ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual motion

1 epancies between self-generated and external visual motion.

2 changes, resulting in enhanced perception of visual motion.

3 anced the human ability to perceive coherent visual motion.

4 y linked to the processing and perception of visual motion.

5 ignals to select dynamic properties, such as visual motion.

6 movement, can be independently modulated by visual motion.

7 rovide an important stage in the analysis of visual motion.

8 not sufficient for the perception of global visual motion.

9 ption of an elementary circuit for detecting visual motion.

10 s selective for faces and areas sensitive to visual motion.

11 ntire protocerebral bridge and was driven by visual motion.

12 objects by exploiting panoramic patterns of visual motion.

13 ennae in a direction opposite to that of the visual motion.

14 al ganglion cells (DSGCs) encode the axis of visual motion.

15 is closely associated with the perception of visual motion.

16 s are specialized for processing of coherent visual motion.

17 the motor system adapts to restore straight visual motion.

18 ions between multiple possible directions of visual motion.

19 n MST, but not MT, independent of imagery of visual motion.

20 nd instead more strongly in the direction of visual motion.

21 actile stimuli unlikely to induce imagery of visual motion.

22 a prolonged exposure to temporally periodic visual motion.

23 ted their contribution to working memory for visual motion.

24 a MT (V5) are selective for the direction of visual motion.

25 osely mimics the learning instructed by real visual motion.

26 extra-striate visual areas are activated by visual motion.

27 , such as representations of visual form and visual motion.

28 mporal cortex (hMT+/V5) region for computing visual motion.

29 tual decision between multiple directions of visual motion.

30 or response, an orienting behavior evoked by visual motion.

31 fic spatiotemporal correlations that signify visual motion.

32 ispheres during memory-guided comparisons of visual motion.

33 uit described likely contributes to encoding visual motion.

34 In the specific case of visual motion, a central, "perceptual" role has been ass

35 This contextual effect generalized to purely visual motion, active movement without vision, passive m

36 adaptation phase impacts the strength of the visual motion aftereffect (MAE) during a subsequent test

37 ily driven apparent motion produced a robust visual motion aftereffect in the opposite direction, whe

38 In the well-known visual motion aftereffect, adapting to visual motion in

39 epeated exposure to tactile motion induces a visual motion aftereffect, biasing the perceived directi

40 Here we extend this work, examining whether visual motion also exhibits similar generalization acros

41 Area MT, an important region for processing visual motion, also shows weak activation in response to

42 havioral variability observed in response to visual motion and appears sufficient for eliciting turns

43 lance the strength of self-induced bilateral visual motion and bilateral wind cues, but it is unknown

44 rectional congruence between decisions about visual motion and decision-irrelevant saccades.

45 Area MT is heavily implicated in processing visual motion and depth, yet previous work has found lit

46 Previous studies have shown that watching visual motion and listening to auditory motion influence

47 multimodal processing system that integrates visual motion and locomotion during navigation.

48 ng plays a fundamental role in perception of visual motion and position.

49 isual cortex both mediates the perception of visual motion and provides the visual inputs for behavio

50 urons reflect task-related information about visual motion and represent decisions that may be based,

51 and quantified how head movements stabilize visual motion and shape wing steering efforts in fruit f

52 Saccades modulate the relationship between visual motion and smooth eye movement.

53 ea (MSTd) cortical neuronal responses to the visual motion and spatial location cues in optic flow.

54 We developed a change blindness paradigm for visual motion and then showed that presenting an attenti

55 hophysical and neurophysiological studies of visual motion and vibrotactile processing show that the

56 orsal visual stream, dedicated to processing visual motion and visually guided behaviors.

57 imately one-half as large as the response to visual motion and were distinct from those in another vi

58 modulate responses to electrosensory and/or visual motion and, in particular, to looming/receding st

59 n both within modalities (e.g., visual form, visual motion) and across modalities (auditory and visua

60 ibutes of word meaning (color, shape, sound, visual motion, and manipulability) and encodes the relat

61 The neural pathways underlying our sense of visual motion are among the most studied and well-unders

62 in behavioral contexts where these speeds of visual motion are relevant for course stabilization.

