ライフサイエンスコーパス: watt

1 he twins in each pair had different CRF (>=1 watt).

2 essive energy efficiency of up to 15.7 GCUPS/Watt.

3 y up to 88.51 tera-operations per second per watt.

4 ielding a power efficiency of 1.7 Gflops per Watt.

5 m with a natural solar light capacity of 257 watts.

6 g a significant power output of the order of Watts.

7 ork (median, range, % change) increased 17.5 watts (-13 to +44 watts, 46%, p < 0.05), maximal oxygen

8 r men and women in Harlem, 4.11 and 3.38; in Watts, 2.92 and 2.60; in central Detroit, 2.79 and 2.58;

9 (0.58 +/- 0.30 versus 0.76 +/- 0.32 L/min), Watts (45 +/- 48 versus 71 +/- 59), V E/MVV (88 +/- 33 v

10 , % change) increased 17.5 watts (-13 to +44 watts, 46%, p < 0.05), maximal oxygen consumption increa

11 energy metric of frames per second (FPS) per watt, a 5 times higher space metric of FPS per transisto

12 In 1952, James Watt, a young US Public Health Service (PHS) infectious

13 ted with a conversion efficiency of 141% per watt (absolute 7.9%).

14 wedge pressure, left ventricular dimensions, watts achieved during exercise, heart rate, maximum syst

15 Resting systolic blood pressure, watts achieved, peak VO2, VO2 at the ventilatory thresho

16 s determined by van't Hoff as well as D'Arcy/Watt analyses of the isotherms at 5, 15, and/or 25 degre

17 The coming together of Watt and Fejfar, with a joint focus on improved methods

18 on further to less than half a US dollar per watt and to minimize the environmental impact.

19 g system with a maximum cooling power of 260 watts and a maximum temperature span of 22.5 kelvin.

20 ic capacity and muscle strength (measured in watts and newtons per kilogram of body weight, respectiv

21 uce customer acquisition costs by 15% ($0.07/Watt) and identify new market opportunities for solar co

22 trated adequate efficiencies (1 to 15 lumens/watt) and lifetimes (>5000 hours) for practical use; how

23 sma can be formed with very low power (a few watts) and overlapped with the glow discharge.

24 and 275 mW (effectively >6,000 frames/s per Watt), and (iii) can be specified and trained using back

25 approximately 0.80 watt at 80 kelvin to 0.2 watt at 200 kelvin has been demonstrated in a superlatti

26 peak powers ranging from approximately 0.80 watt at 80 kelvin to 0.2 watt at 200 kelvin has been dem

27 piratory (TI) and expiratory (TE) times, and watts at rest and during maximal exercise, before and 3

28 ting regime of mHz fundamental linewidth and Watt class lasers.

29 eraFLOPS rates reserved for high-power (>100 watts) cloud computers.

30 nd a high output power densities of over 2.1 Watt cm(-2) at the temperature difference of 700 K.

31 ; 0.5 MHz; estimated peak tissue energy 2.26 Watt/cm(2); 10% duty cycle) to engage a target in the AL

32 PFT over the 30 year lifetime of a 1000 mega watt coal fired plant.

33 put of 143.6 kilowatts per cubic meter, a 24-watt commercial lamp can be directly lighted by a contin

34 Mean total energy delivered was 1271 J (2-watt continuous power mode).

35 later using either a surgical blade or a 150-Watt continuous-wave CO2 laser deflected by an x-y galva

36 with photoresponsivity above 0.1 ampere per watt (corresponding to an external quantum efficiency of

37 l pleural surface using 1 min of exposure (5 watts, defocused to 70 W/cm2 power density for both lase

38 CO reserve was calculated as DeltaCO/Watt (DeltaCO/W) and DeltaCO/DeltaVO(2).

39 association was stronger in pairs with >=60-watt difference in CRF (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.71).

40 e risks were similar in twin pairs with >=60-watt difference in CRF (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.64).

