ライフサイエンスコーパス: certificate

1 were hospital-matched and selected by birth certificate.

2 tive >/=70% grade on quizzes, were awarded a certificate.

3 f life at the address indicated on the birth certificate.

4 s (81%) passed all requirements and earned a certificate.

5 lling for confounders available on the birth certificate.

6 3.7%) had respiratory TB listed on the death certificate.

7 g use check boxes on the Massachusetts birth certificate.

8 re derived by chart review or from the death certificate.

9 hat specific etiology mentioned on the death certificate.

10 een events or conditions listed on the death certificate.

11 Underlying cause of death on the death certificate.

12 hnic ancestry were identified from the birth certificate.

13 conomic resources were more likely to earn a certificate.

14 ths and almost all stillbirths have no death certificate.

15 ords with a birth defects registry and birth certificates.

16 , and race-ethnicity was obtained from death certificates.

17 cates, and controls were selected from birth certificates.

18 ough linkage with hospital records and death certificates.

19 guidelines and compared with reported death certificates.

20 ces and linked to 1995-2006 California birth certificates.

21 n medical and pharmacy claims data and birth certificates.

22 Infants were identified from birth certificates.

23 ing ECGs, hospital discharge codes and death certificates.

24 uting causes-of-death data recorded on death certificates.

25 ained from death registry matching and death certificates.

26 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates.

27 h poisoning mortality as identified on death certificates.

28 tives was determined and verified from death certificates.

29 rough interviews, medical records, and death certificates.

30 cause of death as that listed on their death certificates.

31 han with the causes of death listed on death certificates.

32 cal history, physical examination, and death certificates.

33 mining cause of death than reliance on death certificates.

34 and CVD mortality were abstracted from death certificates.

35 nza infection by laboratory results or death certificates.

36 ntal ages and covariates obtained from birth certificates.

37 and ICD-10 code) was ascertained from death certificates.

38 ho were diagnosed only on the basis of death certificates.

39 Causes of death were obtained from death certificates.

40 ALS cases were ascertained through death certificates.

41 that selected controls from electronic birth certificates.

42 and birth outcomes were obtained from birth certificates.

43 ere obtained from hospital records and death certificates.

44 ialists choose not to renew their respective certificates.

45 -specific mortality as determined from death certificates.

46 cords in a records-linkage system, and death certificates.

47 cians to bill as subspecialists with expired certificates.

48 with genealogy data and 250,000 linked death certificates.

49 rug poisoning deaths as "accidents" on death certificates.

50 rm of punishment, and falsification of death certificates.

51 , and 32% (25/78) for falsification of death certificates.

52 onfirmed by use of medical records and death certificates.

53 fied in two, for a total of 257 subspecialty certificates.

54 thms for hospitalization databases and death certificates.

55 cer Registry and matched to California birth certificates.

56 cause of death from ALS collected from death certificates.

57 f death were ascertained from official death certificates.

58 ation (GP) controls (n=418) from state birth certificates.

59 cause of death was ascertained through death certificates.

60 nfection is greatly underdocumented on death certificates.

61 medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates.

62 liver disease had HCV listed on their death certificates.

63 m 520 patients), supplemented by state death certificates.

64 bout the coding of individual cause of death certificates.

65 he drugs and other substances named on death certificates.

66 less likely than men to have a subspecialty certificate (16% vs 27%, P < .001).

67 oncancer mortality rates from national death certificates, 1975 to 2005.

68 pa (kappa) statistic = 0.69) than with death certificates (61%; kappa = 0.54).

69 he presenting cancer (ascertained from death certificates), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, y

70 ses of deaths were ascertained through death certificates; ALS was not identified separately until 19

71 hysician epidemiologists, based on the death certificate and additional records surrounding the death

72 The mother's address from the birth certificate and addresses reported from a residential hi

73 study using 1992-1998 Washington State birth certificate and hospital discharge records to investigat

74 None of the differences between birth certificate and ideal controls was significant, whereas

75 birth weight, the differences between birth certificate and ideal controls were smaller than those b

76 Agreement between the birth certificate and maternal report was good for singletons

77 til 31 March 2008 were abstracted from death certificates and a database of hospital admissions, resp

78 individual patients was obtained from death certificates and cancer registries.