63 cleus (LGN), primary visual cortex (V1), and visual motion area (V5) in humans to determine where sup

64 For example, reentrant projections from the visual motion area (V5) to V1 are considered to be criti

65 ic resonance imaging, we found that cortical visual motion area MT+/V5 responded to auditory motion i

66 For visual motion area MT, previous investigations have repo

67 associated with tactile motion perception in visual motion area V5/hMT+, primary somatosensory cortex

68 visual motion integration bilaterally in the visual motion areas hMT+/V5+ and implicate the posterior

69 that the conscious experience of a specific visual motion axis is reflected in response amplitudes o

70 Although visual motion blindness was predominantly observed in th

71 N neurons respond phasically to swim-induced visual motion, but little to motion that is not self-gen

72 The brain estimates visual motion by decoding the responses of populations o

73 Animals estimate visual motion by integrating light intensity information

74 l (LIP) area and PFC in monkeys performing a visual motion categorization task.

75 cortex (PPC) before and after training on a visual motion categorization task.

76 Recent evidence suggests that a key visual motion centre in the brain ignores extra-retinal

77 st adaptation in neurons across Drosophila's visual motion circuitry.

78 Vestibular activation specifically reduces visual motion cortical excitability, whereas other visua

79 Visual motion cues are used by many animals to guide nav

80 navigating in their environment, animals use visual motion cues as feedback signals that are elicited

81 Many animals use visual motion cues for navigating within their surroundi

82 tio-temporal changes in luminance to extract visual motion cues have been the focus of intense resear

83 The BBD learned which visual motion cues predicted impending collisions and us

84 Visual motion cues provide animals with critical informa

85 tion that functionally manifests as superior visual motion detection ability in the deaf animal.

86 imilar correlation-based mechanism underlies visual motion detection across the animal kingdom.

87 deafness, such that behavioral advantages in visual motion detection are abolished when a specific re

88 Many animals rely on visual motion detection for survival.

89 At the neural level, visual motion detection has been proposed to extract dir

90 Visual motion detection in insects is mediated by three-

91 Visual motion detection is one of the most important com

92 ct population responses and habituation of a visual motion detection system.

93 n the neuropil thought to be responsible for visual motion detection, the medulla, of Drosophila mela

94 lementation of a computational algorithm for visual motion detection.

95 d the novel insecticide sulfoxaflor (SFX) on visual motion-detection circuits and related escape beha

96 ion-detection task and a second group with a visual motion-detection task, and compared performance o

97 el of how a simple neural circuit can detect visual motion, developed from work on insect vision but

98 We describe a new phenomenon in which visual motion direction adapts nonsymbolic numerosity pe

99 d on multivariate analysis methods to decode visual motion direction from measurements of cortical ac

100 ff DSGCs), which are important for computing visual motion direction in the mouse retina.

101 uditory timing strongly influenced perceived visual motion direction, despite providing no spatial au

102 ed that improved perceptual performance on a visual motion direction-discrimination task corresponds

103 w that in monkeys performing a reaction-time visual motion direction-discrimination task, neurons in

104 nd influencing spatio-temporal processing of visual motion direction.

105 e trained monkeys to classify 360 degrees of visual motion directions into two discrete categories, a

106 T to reduce the SNR focally and thus disrupt visual motion discrimination performance to visual targe

107 al dopamine and serotonin signaling during a visual motion discrimination task that separates sensory

108 led that, in a two-alternative forced-choice visual motion discrimination task, reaction time was cor

109 ty is modified by prior expectation during a visual motion discrimination task.

110 s both choice and saccade response time on a visual motion discrimination task.

111 been observed in autism, including superior visual motion discrimination, but the neural basis for t

112 uld improve not just simple but also complex visual motion discriminations in humans with long-standi

113 o human observers' performance on two global visual motion discriminations tasks, one requiring the c

114 oth rotational and translational patterns of visual motion, Drosophila actively moved their antennae

115 sults show that congruent direction of audio-visual motion during adaptation induced a stronger initi

116 ) cells exhibit a boost in their response to visual motion during flight compared to quiescence.

117 to suppress the perception of self-generated visual motion during intended turns.

118 thought to respond to local orientation and visual motion elements rather than to global patterns of

119 We exploit the close connection between visual motion estimates and smooth pursuit eye movements

120 In the domain of visual motion, estimates of target speed are derived fro

121 rcuits, represents a valuable feature of its visual motion estimator.

122 The present study aimed to determine how visual motion evoked by an upper body perturbation durin

123 We recorded visual motion evoked potentials (EPs) at occipital and p

124 nt in Alzheimer's disease hypothesizing that visual motion evoked responses to optic flow simulating

125 ndent on the congruence between auditory and visual motion experienced during adaptation.

