戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  decreased in autumn due mainly to increased water stress.
2 ing bubbles in the stem xylem during imposed water stress.
3 ts evolved different strategies to cope with water stress.
4 imilation process due to natural senesce and water stress.
5 ss would add considerably to drought-related water stress.
6 t parts and alternative methods for inducing water stress.
7 ing photosynthesis is strongly influenced by water stress.
8 clines, presumably because of leaf ageing or water stress.
9 t of abscisic acid, which is associated with water stress.
10  maturation depending on the duration of the water stress.
11 isition, and improved growth and yield under water stress.
12  fluctuations of uptake rates in response to water stress.
13 lant's control of stomatal conductance under water stress.
14 d to apply irrigation to cope with increased water stress.
15 en isotope ratio of plants under salinity or water stress.
16 isition, and improved growth and yield under water stress.
17 nt in the rhizosphere of newer hybrids under water stress.
18  abscisic acid (ABA) to close stomata during water stress.
19 ests, but fail to capture their responses to water stress.
20 ABA levels to close stomata during sustained water stress.
21 tive to the wild-type wheat genotypes during water stress.
22 , and attenuates derepression of genes under water stress.
23 n suggests an increasing frequency of lethal water stress.
24 wth control in the plant response to ROS and water stress.
25 ase of compounds related to the avoidance of water stress.
26 dogenous ABA and leaf water potential during water stress.
27 crop quality under artificially imposed mild water stress.
28 s in plants subjected to different levels of water stress.
29 st in postgermination embryos that encounter water stress.
30 l for plants experiencing dynamic changes in water stress.
31 amine the acclimated response of chi to soil water stress.
32 al properties of these macromolecules during water stress.
33 eus, and its expression was downregulated by water stress.
34 ons of LEA proteins in animal species during water stress.
35 tic processes and its beneficial role during water stress.
36 functions into the model to account for soil water stress.
37  increased CO(2) concentration and increased water stress.
38 out the response of plant water transport to water stress.
39 ential oil content was negatively reduced by water stress.
40 ivity, thereby avoiding potential short-term water stress.
41  Salvia reuterana Boiss) under conditions of water stress.
42 s to regulate gas exchange during periods of water stress.
43  environmental memory scales with increasing water stress.
44 tion and partitioning in soybean seeds under water stress.
45 ficantly with rising D during the periods of water stress.
46 describe mortality risk across all levels of water stress.
47 l scale and return flows when characterizing water stress.
48  repress stomatal development in response to water stress.
49 henotypes related to plant performance under water stress.
50 pecies that experience higher variability in water stress.
51 ht and implying that mitigation would reduce water stresses.
52 Soybean plants were not visibly nutrient- or water-stressed.
53 e gross primary production through ecosystem water stress(3,4), cause vegetation mortality(5) and fur
54          All species were very vulnerable to water stress (50% reduction in whole-leaf hydraulic cond
55 een and Purple Iranian), and the impact that water stress (75% and 50% field capacity) and storage ti
56 widespread ant-plant symbiosis increase with water stress across 26 sites along a Mesoamerican precip
57 s supported similar environments in terms of water stress across a wide climatic gradient, indicating
58 e CO2 effects on WUE in the model alleviated water stress across all sites.
59 esults, to summarize expression responses to water stress across studies, and meta-regression to mode
60    The wheat translocation line had improved water stress adaptation and higher root and shoot biomas
61 its are an important component for improving water stress adaptation.
62             Given the current replacement of water-stress adapted 'xerophytic' tree species by mesoph
63 ed ancestry or independent associations with water stress alone.
64                  Plant hydraulics integrated water stress along the soil-plant continuum and was more
65                                     Moderate water stress also increased beta-carotene, flavonoids an
66       Edaphic stress, even in the absence of water stress, altered xylem structure and thus had subst
67 ontrolled to enable plant protection against water stress and define the dimeric receptors as key tar
68                                 With growing water stress and demand for energy, this number will con
69 e crucial for heavy use, factors relating to water stress and geographical proximity matter most for
70 ed tubules likely exposes locusts to greater water stress and increased energy costs.
71 ggested to act as an osmosensor that detects water stress and initiates downstream responses.
72  algorithms allowed to differentiate between water stress and irrigation grape samples when the fluor
73 acts from cv Tempranillo grapes subjected to water stress and irrigation treatment, both of them with
74 ons but that grasses are more susceptible to water stress and lose biomass more quickly in dry condit
75 s located in Nebraska, a state with moderate water stress and moderate corn production (11%).