79 ons leading to death was obtained from death certificates and comprehensive assessments that were com

80 We tabulated the drugs named on death certificates and computed age-adjusted and age-specific

81 linked with maternal health data using birth certificates and EHRs to determine prenatal medication e

82 ined through blind physician review of death certificates and hospital or pathology reports.

83 ty diagnoses were obtained from linked birth certificates and hospitalization files.

84 ach case, we recruited 3 controls from birth certificates and interviewed identified adult close cont

85 individuals were randomly sampled from birth certificates and matched 2:1 to cases by sex, birth year

86 Data were collected from birth certificates and maternally linked hospital discharge da

87 l record review and fatalities through death certificates and medical record review.

88 ver a median of 4.6 y were verified by death certificates and medical records.

89 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates and medical records.

90 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates and primary care and health authority recor

91 l registration, including specific perinatal certificates and revised International Classification of

92 The accuracy of GUE reporting on death certificates and the etiology of fatal GUE merit further

93 ying causes of death was obtained from death certificates and the National Death Index.

94 individuals, ascertained by validated death certificates and the national death registry.

95 Methadone was named on 2,149 death certificates and was the most frequently named substance

96 from inpatient and outpatient care and death certificates and were confirmed by medical record review

97 Center Enterprise Data Warehouse, and death certificates and were linked to the UPDB for analysis.

98 01, were retrospectively obtained from birth certificates and were linked to their clinical, laborato

99 lergy passport, a drug allergy alert card, a certificate, and a discharge letter after medical evalua

100 the decedent frequently completed the death certificate, and HCV and HBV often were not detected and

101 he world's newborn babies do not get a birth certificate, and most neonatal deaths and almost all sti

102 Used linked ART surveillance, birth certificates, and birth defects registry data for 3 stat

103 had their records linked to California birth certificates, and controls were selected from birth cert

104 death was similar to that for clinical death certificates, and could therefore be acceptable for medi

105 ,103) were ascertained from linkage to death certificates, and hazard ratios (HRs) for all- and cause

106 s, hospital discharge diagnosis codes, death certificates, and Medicare claims data.

107 erts used study data, medical records, death certificates, and proxy reports to adjudicate causes of

108 ontact with next of kin, collection of death certificates, and searches of the National Death Index.

109 es identified through medical records, death certificates, and state cancer registries.

110 viewed EMS and hospital records, state death certificates, and the national death index to determine

111 untries are based on clinical records, death certificates, and verbal autopsy studies.

112 er who had an Ebola treatment unit discharge certificate are eligible for inclusion.

113 The authors concluded that birth certificates are an efficient means of locating children

114 Death certificates are inaccurate and do not report PCI-relate

115 on and diabetes mellitus (mentioned on death certificate as either primary or contributing cause of d

116 us (breast vs bottle) was coded on the birth certificate as the type of feeding the infant was receiv

117 mong 1244 child reports with available death certificates/autopsy reports included sudden infant deat

118 Death certificate-based 12-year mortality was analyzed among 1

119 risons were made with a retrospective, death certificate-based determination of SCD incidence using I

120 imultaneous comparison was made with a death certificate-based method of determining SCD incidence.

121 Standard death certificate-based methods for ascertaining deaths due to

122 The retrospective death certificate-based review yielded 1,007 cases (incidence

123 Retrospective death certificate-based surveillance results in significant ov

124 Birth certificate (BC) controls are an alternative, because th

125 agnosed ALS and a severely disabling disease certificate between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 20

126 may be due to underreporting of SLE on death certificates, but may also represent underdiagnosis of S

127 t being required to maintain their specialty certificate by at least 1 employer, but only approximate

128 estimate) revisions of the US standard birth certificate: clinical or obstetric estimate and LMP-base

129 ing cause of death was identified from death certificates collected through 2006 (mean follow-up, 14.

130 s targeted at improving the quality of death certificate completion are urgently needed.

131 a (ALL) cases 0-7 years of age and 214 birth certificate controls matched on date of birth, sex, and

132 n diagnosed with incident leukemia and birth certificate controls who were matched to them on age, se

133 icipation rate (49.0% for 560 enrolled birth certificate controls), using birth records to recruit co

134 ntrols may be less representative than birth certificate controls.

