戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  not been systematically demonstrated in any wild population.
2 s picta, based on data spanning >20 y from a wild population.
3 fine-scale location-based variation within a wild population.
4  taxa were reintroduced into the surrounding wild population.
5 study of baboons from an intensively studied wild population.
6 effect diminished with increased size of the wild population.
7 well as new insights into disease risks in a wild population.
8 nsequences of domestication-introgression in wild populations.
9  observe the effects of natural selection in wild populations.
10  and evolution of sex chromosomes systems in wild populations.
11 d be accounted for in demographic studies of wild populations.
12  require steps to mitigate transgene flow to wild populations.
13 olutionized quantitative genetic analyses of wild populations.
14  components of eco-evolutionary feedbacks in wild populations.
15 ries is not well understood, particularly in wild populations.
16  role in shaping demographic trajectories in wild populations.
17 onstrating the impact of this contaminant on wild populations.
18 mation of quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations.
19 ation of gene drives for the manipulation of wild populations.
20 prerequisite to preventing the extinction of wild populations.
21 ssive alleles under inbreeding conditions in wild populations.
22 es on the key drivers of social behaviour in wild populations.
23 r gene flow between cultivated and sympatric wild populations.
24 nfluence on the genome to be demonstrated in wild populations.
25  studies, but they also continue to exist as wild populations.
26 it expression among domesticated, hybrid and wild populations.
27 processes have led to genetic structuring in wild populations.
28 ariation and erosion of genetic structure in wild populations.
29  803 barley landraces to 277 accessions from wild populations.
30  in that it is transmitted naturally through wild populations.
31 that mimics the effects of mortality in many wild populations.
32 conflict and maintains adaptive variation in wild populations.
33 hat measure multivariate maternal effects in wild populations.
34  aspects of pair-bond and mating behavior in wild populations.
35 group selection driving collective traits in wild populations.
36 bsorption spectrum, has not been explored in wild populations.
37  the processes involved remain unexplored in wild populations.
38  affect the distribution of pathogens within wild populations.
39 s of this hypothesis are rare, especially in wild populations.
40 ersal, but these are difficult to measure in wild populations.
41  life might shape life history strategies in wild populations.
42 ut sensitive strains are the majority in the wild populations.
43 taxa, and little of this work has focused on wild populations.
44 e phages) emerging as a dominant 'signal' in wild populations.
45  developing appropriate management tools for wild populations.
46 hose of polymorphisms shared by domestic and wild populations.
47 who studied patterns of genetic variation in wild populations.
48 variation observed in senescence patterns in wild populations.
49 arvest on the genetics and sustainability of wild populations.
50 neutral loci to assess the genetic health of wild populations.
51 QDG 36:3; MGDG 36:6) compared with the donor wild populations.
52 obial consumers influence fruit chemistry in wild populations.
53 more weedy populations when compared to both wild populations.
54  system design requires data on their use in wild populations.
55 conferring disease refractoriness throughout wild populations.
56 ups, both of which typically do not hold for wild populations.
57 opriate for reconstructing sibling groups in wild populations.
58 he genetic causes of phenotypic variation in wild populations.
59 ant perennial weed has established itself in wild populations.
60 ction), with that of conspecifics from donor wild populations.
61 sms remain poorly understood, especially for wild populations.
62 ystems capable of moving effector genes into wild populations.
63  between social context and gene flow within wild populations.
64 investigating the operation of senescence in wild populations.
65 erlying individual behavioural plasticity in wild populations.
66 l phenomena such as pathogen transmission in wild populations.
67 plications for the phenotypic composition of wild populations.
68 et many factors influence local abundance in wild populations.
69 riation for resistance in lines derived from wild populations.
70 r success that is challenging to quantify in wild populations.
71 gher stable frequency of drive maintained in wild populations.
72 adient, as well as individuals from the same wild populations.
73 al effects can be challenging to document in wild populations.
74 reeding is rarely examined simultaneously in wild populations.
75 tally safe and proven technology to suppress wild populations.
76 t the appropriate TDF for diet estimation in wild populations.
77 estored reef population compared to proximal wild populations.
78  among tilapia species in aquaculture and in wild populations.
79 itous but poorly understood, particularly in wild populations.
80 e evolution of adaptive genetic diversity in wild populations.
