ライフサイエンスコーパス: violence

1 for sexual violence, and 16.4% for emotional violence).

2 nt violence (i.e., physical and non-physical violence).

3 risk of depression for women who experience violence.

4 al, and individual levels to prevent firearm violence.

5 iated with the risk of perpetrating physical violence.

6 epression, significantly predicted injurious violence.

7 =1.39) were associated with future injurious violence.

8 ghtened risk of behavioral disinhibition and violence.

9 eported engaging in exclusively noninjurious violence.

10 ingness to actively participate in political violence.

11 swer questions on their experience of sexual violence.

12 risk for both internalized and externalized violence.

13 to 25% of outlets with the highest levels of violence.

14 o empower women and prevent intimate partner violence.

15 eported sexual or emotional intimate partner violence.

16 c methods that explain and predict insurgent violence.

17 ing social behaviors involving interpersonal violence.

18 udes and beliefs related to intimate partner violence.

19 ntial fraction of women recover after sexual violence.

20 ial interactions that varied with respect to violence.

21 gions of the world experiencing conflict and violence.

22 evalent, especially in terms of non-physical violence.

23 s a moral logic to reasoning about political violence.

24 a clinically feasible risk index for firearm violence.

25 se as proactive strategies to decrease urban violence.

26 ng the causes of self-harm and interpersonal violence.

27 as reports per capita of crime and domestic violence.

28 risk of food insecurity and intimate partner violence.

29 , and interventions for survivors of firearm violence.

30 classified as having a high level of firearm violence.

31 interventions to reduce the harms of firearm violence.

32 an association between drought and emotional violence.

33 emic but also an outbreak of state-sponsored violence.

34 use in this population is a risk factor for violence.

35 twork dynamics motivate and maintain extreme violence.

36 abuse; war-affected; refugees; and domestic violence.

37 ult is unusually severe levels of intergroup violence.

38 ing a crime in a sample at high risk for gun violence.

39 ment is key to reducing the harms of firearm violence.

40 ress attitudes accepting of intimate partner violence (0.45, 0.34-0.61; p<0.0001) or beliefs that int

41 on (2.02, 1.45-2.91, p<0.0001), no community violence (1.81, 1.30-2.55, p<0.0001), and no emotional o

42 ne of the goals of imprisonment is to reduce violence(1).

43 on (2.59, 1.63-4.59, p<0.0001), no community violence (2.43, 1.65-3.86, p<0.0001), and no emotional o

44 s related to reproductive health (29 [48%]), violence (26 [43%]), or HIV (18 [30%]).

45 among mothers was 33.3% (27.6% for physical violence, 8.4% for sexual violence, and 16.4% for emotio

46 ical, sexual, and emotional intimate partner violence; acceptability and tolerance of intimate partne

47 Injuries and violence account for a substantial proportion of the glo

48 cal violence, sexual violence, and emotional violence), accounting for demographic and socioeconomic

49 rated males, we investigated how exposure to violence affects the ability to learn about the harmfuln

50 can simultaneously reduce multiple types of violence against children.

51 iated with reduced risk of multiple forms of violence against children.

52 bal package for preventing and responding to violence against children.

53 before flight and 373 (64%) of 586 reported violence against civilians in flight.

54 on, wandering away without notifying anyone, violence against others, damaging goods, and suicide.

55 utcome, IPV, was assessed by the Severity of Violence Against Women Scale (SVAWS) physical/sexual vio

56 risk factors include poverty, low education, violence, alcohol and drug use, human immunodeficiency v

57 ned associations between these disorders and violence, alcohol/drug use, condom use, and HIV/sexually

58 among men and women, and fatal accidents and violence among men, might be causally associated with un

59 the prevalence of unintentional injuries and violence among young adolescents in LMICs.

60 episodes of violence or worsening of ongoing violence and abuse.

61 es should prioritise the development of anti-violence and anti-injury programmes to improve health in

62 ed the direct relationship between workplace violence and burnout; and the indirect relationship betw

63 )C]NOP-1A V(T) were noted between the sexual violence and control groups.

64 f color being the subject of law enforcement violence and criminal justice system interactions at dis

65 motional-cognitive processes contributing to violence and discrimination.

66 Behaviours that harm health, such as violence and drug use, are central to anti-school roles

67 he impacts of social and economic factors on violence and firearm homicide rates, to the author's kno

68 mediated the relationship between workplace violence and health outcomes including musculoskeletal i

69 n explaining the association between patient violence and health professionals' occupational turnover

70 We must collect robust data on firearm violence and its consequences.

71 Violence and legal problems were further associated with

72 explain the association between exposure to violence and maladaptive behavior.