76  2011, and examined the relationship between water stress and NDVI.
77 spiration could be primarily attributable to water stress and subsequently limited plant growth (comm
78 e differences among models in sensitivity to water stress and, among the N cycle models, N availabili
79 osynthetically active zones when the leaf is water stressed and under high-light and low CO(2) condit
80 sions by preventing sugarcane expansion into water-stressed and high-carbon stock ecosystems.
81 n by an external environmental factor, 'soil water stress' and consequently by a constant or decreasi
82 attern consistent with warming and increased water stress, and also with paleohistoric shifts in vege
83 otosynthesis and stem water potential during water stress, and delayed recovery time.
84 r relation traits can acclimate to long-term water stress, and highlight the limitations of extrapola
85                            To overcome heat, water stress, and increased exposure to ultraviolet radi
86 ture forests; interactions with temperature, water stress, and phosphorus limitation; and the influen
87 ic variables, such as the method of applying water stress, and the part of the plant the mRNA was ext
88 alleviate climate-induced increases in plant water stress, and, as a result, sustain high biomass for
89  gross primary production (GPP) responses to water stress are commonly based on remotely sensed chang
90 wth promotion and root tropic response under water stress are key responses for plant survival under
91                         Field areas prone to water stress are shown to lag as much as 23-33% below th
92 cosystems, as well as how these responses to water-stress are shaped by host genotype are poorly unde
93 any of these eligible bodies of water are in water-stressed areas with high land acquisition costs an
94  the example of corn grain shows that 59% of water stress associated with corn grain production in th
95  spatial (i.e., watershed) scales camouflage water stress associated with withdrawals from surface wa
96 acts of virtual water trade on water use and water stress at both the national and basin level.
97 e", we developed a framework to characterize water stress at different time scales and at fine spatia
98 may cope with and respond to temperature and water stress at the molecular level in distinct ways, wi
99 ions of latent heat fluxes during periods of water stress at two eddy covariance sites in Australia.
100  plant community that experiences negligible water stress but is severely stunted by low-nutrient and
101 are characters often cited as adaptations to water stress, but links between the function of these tr
102 range Habanero, and BGH1719 responded to the water stresses, but produced less capsaicinoid yield as
103 shallow groundwater storage can buffer plant water stress; but only where shallow groundwater connect
104 ne abscisic acid (ABA) protects seeds during water stress by activating genes through transcription f
105 ow pre-harvest factors, such as grafting and water stress, can influence the phenolic content of toma
106 aceutical and natural steroid estrogens in a water stressed catchment in South Australia alongside a
107 l drought but are likely to face intensified water stress caused by higher temperatures and to be vul
108  into leaves enables plants to alleviate the water stress caused by low soil moisture, hydraulic resi
109 itive sudden hydraulic failure under extreme water stress (cavitation).
110 itself may raise questions of constraints in water-stressed cities, with such a shift in Delhi increa
111 fting on specific rootstocks more adapted to water stress conditions may be a tool to improve crop qu
112            So, the richness of ZarxJos under water stress conditions with these compounds confirms it
113 ed better growth when exposed to low-K(+) or water stress conditions.
114  mucilage release and seed germination under water-stress conditions.
115 e development of supernumerary carpels under water-stress conditions.
116 times during the season, in well-watered and water-stressed conditions and in newer and older generat
117 ional area were grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions in greenhouse mesocosms and in
118 sting CCFN were grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions in greenhouse mesocosms and in
119  (Zea mays) genotypes under well-watered and water-stressed conditions in the field.
120 se to [eCO(2)] with greater difference under water-stressed conditions.
121 (3) water-stress impact and find that adding water-stress constraints to productivity-based ranking o
122  Citrulline application at 2 mM under severe water stress could also improve essential oil (EO) conte
123          This study reveals that appropriate water stress could increase capsaicinoid yield in some,
124 water desalination plants have been built in water-stressed countries to augment available water reso
125 f those where there are moderate and greater water stress countrywide (except Italy).
