コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 lculated using validated formulas (including waist and hip circumferences, weight, and age) and divid
2 rts, this may be for different reasons: BMI, waist and hip measurements, systolic and diastolic blood
3 Stent, is short-length with an antimigration waist and is easily removable due to long retrieval wire
4 DNAme sites associated with fasting insulin, waist, and body mass index, as well as thousands of DNAm
5 p < 0.001, BMI-based; OR = 2.37, p = 0.001, waist-based), prediabetes (OR = 1.55, p = 0.02), diabete
7 ATS receiving gender-affirming treatment had waist circumference >102 cm (compared with <=25% in othe
8 ts with type 2 diabetes aged >18 years, with waist circumference >94 (males) or >80 (females) cm, ser
9 y) with body mass index (in kg/m(2)) >29 and waist circumference >98 cm were randomly assigned to a v
10 presence of >=3 of the following components: waist circumference >=102 cm for males or >=88 cm for fe
11 calorie-restricted diet for 6 wk to obtain a waist circumference <102 cm followed by a weight-mainten
12 e (controlling for chronologic age) included waist circumference (>88 vs <=88 cm) (odds ratio [OR], 1
14 0.28; 95% CI: -0.42, -0.14; P = 0.0001), and waist circumference (-0.63 cm; 95% CI: -1.11, -0.16 cm;
15 (-7.6 +/- 0.3 compared with 0.4 +/- 0.5 kg), waist circumference (-6.2 +/- 0.4 compared with 0.9 +/-
16 for weight (0.13 lb; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.15), waist circumference (0.009 inches; 95% CI, 0.004 to 0.01
17 body-mass index (1.09 [1.01-1.17]; p=0.023), waist circumference (1.13 [1.02-1.26]; p=0.018), basal m
18 ger increases were seen in women for BMI and waist circumference (7-8%), but trends in skinfolds were
19 facilities close to home had 1.22 cm smaller waist circumference (95% CI -1.64 to -0.80), 0.57 kg/m(2
20 index (beta = 0.017, 95%CI: -0.026; -0.009), waist circumference (beta = -0.043, 95%CI: -0.061; -0.02
21 49; 95% CI 1.30-4.77), a steeper increase of waist circumference (beta=2.41; 95% CI 1.19-3.63) and in
23 = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.13-1.61; Ptrend < 0.0001), waist circumference (HR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.39-1.99; Ptrend
26 3.3% vs. 17.1 in controls, p = 0.02), higher waist circumference (prevalence risk ratio 83.3/20.3, 4.
27 nomic disadvantage with fatty liver included waist circumference (proportion mediated of the total ef
28 belt, intragastric pressure correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.682; P = .008), with the rang
30 de association studies of BMI (n = 681,275), waist circumference (WC) (n = 224,459) and waist-hip rat
31 c regression indicates each unit increase in waist circumference (WC) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and
32 x (BMI) (SD) was 23.7 (3.3) kg/m(2) and mean waist circumference (WC) 80.3 (9.8) cm, with 33% having
35 ith obesity, using body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) as obesity indices in northeast
36 ation of a BMI of 18.5-23.9 kg/m(2) and 1) a waist circumference (WC) of >85 cm in males or >80 cm in
37 ine the association of birth weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC) on cardiovascular disease (CVD)
38 hanges in fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), and waist circumference (WC) to the risk of HF and myocardia
39 GPRS-obesity) with body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) was modified by sleep character
42 e found that changes in body weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC) were significantly different ac
43 indices including body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were used to determine general
46 esity-related traits [body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
47 However, except waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist circumference (WC), it remains unknown whether the
49 istical analyses were body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), serum adipokines, cytokines, a
52 rtension, and between body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR),
53 y outcomes were changes in body weight, BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR),
57 s index (kg/m2) >=25] and central adiposity [waist circumference (WC): >88 cm for women, >102 cm for
58 = 0.93; 95% confidence interval = 0.89-0.96; waist circumference (WC): OR per 10 cm = 0.81 (0.69-0.96
59 nsus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumference afford practitioners with an importa
63 had statistically significant higher BMI and waist circumference and consumed more energy, and also h
65 l within the range associated with differing waist circumference and likely to be relevant to the ass
66 ilarly, fasters had a significantly low mean waist circumference and low mean body fat percent (P < 0
67 me was independently associated with smaller waist circumference and lower BMI and body fat percentag
68 Inverse associations were observed between waist circumference and LTL (-0.96% per z-score unit; 95
71 itional status as risk factors for increased waist circumference and type 2 diabetes among Ghanaian a
73 ngth, leg length-to-height ratio (LHR)] with waist circumference and type 2 diabetes, respectively.
