ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual space

1 in the eye tuned to specific features of the visual space.

2 d modulates the distribution of attention in visual space.

3 ishing a continuous neural representation of visual space.

4 along the nasotemporal (azimuth) axis of the visual space.

5 along the nasotemporal (azimuth) axis of the visual space.

6 ntains mutually aligned maps of auditory and visual space.

7 fields in imagined space are larger than in visual space.

8 zed for adequate coverage of each feature in visual space.

9 fragmented or asymmetrical representation of visual space.

10 nd antagonism and regular mosaic sampling of visual space.

11 rent types of TGCs within the same column of visual space.

12 iring in response to eye movements, i.e., in visual space.

13 g is integral for the topographic mapping of visual space.

14 ls contains topographic maps of auditory and visual space.

15 ssion of the representation of contralateral visual space.

16 ions tested within the central 10 degrees of visual space.

17 have receptive fields which are adjacent in visual space.

18 ific visual features at certain locations in visual space.

19 ent of activation across the cortical map of visual space.

20 ee by the rate of target displacement across visual space.

21 ociations of auditory cues with locations in visual space.

22 within a single bilateral representation of visual space.

23 eptive field center and surrounding areas of visual space.

24 reas and contain separate representations of visual space.

25 r elements located in surrounding regions of visual space.

26 esponses to other stimuli in the surrounding visual space.

27 ceptive fields that sample a small region of visual space.

28 rons are located in about the same region of visual space.

29 blinking spotlight that sequentially samples visual space.

30 lion cell (RGC), whose receptive fields tile visual space.

31 bit a biased representation of contralateral visual space.

32 (RGCs) each encode distinct features of the visual space.

33 perceptual integration of information across visual space.

34 er ownership are systematically organized in visual space.

35 an integrated perisaccadic representation of visual space.

36 opographically organized with respect to the visual space.

37 to quantify the size of these fields across visual space.

38 emporal) and vertical (dorsoventral) axes of visual space.

39 representations of stimulus orientation and visual space.

40 ithin a remarkably precise representation of visual space.

41 ions with non-overlapping representations of visual space.

42 es containing overlapping representations of visual space.

43 control systems containing internal maps of visual space.

44 ere symmetrically representing contralateral visual space.

45 ells establish the optimal representation of visual space.

46 orming a binocular representation of frontal visual space.

47 tively enhanced, neuronal representations of visual space.

48 t cell clusters represent adjacent points of visual space.

49 neurons to integrate over larger regions of visual space.

50 , affects the allocation of attention in the visual space.

51 the overall bias that can be exerted across visual space.

52 eye movement-into a stable representation of visual space.

53 inotopically organized maps of contralateral visual space.

54 ially complete representation of a region of visual space.

55 vements toward successful error reduction in visual space.

56 t intensities from two neighboring points in visual space.

57 y to perform task 2 in specific locations in visual space.

58 ishing a continuous neural representation of visual space.

59 topographic representation of contralateral visual space.

60 hard-wired mechanism of aligning action and visual spaces.

61 mation to pick out the corresponding cars in visual space?

62 oup of RFs that tile a continuous portion of visual space, (2) constructing a population-level measur

63 ons); the receptive fields of R neurons tile visual space(5).

64 ovide each FEF with information about all of visual space, a prerequisite for higher level sensorimot

65 ther stimuli that overlap the same region of visual space, a process known as masking.

66 fields but encompasses the entire region of visual space across which the current receptive field wi

67 with response fields overlapping the part of visual space affected by the D1 receptor manipulation.

68 ial frequencies, boutons tuned to regions of visual space ahead of the mouse showed enhancement of re

69 hich axons that monitor identical regions of visual space align.

70 ith asymmetries in the statistics of natural visual space and behavioral demands.

71 f cortex are confined to a compact region of visual space and display a smooth visuotopic progression

72 intact or with the limbs and torso apart in visual space and either unoccluded or occluded by a set

73 at entails a discontinuity in the mapping of visual space and fragmentation of V2 into isolated corti

74 ally distinct relationships with the maps of visual space and orientation preference.

75 erret, the relationships between the maps of visual space and response features are predicted by a "d

76 As a population, LPLC2 neurons densely cover visual space and terminate onto the giant fibre descendi

77 nuity in the mapping of both orientation and visual space and the generation of a columnar map of abs

78 these connections with respect to the map of visual space and the map of orientation preference remai

79 ses could be elicited from a large region of visual space and were prolonged.

80 ural time difference (ITD), and locations in visual space, and acquire new neurophysiological maps of

81 nd executed trajectories remain congruous in visual space, and enforces this correspondence even at t

82 o the idea that the characteristics of human visual space are determined probabilistically.

83 field, where approximately 30(o) of central visual space are represented bilaterally.