41 Lynne Mofenson and Heather Watts discuss the context and implications of the study

42 ewidth (0.2 +/- 0.1 angstrom), high-power (3 watts) emission that could be varied in different device

43 ted using van't Hoff analyses and the D'Arcy/Watt equation.

44 tantly, the criticism of our study design by Watts et al. and the designs and analysis of their recen

45 Watts et al. have criticised our study: for not filterin

46 Watts et al. introduced a metric of landscape pattern ca

47 rive from fossil fuels (approximately 10(13) watts), even with improvements in energy efficiency.

48 Ergometer work increased 20 Watt every 2 min; expiratory threshold loading (4 cm H2O

49 tiative has set cost-reduction targets of $1/watt for central-station solar technologies.

50 of 50 healthy subjects while spinning at 75 Watts for 1 hour.

51 Patients exercised at 53.7 +/- 4.1 watts for 10.4 +/- 1.4 min.

52 Power was delivered at 30 watts for 60 seconds, when either catheter/tissue contac

53 puffs/day (5 days/week) using either 5 or 30 watts for each respective exposure group.

54 the same trend reported by Millner-White and Watts for the effectiveness of various monovalent anions

55 um are analyzed with the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts formalism, the exponent beta decreases with increa

56 was calculated using the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts function and found to be 0.39.

57 chieved a best-in-class energy density of 41 watt hour per kilogram with a negative-to-positive (n/p)

58 tance of 200 F/g, a specific energy of 30-47 Watt-hour/kilogram (Wh/kg), a specific power of 200,000

59 per kilogram and specific energy up to 631.1 watt hours per kilogram at the micrometre-sized cathode

60 citors and can store a specific energy of 41 watt-hours per kilogram (19.5 watt-hours per liter).

61 ivering a high specific energy exceeding 410 watt-hours per kilogram of electrode plus electrolyte.

62 -ion full cell with an energy density of 460 watt-hours per kilogram of total composite electrode and

63 l cells with energy densities of 412 and 471 watt-hours per kilogram, respectively.

64 c energy of 41 watt-hours per kilogram (19.5 watt-hours per liter).

65 scillation with a threshold of tens of micro-watts in an integrated thin-film lithium niobate photoni

66 osity of the oils increased with the applied Watt increase.

67 rresponding to 200% of individual max power (watts) interspersed by 4.5 min of active recovery.

68 4 beats per minute), W(peak) (1.6 versus 2.7 watts/kg), AT (11.1 versus 18.0 ml O(2)/kg/minute) and W

69 ml O(2)/kg/minute) and W(AT) (0.6 versus 1.4 watts/kg), compared to controls (P <or= 0.05 for each).

70 omega, T), and a general Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) form for time-domain relaxation.

71 functions as well as the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) stretched exponential model.

72 h a deficient energy consumption of just two watts laser.

73 -infrared (mid-IR) spectral range, achieving watt-level continuous wave operation in a compact packag

74 spatial-mode lasers with high efficiency and watt-level output in the 97x-nm wavelength range are in

75 metabolic rate and efficiency (O(2) cost per watt), may fall by an average of 10% following 2 h of he

76 lfur has a thermal conductivity of ~19 to 32 Watt meter(-1) Kelvin(-1) from its top to the center, mu

77 .7 (mg/ml) for biomass to solvent ratio, 250 Watt microwave power and 250 rpm stirring speed.

78 y load-insensitive inotropic index, by 0.143 Watts/mL(2).10(4) (P=0.03, a +41% rise; 5-71 CI) and car

79 re well described by the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts model, from which a characteristic rate constant,

80 was quantified with the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts model.

81 ent and a potential depth around 0.22 mK per watt of incident laser power.

82 onducting glasses could reduce the price per watt of perovskite photovoltaic modules.

83 als from a few tens of mW to several hundred watts of average power and MW level of peak power, cover

84 with megawatts in the cloud but rather with watts on a smartphone.

