 al cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery) lags behind that in other specialties.
164 ta-blockers in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery merits further evaluation.
165 y(CT) scan before major, elective general or vascular surgery (N = 1453).
166 he foot or leg (n=620, 90.4%), arising after vascular surgery (n=619, 90.2%).
167 surgery, upper abdominal surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, neck surgery, emergency surgery, album
168                             Patients needing vascular surgery often possess management challenges tha
169 rventional radiology, vascular medicine, and vascular surgery; oncologists; basic scientists; the Foo
170                   Service lines in heart and vascular surgery, oncology, and pediatrics have been org
171 nine patients having aortic or infrainguinal vascular surgery or lower extremity amputation were incl
172  are practicing in either general surgery or vascular surgery, or obtaining additional transplant tra
173 d for surgical (visceral surgery: OR = 1.38, vascular surgery: OR = 3.33) and endovascular treatment
174 pnia during reperfusion states such as major vascular surgery, organ transplantation, tissue-graft su
175                                 Patterns for vascular surgery outcomes resembled general surgery; how
176  performing elective orthopedic, plastic, or vascular surgery PARTICIPANTS:: All operating theatres s
177 eta-analysis of studies reporting frailty in vascular surgery patients (PROSPERO registration: CRD420
178 mong a systematic sample of 4119 general and vascular surgery patients at a major academic hospital,
179 study, medical records were reviewed for all vascular surgery patients at a tertiary care university
180  was implemented for all general surgery and vascular surgery patients at our institution in August 2
181 ta were compared to the data for general and vascular surgery patients collected during a concurrent
182 openia, is associated with worse outcomes in vascular surgery patients.
183  leading cause of morbidity and mortality in vascular surgery patients.
184 g-term prognostic information in cardiac and vascular surgery patients.
185 tract clinical data from general surgery and vascular surgery patients.
186 ify factors driving end-of-life decisions in vascular surgery patients.
187 ircumstances surrounding end-of-life care in vascular surgery patients.
188  in cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, vascular surgery, pediatric surgery, obstetrics/gynecolo
189           Among the 3646 patients undergoing vascular surgery, perioperative AKI occurred in 1801 (49
190 days prior to and up to 7 days following the vascular surgery procedure.
191    Certain aspects of care are common to all vascular surgery procedures, including thoracoabdominal
192 ograms, 9 graduates of 0 + 5 programs, and 6 vascular surgery program directors.
193  internal medicine, neurology, radiology and vascular surgery) proposes a comprehensive multi-dimensi
194                              The Society for Vascular Surgery recommends annual surveillance with com
195 py (NPWT) on closed incisions after inguinal vascular surgery regarding surgical site infections (SSI
196                Renal dysfunction after major vascular surgery remains a significant problem.
197 mes, but their impact on patients undergoing vascular surgery remains unknown.
198 es were defined according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards.
199  to evaluate whether graduates of integrated vascular surgery residency (IVSR) programs achieve simil
200 ining paradigms analyzed were the integrated vascular surgery residency program (0 + 5, with 0 indica
201 s were reviewed to estimate baseline CC on a vascular surgery rotation.
202                       Among 5254 Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Registry (1999 CAS; 3255 CEA
203 Medicare data (2000-2009) to the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Registry (2005-2008) and the
204 ely to be at high surgical risk (Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Registry: 96.7% versus 44.5%
205                                   Society of Vascular Surgery scores were used to assess comorbidity
206 ntrareader agreement of the 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS/STS)
207  Structural factors included the overall and vascular surgery-specific time spent in training, wherea
208                                   Trauma and vascular surgery substantially decreased.
209       In our study, surgery by a specialized vascular surgery team using GSV grafts led to adequate l
210 therosclerotic aortic tissue obtained during vascular surgery than in normal aortic tissue, suggestin
211                                           In vascular surgery, the aOR for death favored the high FFP
212  and Research Trust, the European Society of Vascular Surgery, the International Angiology Scientific
213 iate application in cardiac, transplant, and vascular surgery, the mechanisms that underlie thrombus
214    Median reliabilities ranged from 0.05 for vascular surgery to 0.79 for gastroenterology and otolar
215 review the recent literature on intracranial vascular surgery, to summarize the main findings, and to
216 To continue providing this valuable service, vascular surgery trainees need to continue to learn the
217 re recent graduates and program directors of vascular surgery training programs in the United States.
218 ning and 2 indicating the number of years of vascular surgery training).
219                                           As vascular surgery transitions to the outpatient setting,
220 centre, phase 3, randomised trial done at 41 vascular surgery units in the UK (n=39), Sweden (n=1), a
221 s were those who presented to hospital-based vascular surgery units with chronic limb-threatening isc
222 hlights the potential use of the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative for surveil
223                              The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative was queried
224 -popliteal artery disease in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative were studie
225 ery, especially in the context of decreasing vascular surgery volume with the adoption of endovascula
226        The median time from randomization to vascular surgery was 54 days in the revascularization gr
227 ne in atherosclerotic tissue obtained during vascular surgery was sixfold higher than that of normal
228 tly, ESRD patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery were also at higher risk for composite
229      A total of 455 patients undergoing open vascular surgery were followed for 30 days for the occur
230 NSQIP methods and risk models in general and vascular surgery were fully applicable to PS hospitals.
231                         Both angioplasty and vascular surgery were initially successful, but recurren
232 n which adult patients undergoing cardiac or vascular surgery were randomized to different transfusio
233      ESRD patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery were significantly more likely than non
234 0.638, vascular surgery; 0.760, general plus vascular surgery) were obtained following application of
235  (vascular surgery), and 0.934 (general plus vascular surgery) were obtained following application of
236                          Patients undergoing vascular surgery who are at high cardiac risk should als
237  for identifying patients who have undergone vascular surgery who have an increased risk for short-te
238 hronic kidney disease undergoing cardiac and vascular surgery who have dysfunctional, pro-inflammator
239  undergoing elective infrainguinal or aortic vascular surgery who were admitted to the intensive care
240 hirty-nine patients undergoing elective open vascular surgery with inguinal incisions received either
241                              The Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection gra

 
Page Top