135 Crude and birth certificate covariate-adjusted results for carbon monoxi

136 ath in HIV (CoDe) protocol, which uses death certificate data and clinical markers.

137 Death certificate data are often used to study the epidemiolog

138 According to death certificate data between 1969 and 2013, an overall decre

139 g persons aged 25 years or older using death certificate data collated by the National Center for Hea

140 e Medical Birth Registry of Norway has birth certificate data dating back to 1967 and allowed nuclear

141 Using New York death certificate data for 1989-1991 and 1999-2001 and hospita

142 were linked to hospital admission and death certificate data for 71,681 pairs of maternal grandparen

143 Using 1999-2001 birth certificate data from 2 counties in North Carolina, the

144 gestation during 2000-2005 using live birth certificate data from three states (Pennsylvania, Ohio,

145 National death certificate data greatly overestimate deaths in which HZ

146 cted for this observational study from death certificate data in the US Centers for Disease Control a

147 hospital discharge diagnoses linked to birth certificate data in the year following delivery for 849,

148 States, researchers compared 1997-2003 birth certificate data linked to selected controls (n = 6,681)

149 ing linked New York City discharge and birth certificate data sets from 2010.

150 We reviewed death certificate data to assess the accuracy of deaths report

151 US death certificate data were used to identify deaths due to met

152 n, identified using publicly available birth certificate data, born in 1992, 1994, 1996, and 1998 fro

153 federal government and based on state death certificate data, identifies such deaths by assigning th

154 ers for Disease Control and Prevention death certificate data, using International Statistical Classi

155 ington State Trauma Registry linked to death certificate data.

156 identified by using state and national death certificate data.

157 causes using 1989-2001 US linked birth/death certificate data.

158 ation from routine cancer-registry and death-certificate data.

159 cy characteristics were extracted from birth certificate data.

160 partment of Health's maternally-linked birth certificate database, we performed a retrospective popul

161 ed through 1992-1993 for a hospital or death certificate diagnosis of CLD or cirrhosis (ICD-9-CM 571)

162 We used data from death certificates filed in the United States from 1999 to 200

163 r diagnosis was randomly selected from birth certificate files (n = 12990) with frequency matching on

164 ; CCR records were linked to statewide birth certificate files from January 2000 to December 2014 to

165 frequent cause of death listed on the death certificate for patients, and cardiovascular disease was

166 Florida resident birth certificates for 2004-2006 were linked to the Centers fo

167 collected by random digit dialing and birth certificates for a Children's Oncology Group case-contro

168 icators was better than agreement with death certificates for all disease-specific causes of death.

169 We linked individual-level data with death certificates for all registered singletons births in Eng

170 ese Ministry of Agriculture issued biosafety certificates for commercial production of two cry1Ab/Ac

171 xies and obtaining medical records and death certificates for ESRD cases.

172 e Congenital Malformations Registry to birth certificates for the years 1992-2006.

173 nt studies looking at information from death certificates found people with intellectual disabilities

174 Sixty-four birth certificate-friend control pairs were enrolled (n = 128)

175 US death certificates from 1990 to 2004 for which hepatitis A was

176 We analyzed Florida birth certificates from 1994 to 2002 linked to Florida public

177 We validated HZ coding on death certificates from California, using hospital records as

178 ses of deaths were ascertained through death certificates from January 1, 1989, through 1998.

179 Individual death certificates from Kentucky during 1911-1919 were abstrac

180 for-service billing records matched to birth certificates from Medicaid beneficiaries aged 0 to 12 mo

181 enhanced by obtaining paper copies of death certificates from the states, because death certificates

182 use-of-death and demographic data from death certificates from the US National Center for Health Stat

183 of Diseases system diagnostic codes on death certificates from the US National Mortality Database.

184 From live birth certificates from three states, we constructed a cohort

185 tional American Board of Medical Specialties certificates (GS+).

