戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ory strain tend to evolve faster than in the wild strain.
2 acity to swarm and did so as robustly as the wild strain.
3 lity, and is observed in both laboratory and wild strains.
4 al flexibility of two Caenorhabditis elegans wild strains.
5 ting extensive mating in both industrial and wild strains.
6 sion response to 5% ethanol in S288c and two wild strains.
7 tion was supported by only a small number of wild strains.
8 zing TE positions in 57 genetically distinct wild strains.
9 amining segregation of markers in crosses of wild strains.
10 h are much higher in abundance in one of the wild strains.
11 locus and induced inversion of eri-6 in some wild strains.
12 emarkable dichotomy between domesticated and wild strains.
13 ed heterogeneous stock (WHS) mice from eight wild strains.
14 nguishable in architecture from those of the wild strain, 3610.
15 y to interrogate genomic DNA diversity in 23 wild strains (accessions) of Arabidopsis thaliana (arabi
16 say, which was based on transfer of trt to a wild strain and screening for transformability in the pr
17 yloid-based yeast prions from laboratory and wild strains and disease-related polyglutamine proteins
18 ation line panels that were derived from two wild strains and found background-dependent and fitness-
19 ressions are absent in the large majority of wild strains and gene ontology analyses indicate that se
20  sequencing of a worldwide collection of 200 wild strains and identified 41,188 SNPs.
21 Rs, 27,667 harbored polymorphisms across 540 wild strains and only 9691 polymorphic STRs (pSTRs) had
22 enetically and phenotypically separated from wild strains and originate from only a few ancestors thr
23 quired ethanol tolerance in a large panel of wild strains and show that most strains can acquire high
24                           By comparing three wild strains and the commonly used N2 laboratory strain,
25 In contrast, the "selfish" 2mu DNA was in 38 wild strains and the selfish RNA replicons L-BC, 20S, an
26 ic divergence and selection signatures among wild strains as in previous studies using SNVs.
27 ptional heterogeneity within and among these wild strains at the single-cell level, finding different
28 s has been studied in Caenorhabditis elegans wild strains, but the impacts of differences in gene exp
29                      We find that none of 70 wild strains carry this prion, suggesting that it is not
30                                              Wild strains carrying [PIN+] are far more likely to be h
31 oss between the laboratory strain (N2) and a wild strain (CB4856).
32   CeNDR provides the research community with wild strains, genome-wide sequence and variant data for
33  of these studies by providing an archive of wild strains, genome-wide sequence and variant data for
34                           Fully one-third of wild strains harboured them.
35 ic information are available for hundreds of wild strains in public repositories, providing new oppor
36          We find that Rnq1p polymorphisms in wild strains include several premature stop codon allele
37 ired for acquisition of ethanol tolerance in wild strains, including new genes and processes not prev
38          The absence of [URE3] and [PSI+] in wild strains indicates that each prion has a net deleter
39 duction of alleles of degQ and swrA from the wild strain into the domestic strain was sufficient to a
40 hat create new traits have not been found in wild strains, leading to the perception that they are ra
41 ring, that make the process of domesticating wild strains more precise and efficient.
42 f mutated genes was then introduced into the wild strain NCIB 3610 to study their effects on biofilm
43 rkedly attenuated biofilms compared with the wild strain NCIB3610 (3610), even after repair of a muta
44                Bacillus subtilis JH642 and a wild strain of B. subtilis called 22a both produce an an
45 in a cross between a laboratory strain and a wild strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
46  scanning electron microscopy showing that a wild strain of the Gram positive bacterium Bacillus subt
47                                              Wild strains of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) exhib
48      Much of the flowering time variation in wild strains of Arabidopsis thaliana is due to allelic v
49                             We found that in wild strains of B. subtilis, surfactin disrupted vesicle
50                                              Wild strains of Bacillus subtilis are capable of forming
51  to identify natural genetic variation among wild strains of C. elegans that drives assembly of disti
52                             The isolation of wild strains of Caenorhabditis elegans has facilitated t
53 ariation in the acute response to ethanol in wild strains of Caenorhabditis elegans.
54 to produce de novo genome assemblies for two wild strains of Drosophila melanogaster from the Drosoph
55 nations of X chromosomes and cytoplasms from wild strains of Drosophila melanogaster.
56 bda) of bacteriophage lambda was examined in wild strains of Escherichia coli.
57 ct sequences cloned from five laboratory and wild strains of mice and from hamsters and minks.
58 ain that aneuploidy is well tolerated in the wild strains of S. cerevisiae that we studied and that t
59 d that aneuploidy was frequently observed in wild strains of S. cerevisiae.
60 ilar cell types, for example lab strains and wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultured under
61  variation in a cross between laboratory and wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
62 Here we biochemically test approximately 700 wild strains of Saccharomyces for [PSI(+)] or [MOT3(+)],
63 n frequencies differed significantly between wild strains of the fungus Sordaria fimicola isolated fr
64 using embryonic lethality in crosses between wild strains of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans The
65                                              Wild strains of the spore-forming bacterium Bacillus sub
66 al variants of a prion protein isolated from wild strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
67 a portion of the E protein for a panel of 38 wild strains of YF virus from Africa representing differ
68 her set of MA lines derived from a different wild strain (PB306).
69 ated strain and the deletion of CAP10 from a wild strain resulted in an acapsular phenotype.
70 assay to 100 genetically diverse, sequenced, wild strains, revealing natural variation in starvation
71  sequence dissimilarity correlates well with wild-strain segregation.
72 athogen in the presence of the nonpathogenic wild strain showed that the antibody fragments retained
73  retention across 316 Caenorhabditis elegans wild strains, some exhibiting strong retention, followed
74 ere we show that some Caenorhabditis elegans wild strains switch between two foraging behaviours in r
75                                              Wild strains that have not undergone domestication in th
76 al [PSI+] variants, the absence of [PSI+] in wild strains, the mRNA turnover function of the Sup35p p
77 lyses on 207 genetically distinct C. elegans wild strains to study natural regulatory variation of ge
78 eding depression, reduced compatibility with wild strains, unintentional selection for traits that lo
79 rogeny of a cross between a laboratory and a wild strain using flow cytometry and high-content micros
80     Using long-read genome assemblies for 15 wild strains, we show that hyper-divergent haplotypes co
81                                        These wild strains were able to form robust biofilms both in d
82 ds of Sup35p and Ure2p) were not found in 70 wild strains, while [PIN+] (amyloid of Rnq1p) was found
83  saturates with approximately 40 well-chosen wild strains, with half of the pan-NLRome being present
84  to all offspring in meiosis, its absence in wild strains would imply that it has a net deleterious e
85 ading to the laboratory strain (S288c) and a wild strain (YJM789) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and fou