85 bias fields, and for low-input power (micro-Watts or lower).

86 during normal walking [generating up to 7.4 watts, or a 300-fold increase over previous shoe devices

87 49% (median increase 17 watts, range 6 to 44 watts, p < 0.05) and maximal minute ventilation (VEmax)

88 A key goal is to achieve operation at sub-watt peak power levels and on sub-picosecond timescales.

89 emens per centimeter and a power output of 1 watt per square centimeter at 520 degrees C.

90 per square centimeter on NH(3) fuel, and 0.3 watt per square centimeter on CH(4) fuel in fuel cell mo

91 he PCECs achieve a peak power density of 1.6 watt per square centimeter on H(2) fuel, 0.5 watt per sq

92 watt per square centimeter on H(2) fuel, 0.5 watt per square centimeter on NH(3) fuel, and 0.3 watt p

93 e is estimated to be no more than about -0.3 watt per square meter (cooling), compared with +2.45 wat

94 aerosol climate forcings of as much as -0.8 watt per square meter cooling and +0.3 watt per square m

95 n for climate sensitivity and -0.30 to -0.95 watt per square meter for the net aerosol forcing.

96 nal negative radiative forcing of about -0.1 watt per square meter from 1960 to 1990.

97 (5)CF(3) to have a radiative forcing of 0.57 watt per square meter per parts per billion.

98 of clouds over the TP, with a 1.98 +/- 0.39-watt per square meter reduction in surface net CRE corre

99 -0.8 watt per square meter cooling and +0.3 watt per square meter warming.

100 rosol changes over this period of about -0.1 watt per square meter, reducing the recent global warmin

101 to endogenic heat fluxes locally reaching 1 watt per square meter.

102 In 2100, we project median forcings of 5.1 watt per square meters (5th to 95th percentiles of 3.3 t

103 d) century (the probability of exceeding 8.5 watt per square meters increases to about 7% by 2150), a

104 Although the probability of 8.5 watt per square meters scenarios is low, our results sup

105 th roughly 0.5% probability of exceeding 8.5 watt per square meters, and a 1% probability of being lo

106 and a 1% probability of being lower than 2.6 watt per square meters.

107 erated peak power densities of less than one watt per square metre, owing to the limitations imposed

108 ray laser, high-intensity radiation (>10(17) watts per cm(2), previously the domain of optical lasers

109 ice produced a specific cooling power of 2.8 watts per gram and a COP of 13.

110 th-run electrochemical muscle generates 1.98 watts per gram of average contractile power-40 times tha

111 ers a maximum specific cooling power of 1.52 watts per gram.

112 an extremely low thermal conductivity of 0.1 watts per kelvin per meter at room temperature along its

113 discharge/regeneration power of 1,061/1,425 watts per kilogram at a 50 per cent state of charge and

114 Stretching coiled yarns generated 250 watts per kilogram of peak electrical power when cycled

115 quency of 500 hertz and power density of 600 watts per kilogram.

116 ernating W and Se layers is as small as 0.05 watts per meter per degree kelvin at room temperature, 3

117 ntally measured thermal conductivity of 1200 watts per meter per kelvin and ambipolar mobility of 160

118 ioxide support is still as high as about 600 watts per meter per kelvin near room temperature, exceed

119 (kappa) of suspended graphene, 3000 to 5000 watts per meter per kelvin, exceeds that of diamond and

120 an enhanced thermal conductivity up to 1290 watts per meter per kelvin.

121 a thermal conductivity of approximately 0.6 watts per meter per kelvin.

122 impact, as expressed by radiative forcing in watts per meter squared, of individual chemical species.

123 sotopes and measured kappa greater than 1600 watts per meter-kelvin at room temperature in samples wi

124 ed thermal conductivity of approximately 309 watts per meter-kelvin while strained and heated.

125 245T2/10(7)) - (3.407T3/10(11)), in units of watts per meter-kelvin, if Fe2+ is present.