84 Saccades cause compression of visual space around the saccadic target, and also a comp

85 tions between auditory cues and locations in visual space as a result of abnormal visual experience c

86 If movements are planned in visual space, as indicated from a variety of studies on

87 interocular position shift, the distance in visual space between the center positions of the two eye

88 t LP neurons representing matched regions in visual space but projecting to different extrastriate ar

89 res respond to stimuli in the same region of visual space, but they have different spatial summation

90 ulus can be manipulated in a local region of visual space by adapting to oscillatory motion or flicke

91 By measuring the coverage of visual space by the receptive fields of the recorded cel

92 These cells might link the 2D depiction of visual space by the retina with the need of the body to

93 ration of information over extended areas of visual space can be measured psychophysically in a task

94 he location of a neuron's receptive field in visual space closely corresponds to the physical locatio

95 To achieve visual space constancy, our brain remaps eye-centered pr

96 direction tendency from an extended area of visual space containing widely disparate local direction

97 have access to an accurate representation of visual space despite a constantly moving eye.

98 ields are distributed over a wider region of visual space, display substantial visuotopic scatter, an

99 on in order to reconstruct three-dimensional visual space during motion in depth.

100 LPLC2 neurons sampling different regions of visual space exhibit graded expression of cell recogniti

101 when the source is offset from the target in visual space, feedback is relatively facilitating.

102 arget of feedback represent the same area of visual space, feedback is relatively suppressive.

103 ows, as well as the tiling hypothesis of the visual space for different curvature values.

104 Furthermore, the geometry of visual space frequently changes as the size of spatial c

105 ith theta "scanning" across the FEF and thus visual space from top to bottom.

106 uli, indicating a reduction in the extent of visual space from which LGN neurons integrate signals.

107 y defined uncrossed retinal projections into visual space gives binocular congruence if the optical a

108 The left and right halves of visual space had independent capacities and thus are dis

109 x photoreceptors that view the same point in visual space have to be sorted into synaptic modules cal

110 s investigations evaluating the curvature of visual space have utilized only small numbers of observe

111 buted with respect to the topographic map of visual space, however, has not been resolved.

112 Much of this research into the geometry of visual space, however, required observers to make judgme

113 on specifically along the third dimension of visual space (i.e., from close to far or vice versa), co

114 but these always cover a coherent region of visual space, implying visuotopic order at the single-un

115 asing evidence that the mouse retina encodes visual space in a region-specific manner.

116 ing stimuli from the corresponding region of visual space in all Rt subdivisions.

117 nhancement of visual attention to peripheral visual space in deaf individuals.

118 The collective representation of visual space in high resolution visual pathways was expl

119 ectome Project has revealed multiple maps of visual space in human cerebellum.

120 ye position, but almost all cortical maps of visual space in monkeys use a retinotopic reference fram

121 ield demonstrated a global representation of visual space in MT.

122 uning of delay cells, neurons that represent visual space in the absence of sensory stimulation.

123 ila visual system elaborate a precise map of visual space in the brain.

124 effects of blur, aliasing, and distortion of visual space in the brain.

125 is complex connectivity pattern reconstructs visual space in the first optic ganglion, the lamina.

126 a result of this navigational error, maps of visual space in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) hav

127 responses and topographic representation of visual space in the LGN.

128 fields of ganglion cells cover each point in visual space in the salamander, consistent with anatomic

129 vity revealed continuous topographic maps of visual space in the VG3-AC plexus.

130 map of orientation preference and the map of visual space in tree shrew V1.

131 lation activity, we conclude that the map of visual space in V1 is orderly at a fine scale and has un

132 ter training and is limited to the region of visual space in which training occurred.

133 a priority map, which is a representation of visual space indexing the relative importance, or priori

134 In vision, retinal ganglion cells partition visual space into approximately circular regions termed

135 ate that (i) parietal-mediated perception of visual space is affected in Parkinson's disease, with bo

136 The representation of visual space is anisotropic, with the elevation and azim

137 ndritic Ca2+ signals to stimulus location in visual space is correlated with their anatomical positio

138 This evidence implies that the perception of visual space is determined by the probability distributi

139 rojection of the path of the transition into visual space is highly biased toward lower visual fields

140 The size of central binocular visual space is nearly normal and is flanked by monocula

141 We conclude that columnar organization for visual space is not only defined by the spatial location

142 Indeed, visual space is not sampled uniformly across the vertebr

143 have normal vision as long as each point of visual space is perceived by at least 1 eye, that is, wi

144 The topographic representation of visual space is preserved from retina to thalamus to cor

145 in a regular mosaic, so that every point in visual space is processed for visual primitives such as

146 Thus, visual space is represented across the retina in paralle

147 timuli, we find that a substantial region of visual space is represented bilaterally.

