ライフサイエンスコーパス: winning

1 ct that switching doubles the probability of winning.

2 al striatum, the same reward area as seen in winning.

3 ction errors modulated by the probability of winning.

4 ntly associated with a higher probability of winning.

5 rger trait value has a higher probability of winning.

6 of the parvalbumin (PV) interneurons induces winning.

7 f plasticity events observed during repeated winning.

8 ime zones if the primary goal is to optimize winning.

9 and why people enjoy gambling and care about winning.

10 ambler changes bets despite constant odds of winning.

11 if the extreme strategies have no chance of winning.

12 biases that create a distorted expectancy of winning.

13 rate was associated with decreased chance of winning.

14 though switching doubles the probability of winning.

15 lphaGo Zero achieved superhuman performance, winning 100-0 against the previously published, champion

16 ore allies [15], and those with a history of winning [16-18].

17 Winning a competition engenders subsequent unrelated une

18 Winning a competition increased both explicit and implic

19 Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that winning a competition increases the likelihood of winner

20 Our data indicate that winning a competition lead to more dominant behaviour, a

21 emory technology of the future and have been winning a great deal of attention due to their ability t

22 ilities of our agent, Gran Turismo Sophy, by winning a head-to-head competition against four of the w

23 es were most impactful on the probability of winning a medal, and how injury or illness influenced at

24 er Olympic Games affected the probability of winning a medal, which combinations of injuries or illne

25 ocial experience, Galphai2 deletion promotes winning a novel social competition with an unfamiliar co

26 study 5), cheat to increase their chances of winning a prize (study 6), and endorse unethical behavio

27 l status, including events such as losing or winning a territorial encounter, result in changes in so

28 nd other disciplines is currently lower than winning a toss of a fair coin.

29 e readiness to attack and the probability of winning, a widespread phenomenon known as the "winner ef

30 ded Ebola treatment unit at the Eternal Love Winning Africa (ELWA) campus.

31 d in an ophthalmology clinic at Eternal Love Winning Africa (ELWA) Hospital in Monrovia, Liberia.

32 The Eternal Love Winning Africa (ELWA) outbreak diagnostic laboratory, es

33 od samples from patients at the Eternal Love Winning Africa Ebola treatment unit (Monrovia, Liberia)

34 Winning aggressive disputes can enhance future fighting

35 Thus, in principle, winning aggressive encounters may cause long-term and co

36 minant social rank results from a history of winning agonistic encounters.

37 Here, we present a winning algorithm in the 2017 NCI-CPTAC DREAM Proteogeno

38 It is based on the winning algorithm in the AstraZeneca-Sanger Drug Combina

39 We estimate that using both winning algorithms in future trial designs could reduce

40 o evaluate and report the performance of the winning algorithms of the Radiological Society of North

41 The weighted RMSEs metric showed that the winning algorithms produced scores that were very close

42 resident does not stand a reliable chance of winning alone.

43 dditional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10%.

44 om the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31%.

45 nforcement-learning model capturing frequent winning and intrinsic skewness preferences provides the

46 aggressiveness, as well as by experience of winning and losing (so called 'winner-loser effects').

47 rlying the nervous system changes induced by winning and losing bouts during agonistic encounters.

48 lves a period of agonistic activity in which winning and losing decide relative positions in the hier

49 tions--situations in which the likelihood of winning and losing is unknown.

50 ting or rejecting gambles with equal odds of winning and losing money.

51 ell competition, we find that eB3 determines winning and losing neurons in a contest for synapses.

52 Further, we conducted experiments to test if winning and losing probabilities are affected only by th

53 ies fight; (ii) whether flies adopt distinct winning and losing strategies as hierarchical relationsh

54 r, Scissors and by manipulating the value of winning and losing.

55 is unlikely to affect how animals experience winning and losing.

56 e can make the difference between one strain winning and mutual destruction.

57 highlight the importance of recognizing both winning and non-winning experiences in talent scouting a

58 Both history of winning and rank of cage mates affect stress susceptibil

59 en taking into account individual history of winning and the overall hierarchy landscape in male and

60 in which losers eventually have no chance of winning and thus become non-functional.

61 er natural income experiments (e.g., lottery winnings) and other methods that allow better adjustment

62 A) nuclei of the amygdala when compared with winning animals as well as novel cage and home cage cont

63 Interestingly, winning animals had significantly more BDNF mRNA in the

64 is a web service implementing a competition-winning approach utilizing word and syntactic analyses b

65 heir initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying.

66 ously associated with a rewarded task (i.e., winning at a complex game).