73 arning underlie the link between exposure to violence and maladaptive behaviors.

74 lescent and adult survivors of interpersonal violence and non-trauma-exposed demographically matched

75 r of high public concern because it predicts violence and offense recidivism.

76 about the acceptability of intimate partner violence and perceived norms about intimate partner viol

77 discriminatory law enforcement practices and violence and personal and community health necessitates

78 indirect effects for the association between violence and preterm birth were observed for infection (

79 n living in a neighborhood with high firearm violence and preterm delivery, and assessed whether ther

80 taneous strong effects of baseline injurious violence and recent violent victimization on future inju

81 the indirect relationship between workplace violence and the three health outcomes.

82 ut has on the relationship between workplace violence and three health outcomes.

83 d the capacity for extreme territorial-based violence and warfare, whilst also engaging in the strong

84 lth (suicidality, psychosis, depression, and violence), and increased risk of cardiovascular events.

85 27.6% for physical violence, 8.4% for sexual violence, and 16.4% for emotional violence).

86 partner, Suzanne Eaton to a senseless act of violence, and all assumptions were called into question.

87 fferences in prevalence of serious injuries, violence, and bullying.

88 of IPV separately (physical violence, sexual violence, and emotional violence), accounting for demogr

89 ncy, depression or lifetime intimate partner violence, and maternal HIV infection).

90 sex, no violence perpetration, no community violence, and no emotional or physical abuse.

91 e risk of harmful outcomes such as injuries, violence, and poorer academic performance.

92 and adverse outcomes, including addictions, violence, and suicide.

93 r work environments may not expect workplace violence, and they may be at more burnout risk than nurs

94 eptability and tolerance of intimate partner violence; and attitudes and beliefs related to intimate

95 s likely to report physical intimate partner violence (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.99; p=0.043) and were

96 deaths were previously collected by the Gun Violence Archive, and then linked by the British newspap

97 cement, childhood sexual abuse, and domestic violence are increasingly prevalent.

98 Individuals exposed to community violence are more likely to engage in antisocial behavio

99 However, direct links between climate and violence are unlikely because cultural institutions modi

100 Treating firearm violence as a disease and taking a public health approac

101 capita of liquor or convenience stores, and violence as measured by reports of violent crime and rep

102 or participants with no history of injurious violence at study entry, baseline noninjurious violence

103 parately, for participants with no injurious violence at study entry.

104 and tailor care focused on safety planning, violence awareness, self-efficacy, and referral to socia

105 ships (2014)], who assert that people commit violence because they believe it is the morally right th

106 parental mental illness or suicide attempt; violence between parents; parental separation; bullying;

107 ere so much variation in reactive aggression/violence between people living in the same environment?

108 physical and mental consequences of firearm violence but also focuses our attention on underlying ca

109 ar District, Bangladesh, following escalated violence by Myanmar security forces.

110 idespread and systematic violence, including violence by state forces.

111 o change strategies, subsequent incidents of violence can be reduced.

112 Nonetheless, our findings show that patient violence can be related to health professionals' intenti

113 rated these according to MacArthur Community Violence categories.

114 imate partner violence or non-partner sexual violence, childhood trauma, and harsh parenting (smackin

115 Exposure to violence continues to be a growing epidemic, particularl

116 ticipants' recent injurious and noninjurious violence, demographic and background variables, childhoo

117 ding low school attendance, intimate partner violence, depression, transactional sex, and age-dispara

118 ovascular risk factors, experience of sexual violence, diet, and obesity.

119 However, exposure to violence disrupts the ability to form moral impressions

120 Exposure to violence does not impact the ability to accurately devel

121 rses are particularly at risk from workplace violence due to the nature of their work or inadequacies

122 ipants (5.4%) reported engaging in injurious violence during follow-up, and 119 (8.3%) reported engag

123 ere self-reported injurious and noninjurious violence during follow-up.

124 ssed women's experiences of intimate partner violence during the pandemic.

125 8-2.42); having experienced intimate partner violence during the previous 6 months (1.65, 1.10-2.48);

126 Recent innovation in domestic violence (DV) treatment suggests that when a batterer in

127 ore than 60,000 people are victimized by gun violence each year in the United States.