148 We recently demonstrated that position in visual space is represented by grid cells in the primate

149 In turn, the local representation of visual space is smooth, as predicted when many features

150 visual cortex, the representation of central visual space is supplied by matching geniculate inputs t

151 which a flickering target (a bar oriented in visual space) is rendered invisible by two counter-phase

152 NS plans arm movements based entirely on the visual space kinematics of the movements, or whether the

153 or specific stimulus features in a region of visual space known as the receptive field, but can be mo

154 tterns falling within a restricted region of visual space known as the receptive field.

155 The auditory space map aligned with the visual space map in the Ipc.

156 y space map with the prismatically displaced visual space map.

157 int-by-point comparison between auditory and visual space maps or on a foveation-dependent visual ass

158 ls, those that report upon a small region of visual space may need to receive a denser synaptic input

159 sensory circuits may sample those regions of visual space most relevant to behaviours such as gaze st

160 atic analysis has now shown that mice encode visual space non-uniformly, increasing their spatial sam

161 lier and were more widely distributed across visual space, nonspecific suppression was found more oft

162 We find, on the contrary, that the map of visual space on cat V1 shows strong and systematic local

163 de a useable head-centered representation of visual space on timescales that are compatible with the

164 The map of visual space on V1, in contrast, has been assumed to be

165 the target stimuli to an untrained region of visual space or by having the subjects take a mid-day na

166 sensus about either the genesis of perceived visual space or the implications of its peculiar charact

167 The subjective visual space perceived by humans does not reflect a simp

168 Visual space perception has been a topic of sustained re

169 of previous investigations have now explored visual space perception in outdoor natural environments,

170 asymmetric path-integration finding in human visual space perception is reminiscent of the asymmetric

171 Such differential representation of visual space poses a substantial challenge to the idea o

172 s and demonstrated that the effect occurs in visual space (rather than the early representations of t

173 port differences in stimulus features across visual space, regardless of whether excitation occurs in

174 y in a tacto-visual sub-region of VISp whose visual space representation closely overlaps with the wh

175 nner: thresholds decrease at the location in visual space represented by the stimulated SC site, but

176 How is visual space represented in cortical area MT+?

177 toward or away from the trained subregion of visual space, respectively.

178 eptive fields that form a sampling mosaic of visual space, resulting in a series of retinotopic maps

179 ual information from corresponding points in visual space seen by two different lines of sight.

180 Attention samples visual space sequentially to enhance behaviorally releva

181 icting how the integration of signals across visual space shapes the outputs of retinal ganglion cell

182 se topographic variations in the encoding of visual space should be considered when studying visual p

183 This predicts that positions in visual space should be represented more reliably during

184 system contains organized representations of visual space.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Primates have specia

185 spatial representations as primates explore visual space, similar to those identified in rodents nav

186 plete or biased toward particular regions of visual space, suggestive of specializations for processi

187 ction site but spanned a greater distance in visual space than the ARF of the injection site.

188 ly populated subsets of cells are given more visual space than warranted by their transcriptional div

189 erminal boutons, along an axis in the map of visual space that corresponds to the preferred orientati

190 facets, and found a non-uniform sampling of visual space that explains the spatial variation in pref

191 in constructing the stable representation of visual space that is an essential aspect of conscious pe

192 Our findings suggest an entorhinal map of visual space that is timed with neural activity in oculo

193 the sampling of information from regions of visual space that lie along a neuron's axis of preferred

194 t on behavior was specific to the portion of visual space that retinotopically coincided with the V1

195 y by pulling the eyes toward the part of the visual space that was preferentially encoded by the oliv

196 is local: when contrast varies smoothly over visual space, the gamma peak frequency in each cortical

197 enting the central and peripheral regions of visual space to adjust differently, according to the opt

198 iate cortices and cover anisotropic parts of visual space, unlike V1 horizontal connections that are

199 cover portions of V1 representing regions of visual space up to eight times larger than receptive fie

200 and the topographical representation of the visual space was mapped in the tectum.

201 Representations of central visual space were identified within dorsal portions of L

202 nal, coarse representations of contralateral visual space were identified within ventral medial and d

203 Nevertheless, representations of visual space were typical in dorsal face-selective regio

204 theless, postoperatively, representations of visual space were typical in dorsal face-selective regio

205 Blur could in principle fill in the parts of visual space where disparity is imprecise.

206 The eCRF is defined as the region of visual space where stimuli cannot elicit a spiking respo

207 versus ON responses across large portions of visual space with silicon probe and whole-cell patch-cla

208 w the thalamus might form a resampled map of visual space with the potential to facilitate detection

209 h maps contain an inversion of contralateral visual space with the upper visual field represented ven

210 cortical area contains a topographic map of visual space, with different areas extracting different

211 We also assessed the representation of visual space within each region, finding that four visua

212 maging, we found multiple representations of visual space within the ventral human pulvinar and exten

213 maging, we found multiple representations of visual space within ventral IT cortex of macaques that i

214 spans enough columns to sample 75 degrees of visual space, yet the area that evokes calcium responses