81 influence selection and genetic variation in wild populations?
82 ghtly lower in inbred lines ( = 0.0094) than wild populations ( = 0.0128).
83  at r(2) = 0.50) when compared with the semi-wild populations (19.5 kb at r(2) = 0.22).
84 mid ( approximately 1%) and its frequency in wild populations (38/70).
85  lower among cultured populations than among wild populations; (5) Effective population size in hatch
86 duce a novel method for estimating TDFs in a wild population-a proportionally balanced equation that
87 el of variation in recombination rate within wild populations-a key determinant of evolution in this
88 on of foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa in wild populations across its native range (Pacific Northw
89                     We used tilapia species, wild populations and breeding programmes to validate our
90 , potentially due to admixture from Burma in wild populations and demographic events post-captivity.
91 he genetic structure of M. salmoides from 20 wild populations and five cultured stocks across the Uni
92 ymmetry in large samples collected from both wild populations and four moderately inbred lines of Dro
93 city over an individual's lifespan varies in wild populations and influences population resilience.
94  evolutionary fate of any resistance gene in wild populations and its environmental impacts depend up
95 aracterizing the entire growth trajectory in wild populations and lay the foundation necessary for id
96  genome-wide association study in C. elegans wild populations and quantitative trait locus mapping, w
97 nt species with stress tolerant genotypes in wild populations and selected family lines.
98  for the process of natural divergence among wild populations and species [2].
99 assay, facilitating monitoring of Vgsc CN in wild populations and the elucidation of association betw
100 ated by mismatches in genome content between wild populations and their better-studied cultured relat
101 ngshan, which were two of the three smallest wild populations and were already severely under-represe
102 ingle nucleotide polymorphism data across 57 wild populations and whole genome re-sequencing, we find
103  services: lake eutrophication, harvest of a wild population, and yield of domestic herbivores on a r
104 t loci are potentially far more prevalent in wild populations, and can therefore potentially be highl
105 ation underlying sexually selected traits in wild populations, and consequently, this phenomenon has
106          Allelic diversity was higher in the wild populations, and F(IS) lower.
107 srupting the social organisation of existing wild populations, and inferring long-term implications f
108 orphic, with nine coding variants present in wild populations, and that this diversity interferes wit
109 model, 20-40% of all mutations in C. elegans wild populations are derived from programmed meiotic dou
110 arise as reproductive states and survival in wild populations are estimated based on imperfect and po
111 wever, research and monitoring of impacts on wild populations are generally lacking, and the benefit
112      Current methodologies for biomonitoring wild populations are invasive and mostly lethal.
113 at maintain patterns of genetic variation in wild populations are not completely understood.
114 e recently reported for disease outbreaks in wild populations are not sustainable.
115 t genes contributing to climate tolerance in wild populations are poorly described in number and effe
116 of mutations favored by natural selection in wild populations are similar to those that contribute to
117 ent genetic optima, but supporting data from wild populations are still scarce.
118 the first population genetic analysis of the wild population as well as of captive-born individuals (
119 genetically and phenotypically distinct from wild populations associated with trees.
120                        If we are to identify wild populations at risk of disease epidemics, we must e
121  may increase the contribution of some small wild populations at the expense of decreasing the contri
122 environments, but the few studies of in situ wild populations available to date rarely find strong su
123        Our study has direct implications for wild populations, because many factors that could drive
124 ed in early life can alter life histories in wild populations, but our understanding of the processes
125 sh behavior that could potentially impact on wild populations, but the physiological mechanisms under
126 on are under higher expression constraint in wild populations-but they show elevated rates of gene am
127  CRISPR-based gene drives can spread through wild populations by biasing their own transmission above
128 s constituting a small fraction of the local wild population can drive a useful genetic element nearl
129                                Inbreeding in wild populations can have devastating effects on fitness
130 recede such declines, but detection prior to wild population collapses has had limited success, leadi
131              However, pedigrees collected in wild populations commonly contain many individuals with
132 nt evidence of intrasegment recombination in wild populations, consistent with (i).
133 ts from local wild populations suggests that wild populations contributed locally adaptive variation
134 rigins of this crop, with different regional wild populations contributing putative adaptive variatio
135                                              Wild populations could be at risk of masculinization fro
136 ology of gestodene-exposed fish suggest that wild populations could be similarly affected.