67 uman gene appears to be at least temporarily winning at this interface of the primate-herpesvirus evo

68 The winning behavior is associated with sequential calcium a

69 a bonus, in addition to the payouts from any winning bets.

70 from the 2004 Olympics to show that similar winning biases occur in contests in which neither contes

71 tainty (i.e., there is no guarantee that the winning bids for such an auction can be found in a "reas

72 rpose To evaluate the robustness of an award-winning bone age deep learning (DL) model to extensive v

73 hile smaller signals were noted for fighters winning by joint or choke submission (lower impact mecha

74 the mature 1:1 innervation by selecting the winning calyceal input based on synaptic strength.

75 to expectations, partisans who voted for the winning candidate are no less polarized post-election th

76 A class II-specific CD4(+) T cells from the "winning" CBU may contribute to rejection of the "loser"

77 Moreover, selective photo-ablation of the winning CF (that undergoes dendritic translocation) reve

78 rtain rewards but, for the Signaled group on winning choices, presented a 'jackpot' signal prior to r

79 Winning clones exhibited shorter doubling times, greater

80 ly and sometimes failed to develop a single "winning" cluster before budding.

81 er density, has the potential to achieve the winning combination of a high energy and power density.

82 and novel gene regulatory circuits, allowing winning combinations of epigenetic states to be transmit

83 tion between multiple motor plans before the winning command is executed.

84 motor plans compete for selection before the winning command is executed.

85 egrity in the IL and PL, and that experience winning competitive interactions can specifically protec

86 iate selection of the strongest input as the winning competitor.

87 ernal validity for our learning task and the winning computational model.

88 ict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders.

89 s failed to adjust their bets by the odds of winning, consistent with a role of the insular cortex in

90 increased betting regardless of the odds of winning, consistent with a role of vmPFC in biasing heal

91 e (resource value) with perceived chances of winning contests (resource holding potential).

92 d is associated with a higher probability of winning contests, especially when bouts are close.

93 can surpass the future performance of their winning counterparts.

94 In competitive situations, winning depends on selecting actions that surprise the o

95 decision values and increased sensitivity to winning despite low odds (positive PE) facilitate risky

96 eaving vignettes describing four Nobel Prize-winning discoveries with descriptions of how the major N

97 in the work that resulted in the Nobel prize-winning discovery of a supermassive compact object at th

98 the remote food source, and this Nobel Prize-winning discovery revealed the most sophisticated exampl

99 Materials and Methods The winning DL model of the 2017 RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Cha

100 Social dominance encompasses winning dyadic contests and gaining priority access to r

101 es superior performance in comparison to the winning entries of the Challenge.

102 n, Fastqz and Samcomp/Fqzcomp, including the winning entry.

103 Fit and Strong! is an award winning, evidence-based, multiple-component physical act

104 portance of recognizing both winning and non-winning experiences in talent scouting and assessment, w

105 nally reproduce Anfinsen's early Nobel prize winning experiments by using OpenMM's Custom Forces fram

106 nize with the tectal location receiving the "winning" feedback from Ipc.

107 Thus, winning fights can change brain phenotype in a manner th

108 nd real-time quantitative PCR, we found that winning fights either at home or away increases the expr

109 petition and sorting, resulting in a stable "winning" floorplate.

110 icipants had the opportunity to re-wager any winnings from the roulette game.

111 Analyses of winning (functional) sequences revealed three different

112 arch output that can reduce their chances of winning funding.

113 ich summarize the results of the Nobel Prize-winning 'Heidelberg screen'.

114 it trial winnings plus a portion of previous winnings (high-penalty trials).

115 significantly improves the odds of the team winning in all sports beyond the talents of individuals.

116 lized aggression enhancement over 10 days of winning in male mice.

117 umans, would fail to maximize their expected winnings in a version of the MHD.

118 in-group trust and cooperation, rather than winning (in)direct intergroup competitions.

119 nhibition of cACC pyramidal cells, promoting winning, in a pattern strikingly opposite to the dorsome

120 the same rate as men when the incentive for winning includes the option to share part of the rewards

121 We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additiona

122 of "chicken." As subjects watched ostensible winnings increase over time, they decided when to press

123 Winning increases the readiness to attack and the probab

124 A-VMHvl synaptic potentiation eliminates all winning-induced plasticity.

125 These data suggest mechanisms to select "winning" inputs by regional reinforcement of postsynapti

126 decided when to press a button to bank their winnings, knowing that if they did not stop pursuing mon

127 action to gambles featuring small chances of winning large amounts (called "positively skewed" gamble

128 environmental deterioration arises because a winning lineage has to compete against more winners in s

129 Purpose To evaluate the performance of the winning machine learning models from the 2023 RSNA Abdom

130 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning marathon times by 2100.