126 Following visual motion exposure, both reflex and perceptual thres

127 e investigated whether prolonged, full-field visual motion exposure, which has been previously shown

128 by vestibular threshold elevation following visual motion exposure.

129 y interpreted as reflecting the retrieval of visual-motion features of actions.

130 s higher for verbs than nouns, regardless of visual-motion features.

131 x (LPFC) contains accurate representation of visual motion from across the visual field, supplied by

132 ection makes it clear that we do not see the visual motion generated by our saccadic eye movements.

133 Many animals use the visual motion generated by traveling straight-the transl

134 Temporal integration of visual motion has been studied extensively within the fr

135 outline of the neural pathways that compute visual motion has emerged.

136 The estimation of visual motion has long been studied as a paradigmatic ne

137 d neurophysiological studies of responses to visual motion have converged on a consistent set of gene

138 erns and show that many units are excited by visual motion in a direction-selective manner.

139 paradigm, we found that repeated exposure to visual motion in a given direction produced a tactile mo

140 Direction-selective neurons respond to visual motion in a preferred direction.

141 d noise within the sensory representation of visual motion in extrastriate visual area MT.

142 maging (fMRI) data of delayed recognition of visual motion in human participants were analyzed with t

143 These results indicate that processing of visual motion in mouse cortex is distributed heterogeneo

144 known visual motion aftereffect, adapting to visual motion in one direction causes a subsequently pre

145 sensory neurons maximizes information about visual motion in pursuit eye movements guided by that co

146 have different effects on postural sway; 3) visual motion in the anterior-posterior plane induces ro

147 In response to rotational visual motion, increases in passive antennal movements a

148 Why does the world appear stable despite the visual motion induced by eye movements during fixation?

149 In trials with no pull, the visual motion induced postural responses that were later

150 Convergence of visual motion information (optic flow) and vestibular si

151 ry motion information (signal vs noise), (2) visual motion information (signal vs noise), and (3) rel

152 perception emerges from integration of audio-visual motion information at a sensory neural stage of p

153 Highly active insects and crabs depend on visual motion information for detecting and tracking mat

154 Visual motion information from the retina is known to be

155 er the temporal tuning of neurons that carry visual motion information into the central brain.

156 Convergence of vestibular and visual motion information is important for self-motion p

157 Rather, visual motion information must be mediated to higher-tie

158 us (PUL), and concomitantly the cortex, with visual motion information through its dense projections

159 In Drosophila, small-field T4/T5 cells carry visual motion information to the tangential cells that a

160 hich might optimize sensory integration with visual motion information.

161 judgments on word pairs varying in amount of visual-motion information.

162 he targeting saccade weights the presaccadic visual motion inputs by the distance from their location

163 rsuit eye movements in monkeys, we show that visual motion inputs compete with two independent priors

164 l when smooth eye movement is driven only by visual motion inputs.

165 th-pursuit eye movements transform 100 ms of visual motion into a rapid initiation of smooth eye move

166 how the human brain integrates auditory and visual motion into benefits in motion discrimination.

167 Sensitivity to visual motion is a fundamental property of neurons in th

168 information about these distinct features of visual motion is combined.

169 The perception of visual motion is critical for animal navigation, and fli

170 rate signals over a shorter time window when visual motion is fast and a longer window when motion is

171 Perception of visual motion is important for a range of ethological be

172 The source of visual motion is inherently ambiguous such that movement

173 and had smaller amplitudes compared to when visual motion is paired with an unexpected perturbation

174 E STATEMENT Compared with what we know about visual motion, little is known about how the brain imple

175 -surround interactions are a key property of visual motion mechanisms.

176 multiplication enables DSGCs to discriminate visual motion more accurately in noisy visual conditions

177 ations in selectivity patterns revealed that visual motion, object form, and the form of the human bo

178 Older people can discriminate visual motion of large, high-contrast stimuli better tha

179 sible for the patient to perceive the global visual motion of moving random dot patterns.

180 We exploited the known influence of visual motion on the apparent positions of targets, and

181 orce from lower leg muscles 130 ms after the visual motion onset.

