戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ex to determine clinical characteristics and vital status.
2 contacted for symptoms, clinical events, and vital status.
3 elated to trial phase, institution type, and vital status.
4  psychotic depression but was not related to vital status.
5 ormed to obtain baseline characteristics and vital status.
6 ructosamine assays were performed blinded to vital status.
7 er mobile phone to update information on her vital status.
8 sing date of birth, diagnosis, or last known vital status.
9 t screening histories, incident cancers, and vital status.
10 tion to ascertain incident hip fractures and vital status.
11 ational Death Index to ascertain their later vital status.
12 until May 31, 2019, to obtain information on vital status.
13 AIDS Programme database to ascertain ART and vital status.
14 ology Score II), organ failure supports, and vital status.
15                Of 497 (86%) with ascertained vital status, 340 (69%) were alive and, in 278 (82%) cas
16 ed in all women who had at least one updated vital status after baseline interview.
17 nd sex among guideline-eligible patients for vital status (alive/dead) at 24 months.
18 follow-up of 212733 surgical cases using VHA Vital Status and admission records were obtained with 10
19 roughout the United States and combined with vital status and cause of death data through December 31
20                                              Vital status and cause of death of all patients eligible
21                                              Vital status and cause of death was determined during 19
22                        Information regarding vital status and cause of death was obtained from the Na
23                                        Their vital status and cause of death were ascertained by comp
24                                              Vital status and cause of death were ascertained for the
25                                              Vital status and cause of death were ascertained through
26                                              Vital status and cause of death were ascertained through
27                                              Vital status and cause of death were determined through
28                                              Vital status and cause of death were obtained from Natio
29 cluding initial SUD episode and any relapse, vital status and cause of death, and professional conseq
30 an areas followed from 1982 through 2004 for vital status and cause of death.
31                                              Vital status and causes of death were ascertained using
32                                              Vital status and date and cause of death were ascertaine
33 e and passive follow-up methods to determine vital status and date of death for 1,954 pancreatic canc
34                                              Vital status and death date information was queried usin
35                           We ascertained the vital status and development of ESRD in 143 living kidne
36 s the demographics, health services use, and vital status and discharge dispositions of patients with
37 ery were contacted by telephone to determine vital status and functional capacity using the Duke Acti
38 ted symptom burden, ventilator outcomes, and vital status and functional status at discharge and 3 an
39                                              Vital status and history of MI during follow-up were det
40 ons (2011-2013) with active surveillance for vital status and hospitalizations.
41                               We ascertained vital status and identified predictors of mortality usin
42                               Information on vital status and infertility from the Danish Civil Regis
43                           We ascertained the vital status and lifetime risk of ESRD in 3698 kidney do
44                                              Vital status and medical history were ascertained from a
45                                              Vital status and MRS at the end of the trial were known
46 on surveys in these towns to collect data on vital status and other characteristics of survey respond
47                                              Vital status and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) we
48 is period, we surveyed the cohort to measure vital status and subsequent TB episodes.
49 rhans'-cell histiocytosis to ascertain their vital status and whether cancer had been diagnosed.
50 s calculated on the basis of length of stay, vital status, and 30-day readmissions.
51                           Cancer recurrence, vital status, and cause of death were documented for a m
52                           Cancer recurrence, vital status, and cause of death were documented for a m
53 s and emergency department visits, patients' vital status, and current antipsychotic drug status was
54 y and morphology, age and date at diagnosis, vital status, and date of death (if applicable) were col
55 diagnosis, morphology and topography, stage, vital status, and date of death or last contact) were in
56 logy Project through December 1994 to obtain vital status, and death certificates were obtained for t
57 ational or regional registries of cancer and vital status, and eligible cases were patients with brai
58 frequency matched to cases on year of birth, vital status, and maternal county of residence at delive
59                    We determined treatments, vital status, and other factors using registry, intervie
60 all subjects to whom SSA assigned an unknown vital status as well as all subjects whom SSA identified
61                         Recently, during the vital status ascertainment phase of an ongoing occupatio
62 protocol will enable researchers to maximize vital status ascertainment while containing costs associ
63 mented by CLU vital status updates, improves vital status assessment while increasing substantially t
64                                              Vital status at 1 year was available in 936 of 944 (99.2
65 days was sent a return postcard to ascertain vital status at 1 year.
66 ospital charges for the index admission, and vital status at 100 days.