126                                  Thus, acute water stress damage shows parallels to vacuole-mediated
127                                          The water stress decreased Mn, P, Mg and S contents in 100,
128 ssimilation by trees at the MMSF, increasing water stress decreased the number of days of wood produc
129                                              Water stress depleted the volatile profile of these thre
130 forests are projected to experience seasonal water stress, despite anticipated increases in precipita
131 nly after prolonged exposure to more extreme water stress did active ABA-mediated stomatal closure be
132 Rivers provide crucial ecosystem services in water-stressed drylands.
133         In addition to buffering plants from water stress during severe droughts, plant water storage
134 led tendencies toward lower vulnerability to water stress (e.g. osmotic potential at full turgor, cel
135 ions, the crop often encounters intermittent water stress either at early stages of development or fl
136                                 Heat but not water stress elevated NCED4 expression in leaves, while
137  warm, water-limited regions, as intensified water stress eliminates drought-intolerant species that
138 quences of COMT deficiency under optimal and water stress environments in grasses.
139 d to provide benefit across the diversity of water stress environments relevant to economic yield.
140 agricultural sustainability in nutrient- and water-stressed environments.
141 -habitat Ranunculus lanuginosus Accordingly, water stress-exposed plants from the broad-amplitude Ran
142 contiguous US suggest consistent increase in water stress for power production with about 27% of the
143 104 countries; virtual water trade mitigated water stress for the basins within 85 of the 104 countri
144 frLEA3m and trehalose, exhibit resistance to water stress (freezing) as evidenced by an unchanged cap
145 redicting plant responses to a wide range of water stress from one or two sampled traits, increasing
146 consistent socioeconomics, the reductions in water stress from slower rates of climate change resulti
147  mitigation are overwhelmed by the increased water stress from the emissions mitigation itself.
148                Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere
149 ower, we assess its vulnerability related to water stress, governance, hydropolitical tension and fut
150 shutdown to preserve leaf water content when water stress has been sensed.
151                     However, the effect that water stress has on these two functional pools, especial
152 hytic tree species, we estimate that chronic water stress has the potential to decrease the C sink of
153 ydraulic conductance (Kleaf) with increasing water stress have been attributed to cavitation of the l
154               The region is characterized by water stress, high dessert conditions, declining land he
155  It facilitates responses to drought, to the water stress hormone abscisic acid, and to pathogen atta
156 r watersheds account for 78% of the national water stress impact, as these areas have high milk produ
157 ductivity, (2) water-use efficiency, and (3) water-stress impact and find that adding water-stress co
158 vity-based ranking of suitable sites reduces water-stress impact by 97% and water consumption by half
159                                   Evaluating water-stress impact is important because the impact of u
160               Thus, it is possible to reduce water-stress impact, quantified as water scarcity footpr
161 enewable diesel annually without significant water-stress impact.
162                             Knowledge of how water stress impacts the carbon and water cycles is a ke
163 ll, our results suggest that the response to water stress implies the activation of wax biosynthesis
164  desert shrubs to increasing temperature and water stress in a region where climate is changing rapid
165 academics, especially in light of increasing water stress in many regions around the world.
166 2) would also substantially exacerbate plant water stress in marginally arid environments, providing
167                                        Under water stress in mesocosms, lines with large CCS had betw
168                Overall, with the increase of water stress in plants, the osmotic potential of liquid
169 the ETCW, which is consistent with increased water stress in response to climate warming and dryer so
170 the observed diversity in plant responses to water stress in seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs).
171 vestigate dynamic physiological responses to water stress in silico and their relationships to genoty
172 site with greater cloud cover exhibited less water stress in summer, larger basal area growth, and gr
173                                         High water stress in T2 delayed fruit maturation, increased a
174  and Pinus contorta) that experienced lethal water stress in the field and in laboratory conditions.
175                                        Under water stress in the field, genotypes with reduced CCFN h
176                                        Under water stress in the field, lines with large CCS had betw
177                                        Under water stress in the mesocosms, genotypes with reduced CC
178  moderate changes of SWA, indicate long-term water stress in the region.
179                                         With water stress in the top 40 cm of the soil (REW(0-40 cm)
180                                     Although water stress increased and growth declined strongly at l
181                                          The water stress increased stomatal resistance and decreased
182                              Such additional water stress increases the risk of social instability, c
183 approach that relies on a novel multivariate water stress index, which considers the joint probabilit
184 hysical water scarcities can be described by water stress indices.