182 Humans and monkeys use both vestibular and visual motion (optic flow) cues to discriminate their di

183 the well known hierarchical structure of the visual motion pathway to demonstrate dissociation in the

184 In the fly's visual motion pathways, two cell types-T4 and T5-are the

185 Monkeys had to identify and remember a visual motion pattern and compare it to a second pattern

186 To examine this, we trained monkeys to group visual motion patterns into two arbitrary categories, an

187 , it was largely attributable to deficits of visual motion perception (R(2) adj = 0.57, P < 0.001).

188 gnals across space underlies many aspects of visual motion perception and has therefore received cons

189 zed networks that support functions, such as visual motion perception and language processing.

190 ns that perform different functions, such as visual motion perception and language processing.

191 human infants shows that this key feature of visual motion perception does not emerge until seven mon

192 congruency effects measured here imply that visual motion perception emerges from integration of aud

193 Visual motion perception has long been associated with t

194 Visual motion perception is critical to many animal beha

195 Visual motion perception is fundamental to many aspects

196 ntribution of the adjoining vermal cortex to visual motion perception is nonmotor and involves a cere

197 Visual motion perception relies on two opposing operatio

198 ve attention, and psychophysical measures of visual motion perception to all subjects.

199 TMS degraded visual motion perception when the evoked phosphene and t

200 om the primary visual cortex (V1), a role in visual motion perception, and a suggested role in "blind

201 ate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have l

202 e of these pathways normally mediate complex visual motion perception, we asked whether specific trai

203 atory/inhibitory imbalance in the context of visual motion perception.

204 form of such multisensory interaction: audio-visual motion perception.

205 visual areas causes dramatic improvements in visual motion perception.

206 nt provides a natural interpretation of many visual motion percepts, indicates that motion estimation

207 s underwent open-field navigational testing, visual motion perceptual threshold determination and a b

208 integration assume separate substrates where visual motion perceptually dominates tactile motion [1,

209 idence in a manner that mimicked a change in visual motion, plus a small increase in sensory noise.

210 regions involved in executive functions and visual motion processing (P < .01).

211 This study demonstrates that visual motion processing and coordinated eye movements a

212 ple with autism may suffer from a deficit in visual motion processing and proposed that these deficit

213 Recent evidence suggests a link between visual motion processing and social cognition.

214 ng ability and activity in area V5/MT during visual motion processing and, as expected, also found lo

215 PMLS is also an extrastriate visual motion processing area and is widely considered t

216 ng findings demonstrate strong activation of visual motion processing areas by tactile stimuli [3-6],

217 in many components of pursuit, saccades and visual motion processing as a function of time awake and

218 s show significant impairment of pursuit and visual motion processing at 0.015% BAC, reflecting degra

219 emonstrate that a recurrent network model of visual motion processing can reconcile these different p

220 this motion as a proxy for changes in early visual motion processing caused by microsaccades.

221 Thus, perceptual relearning of complex visual motion processing is possible without an intact V

222 Multiple studies show that visual motion processing is tuned for accuracy under nat

223 Visual motion processing plays a key role in enabling pr

224 e closely related to sensory inputs from the visual motion processing system.

225 sual processing, we applied a psychophysical visual motion processing task in which healthy young adu

226 s from extrastriate visual areas involved in visual motion processing to DZ may contribute to the cro

227 We address these questions in the context of visual motion processing, a perceptual modality characte

228 ssociation indicates relatively intact early visual motion processing, but a failure to use efference

229 Despite decades of work on visual motion processing, it remains unclear how 3D dire

230 nected brain regions known to be involved in visual motion processing.

231 n that may lead to a deeper understanding of visual motion processing.

232 bout the circuitry and mechanisms underlying visual motion processing.

233 tentional load effects on neural activity in visual motion-processing and attention-processing areas.

234 hat the peak-to-peak responses of a class of visual motion-processing interneurons, the vertical-syst

235 of motion to the retinal image, complicating visual motion produced by self-motion or moving objects.

236 For many animals, visual motion provides essential information for navigat

237 conclude that noise in sensory processing of visual motion provides the major source of variation in

238 ident on a battery of neuropsychological and visual motion psychophysical measures.

239 that these PLTC regions did not overlap with visual-motion regions.

240 neurons become sensitive to the direction of visual motion represents a classic example of neural com

241 tations or body movements) best engages this visual motion response.