128 e overall prevalence of serious injuries and violence (eg, physical attack, physical fighting) and bu

129 rminants may help to address the growing gun violence epidemic and reverse recent life expectancy dec

130 Children exposed to interpersonal violence exhibited poor memory of contexts paired with a

131 lyses found significant associations between violence experience and depression, violence experience

132 between violence experience and depression, violence experience and recent suicidal behaviour, alcoh

133 C vs G allele groups among those with higher violence exposure (F = 17.46, p = 0.0002).

134 ss 8 sites) included limited questions about violence exposure and information for abused women but n

135 Trauma exposure was assessed using the Violence Exposure Scale-Revised (VEX-R).

136 hose with the CC genotype and high levels of violence exposure, as well as females with the CC genoty

137 g and marijuana use and experience of sexual violence, feminine gender expression in adulthood was ne

138 es the direct and spillover effects of a gun violence field intervention in Chicago.

139 re to armed attacks, sexual and gender-based violence, food security and feeding practices, nutrition

140 Patient violence found in this study was prevalent, especially i

141 safe schools (ie, without teacher or student violence), free schools, parenting support, free school

142 elf-control difficulties and are immersed in violence from a young age.

143 Dual harmers had been victims of violence from childhood and exhibited lower childhood se

144 cluded to provide a contrast with the sexual violence group.

145 ericans, the looming threat of exclusion and violence has been an unwelcome companion since birth.

146 Gun violence has shortened the average life expectancy of Am

147 d women's increased risk of intimate partner violence have been observed.

148 e (hazard ratio=2.93), baseline noninjurious violence (hazard ratio=2.72), childhood sexual abuse (ha

149 e multivariable analysis, baseline injurious violence (hazard ratio=4.02), recent violent victimizati

150 Rai, Virtuous Violence: Hurting and Killing to Create, Sustain, End, a

151 cipants reported their experience of patient violence (i.e., physical and non-physical violence).

152 isonment modestly reduced the probability of violence if comparisons included the effects of incapaci

153 variable analysis of predictors of injurious violence in a large cohort of patients with schizophreni

154 annabis use and the perpetration of physical violence in a sample of youths and young adults <30 year

155 can also explain the evolution of collective violence in certain animal societies.

156 the extent, nature, and perpetrators of the violence in Northern Rakhine State in August, 2017, and

157 ined the role of racism, discrimination, and violence in one's interaction with the health care syste

158 ional violence, physical violence, or sexual violence in the 12 months prior to survey.

159 e and perceived norms about intimate partner violence in the community.

160 More than 20 years of violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) h

161 374-1.825) and experienced patient-initiated violence in the past 12 months (OR = 1.566, 95%CI = 1.37

162 with reduced odds of at least three forms of violence in the path model.

163 SaFETy was associated with firearm violence in the validation set (odds ratio [OR], 1.47 [9

164 their community members fled was because of violence in their hamlet or in a neighbouring hamlet.

165 sques; 531 (89%) of 599 respondents reported violence in their hamlets before flight and 373 (64%) of

166 Of the 531 respondents who reported violence in their hamlets, 408 (77%) reported that milit

167 ms with a neighbor, friend, or relative; and violence) in the general adult population.

168 We find that exposure to neighborhood violence, incarceration, and lead combine to independent

169 pment: those characterized by high levels of violence, incarceration, and lead exposure.

170 The main perpetrators of violence included but were not limited to Border Guard P

171 Firearm violence, including self-harm, assault, and unintentiona

172 s of a campaign of widespread and systematic violence, including violence by state forces.

173 tions, a general rule is that aggression and violence increase as one moves closer to the equator, wh

174 ce of psychosis, increased perceived risk of violence, increased police contact, absence of or mistru

175 ontrol website was a static intimate partner violence information website.

176 e symptoms compared with an intimate partner violence information website.

177 At V2 there was a Genotype by Violence interaction, with higher FPS in the CC vs G all

178 Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a major global health is

179 Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is associated with a wide r

180 Both intimate partner violence (IPV) and alcohol misuse are highly prevalent,

181 ce and severity of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVI

182 Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global social and public health prob

183 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health problem with significa

184 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with increased HIV risk and

185 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is linked to substance use by male perpet

186 posure, such as exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV), to predict self-regulation indicators an

187 ionship between drought and intimate partner violence (IPV).

188 ic findings associated with intimate partner violence (IPV).

189 n's knowledge, and physical intimate partner violence (IPV).

190 s elevated for individuals with a history of violence (IRR 5.19, 95% CI 4.45-6.06) or self-harm (12.6

191 18 college women who had experienced sexual violence irrespective of whether they met DSM-5 diagnost

192 Although violence is a frequently researched topic, little is kno

193 Firearm violence is a major public health challenge in the Unite

194 Workplace violence is a prevalent phenomenon in healthcare and nur

195 ; p<0.0001) or beliefs that intimate partner violence is a private matter (0.51, 0.32-0.81; p=0.005)

196 etter knowledge about the root causes of gun violence is crucial to its prevention.