67                                              Vital status at 24 months was known for 2960 (88.5%) pat
68                                              Vital status at 3 months was determined, and independent
69 ssion status based on clinical interview and vital status at 5 years by using the National Death Inde
70               Loss to follow-up was low with vital status at 6 months of age reported for 22,698 (98.
71  criterion standards of current work status; vital status at 6 years; grip strength; walking velocity
72                                              Vital status at day 90 was available for 936 of 1117 (84
73 B from 2015 to 2019, including demographics, vital status at diagnosis, treatment duration, treatment
74 f mechanical ventilation, and information on vital status at hospital discharge was acquired.
75                                              Vital status at hospital discharge was the outcome measu
76 ristics were recorded as were procedures and vital status at hospital discharge.
77 existing studies have not considered patient vital status at ICU discharge.
78                                              Vital status at June 30, 1992, was obtained for the 1134
79 people without MS by sex, year of birth, age/vital status at MS diagnosis, and region of residence (c
80                              The outcome was vital status at PICU discharge.
81                                              Vital status at study end was available for all patients
82      Based on patients' diagnostic codes and vital status at the end of the admission, disease focus
83 time of SCU admission, at 24 hrs, as well as vital status at the time of discharge from the SCU and h
84                                              Vital status, cause of death and coronary heart disease
85  home visit about 60 days later to ascertain vital status, clinical outcome, and interval growth.
86 it was made about 60 days later to ascertain vital status, clinical outcome, and interval growth.
87 tion, 66 [11] years); long-term follow-up of vital status, conducted annually until 2005, ranged from
88                                          The vital status could be updated on Dec 31, 2008, in all re
89                                   Additional vital status data collection and subsequent analyses wer
90 hoc.Measurements and Main Results: We report vital status data for 99.6% of the intention-to-treat po
91                         The process uses the vital status data service of the Social Security Adminis
92    A secondary analysis of recovered missing vital status data was performed.
93                      High-quality cancer and vital status data, and continued progress in early diagn
94                  With inclusion of recovered vital status data, the excess relative mortality risk wa
95  therapy, following collection of additional vital status data.Methods: Patients were randomized 2:2:
96 detectable CMV DNA at randomization, 437 had vital-status data available through week 48 post-HCT at
97                              VA and Medicare vital-status data were used to calculate one-year surviv
98                               Information on vital status, date of death and cause of death was obtai
99                                              Vital status, date of death, and cause of death were obt
100  (2.9%) of 1440 (one individual did not have vital status documented at 48 h) after randomisation (ad
101 21,390 HCC cases diagnosed with follow-up of vital status during 1998-2008, there were 4,727 (22%) wi
102 efined by the Veterans Health Administration vital status file.
103 ertained through corresponding inpatient and vital status files, and risk-standardized rates were cal
104 rates were ascertained through corresponding vital status files.
105 y and 1-year mortality were calculated using Vital Status Files.
106                                              Vital status follow-up began with the date of exit from
107                                              Vital status follow-up was conducted via population regi
108                                              Vital status for 1,043 (97%) participants was ascertaine
109                                We determined vital status for 561 miners, and obtained a follow-up qu
110       The NDI and active follow-up agreed on vital status for 91.2% of Hispanic EPESE subjects.
111 was followed for future cancer incidence and vital status for a median of 7.0 years.
112 sive hemodynamic data, echocardiography, and vital status for all patients referred for right heart c
113 invasive hemodynamics, echocardiography, and vital status for all patients.
114 e National Death Index was used to ascertain vital status for patients who could not be contacted.
115    A National Death Index search ascertained vital status for those with incomplete follow-up.
116 edicaid Services claims data, we ascertained vital status from date of surgery through December 31, 2
117 rom the National Danish Patient Registry and vital status from the National Danish Civil Registration
118 gh only 34% of these differentiated LTFU for vital status from withdrawal of consent.
119                                      Patient vital status generally is passively obtained by cancer r
120                                              Vital status has been traced, and risk factors in adulth
121                      Data collected included vital status, histologic findings, and therapeutic inter
122 ithm incorporating recency, maternal HIV and vital status, history of sexual activity, and age at dia
123 d clinical outcomes were obtained, including vital status, hypoxia, and lung transplant.
124                 We report ART initiation and vital status in children with HIV after 7 years of rollo
125                                              Vital status in September 2010 was obtained from the Med
126                   Complete information about vital status in the Ontario Cancer Registry was availabl
127                                              Vital status information at 10 years was complete for 84
128                                              Vital status information was available for all patients
129                                              Vital status information was queried using an institutio
130  occurrence of cholangiocarcinoma and obtain vital status information.