242 monkey is associated with maldevelopment of visual motion responsiveness, one manifestation of which

243 Visual motion sensing neurons in the fly also encode a r

244 neurons in the middle temporal area (MT), a visual motion-sensitive region that projects heavily to

245 We found visual motion-sensitive responses in a central region of

246 Food-deprived flies reduce the gain of a visual-motion-sensitive interneuron whilst walking, and

247 tion (ccPAS) protocol to transiently enhance visual motion sensitivity and demonstrate both the funct

248 that V6 is involved primarily in processing visual motion signals and does not appear to play a role

249 mation reflects the reweighting of bottom-up visual motion signals and top-down spatial location sign

250 areas are well studied, sensory estimates of visual motion signals are formed quickly, and the initia

251 We find that the answer must reside in how visual motion signals are interpreted by perception, bec

252 Externally generated visual motion signals can cause the illusion of self-mot

253 ological response and use it to test whether visual motion signals driving pursuit differ pre- and po

254 The implication is that visual motion signals exist in the brain that can be use

255 obligatory "open-loop" interval in which new visual motion signals presumably cannot influence the en

256 Such cues include visual motion signals produced both by self-movement and

257 t initiation arises mostly from variation in visual motion signals that provide common inputs to the

258 egration primarily for degraded auditory and visual motion signals while obtaining near ceiling perfo

259 ption of self-motion requires integration of visual motion signals with nonvisual cues.

260 ng "open-loop"; that is, unmodifiable by new visual motion signals.

261 utative dorsal areas show specialization for visual motion signals.

262 er, trained to discriminate the direction of visual motion, significantly decoded the gaze direction

263 al components with opposite relationships to visual motion speed.

264 ng gain of postural response with increasing visual motion speed.

265 n frequencies alone, and in combination with visual motion speeds and directions.

266 Visual motion speeds were manipulated during unexpected

267 sitions of objects are strongly modulated by visual motion; stationary flashes appear shifted in the

268 we investigated whether (i) concurrent audio-visual motion stimulation during an adaptation phase imp

269 n in the vestibular cortex, despite constant visual motion stimulation.

270 ularly surprising given that the learning of visual motion stimuli is generally thought to be mediate

271 ted human subjects' prior expectations about visual motion stimuli, and probed the effects on both pe

272 rmance in tasks involving classic random dot visual motion stimuli, corrupted by noise as a means to

273 Based on the responses to a broad panel of visual motion stimuli, we have developed a model by whic

274 ." By briefly perturbing the strength of the visual motion stimulus during the formation of perceptua

275 spontaneously or in response to patterns of visual motion such as expansion [6-8].

276 Our results demonstrate a link between the visual motion system and social brain mechanisms, in whi

277 ed in one of the most basic functions of the visual motion system: extracting motion direction from c

278 carry up to twice as much information about visual motion than does population spike count, even whe

279 Visual motion that appeared slower than actual body moti

280 ions often involve comparisons of sequential visual motion that can appear at any location in the vis

281 ely accepted biophysical model for computing visual motion, the elementary motion detector proposed n

282 on known to be involved in the processing of visual motion, the posterolateral lateral suprasylvian a

283 We found that although perception of visual motion through a cloud of dots was unimpaired wit

284 ne locomotor kinematics, we used whole-field visual motion to drive zebrafish to swim at different sp

285 l mechanisms that analyze global patterns of visual motion to perform computations that require knowl

286 Humans adeptly use visual motion to recognize socially relevant facial info

287 is, the representation of eye movements and visual motion, to compare the functional characteristics

288 al group received twelve magnocellular based visual motion training sessions, twice a week over 6 wee

289 d show that qualitatively different types of visual motion tuning and levels of response sparsity are

290 However, even minimal visual motion was sufficient to cause a loss of position

291 ce (sound, color, shape, manipulability, and visual motion) was used to predict brain activation patt

292 d stronger calcium transients in response to visual motion when flies were walking rather than restin

293 T) have been implicated in the perception of visual motion, whereas prefrontal cortex (PFC) neurons h

294 area to determine the perceived direction of visual motion, whereas psychophysical studies tend to ch

295 ving stimuli are likely to induce imagery of visual motion, which is known to be a powerful activator

296 acaca mulatta) to determine the direction of visual motion while we recorded from their middle tempor

297 To achieve this, neurons must combine visual motion with extra-retinal (non-visual) signals re

298 viously demonstrated that MT neurons combine visual motion with extraretinal signals to code depth-si

299 d tuning even when the stimulus consisted of visual motion with gradual speed changes.

300 neurons in prefrontal cortex (PFC) represent visual motion with precision comparable to cortical neur