197 used response when risk for imminent firearm violence is high.

198 Although workplace violence is known to have serious negative implications

199 r violence, suggesting that intimate partner violence is preventable in high-risk settings such as Ta

200 to help women experiencing intimate partner violence is scarce.

201 0.7, 95% CI 0.2, 1.1; p = 0.003) and sexual violence (marginal RD = 0.7, 95% CI 0.3, 1.2; p = 0.001)

202 1.3, 4.6; p < 0.001), experiencing physical violence (marginal RD = 0.8, 95% CI 0.1, 1.5; p = 0.019)

203 .1, 1.5; p = 0.019), and experiencing sexual violence (marginal RD = 1.2, 95% CI 0.4, 2.0; p = 0.001)

204 Violence may be the new 'reality shock' for nurses.

205 Firearm violence may indirectly affect health among pregnant wom

206 (n = 156; 23.7%), lifetime intimate partner violence (n = 310; 47.3%), and history of maternal child

207 Residence in high-violence neighborhoods was associated with higher preval

208 Inequities, armed conflict and violence, nuclear proliferation, forced migration, globa

209 are often modelled on the territorial-based violence of chimpanzees, with limited comparison to othe

210 erent effects of targeted versus nontargeted violence on Ebola virus (EBOV) transmission in Democrati

211 the present sample experienced non-physical violence once or twice per month.

212 rts of violent crime and reports of domestic violence, operationalized as reports per capita of crime

213 ed positive for any form of intimate partner violence or fear of a partner in the 6 months before rec

214 red near ZPG under harsher conditions (e.g., violence or food shortage), modern Homo sapiens were equ

215 rpetration or experience of intimate partner violence or non-partner sexual violence, childhood traum

216 tion in the trial had led to new episodes of violence or worsening of ongoing violence and abuse.

217 ast-year physical or sexual intimate partner violence, or both, compared with 119 (27%) of 434 in the

218 of women have experienced physical or sexual violence, or both, from an intimate partner during their

219 Reported physical or sexual intimate partner violence, or both, was reduced among women who participa

220 ast-year physical or sexual intimate partner violence, or both.

221 nd experiencing emotional violence, physical violence, or sexual violence in the 12 months prior to s

222 associated with lower odds of three or more violence outcomes (p < 0.05).

223 Each cohort measured six self-reported violence outcomes (sexual abuse, transactional sexual ex

224 For boys, the adjusted probability of violence outcomes was also estimated to be lower if all

225 For girls, the adjusted probability of violence outcomes was estimated to be lower if all three

226 between hypothesised protective factors and violence outcomes were estimated jointly in a sex-strati

227 experiencing emotional or moderate physical violence, over half reported it had increased since the

228 Illegal residence (p < 0.001), domestic violence (p < 0.05) and a history of mental illness (p <

229 ions for women experiencing intimate partner violence, particularly into the duration needed for inte

230 onthly income, work hours, patient-initiated violence, perceived patient respect, physician-nurse coo

231 me, work hours, history of patient-initiated violence, perceived respect from patients, social recogn

232 l progression (1.57, 1.17-2.13, p=0.004), no violence perpetration (2.02, 1.45-2.91, p<0.0001), no co

233 high-risk sex (2.44, 1.45-5.03, p=0.005), no violence perpetration (2.59, 1.63-4.59, p<0.0001), no co

234 14] versus 0.62 [0.46-0.84], p < 0.001); and violence perpetration (OR [95% CI] = 0.16 [0.09-0.29] ve

235 The petitioner reported prior domestic violence perpetration by the respondent in 24% of cases,

236 s; respondent's reported history of domestic violence perpetration, mental illness, substance misuse,

237 ssion, no sexual abuse, no high-risk sex, no violence perpetration, no community violence, and no emo

238 ssociated with all forms of intimate partner violence perpetration.

239 R] = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.04-0.14; p < 0.001; and violence perpetration: OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.09-0.29; p <

240 k factor for IPV) and experiencing emotional violence, physical violence, or sexual violence in the 1

241 gative participants experiencing social (eg, violence, poverty) and interpersonal (eg, discrimination

242 complications, obesity, recent interpersonal violence, pre- and early postpartum stress, gestational

243 We therefore aimed to assess the effect of a violence prevention intervention delivered to women part

244 ed, a bill that included $25 million for gun violence prevention research at the Centers for Disease

245 is an ineffective long-term intervention for violence prevention, as it has, on balance, no rehabilit

246 for example, urban planning, sexual health, violence prevention, substance use, and community transf

247 Ebola-targeted violence, primarily driven by civilian-induced events, h

248 pport to the provocative notion of "virtuous violence" put forth by Fiske and Rai [A.