126 the low end of previous estimates, at 18-44 watts per metre per kelvin.

127 gigahertz and output power densities of 4.6 watts per millimeter at 2 gigahertz and 4.1 watts per mi

128 watts per millimeter at 2 gigahertz and 4.1 watts per millimeter at 6 gigahertz-among the highest fo

129 ed extremely high power densities of about 2 watts per square centimeter at 650 degrees C along with

130 tailored intense laser fields (about 10(13) watts per square centimeter) can dynamically Stark shift

131 ielding stable power densities of 0.3 to 0.6 watts per square centimeter.

132 for example, at 900 degrees C they deliver 2 watts per square centimetre of power in humidified hydro

133 intense (with intensities approaching 10(20) watts per square centimetre), hard (with photon energies

134 mely high peak intensities (exceeding 10(20) watts per square centimetre).

135 ase in S from 1983 to 2001 at a rate of 0.16 watts per square meter (0.10%) per year; this change is

136 square meter (cooling), compared with +2.45 watts per square meter (warming) due to anthropogenic gr

137 ivities should not exceed 2.5 (range: 1.7-4) watts per square meter (Wm(-2)) of the Earth's surface.

138 rane achieved a record power density of 85.1 watts per square meter and an osmotic potential of 181.5

139 urement Missions and is found to average 1.8 watts per square meter between 30 degrees S and 30 degre

140 ke instantaneous forcing of climate from -28 watts per square meter in cloud-free conditions to +8 wa

141 cking up to 97% of UV radiation from 5 to 90 watts per square meter in less than 16.9 seconds, demons

142 es that Earth is now absorbing 0.85 +/- 0.15 watts per square meter more energy from the Sun than it

143 ive forcing during the first year (34 +/- 31 Watts per square meter of burned area), but to decrease

144 imum power density using acetate reached 5.6 watts per square meter of cathode surface area, which wa

145 square meter in cloud-free conditions to +8 watts per square meter once the reduction of cloud cover

146 eased atmospheric heating locally by about 3 watts per square meter per decade (similar in magnitude

147 cooling increases at a rate of 0.11 +/- 0.31 watts per square meter per decade (Wm(-2) dec(-1)).

148 centimeter, an average power output of 4.46 watts per square meter per hertz, and an energy conversi

149 ck had a magnitude of 0.54 +/- 0.74 (2sigma) watts per square meter per kelvin, meaning that it is li

150 d to increase with SST at a rate of 13 to 15 watts per square meter per kelvin.

151 a global aerosol radiative forcing of +0.14 watts per square meter relative to business-as-usual sce

152 ls that the model underestimates by 25 to 30 watts per square meter the amount of solar energy absorb

153 ows a noontime radiative cooling power of 93 watts per square meter under direct sunshine.

154 without the dialysis stack, and 3.0 +/- 0.05 watts per square meter with domestic wastewater.

155 ged over an 80-year fire cycle (-2.3 +/- 2.2 Watts per square meter) because multidecadal increases i

156 equire local surface heat flux changes (+/-4 watts per square meter) much larger than the basinwide a

157 ve flux at the top of the atmosphere was -15 watts per square meter, comparable to the aerosol indire

158 reflected sunlight decreased by less than 2 watts per square meter, in the tropics over the period 1

159 Under peak sunlight of about 920 watts per square meter, our emitter reaches a temperatur

160 ly summer from BC in Arctic snow was about 3 watts per square meter, which is eight times the typical

161 alent to a radiative forcing of -0.5 +/- 0.4 watts per square meter, which suggests that reaching low

162 d by Earth to space increased by more than 5 watts per square meter, while reflected sunlight decreas

163 of mechanical power with a potential for >6 watts per square meter.

164 day conditions with a solar intensity of 850 watts per square meter.

165 eat across the ocean surface of 0.4 +/- 0.05 watts per square meter.

