ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual evoked potential

1 processing (visual P1 and 25-Hz steady-state visual evoked potential).

2 ssessed by the preferential looking test and visual evoked potential.

3 est, and cluster) and an abnormal multifocal visual evoked potential.

4 vertical disparities were measured using the visual evoked potential.

5 rent frequencies, thus inducing steady-state visual evoked potentials.

6 ability, histology, electron microscopy, and visual evoked potentials.

7 st 4 months following OCT, and normal/stable visual evoked potentials.

8 (OCT), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and visual evoked potentials.

9 rsts and enhanced paired-pulse depression of visual evoked potentials.

10 ne patient, an interhemispheric asymmetry in visual evoked potentials.

11 was not accompanied by modulations of early visual-evoked potentials.

12 tency delay on full-field, pattern-reversal, visual-evoked potentials.

13 and monitoring frequency-tagged steady-state visual-evoked potentials.

14 sual acuity, visual field, color vision, and visual-evoked potential amplitude.

15 iput (Oz), but we find that pattern-reversal visual evoked potential amplitudes are larger for a lowe

16 We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential, an oscillatory response of the

17 otography, electroretinography analysis, and visual-evoked potential analysis.

18 ophysiological studies as electroretinogram, visual evoked potential and electrooculogram.

19 cking humans, and was paralleled by impaired visual evoked potentials and correction by acute NAP tre

20 E STATEMENT Using source-imaged steady-state visual evoked potentials and frequency-domain analysis o

21 g in humans using source-imaged steady state visual evoked potentials and frequency-domain analysis o

22 Here we used source-imaged, steady-state visual evoked potentials and visual psychophysics to det

23 Visual function, visual evoked potential, and optic nerve magnetic resona

24 Diagnostic investigations include MRI, visual evoked potentials, and CSF examination.

25 phthalmologic assessments, including SD-OCT, Visual evoked potentials, and perimetry.

26 g; electrophysiologic testing, such as sweep visual-evoked potentials; and perceptual testing, allow

27 n and atrophy of brain microvasculature with visual evoked potential anomalies.

28 ameters affecting the utility of the pattern visual evoked potential as an outcome measure in potenti

29 lity to perform simple vision-guided tasks), visual evoked potentials (assessed by recording cortical

30 Objective visual evoked potential assessment of visual acuity can

31 ble the detection of multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials associated with visual field st

32 high-frequency (30-90 Hz) power, but not in visual evoked potentials, associated with spatial attent

33 coherence tomography, visual assessments and visual evoked potentials at presentation (median 16 days

34 front analysis for amblyogenic factors and a visual evoked potentials-based screening tool for the pr

35 atency of P100 component of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential, best-corrected visual acuity, o

36 show abnormalities in brainstem auditory and visual evoked potentials (BSAEP and VEP) and in sleep pa

37 In the optic nerve, visual evoked potentials can indicate demyelination and

38 of the electroretinogram, and the multifocal visual-evoked potential can detect early glaucomatous da

39 nd ponesimod to decrease the latency time of visual evoked potentials compared to vehicle conditions,

40 duced both a clear reduction of the earliest visual evoked potential components, the C1 and the N1, a

41 Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, or sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

42 Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

43 es of Single-Opponent cells in the chromatic visual evoked potential (cVEP) recorded on the scalp of

44 We used the chromatic visual evoked potential (cVEP) to study responses in hum

45 We explored this theory by measuring visual evoked potentials during contour integration as c

46 Recordings of steady-state visual evoked potentials elicited by the flickering stim

47 rent motion confound might not have obtained visual evoked potentials entirely due to vernier offset.

48 We characterized electrically elicited visual evoked potentials (eVEPs) in Argus II retinal imp

49 neural circuit dynamics of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials extracted from concurrent EEG-f

50 ic nerve conduction latency using full-field visual evoked potential (FF-VEP) versus the unaffected f

51 died in unexperienced observers by measuring visual evoked potentials from 64-channels.

52 lectroretinography (full field and pattern), visual evoked potentials, fundus autofluorescence IRR, a

53 photopic flash electroretinogram (FERG) and visual evoked potential (FVEP) also were recorded before

54 en nerve fibre layer anatomy and the pattern visual evoked potential has been addressed, correlating

55 Recent clinical trials using visual evoked potential have had promising results, but

56 Photopic ERG, visual evoked potentials, IHC and cell counting indicate

57 ircuitry as we report a significant delay in visual evoked potential implicit time in the retina-spec

58 f visuocortical engagement, the steady-state visual evoked potential in response to naturalistic angr

59 Visual acuity was measured by visual evoked potentials in 244 infants who completed th

60 re none that have been validated, other than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis.

61 Abnormal visual-evoked potentials indicated that the hypomyelinat

62 The multifocal visual evoked potential is a relatively new technique th

63 Further, the multifocal visual-evoked potential is the only one of these tests t

64 ion, reduced neuroinflammation, and restored visual evoked potential latencies (VEP).