137 rations made in laboratory organisms through wild populations could be used to address environmental
138                If they are able to spread in wild populations, CRISPR-based gene-drive elements would
139  of the toolkit for animal model analyses of wild population data sets.
140 uctive output, provide complementary fits to wild population data: maturation time and early adult gr
141  that the genetic contribution of individual wild populations differs across the genome.
142          U accumulation was limited in these wild populations due to a combination of factors includi
143 only a few methodologies can provide data on wild populations during war conflicts.
144 ariances in such traits remains difficult in wild populations, especially if related individuals inha
145               The rate of gene flow into the wild population, estimated using genetic markers, is oft
146 would be facilitated by long-term studies in wild populations experiencing different ecological condi
147 volved in the male-to-female sex reversal in wild populations exposed to environmental estrogens, and
148  that threaten to cause local extinctions if wild populations fail to adapt to novel conditions.
149 rally, these exhibit chaos with increasingly wild population fluctuations driving extinctions.
150 tudies are set to become widespread in those wild populations for whom appropriate phenotypic data an
151 in owl monkeys, we sequenced this locus in a wild population from the Gran Chaco.
152 ive F2-cross from The Netherlands (NL) and a wild population from the United Kingdom (UK).
153 s of Mexican sunflower landraces and Mexican wild populations from a broad geographic range.
154 des alleles recovered in both cultivated and wild populations from distinct geographic regions.
155 ersity in cultivated coffee germplasm and in wild populations growing in the center of origin of the
156      In any case, our analyses show that the wild population has survived for a long period of time w
157 To date, however, social network analysis of wild populations has been limited to static models that
158                Yet, few studies conducted on wild populations have compared sex-specific senescence t
159 uman-associated migration and admixture with wild populations have had a strong impact on S. cerevisi
160 e mice and to create new inbred strains from wild populations have the potential to strengthen house
161 ons have fewer unique trnG-trnS alleles than wild populations; however, five haplotypes were absent i
162  decreasing the contributions of other small wild populations, i.e., increasing the Xiaoxiangling con
163  decompositions have not been implemented in wild populations, impeding evolutionary inference.
164 est of phenotypically desirable animals from wild populations imposes selection that can reduce the f
165 uld spread anti-pathogen effector genes into wild populations in a safe, confinable and reversible ma
166 t of O. niloticus are present in captive and wild populations in Hawaii.
167 s are expected to have beneficial impacts on wild populations in polluted environments because of the
168                                  We identify wild populations in southern China and the Yangtze valle
169 ncreasing temperatures may affect fitness in wild populations in species-specific ways, and induce li
170  plans, the severely under-represented small wild populations in the current captive panda population
171  able to spread beneficial traits throughout wild populations in ways that are self-sustaining.
172  the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations into breeding plans, the severely under
173 thesis that the paucity of SIV infections in wild populations is a general feature of this monophylet
174 ne flow indicated the genetic exchange among wild populations is difficult; (2) AMOVA showed that 14.
175 ore revealing the causes of ASR variation in wild populations is essential for understanding sex role
176 tween genotype, phenotype, and adaptation in wild populations is fundamental to the study of evolutio
177 n exploitation on the genetic composition of wild populations is important for predicting species per
178 n the variance of tissue isotope values from wild populations is informative.
179 ntrogression of hatchery-reared animals into wild populations is of global concern.
180 used to establish the presence of culture in wild populations is the method of exclusion.
181 ces of the green revolution, particularly in wild populations, is an important frontier in contempora
182 genetic differentiation with gene flow among wild populations ("isolation by ecology") [1-4].
183                         Feral fish outnumber wild populations, leading to a possible loss of local ad
184                                Fish from one wild population learned with both colors and reversed le
185  LD decayed more slowly in inbred lines than wild populations (mean LD declined to 0.32 by 5.5 kbp in
186                                     A nearby wild population mirrored these changes, concurrently adv
187 es, survival and reproductive performance in wild populations, models of population dynamics often fo
188 ng-resistant allele generation to suppress a wild population of a given size.