185            This supports the hypothesis that water stress induced by high temperatures causes the dec
186          Across the deciduous forest region, water stress induced similar declines in tree growth, pa
187 s to a loss of function by cavitation during water stress is a key indicator of the survival capabili
188  the C sink due to mesophication and chronic water stress is equivalent to an additional 1-3 days of
189        Our analysis suggests that dry-season water stress is likely to increase in E.
190           Our work suggests that alleviating water stress is not the reason we find grasses growing i
191 between the carbon footprint and the induced water stress is observed.
192                                              Water stress is one of the primary selective forces in p
193                       Among potential sites, water-stress is significantly more variable than algae p
194  damage thresholds, particularly in terms of water stress, is especially concerning.
195 imate change, and especially drought-induced water stress, is the dominant cause of the observed redu
196 ave high milk production and relatively high water stress; it is the production of local silage and h
197  difference vegetation index) indicated that water stress limited GEE and inhibited Reco .
198                                              Water stress makes this region vulnerable economically a
199                                              Water stress makes this region vulnerable to drought, bu
200                                              Water stress markedly decreased the grain Se, iron (Fe),
201 that determines ecosystem responses to plant water stress necessitates a re-evaluation of trait-based
202 tosynthesis and nitrogen assimilation during water stress, neither carbon nor nitrogen assimilation w
203 ogical changes plants undergo in response to water stress, new challenges have arisen pertaining to t
204                                   Under soil water stress, nocturnal sap flow is mainly used to reple
205                                          The water stressed North stays in contrast to the water abun
206 e found, and miRNAs regulated in response to water stress, nutrient stress, or temperature stress wer
207  T3 advanced internal ripening when moderate water stress occurred during the first 40 days of phase
208       When we included the NDVI responses to water stress of adjacent ecosystems with high SSWS into
209 do aspens to the most extreme growing season water stress of the past century by creating high atmosp
210 e mortality, the impacts of mild but chronic water stress on forest phenology and physiology are larg
211                                    Effect of water stress on germination was tested for fresh and 6-m
212 oved framework for predicting the impacts of water stress on GPP in forests with low SSWS.
213 ral content and to investigate the effect of water stress on it.
214 ther factors seemed to have more impact than water stress on K, Ca, Cu, Fe and Zn levels.
215  examined the effects of light intensity and water stress on metabolism by using a combination of dir
216 bon allocation, phenology, and the impact of water stress on phenology.
217                The effect might be indirect: water stress on plants can lead to carbon stress, which
218    Here, we investigated the effects of cold water stress on the hippocampus of sedentary and runner
219 tomatal conductance during the imposition of water stress on two drought-tolerant conifer species wit
220  grafting) combined with the abiotic stress (water stress) on the content of phenolic compounds (flav
221                          We demonstrate that water stress operating at the scale of individual plants
222                                              Water-stressed Opuntia show decreased ascorbic acid leve
223 vation in response to a period of protracted water stress or temperature-insensitive sudden hydraulic
224 , with plants exposed to different levels of water stress or to natural water availability, respectiv
225 atment effects were subtle and contingent on water stress, phenology, and species composition.
226  (Na2SeO4) improved the yield and quality of water stressed plants due to enhancement in the producti
227 bolism and signaling in roots of flooded and water stressed plants of Carrizo citrange revealed that
228 tio of GSH/GSSG when compared to non-sprayed water stressed plants.
229 enic isoprene, a major ozone precursor, from water-stressed plants under a dry and warm condition.
230 boidea to rapidly recover gas exchange after water-stressed plants were rewatered, and was associated
231                    The method is verified in water-stressed plants, as compared with a well-watered t
232                                 To cope with water stress, plants must be able to effectively sense,
233 ystem while avoiding the severe effects that water stress poses on woody species.
234 re affected by biases in factors controlling water stress (precipitation, humidity, and air temperatu
235 quantified tree-to-tree variation in growth, water stress (predawn and midday xylem tension), drought
236 tasets, we identify 2.65 million hectares of water-stress prone cropland, and estimate an aggregated
237  taeda) saplings (n = 83) to drought-induced water stress ranging from mild to lethal.
238                                     Although water stress reduces fruit yield, it also increases caps
239                                              Water stressed regions rely heavily on the import of wat
240 more common as water reuse is implemented in water-stressed regions.
241 s based on concentrations of water intake in water-stressed regions.
242  facilitating plant nutrient acquisition and water stress resistance, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fun
243 tial genetic source in breeding programs for water stress resistance.