76 NAcc is related to individual differences in waist circumference at baseline and is predictive of inc
79 dence that clinically relevant reductions in waist circumference can be achieved by routine, moderate
80 ith suppressed HIV-1 RNA examined weight and waist circumference change before and after first switch
82 cg08309687 in chromosome 21 associated with waist circumference for the first time (P = 2.24 x 10(-7
84 paring the fourth with the first quartile of waist circumference gave an RR of 1.95 (95% CI = 1.46-2.
87 20)), type 2 diabetes (P=2.8 x 10(-13)), hip/waist circumference in men (P=1.1 x 10(-9)), schizophren
88 eption and body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in older subjects with MetS and iden
90 professional societies to routinely include waist circumference in the evaluation and management of
91 ased adiposity (1.26 kg/m(2) BMI and 3.58 cm waist circumference increase, p < 0.0001), circulating i
93 tio were calculated from weight, height, and waist circumference measurements whereas fat mass was as
94 iglyceride level <1.3 mmol/L [<115.1 mg/dL], waist circumference of 85 cm [men] or 80 cm [women], and
95 d to examine the modifying effect of BMI and waist circumference on these associations among adults w
96 baseline levels and trajectories of BMI and waist circumference over time using linear mixed modelin
97 Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additi
99 ly less weight gain and smaller increases in waist circumference than olanzapine and was well tolerat
100 n the knowledge, including the refinement of waist circumference threshold values for a given BMI cat
102 ed: 1) periodontitis; 2) body mass index; 3) waist circumference to height (WHTR) ratio for central a
103 (2) = 26%, n = 3), and per 10 cm increase in waist circumference was 1.13 (95% CI 1.02-1.25, I(2) = 4
105 rse association between MVPA and 6-y gain in waist circumference was also limited to the older group
107 that the genetic correlation between MDD and waist circumference was only significant in individuals
109 BMI in middle age, BMI at age 18 years, and waist circumference were associated with increased rheum
110 ters < 296 dB/m, BMI < 25 kg/m(2) and normal waist circumference were included in the interventional
116 essure, total cholesterol, triglycerides and waist circumference with risk of meningioma were non-sig
117 e RFM equation for adults (64 - (20 x height/waist circumference) + (12 x sex)) may be used for adole
120 essure), metabolic (HOMA(ir), triglycerides, waist circumference), and immune (white blood cell count
122 5 trials on percentage body fat, 4 trials on waist circumference, 4 trials on fasting plasma glucose,
123 o <30 in 38% and >=30 in 30%, 33% had a high waist circumference, 89% were physically inactive, 37% (
124 ood pressure, 2.1% (95% CI: 0.5, 3.8) higher waist circumference, and 1.6% (95% CI: - 0.6, 3.8) highe
125 ffects of viscous fiber on body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and body fat, independent of calori
128 for age, sex, smoking, LDL-cholesterol, BMI, waist circumference, and HOMA-insulin resistance (HOMA-I
129 a significant reduction in body mass index, waist circumference, and improvement in blood pressure t
130 nts of body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and waist circumference, and information on 5 genetic varian
131 , lower BMI, lower C-reactive protein, lower waist circumference, and lower odds of hypertension and
132 Metabolic parameters, particularly increased waist circumference, and not HIV-specific factors, were
133 s inversely associated with body mass index, waist circumference, and percent body fat, while 2,5-dic
135 were fairly similar trends in levels of BMI, waist circumference, and skinfold thicknesses in men in
137 en body size (body mass index [BMI], height, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio) and body fa
138 SD) age = 16.8 (0.2) years), height, weight, waist circumference, blood lipids, glucose, insulin, and
139 tering patients and was associated with BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, heart rate, HbA1c,
140 fter adjustments for age, service specialty, waist circumference, body mass index, alcohol consumptio
143 ty to fast-food outlets were associated with waist circumference, body-mass index (BMI), and body fat
145 and their accretion in infancy with height, waist circumference, FM, FFM, and cardiometabolic risk m
146 ary outcomes were gastrointestinal symptoms, waist circumference, glycemic status, and changes in the
147 fat = 14.1 +/- 2.7%-TEI) intakes as regards waist circumference, HDL-C, blood pressure, glucose, ins
148 lycerides, fasting glucose, body mass index, waist circumference, heart rate (HR) and diabetes, but w
149 mposite of seven biomarkers [blood pressure, waist circumference, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), insulin res
150 er adjusting for body mass index in kg/m(2), waist circumference, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabete
151 than 2 of the following 4 criteria (elevated waist circumference, hypertension, elevated plasma gluco
152 s associated with adolescent age, and higher waist circumference, levels of alanine or aspartate amin
153 in secondary outcomes were change in weight, waist circumference, lipids, serum glucose, and hemoglob
154 weight loss maintenance and changes in BMI, waist circumference, number of steps per day, health-rel
155 adjustment for skin type, fracture history, waist circumference, outdoor free play, neighborhood inc
156 d on an algorithm including body mass index, waist circumference, serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and