131 demonstrate that the effect holds only when winning means performing better than others (i.e., deter

132 ociated microbial communities along with the winning metabolic strategy Salmonella serovars use to ed

133 Winning methods incorporate prior knowledge of drug-targ

134 " eukaryotes, benthic foraminifera represent winning microeukaryotes in the face of ongoing oceanic d

135 The winning model allowed to extract and quantify estimates

136 mary motor cortex (Bayesian model selection; winning model Bayes factors >17).

137 Bayesian model selection showed that the winning model contained both extrinsic connectivity modu

138 odeling of splicing) with which we built the winning model of the CAGI5 exon skipping prediction chal

139 The winning model showed participants engaging hierarchicall

140 Bayesian model selection revealed a winning model, the architecture of which revealed bidire

141 (PEB), we estimated group averages under the winning model.

142 ions of the visual cortex estimated from the winning model.

143 The winning models far outperformed our previous effort at m

144 Conclusion The winning models from the 2022 RSNA AI Challenge demonstra

145 Conclusion The award-winning models from the artificial intelligence challeng

146 The winning models serve as the first subcellular omics tool

147 However, robust human-like performance of winning models such as Qwen2.5-VL and GPT supports the f

148 this study, performances of the eight award-winning models were retrospectively assessed and compare

149 Root Cause Analysis, an IBI prize-winning module, requires students to use a systematic ap

150 We recovered a set of "winning" molecules that describe solutions to this probl

151 When winning money in the real world, individuals sustaining

152 essed more pessimistic predictions regarding winning money in the study (d = -0.47) and were less wil

153 and when exerting effort in anticipation of winning money.

154 g motor steps backward in synchrony with the winning motor.

155 e rate and dynamics of adaptation and biases winning mutations toward those with the largest selectiv

156 The winning neural network model, DLBclass, assigned all cas

157 e frame, in which starvation corresponded to winning nothing.

158 ltimately participate in the function of the winning nucleic acid(s)-where recombination is expected

159 nd NMDA receptors causing first winner keeps winning of granule cells, illustrate how fundamental pro

160 30.97) (3.74 [2.31] times Medicare), and the winning offer was $32 463.70 ($9987.17) (7.82 [2.39] tim

161 of effort to improve their chances of either winning or avoiding the loss of money.

162 ends the children's game to situations where winning or losing can matter more or less relative to ty

163 d expectancies with various probabilities of winning or losing different amounts of money in 15 patie

164 Winning or losing in agonistic encounters can have strik

165 f uncertainty (e.g., when the probability of winning or losing is 50/50 and no particular financial c

166 mes of interactions (e.g., whether coral was winning or losing) were considered.

167 n of effort independently of the prospect of winning or losing.

168 t overbidding may result from either "joy of winning" or risk aversion.

169 Positive reward anticipation, winning outcome, and evaluation of right choices activat

170 impact that dopaminergic signals exert when winning outcomes are cued.

171 ntromedial prefrontal cortex activity during winning outcomes.

172 d costs (or benefits) of competition for the winning parasitoid reveal that time lags between success

173 rains and a uniform host population-here the winning pathogen strain is that with minimum threshold d

174 Conclusion Although an award-winning pediatric bone age DL model generalized well to

175 ffects of travel and home-court advantage on winning percentage, shooting accuracy, and rebounding.

176 season, traveling across time zones reduces winning percentage, team shooting accuracy, and turnover

177 in human intelligence, from how Nobel prize-winning physicists make their discoveries to how childre

178 trial (low-penalty trials) or forfeit trial winnings plus a portion of previous winnings (high-penal

179 Patients have been key to winning political support.

180 including a voucher for a 1 in 100 chance of winning pound1000 if they attend their appointment).

181 substance-free urine samples; the chances of winning prizes increased with continuous time abstinent.

182 We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bo

183 timate of the tendency of the slot machine's winning probability to change (volatility), increased su

184 7) and acceleration (p = 0.008) had a higher winning probability.

185 nts and challenges of this pioneering, award-winning, public-private partnership which offers a model

186 cidence, or does it reflect convergence to a winning quaternary structure?

187 orithm, our program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the

188 urthermore, starvation decreased the contest winning rate between S. detrahens pairs with similar eye

189 f its utility, the scope of this Nobel prize-winning reaction is rather limited when applied to aliph

190 However, all second- and third-round winning replacement sequences folded into hairpins flank

191 We identify influential and prize-winning research topics from the past inside SemNet, thu

192 natives differ circularly in their number of winning samples.