244 dence that ATHK1 not only is involved in the water stress response during early vegetative stages of
245         To identify genes induced during the water stress response in Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)
246 erefore also a poor basis for parameterizing water stress response in land-surface models.
247 s a major physiological determinant of plant water stress response.
248  signaling, distinguishing it from a classic water-stress response.
249  to a richer understanding of the biology of water stress responses, and may prove valuable in other
250 ying the cellular signaling events governing water-stress responses, it is also important to consider
251 sults of various studies seeking to identify water stress-responsive genes only partially overlap.
252 an essential toolset to combat the worsening water stress resulting from population and industrial gr
253 o exhibit ABA-driven stomatal closure during water stress, resulting in strongly isohydric regulation
254             Moreover, in the absence of soil water stress (REW(0-40 cm) > 0.4), A. fruticosa can surv
255  results suggest that in the absence of soil water stress (REW(0-40 cm) > 0.4), the nocturnal sap flo
256 in protein profiles between well-watered and water-stressed roots.
257  the apical region of the elongation zone of water-stressed roots.
258 s quantified by U-PLS in both, irrigated and water stressed samples, and levels between 3.46 +/- 0.22
259 tiated by elevated foliar ABA, but sustained water stress saw a marked decline in ABA levels and a sh
260 as well as novel drought-phenology and plant water stress schemes.
261 ime stomatal closure in response to moderate water stress seemed to be a passive hydraulic process in
262 ought in recorded history, causing statewide water stress, severe economic loss and an extraordinary
263                         Interestingly, acute water stress showed accumulation of singlet oxygen as de
264           Under T2, trees suffering moderate water stress showed increased flavonoid and phenolic con
265 nd water demand, the region could experience water stress similar or worse than the epic Millennium D
266 o protein (or protein precursors) of intact, water-stressed soybean leaves exposed to (13)CO(2) and (
267 any forests have low spectral sensitivity to water stress (SSWS) - defined here as drought-induced de
268       When instantaneously rehydrated from a water-stressed state, fern and lycophyte stomata rapidly
269                                       During water stress, stomatal closure occurs as water tension a
270 the macroband from groups occupying the more water-stressed subcontinental interior.
271  wild-type exhibits similar phenotypes under water stress, suggesting that bmr12 may be in a water de
272 rporation of glycine into protein shows that water stress suppresses photorespiration in soybean leav
273 groups of plants with well-defined levels of water stress that could not be detected visually.
274 ofile during storage varied depending on the water stress that had been applied.
275 fecycles, trees encounter multiple events of water stress that often result in embolism formation and
276                                         Upon water stress, the overexpression of VvPIP2;4N induced a
277                                        Under water stress, the trees have smaller carbon pools.
278 hdrawals based on stream-specific ecological water stress thresholds facilitates protecting fragile a
279 ne across the range of dehydration from mild water stress to beyond turgor loss point.
280 plants (Populus x canescens) were exposed to water stress to investigate xylem sap sulfate and ABA, s
281 oisture, seasonal and annual streamflow, and water stress) to projections of future climate.
282 highlights the complexity and variability of water stress tolerance, and underscores the need for com
283 overexpression of ATHK1 results in increased water stress tolerance, our observations suggest a new t
284 o determine their role in poplar response to water stress, transgenic Populus tremula x Populus alba
285 ould periodically experience nutritional and water stress under these conditions, and thus the common
286  We quantified the C consequences of chronic water stress using a 13-year record of tree growth (n =
287 ause the impact of unit water consumption on water stress varies significantly across regions and sea
288                                              Water stress was applied using a reduced irrigation stra
289                          Cell death by acute water stress was inhibited by the singlet oxygen scaveng
290 s affected by the ATHK1-mediated response to water stress, we created a large-scale summary of expres
291 f Miscanthus germination, four hormones plus water stress were investigated and the range over which
292 level, the impacts of virtual water trade on water stress were statistically significant for basins a
293 fied, particularly in countries experiencing water stress, where dilution of pollutants entering rive
294                                   Increasing water stress, while significantly enhancing malondialdeh
295 e is rigorously maintained even under severe water stress, while the FAA composition is more plastic
296  Craig (AC) and M82, grown under control and water stress (WS) conditions.
297 to non-NATs are specifically expressed under water stress (WS).
298 tolerance to environmental stresses, such as water stress (WS).
299 cultures of dot/icm mutants in water, termed water stress (WS).
300 rown in environments without (WoWS) and with water stress (WthWS).

 
Page Top