131 n 1964 and 2013; 176 had valid follow-up and vital status information.
132 in the original analysis owing to incomplete vital status information.Objectives: Report ACM and impa
133  3 and 12 months post-discharge, we assessed vital status, instrumental activities of daily living, b
134  in 1999 to 2000, which included determining vital status, interviewing participants or proxies, and
135                       Extended follow-up for vital status is being conducted by sites or through cent
136       Complete and accurate ascertainment of vital status is of great importance in cohort studies.
137   For stage I, data on all subjects for whom vital status is unconfirmed should be sent to the SSA.
138 ed baseline and longitudinal data, including vital status, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),
139 titution (2014-2015) were followed to obtain vital status, living location, and patient-reported outc
140       Depression status, cause of death, and vital status might have been misclassified.
141                                     Two-year vital status (minimum, 688 days) was determined in 2375
142 e electronic health records were linked with vital status obtained from the National Death Index.
143  randomization group, long-term follow-up of vital status occurred between June and October 2024.
144 data were merged with BIRLS to determine the vital status of 105,951 patients who underwent 8 types o
145                                          The vital status of 12,373 people aged 65 y and over was det
146                                          The vital status of 265 SLE patients and 355 controls enroll
147      In 2019, we verified information on the vital status of 5983 participants (89%).
148 analytic techniques were used to compare the vital status of 61 patients with psychotic major depress
149 compared clinical presentation, relapse, and vital status of 78 patients with type 1 AIP who met the
150                                  We knew the vital status of 93% of children (2,669/2,869) at 18 mont
151                                              Vital status of all participants was ascertained thirty-
152                                          The vital status of each member of this cohort was ascertain
153                                          The vital status of each patient was determined as of Decemb
154 h Index to obtain updated information on the vital status of participants and to determine causes of
155                            We determined the vital status of patients over a median of 3.6 years (10%
156 tudy, which evaluated for up to 10 years the vital status of patients who were originally enrolled in
157                                          The vital status of study participants was ascertained throu
158                                              Vital status of study participants was ascertained throu
159                                              Vital status of the patients was determined through the
160 the maximum accuracy (78%) in predicting the vital status of the patients.
161                                          The vital status of the subjects was identified in October 1
162                  Nine to 12 years later, the vital status of these subjects was determined.
163 system (BIRLS) is a VA file that depicts the vital status of U.S. veterans with 87% to 95% accuracy.
164                                  We recorded vital status on June 1, 1999, and ascertained causes of
165     Patients with unknown or uninterpretable vital status or graft survival time (n=264 [0.8%]) were
166                          We incorporated the vital status outcomes for these patients into analyses o
167 ariables to better predict patient outcomes: vital status (overall survival), metastasis (metastasis-
168 The working group defined 5 outcome domains: vital status, patient-reported outcomes, progression of
169                                              Vital status, risk factor, and cause-of-death data, coll
170 n a cohort of over 200,000 employees, an SSA vital status search reduced the size of the NDI death re
171 which respondents provided information about vital status, sociodemographic and socioeconomic charact
172                   Patients were followed for vital status through 180 days.
173 urvey in 1976 to 1980 and were monitored for vital status through 1992 in the Second National Health
174               Participants were followed for vital status through 1998.
175                                              Vital status through 2003 was obtained from the US Natio
176 5-2003, were followed for their CRC-specific vital status through 2005 and overall vital status throu
177 ecific vital status through 2005 and overall vital status through 2006.
178 luated in 1992 to 1996 and were followed for vital status through 2010.
179 sed by interview shortly after diagnosis and vital status through 2013 via the National Death Index.
180 lity Linkage Study ascertained participants' vital status through 2016 with linkage to the National D
181                                They compared vital status through 7 years ascertained from an NDI sea
182 iagnosed between 1988-2009 in California for vital status through December 31, 2010.
183 quartile range, 43-89 months) (follow-up for vital status through December 31, 2011), 2119 patients (
184 988 and 2005 in California were observed for vital status through November 2007.
185 ual characteristics in 1982 and follow-up of vital status through to 2000.
186  Death Index was used to ascertain patients' vital statuses through 2007.
187  Death Index was used to ascertain patients' vital statuses through December 31, 2007.
188 ex and Social Security Death Master File for vital status to 2016.
189 s, the authors recommend a revised two-stage vital status tracing protocol.