193 n vivo genetic selection (SELEX) resulted in winning sequences that contain an H4a-like stem-loop, wh

194 n in satC generated three distinct groups of winning sequences.

195 ents with OCD outperformed healthy controls, winning significantly more points.

196 To this end, L.U.St implements a winning sites test allowing ranking of a collection of a

197 thms, with a fitness function to determine a winning solution from many.

198 The winning solutions demonstrated high accuracy, high speci

199 For non-lethal infections, the winning strain is that which affords the pathogen maximu

200 The winning strategy (discountmachine) relied nearly exclusi

201 Alternating between lysis and lysogeny is a winning strategy for a bacteriophage, even when each str

202 erefore be too early to predict the eventual winning strategy for safer anti-inflammatory drugs.

203 e results imply risk-sensitive learning is a winning strategy for urban-invasion leaders, underscorin

204 to lead to the emergence of a single optimal winning strategy in which individuals maximize their gai

205 timal compensation scheme coincides with the winning strategy of the Red Balloon Challenge.

206 icle, we show that underdamped systems are a winning strategy to reduce this extra energetic cost.

207 rnations between losing strategies produce a winning strategy, is selected when transitions between d

208 sting that co-limitation at equilibrium is a winning strategy.

209 the importance of direct visualization as a winning strategy.

210 generate conditions that make cooperation a winning strategy.

211 he alpha7-nAChR affinity of MG624 (2), was a winning strategy.

212 lation, in the short-term it is ultimately a winning strategy.

213 social success rather than a single optimal winning strategy.

214 aining," in which the repeated experience of winning successive aggressive encounters across multiple

215 n the hippocampus may instantiate aspects of winning such as control of a territory in dominant anima

216 ers but wild-type strains were also observed winning, suggesting that the competitive advantage of mu

217 However, how winning synapses emerge through competition remains uncl

218 Most winning teams adopted CNN-based machine-learning approac

219 to fault criticality in the laboratory, the winning teams employed unexpected strategies based on re

220 all interfering RNA (siRNA) is a Nobel prize-winning technology that is now being evaluated in clinic

221 -art homology detection methods and the CASP-winning template-based protein structure prediction meth

222 , and being equipped with multiple challenge-winning text mining algorithms to ensure the quality of

223 Winning the American Society for Cell Biology's Women in

224 the world's energy coming from fossil fuel, winning the battle also requires capturing CO2 from larg

225 d all 10 balloons in less than 9 hours, thus winning the Challenge.

226 Drug resistant bacteria are winning the fight over antibiotics with some bacteria no

227 market's estimate of a team's probability of winning the game before it occurs to isolate the surpris

228 mately overcome host restriction factors via winning the recruitment race and overwhelming cellular d

229 ficance of the success of Lance Armstrong in winning the Tour de France for the second time.

230 If a winning therapeutic emerges, it is unlikely that the exi

231 Skiers' best performance (in percent of winning time) and number of completed races during the s

232 he skiers, better performance (in percent of winning time) in Vasaloppet was strongly associated with

233 ween 1933 and 2004 did not consistently slow winning times because of high variability in temperature

234 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning times by 2100.

235 Marathon to test for an effect of warming on winning times by men and women.

236 not known whether global warming will affect winning times in endurance events, and counterbalance im

237 es and headwinds on the day of the race slow winning times.

238 t to anticipate effects of future warming on winning times.

239 he lottery prizes, boosting their chances of winning to 50x-100x those of other Philadelphians.

240 ince then, the field has progressed greatly, winning two Nobel Prizes and seeing the implementation o

241 plasticity in the aggression circuit during winning, ultimately leading to increased "aggressiveness

242 ive team interactions and the probability of winning using historical records from professional sport

243 Over 10 days of winning, VMHvl cells experience monotonic potentiation o

244 In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and

245 The probability of winning was conveyed using explicit visual cues (sector

246 These effects of winning were likely exclusive to the neural androgenic s

247 y (i.e., attending to overall probability of winning) were associated with activation in parietal and

248 sociated with a predetermined probability of winning, which was altered repeatedly to examine neural

249 f choice to information about probability of winning; while decreasing discrimination according to ma

250 enanes, exemplified by Sauvage's Nobel Prize-winning work in 2016.

251 reshadowing this seismic change, Nobel Prize winning work on the proteasome ubiquitin pathway had sti