157 study measured child body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, skinfold thickness, and body fat ma
158 ements (taken from birth through childhood), waist circumference, skinfold thickness, blood pressure,
159 combines measures of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, triglyceride, and gamma-glutamyl tr
160 and natural log-transformed blood pressure, waist circumference, triglycerides, fasting glucose, and
161 was computed from the following components: waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL-c, glucose, and
162 dex, physical activity, body fat percentage, waist circumference, triglycerides, total cholesterol, a
164 work stress was associated with higher BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, alanine transamina
165 vely examined the effect of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and 10-year weight
166 take have negative genetic correlations with waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and neighborhood d
167 ith risk of T2DM, increased body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, diastolic blood pr
168 hropometric measurements of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and fat percent
169 found that central adiposity, as measured by waist circumference, was associated with worse global lo
170 lly attenuated after adjustments for BMI and waist circumference, which demonstrates a crucial role f
181 Twenty-five healthy, normal-weight men (waist circumference: <94 cm) and 54 abdominally obese me
183 edicted by an interaction between height and waist circumference: the presumed benefits of being tall
184 nd percentage of body fat from bioimpedance; waist circumference; overweight and obesity; height; BP;
185 sease history, and body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference; results were pooled based on a rand
186 , and inflammatory systems (body mass index; waist circumference; total, high and low density lipopro
187 )), body weight, percentage of body fat, and waist circumference] and glucose and insulin metabolism
188 e: the presumed benefits of being taller are waist-dependent, and affect taller people more than shor
189 m-up and top-down forcing, analogous to wasp-waist dynamics, but occurring across multiple trophic le
190 eeds in three stages: a local constriction ("waist formation"), pulsation-which increases waist longi
193 .4% in PBF, and 2.0, 1.9, 0.6, and 1.0 cm in waist, hip, arm, and thigh circumference, respectively (
194 .4% in PBF, and 2.0, 1.9, 0.6, and 1.0 cm in waist, hip, arm, and thigh circumference, respectively (
195 index (BMI), percentage body fat (PBF), and waist, hip, arm, and thigh circumferences were measured
196 index (BMI), percentage body fat (PBF), and waist, hip, arm, and thigh circumferences, were measured
197 , waist circumference (WC) (n = 224,459) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) (n = 224,459) to obtain unconfound
198 ned for adipose tissue eQTL colocalizations, waist-hip ratio (WHR) and circulating lipid traits had t
199 (CAD), rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, waist-hip ratio (WHR), body-mass index (BMI), and height
200 gnals that colocalized with GWAS signals for waist-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index (WHRadjBMI)
202 ciated with higher BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, alanine transaminase, white blood cell
203 ect of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and 10-year weight change on the risk o
204 netic correlations with waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and neighborhood deprivation (|r(g)| ~
205 cipants had measurements of body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and waist circumference, and informatio
206 king status, triglycerides, type 2 diabetes, waist-hip ratio, attention deficit hyperactivity disorde
207 physiological traits: height, waist, weight, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, fasting serum insulin,
208 king status, triglycerides, type 2 diabetes, waist-hip ratio, childhood cognitive ability, neuroticis
209 reased body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, diastolic blood pressure, type 1 diabet
210 yses, lower BMI and oxidized LDL, and higher waist-hip ratio, hsCRP and zonulin correlated with thick
211 yses, lower BMI and oxidized LDL, and higher waist-hip ratio, hsCRP, and zonulin correlated with thic
214 ith lower age, higher body mass index, lower waist-hip ratio, vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyv
216 ices, such as the body mass index (BMI), the waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and waist-by-height(0.5) ratio (WH
217 DNA associations with body mass index (BMI), waist-hip-ratio (WHR), glucose, insulin, HOMA-B, HOMA-IR
218 ociations of anthropometric (weight, height, waist/hip circumferences, 4-site skinfold thicknesses) a
219 orrelated with age, known diabetes duration, waist/hip ratio, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR)
220 ed to provide a short pulling impulse at the waist in the anterior direction to ten dancers and ten n
221 g in one model BMI and a strongly correlated waist index altered the association patterns with mortal
223 and a stronger positive association for the waist index, while combining BMI with the uncorrelated A
227 nt role in human mate-choice, and height and waist interact to signal health, its evolutionary conseq
228 design the incident beam such that the beam waist is aligned precisely and that stability is assured
229 waist formation"), pulsation-which increases waist longitudinal stresses-and transverse rupture.