189 ons of feeding behaviors video-recorded in a wild population of bearded capuchins (Sapajus libidinosu
190              This hypothesis was tested in a wild population of brown anole lizards (Anolis sagrei) u
191 rnation emergence date of adult females in a wild population of Columbian ground squirrels in Alberta
192 expression of a lethal recessive allele in a wild population of conservation concern, and provide a g
193  carried out an experiment of this kind on a wild population of cooperatively breeding banded mongoos
194 occurred within a captive facility housing a wild population of desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis
195 h by quantifying floral shape variation in a wild population of Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicacea
196 ith DNA profiling of all of the members of a wild population of field crickets across two generations
197 cimens, we describe the genomic changes in a wild population of honey bees in North America following
198 network of infrared video cameras to study a wild population of individually marked and genotyped fie
199 ial behaviour, and agonistic encounters of a wild population of Javan slow lorises (Nycticebus javani
200 capture the space-use patterns observed in a wild population of long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus.
201 ference A. darlingi genome, sequenced from a wild population of males and females collected in the Br
202                           Here we screened a wild population of Posidonia oceanica, an endemic long-l
203 rn phenotype ('self' or uniform colour) in a wild population of primitive Soay sheep.
204 ange of life history traits and fitness in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Scotland
205                                         In a wild population of red deer, average parturition date ha
206 counterproductive; (2) in the absence of any wild population of reservoir hosts, the parasite will be
207 digree and high-density SNP information in a wild population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to investigat
208                                         In a wild population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries), phenotypic a
209  data collected between 1989 and 2008 from a wild population of Soay sheep in the St.
210 e self-reactive antibody responsiveness in a wild population of Soay sheep.
211  the genetic effects of supplementation on a wild population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from
212  dissolution during somatic cell fusion in a wild population of the filamentous fungus Neurospora cra
213 cted pollen-supplementation experiments in a wild population of the glacier lily (Erythronium grandif
214 ring plant, we use shotgun resequencing of a wild population of the monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus to
215 art association patterns across 19 days in a wild population of the New Caledonian crow--a tool-using
216 ome-wide recombination rates in males from a wild population of the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus le
217                                 However, the wild population of Z. tequila did not show a significant
218 se growth data from both hatchery-raised and wild populations of a large freshwater fish (lake trout,
219 linked gene drives that could safely control wild populations of Ae. aegypti to combat local pathogen
220  immunodeficiency virus (SIV) persistence in wild populations of African nonhuman primates (NHPs) may
221 sive melanosis and melanoma (skin cancer) in wild populations of an iconic, commercially-important ma
222    The increase of insecticide resistance in wild populations of Anopheles malaria vectors emphasises
223 winter food supplements on egg production in wild populations of blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus).
224  prion disorder that is spreading rapidly in wild populations of cervids in North America.
225 iation would enable new strategies to manage wild populations of disease vectors, agricultural pests,
226 ted partitivirus, galbut virus, is common in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster To begin to
227 ency of lethal giant larvae (lgl) alleles in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster was reported
228 limate change on patterns of ageing rates in wild populations of ectotherms facing warming conditions
229 an pathogens, as well as emerging disease in wild populations of endangered species.
230 We report here PFAA plasma concentrations in wild populations of great tits ( Parus major) settled at
231 ed the effects of habitat and temperature on wild populations of juvenile southern flounder in North
232 negative consequences for recruitment within wild populations of largemouth bass and possibly other e
233            Such patterns are common today in wild populations of long-lived birds and mammals.
234  evolution of iron acquisition strategies in wild populations of marine bacteria.
235 effects on the size and genetic diversity of wild populations of one of the world's largest marine st
236         Essential oils (EOs) belonging to 25 wild populations of Origanum vulgare L. samples, growing
237 , one stock colony of P. maniculatus and two wild populations of P. leucopus.
238 molecular markers (microsatellites) to study wild populations of plant and animals has created the ne
239                          We demonstrate that wild populations of S. frugiperda in the eastern United
240                   The sequences confirm that wild populations of S. purpurea are the likely progenito
241 -based data set from longitudinal studies of wild populations of seven primate species, we show that
242 tudy provides the first direct evidence from wild populations of stalk-eyed flies to support the hypo
243 ers covary with pollination intensity across wild populations of the biennial Sabatia angularis.