249 The consequences of firearm violence reach beyond the nearly 40,000 firearm-related

250 f networks might be leveraged to amplify gun violence reduction efforts.

251 Despite a growing number of violence reduction programmes that leverage networks to

252 ies and have a higher frequency of potential violence-related imaging findings when compared with age

253 The prevalence of unintentional injuries and violence remain high among young adolescents in LMICs.

254 Alcohol-related homicides and nonfatal violence remained unchanged.

255 onsidering callous-unemotional traits in gun violence research both because callous-unemotional trait

256 We provide a preliminary model of how violence risk may peak at various points in the course o

257 care for people who have experienced sexual violence, set in Kenya.

258 PV and each type of IPV separately (physical violence, sexual violence, and emotional violence), acco

259 three dimensions of empowerment: attitude to violence, social independence, and decision making.

260 Against Women Scale (SVAWS) physical/sexual violence subscale, and the secondary outcome, male alcoh

261 adult substance use and experience of sexual violence, suggesting that expressions of femininity typi

262 ct was greater for physical intimate partner violence, suggesting that intimate partner violence is p

263 Violence targeting healthcare workers and Ebola treatmen

264 individuals with co-occurring self-harm and violence than among those engaging in just one of these

265 lities were also at increased risk of sexual violence than were women without disabilities (11.0% vs

266 individuals with co-occurring self-harm and violence, the risk of accidental death, particularly acc

267 ons of inequality and disadvantage that feed violence through all means.

268 We assessed exposure to violence through either the urban district-level homicid

269 t criminality, and hospitalisation following violence, until Dec 31, 2015.

270 outlets and alcohol use and alcohol-related violence, using an agent-based model of the adult popula

271 ] versus -0.47 [-0.61 to -0.33], p < 0.001); violence victimisation (OR [95% CI] = 0.08 [0.04-0.14] v

272 5% CI -17.04 to -8.95, p < 0.001); community violence victimisation from 41.28% to 35.41% (ARD: -5.87

273 5% CI -16.00 to -8.83, p < 0.001); community violence victimisation, 36.25% and 28.37% (ARD: -7.87% p

274 , physical abuse, emotional abuse, community violence victimisation, and youth lawbreaking) and seven

275 = -2.77; 95% CI: -3.40 to -2.14; p < 0.001; violence victimisation: odds ratio [OR] = 0.08; 95% CI:

276 ggest that the association between childhood violence victimization and later cognition is largely no

277 Conclusion Intimate partner violence victims undergo more imaging studies and have a

278 ime, or hospitalisation due to interpersonal violence was 32.0% (95% CI 31.6-32.5) in the discharged

279 Firearm violence was associated with risk of preterm delivery, a

280 Physical violence was experienced at a much lower rate, and was n

281 eliminary evidence suggests that the risk of violence was higher for persistent heavy users (odds rat

282 Gender-based violence was identified as a significant concern for sex

283 ng initiation, but only exposure to physical violence was independently associated with a decreased l

284 In healthier work environments, workplace violence was more strongly related to increased reports

285 Non-physical violence was positively related to feeling disappointed

286 olence at study entry, baseline noninjurious violence was the strongest predictor (hazard ratio=3.02)

287 Exposure to threat-related ELA (e.g., violence) was associated with accelerated DNAm age and a

288 The rates of patient violence were lower than those in previous studies condu

289 lent criminality, and hospitalisation due to violence were more constant throughout the 10-year follo

290 dom use and recent experiences of stigma and violence were similar between age groups (p>0.05).

291 h of their association with future injurious violence were similar to those for all participants.

292 al hazards models of time to first injurious violence were used to generate bivariable and multivaria

293 form of IPV (physical, sexual, or emotional violence) were less likely to initiate breastfeeding ear

294 ole of mental illness, robbery, and domestic violence; what is the role of private gun ownership (bot

295 pirically assessed the effect of exposure to violence when exploring the association between gun carr

296 anxiety and fear connected to experiences of violence, whereas the rest recalled joyful or emotionall

297 udy was to provide data on the correlates of violence, which may allow better risk assessment and car

298 ous living conditions, and the experience of violence, which might add to nutritional factors and chr

299 ssociation between cannabis use and physical violence, which remained significant regardless of study

300 It is impossible to know whether violence would have occurred had ERPOs not been issued,