65 After multivariate analysis, prolonged visual evoked potential latency and impaired color visio

66 sed holo-transcobalamin, was associated with visual evoked potential latency delay (estimate = -0.04;

67 Furthermore, clemastine does not improve visual evoked potential latency following demyelinating

68 Visual evoked potential latency improves after treatment

69 nd ultrastructural assessments correspond to visual evoked potential latency in both inflammatory and

70 anied by improved spatial memory and reduced visual evoked potential latency times.

71 h visual dysfunction and demyelination (long visual evoked potential latency) during acute optic neur

72 validated by topographically linked delay of visual evoked potential latency, a functional measure of

73 ed with impaired visual acuity and prolonged visual evoked potential latency.

74 egative response-like stimulus (PhNR-S) or a visual evoked potential-like stimulus (VEP-S)-each prese

75 In optic nerve tumours, the pattern visual evoked potential may help identify and monitor th

76 Furthermore, the observed reduction of N170 visual-evoked potentials may be a key mechanism underlyi

77 Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potential measures are suitable for detect

78 of function we demonstrate conclusively that visual evoked potential measures myelin status and is th

79 The aim of this study was to compare visual evoked potential measures of contrast sensitivity

80 global and sectoral multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials metrics to discriminate glaucom

81 are the diagnostic performance of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and standard automated p

82 VCC scans, stereophotographs, and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) data were collected at b

83 ent spectral-domain OCT scans and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recordings.

84 To test the efficacy of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique after long-ter

85 Electroretinogram (mfERG) and the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP), which provide an object

86 4-2 Humphrey visual fields (HVF), multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP), and optical coherence

87 al coherence tomography (OCT) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).

88 Motion-onset visual evoked potentials (MO VEPs) are robust to dioptri

89 of which is directionally asymmetric motion visual evoked potentials (motion VEPs).

90 of horizontal motion and in cortical motion visual evoked potential (mVEP) responses in normal infan

91 s, San Diego, CA) and in the P100 latency of visual evoked potentials; no changes were detected in vi

92 ts, OA and OCA were confirmed with 5-channel visual evoked potentials (optic nerve misrouting).

93 both sexes, using source-imaged steady-state visual evoked potentials over a wide range of relative c

94 ation processing is further examined using a visual-evoked potential paradigm and normalization model

95 a for the global BCI multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials parameter was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.8

96 Brain FC was estimated using steady-state visual evoked potential partial coherence before and 90

97 Visual evoked potential plasticity might represent a rel

98 T) and visual function with pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (PR-VEPs) in a geographically d

99 The pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (prVEP) is an established routin

100 Though pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PRVEPs) are a sensitive, stand

101 Pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) was the most frequently s

102 Pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) are an established clin

103 owing light stimulation and pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (pVEPs).

104 s of electroretinography (ERG) and patterned visual evoked potentials (pVEPs).

105 CAM-null mice displayed reduced responses to visual evoked potentials recorded from layer IV in the b

106 mechanisms, we used electroretinography and visual evoked potential recording in patients, and multi

107 suggested that the signal in the multifocal visual-evoked potential response may be linearly related

108 tile esotropia (ET) has led to the idea that visual evoked potential responses to horizontal motion (

109 Occipital 15 Hz steady-state visual evoked potential responses were selectively heigh

110 Steady-state visual-evoked potential responses were recorded over the

111 ments in visual function, and measurement of visual evoked potentials showed enhanced activity of the

112 Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) elicited by a passive vi

113 Recently the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) paradigm has been increa

114 patially distributed pattern of steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses to flickering

115 EG, which we used to derive the steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), a well established neur

116 encephalography (EEG) to assess steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) in human subjects and s

117 both sexes, using source-imaged steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) over a wide range of re

118 sing frequency-domain data from steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP).

119 encoding via contrast-dependent steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEP), while a read-out of cr

120 Here, we use steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) and controlled visual

121 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are widely used for br

122 rrPs) as the primary signal and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) as the auxiliary signa

123 x was assessed by recordings of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by each of th

124 entical nontargets and recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by these stim

125 We measured steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in 84 human participan

126 We monitored frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in humans and found th

127 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) recorded during the tr

128 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were recorded from act

129 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were recorded from the

130 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were used to quantify

131 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), the brain response to

132 6 Hz) to evoke frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs).

133 hand being stroked and recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

134 essing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

135 ng in 12-week-old infants using steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

136 educed auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, suggesting fatigue of synaptic

137 The complete loss of visual evoked potentials supports the hypothesis that ce

138 rs visual cortical function, swept parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) responses of healthy pret

139 The swept parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) was used to measure contr

140 esholds can be measured with swept-parameter visual evoked potentials (sVEPs) and may therefore be us

141 ith Alzheimer's dementia (AD), using a sweep visual evoked potential technique.

142 Subjects were evaluated with the sweep visual evoked potential technique.

143 ntextual interactions using a dual-frequency visual-evoked potential technique in developing human in

144 We performed multifocal visual evoked potential testing, processing speed testin

145 Electroretinogram and visual evoked potential tests showed visual pathway invo

146 e amplitude of the earliest component of the visual evoked potential, the C1.