230 fracture was noted fluoroscopically when the waist of the balloon released and by a sudden drop in in
231 In particular, we find there exists a beam waist offset whereby the resulting vorticity suppresses
233 but remained significant after adjusting for waist, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoki
234 ences across segments, but their constricted waist provides an evident mechanism for compartmentaliza
235 e age-matched controls with multidirectional waist-pull perturbations while walking on a treadmill.
239 for age, service specialty, body mass index, waist size, mean blood pressure, unhealthy behaviors, li
241 ractice explained up to 52.2% of variance in waist skinfold thickness, while a combined regression mo
242 oximated by an infinite Gaussian beam with a waist that is small compared to the size of the region o
244 ales or >80 cm in females (NWCO by WC); 2) a waist to height ratio (WHtR) of >=0.5 (NWCO by WHtR); 3)
245 t ratio (WHtR) of >=0.5 (NWCO by WHtR); 3) a waist to hip ratio (WHR) of >=0.9 in males or >=0.85 in
246 including the calculation of the laser beam waist to simplify the comparison and reproducibility of
247 (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.62 [95%CI 1.32-1.99]), waist-to-height ratio (OR = 1.74 [1.39-2.17]) and total
248 the results for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) but were similar to BMI and
249 fraction >= 50%]), among whom 2,051 also had waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) measurements (mean age 60.8
251 mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), systolic blood pressure (S
253 body weight, BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), blood pressure and plasma
254 After adjustment for history, adding BMI, waist-to-height ratio and total skinfolds (anthropometry
258 rvey, we regressed body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratios on urinary arsenic concentrations
259 o 0.15), bodyweight (1.03 kg, 0.24 to 1.82), waist-to-hip ratio (0.006, 0.003 to 0.010), and an odds
260 = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.39-1.99; Ptrend < 0.0001), waist-to-hip ratio (HR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.31-1.91; Ptrend
262 [CI] 1.44-1.70), with comparable results for waist-to-hip ratio (ORSD: 1.63, 95% CI 1.40-1.90) and bo
263 he association of a polygenic risk score for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) adjusted for body mass index (B
264 alysis of body fat distribution, measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) adjusted for body mass index (W
266 ta were insufficient to pool the results for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR
267 triglycerides (TG), fasting insulin (FI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in 4,721 individuals from the N
268 sociation studies for body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and multiple cerebrovascular d
269 of UNa, body mass index (BMI), BMI-adjusted waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), body fat (BF) percentage and e
272 ariate Cox regression analyses detected age, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1
273 models predicting body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), including interaction terms fo
275 S) using variants previously associated with waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI) and exam
277 cumference adjusted for body mass index" to "waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index (under 5
278 st causal associations of central adiposity (waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index [WHRadjB
279 iation of body-fat distribution, assessed by waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index, with 22
283 pants were used to estimate the relevance of waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index (BMI) to CKD prev
285 in resistance-related phenotype (e.g. higher waist-to-hip ratio and fasting insulin levels, but lower
286 yses, each 0.06-genetically-predicted higher waist-to-hip ratio was associated with a 29% (1.29; 1.20
289 The associations of mortality with BMI and waist-to-hip ratio were similarly strong, and each was w
290 ve associations of percent body fat, WC, and waist-to-hip ratio with NAFLD, with HRs per 1-SD of 2.27
291 ndex [BMI], height, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio) and body fat composition (total body
292 ated with increased body mass index-adjusted waist-to-hip ratio, act to specifically increase RSPO3 e
293 sting glucose concentration, bodyweight, and waist-to-hip ratio, and an increased risk of type 2 diab
294 nts of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and fat percentage through bioimpeda
295 ome-wide association studies (GWAS) for BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and other adiposity traits have iden
296 nd that of abdominal obesity, as measured by waist-to-hip ratio, have distinct biological backgrounds
297 for age, education, hypertension, diabetes, waist-to-hip ratio, physical inactivity, current smoking
300 ants and eight physiological traits: height, waist, weight, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, fasting