190 0 (n = 1,137,311) and tracked each subject's vital status until December 31, 2009.
191  criteria) was assembled and followed up for vital status until July 1, 2008.
192                                              Vital status up to 1 year after discharge was obtained f
193 S (SYNTAX Extended Survival) study evaluated vital status up to 10 years in 1,800 patients with de no
194 NTAX Extended Survival [SYNTAXES]) evaluated vital status up to 10 years in patients who were origina
195  in cryopreserved serum samples and reviewed vital status up to Jan 1, 2011, through contact with nex
196  match criteria, further supplemented by CLU vital status updates, improves vital status assessment w
197      The cohort was actively followed up for vital status via a trimonthly mobile phone call to each
198                                              Vital status was ascertained 12-16 y later.
199                                              Vital status was ascertained by contacting participants
200                                              Vital status was ascertained by direct subject and famil
201                                              Vital status was ascertained by telephone and by queryin
202                                    Long-term vital status was ascertained by using the respective Nat
203                                              Vital status was ascertained for 1429 (99.2%) participan
204                                              Vital status was ascertained for 604 (93.1%), of whom 55
205 between June 10, 2011, and Aug 27, 2012, and vital status was ascertained for 860 (87%).
206              Median follow-up was 31 months, vital status was ascertained in 99.6% of patients, and t
207                                              Vital status was ascertained in a random sample of 208 p
208                                              Vital status was ascertained on 96.9% of the OOA cohort
209                                              Vital status was ascertained through 1992.
210                                          The vital status was ascertained through computerized linkag
211 ecember 2010 (median follow-up of 20 years), vital status was ascertained with a National Death Index
212  lost patients were sought, and in 175 (85%) vital status was ascertained.
213                             In addition, the vital status was assessed at 24 months.
214                                              Vital status was assessed at 6 months of age.
215                                              Vital status was assessed over 2 years, and outcomes wer
216                                              Vital status was assessed through 180 days.
217                                    Follow-up vital status was assessed, with the primary endpoint of
218                                              Vital status was available for 11 621 patients.
219                                              Vital status was available for 97.2% of patients at 3 ye
220                                              Vital status was available in more than 95% of participa
221  variables were measured, and information on vital status was collected from demographic files at fol
222 eexamination (1990-1993), and information on vital status was collected over the subsequent 5 years.
223                                      Data on vital status was collected through December 31, 2014.
224                                              Vital status was collected.
225 as completed in June 2000, and follow-up for vital status was completed in September 2007.
226                                              Vital status was confirmed for >99% of 1,954 patients.
227                                              Vital status was determined by linkage to the National D
228                                              Vital status was determined by ongoing contact and a Nat
229                                              Vital status was determined from hospital records and th
230                                              Vital status was determined in 1972.
231                                              Vital status was determined in 361 participants (97.8%)
232                                              Vital status was determined through December 31, 2011.
233                                              Vital status was determined using the Social Security De
234                                              Vital status was established for all but 3 of 1351 patie
235                                              Vital status was followed for 9 years.
236                                              Vital status was followed from 1942 to 2003, and cause-s
237                                              Vital status was followed through December 30, 2003 (med
238                                              Vital status was followed up to 32.5 years.
239  the United States Renal Data System's data; vital status was from the National Death Index.
240 ; 49% recent heart failure hospitalization), vital status was known for 5636 (99.8%).
241                                              Vital status was known for all men on the 25th anniversa
242                         At trial completion, vital status was not known for 143 (1%) patients who wer
243                                              Vital status was not known for 2.3% of the patients at 1
244                                              Vital status was obtained by linkage to the National Dea
245                                              Vital status was obtained from record linkages with the
246                                              Vital status was obtained from the Social Security Death
247                     By National Death Index, vital status was obtained in 99.7% (n = 8221) with a mea
248                                       Infant vital status was recorded for 28 completed days.
249                         After follow-up, the vital status was recorded in all patients.
250  randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and thi
251             At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%).
252                                              Vital status was updated telephonically once every 3 mon
253                                              Vital status was verified in each patient.
254 he national population register to determine vital status were combined with data from Europe and Nor
255 y status, gestational age, birth weight, and vital status were measured to estimate the prevalence of
256                                    Patients' vital statuses were tracked using the National Death Ind
257 -TB mortality determined by cross-validating vital status with Georgia's death registry through Novem
258                                              Vital status within 24 h of the echocardiographic study

 
Page Top