244          Using experimental manipulations in wild populations of the fiddler crab Uca stenodactylus,
245                                   We exploit wild populations of the marine chordate Ciona intestinal
246 curs with Wolbachia (strain wMel) in certain wild populations of the model organism Drosophila melano
247 rtitivirus that is extraordinarily common in wild populations of the model organism Drosophila melano
248                                   Studies of wild populations of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana
249  crop, and in 212 individuals collected from wild populations of two closely related Manihot species.
250 in the viromes of laboratory fruit flies and wild populations of two insect vectors: mosquitoes and s
251                      Studies of evolution in wild populations often find that the heritable phenotypi
252 ations and have focused either on individual wild populations or on captive animals that are sheltere
253 ble the spread of desirable genes throughout wild populations or to suppress harmful species, and may
254 , but we know little about their strength in wild populations, or the physiological mechanisms that m
255  method for spreading altered traits through wild populations over many generations.
256  genes and their functions has extended into wild populations, providing additional evidence that pig
257 ed sex ratio differences observed across the wild populations, providing strong evidence that tempera
258 f A. splendens were smaller than that of the wild population; qualitatively similar results were obta
259                                           In wild populations, ranavirosis incidents were more freque
260 were the primary factors associated with the wild population recovery; effects of aquaculture were mu
261 sms driving the spread of this resistance in wild populations remain largely unknown.
262 n in the maintenance of genetic variation in wild populations remains a major problem in evolution.
263 stant transgene (VRT) has been introduced to wild populations repeatedly.
264 lifish display differences in lifespan among wild populations, representing an ideal natural experime
265  use of captive-reared parents to supplement wild populations should be carefully reconsidered.
266 pecies' range, behavioural observations of a wild population show that these thermal effects translat
267 ed sites were relatively pure, whereas three wild populations showed some degree of introgression and
268  bulwark against the continued extinction of wild populations, species, and ecosystems.
269       We identify three possible reasons why wild population studies may generally fail to find stron
270 amine the causes of dispersal variability in wild populations, suggesting that observed patterns coul
271 Further, sequence similarity between distant wild populations suggests recent fragmentation.
272  in landraces of genomic segments from local wild populations suggests that wild populations contribu
273  of current conservation efforts to maintain wild populations sustainable for both commercial and eco
274 roduced more accurate estimates of TDFs in a wild population than traditional approaches, consequentl
275 o wild relatives and becoming established in wild populations that are not reproductively isolated fr
276 change is currently having a major impact on wild populations, this raises the possibility that life
277 elease of sterilized insects that reduce the wild population through infertile matings.
278 e used a reciprocal design experiment on the wild population to test whether BFDV management reduced
279  the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations to 6.7-11.2 % for Xiaoxiangling, 11.5-1
280 tter understand the genetic contributions of wild populations to domesticated barley, we compare sing
281                         The use of data from wild populations to gauge the error associated with esti
282  to growth and maturation data from nineteen wild populations to generate population-specific estimat
283 ns and empirical evidence for the ability of wild populations to persist and adapt in response to the
284 diversity arises, we used deep sequencing of wild populations to reveal genetic variation patterns in
285 age those responsible for managing harvested wild populations to take into account possible selective
286     The genetic contributions from different wild populations to the captive panda population were hi
287 large sets of multiple genome sequences from wild populations to understand adaptation, with an empha
288                    Fruitflies derived from a wild population vary in their resistance to infection wi
289 uantification of individual heterogeneity in wild populations' vital rates has recently attracted gro
290 solation, and population genetic analysis of wild populations, we set out to determine whether eviden
291 vestigated how phenological mismatch affects wild populations, we still lack studies and a framework
292                      It was found that while wild populations were best described by a lognormal dist
293                                        These wild populations were domesticated in several distinct N
294  samples collected from two captive and four wild populations were processed for virome characterizat
295 y differential viability of hybrid larvae in wild populations where native California Tiger Salamande
296 after anthesis (before nectar is depleted in wild populations), whereas other floral traits (scent, s
297                              Using replicate wild populations with differing levels of sexually antag
298 c diversity, and relatedness to samples from wild populations, with no significant genetic differenti
299  developmental and reproductive disorders in wild populations, with subsequent effects on the populat
300 es about dynamics and mechanistic drivers in wild populations, yet commonly suffers from insufficient

 
Page Top