166 t has increased since 1750 by -0.05 +/- 0.03 watts per square metre (61 per cent), driven by the anth

167 temperature, and has a cooling power of 40.1 watts per square metre at ambient air temperature.

168 global-mean radiative forcing of around -0.2 watts per square metre for September to October 2014.

169 this leads to an increase of an average 3.4 watts per square metre in the surface longwave fluxes.

170 lanetary energy imbalance of 0.80 +/- 0.49 W watts per square metre of Earth's surface.

171 hen exposed to direct sunlight exceeding 850 watts per square metre on a rooftop, the photonic radiat

172 per square metre), aerosols (+0.03 +/- 0.01 watts per square metre) and stratospheric water vapour (

173 ct cooling effect at present (-0.13 +/- 0.03 watts per square metre) that arises from halogen-mediate

174 nsated by those from methane (+0.09 +/- 0.01 watts per square metre), aerosols (+0.03 +/- 0.01 watts

175 ative perturbations of ozone (-0.24 +/- 0.02 watts per square metre), compensated by those from metha

176 stratospheric water vapour (+0.011 +/- 0.001 watts per square metre).

177 (3) since 1850 AD is probably less than +0.4 watts per square metre, consistent with results from rec

178 hows a noise-equivalent power of 7 x 10(-19) watts per square-root hertz, which corresponds to an ene

179 ange of 1.5-3.0 GHz and at hundreds of micro-Watt power levels.

180 ejection fraction (EF; LV-EF at 90 W versus Watt %: r=-0.463, P<0.05).

181 Fifty-watt radiofrequency applications have proven to be safe

182 ncreased a median of 49% (median increase 17 watts, range 6 to 44 watts, p < 0.05) and maximal minute

183 eLife deputy editor Fiona M Watt recounts some of her personal experiences as a seni

184 ded the Demoralization Scale (DS-II) and the Watt's Connectedness Scale (WCS).

185 three-photon input was used to manipulate a Watt-scale beam at a speed exceeding 500 gigahertz.

186 hmic increasing intensities from 13.5 to 214 Watt seconds (Ws).

187 The average power is nearly 20 watts, several orders of magnitude higher than any exist

188 evention Trial (BCPT) Symptom Checklist; the Watts Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (WSFQ); and subsc

189 Watt soon turned to development of an effective program

190 the reconstructed neutron spectra resembled Watt spectra, which gave confidence that the interrogate

191 pabilities, a neutron image resolution for a Watt spectrum of 9.65 +/- 0.94 degrees in the azimuthal

192 We use three network models, Erdos-Renyi, Watts-Strogatz and structured nodes, to generate network

193 However, the Watts-Strogatz model reproduces very well the topologica

194 e biologically appealing modification of the Watts-Strogatz model to describe residue networks is pro

195 scale-free, and is best approximated by the Watts-Strogatz model, which generates "small-world" netw

196 , and these patterns are consistent with the Watts-Strogatz model.

197 considering Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert and Watts-Strogatz networks whose temporal dynamics follow a

198 legantly explained by mechanisms such as the Watts-Strogatz or the Barabasi-Albert models, among othe

199 chastic network models-small-world networks (Watts-Strogatz), random networks (Erdos-Renyi), and scal

200 ) , floating point operations per second per watt) than the brain (~10(15) FLOPS W(-1) ).

201 0 kg) and consumed less energy (300 vs. 1000 watts) than that for PV-CPR.

202 We show that approximately 10(12) watts--that is, 1 TW, representing 25-30% of the total d

203 In 1961, Crick, Barnett, Brenner, and Watts-Tobin designed an elegant experimental strategy to

204 ve up to 12.4 tera-operations per second per watt (TOPS/W) chip-sustained performance.

205 tput (direct Fick) were assessed at rest, 20 Watts (W), and peak exercise during both placebo and nit

206 We were able to transfer 60 watts with approximately 40% efficiency over distances i

207 wer at 6 months than at baseline, both at 20 watts workload (mean 32 mm Hg [SD 8] at baseline vs 29 m