147 ar and molecular basis for signal changes on visual evoked potential, the interpretation of these tri

148 We tracked steady-state visual evoked potentials to label distinct visual cortic

149 We used source imaging of visual evoked potentials to measure neural population re

150 in a large cohort of infants by using sweep visual evoked potential (VEP) acuity as the functional o

151 s in several studies have suggested that the visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude can vary with st

152 GCs within 1 day after rAION, with a loss of visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude that persisted i

153 The P100 visual evoked potential (VEP) and P3 event-related poten

154 tive of this study was to investigate if the visual evoked potential (VEP) could be used as an unbias

155 Abnormal visual evoked potential (VEP) findings of increased late

156 tly been demonstrated that plasticity of the visual evoked potential (VEP) induced by repeated visual

157 ous evidence for a progressive shortening of visual evoked potential (VEP) latencies and to determine

158 Although prolongation and then shortening of visual evoked potential (VEP) latencies in optic neuriti

159 he association of RNFL loss with a prolonged visual evoked potential (VEP) latency suggests that acut

160 After a clinical examination and visual evoked potential (VEP) measurement, each patient

161 graphic (EEG) signals were recorded, and the visual evoked potential (VEP) peak-to-peak amplitude (N7

162 henomenon affects visual function, the sweep visual evoked potential (VEP) was used to evaluate corti

163 aper we explore the relationship between the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP), a component of the electr

164 rdings, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual evoked potential (VEP), and grading of skin and h

165 on optic nerve function, assessed using the visual evoked potential (VEP).

166 recorded the resting state EEG (rsEEG), the visual evoked potentials (VEP) and the visual P300 (P3)

167 ations demonstrated clear modulations in the visual evoked potentials (VEP) recorded.

168 A clinical examination and measurement of visual evoked potentials (VEP) was performed on each pat

169 On the basis of lesion, visual evoked potentials (VEP), and neuroimaging evidenc

170 Pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP), in response to 60' and 1

171 stimulation produces lasting enhancement of visual evoked potentials (VEP).

172 amined for their elicitation of prototypical visual evoked potentials (VEPs) across local field poten

173 nd response speed], and cortical plasticity [visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and cortical current den

174 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are an important prognos

175 riginally as an increase in the magnitude of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) elicited in layer 4 (L4)

176 Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) following optic neuritis

177 as the peak latency of pattern-reversal (PR) visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have been found to be a

178 ateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) can modulate visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in the intact large anim

179 RECENT FINDINGS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) may be useful as an obje

180 In awake mice, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded in layer 4 of b

181 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to check reversal (163-1

182 se of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to show optic nerve invo

183 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were measured in 10 pati

184 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were performed on select

185 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded over three

186 Structural MRI, visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and optical coherence t

187 ge of this process by documenting changes in visual evoked potentials (VEPs), neuronal spiking activi

188 ld and multifocal electroretinography (ERG), visual evoked potentials (VEPs), spectral-domain optical

189 ces task), biological motion perception, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs).

190 changes in visual acuity, visual field, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs).

191 arly recorded action potentials (spikes) and visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) align with the video imp

192 Steady-state visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) to contrast reversing gr

193 ry- (SEPs; Experiment 1; N = 18; F = 10) and visual-evoked potentials (VEPs; Experiment 2; N = 18; F

194 Here we record steady-state visual evoked potentials via electrocorticography to dir

195 fed control formula had significantly poorer visual evoked potential visual acuity at 12 mo of age th

196 There were no significant differences in visual evoked potential visual acuity between the 3 amou

197 n glaucoma, including the electroretinogram, visual evoked potential, visual spatial acuity, and cont

198 with normal electroretinography findings and visual evoked potential was found to have decreased Arde

199 The visual evoked potential was originally developed and use

200 The first clear effect of monovision on visual evoked potentials was the C1 amplitude reduction,

201 By dissociating somatosensory activity from visual evoked potentials, we provide the first evidence

202 Brainstem auditory and visual evoked potentials were both abnormal in op/op mic

203 nnel-encoding genes as well as modulation of visual evoked potentials were determined for 286 healthy

204 Visual evoked potentials were elicited by standard visua

205 N1 and P1 wave amplitudes of the visual evoked potentials were not significantly differen

206 escein angiography, electroretinography, and visual evoked potentials were obtained preoperatively, a

207 x at rest was enhanced and somatosensory and visual evoked potentials were of high amplitude.

208 Visual evoked potentials were recorded in response to a

209 Visual evoked potentials were subjected to principal com

210 Visual-evoked potentials were obtained for stimuli compo

211 iction experimentally using the steady-state visual evoked potential where we stimulated the visual c

212 and thereby elicited separable steady-state visual-evoked potentials, which were used to examine the

213 The present study aimed to measure the visual evoked potentials with a high-density electrode a

214 We analyzed the modulation of visual-evoked potentials with respect to the phase of ap