186 nterviews with 399 women whose child's birth certificate had at least one of the boxes checked along

187 ol degree or general educational development certificate had greater eye health knowledge (incidence

188 ortion of children aged 0-4 years with birth certificates had increased by 1.5% (95% CI -7.1 to 10.1)

189 Death certificates had only 58% accuracy (95% confidence inter

190 tational age measurements derived from birth certificates has been in question.

191 (HCV)-infected persons recorded on US death certificates has been increasing, but actual rates and c

192 cesses meet established standards and when a certificate holder is required to periodically demonstra

193 We linked birth certificates, hospital discharge abstracts (including in

194 ulture occupation was described on the death certificate in 115 (35%) of these men.

195 y and periodontology at Harvard, receiving a certificate in 1961.

196 use of death (MCOD) data in 12 million death certificates in 2006-2010.

197 g holders of time-limited and time-unlimited certificates in non-VA and nonacademic settings and the

198 alogy of the Utah population linked to death certificates in Utah over a period of 100 years.

199 diagnosis of AN, or who had a cause-of-death certificate including an AN diagnosis.

200 (n = 5) in hospitalization records or death certificates, including 36 who were diagnosed only on th

201 Death certificates indicated PD was a substantial contributor

202 The authors obtained death certificate information in a cohort of 260 patients who

203 awal of anticonvulsant medication, and death certificate information provided no evidence to suggest

204 Using birth certificate information, we examined the relation betwee

205 and cardiometabolic diseases based on death-certificate information.

206 attributed to cardiovascular disease (death certificate International Classification of Diseases, Ni

207 degree or a general educational development certificate (IRR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54), those who we

208 The ABPNS certificate is intended to be the premier comprehensive

209 Accuracy of coding on death certificates is difficult to ascertain.

210 ember 31, 2009, using Washington State birth certificates linked to hospital discharge data.

211 th using 2008-2010 New York City (NYC) birth certificates linked to hospital records.

212 Limitations: Underreporting of SLE on death certificates may have resulted in underestimates of SLE

213 Death certificates may lack accuracy and misclassify the cause

214 r calculating CLD mortality rates from death certificates may underestimate hepatitis C-related CLD m

215 d international sites, including linkages to certificate, MS, and PhD programs.

216 Data were from parental interviews, birth certificates, multiple-pass 24-h dietary recalls, 3-d ac

217 7) who could be linked to a California birth certificate (n = 3,590).

218 Physicians who had signed selected death certificates (n = 6,927) were sent a questionnaire.

219 to fit their practice goals, often earning a certificate of added qualification in generalist fields.

220 approval of the petition for establishing a Certificate of Added Qualification in Transplant Hepatol

221 Board of Internal Medicine examination for a Certificate of Added Qualification, similar to that for

222 raw materials, PHPI product specifications, certificate of analysis, and test methods.

223 tatistical Coordinating Center had a Federal Certificate of Confidentiality and approval from each in

224 r passive consenting processes and a Federal Certificate of Confidentiality and other protections for

225 d using the 2003 revision of the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth (N = 17,896,048).

226 ere accepted based on the application of the Certificate of Medical Benefit between 2003 and 2007, we

227 Certificate of need (CON) regulation was introduced to c

228 analyses have examined relationships between certificate of need regulations and outcomes of care.

229 While many states have repealed certificate of need regulations in recent years, few ana

230 Certificate of need regulations were enacted to control

231 The 624,421 patients in states with certificate of need regulations were less likely to be a

232 states with highly and moderately stringent certificate of need regulations, respectively, were less

233 dergo early revascularization in states with certificate of need regulations.

234 Educational achievement measured by General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) grades had a p

235 United Kingdom-wide examination, the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE), which is admi

236 he age-16 UK-wide standardized GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) examination results

237 We reviewed polysomnograms and the death certificates of 112 Minnesota residents who had undergon

238 Two neuroradiologists with certificates of added qualification, one with 5 years an

239 nd birth weight were obtained from the birth certificates of all 320 subjects.

240 HCV data were matched with 2011-2013 birth certificates of children aged >/=20 months to identify m

241 rocess for evaluating residents in training (Certificates of Clinical Competence).

242 ality was similar in states with and without certificates of need (109,304 [17.5%] vs 90,104 [17.5%];

243 8%]; P<.001) than patients in states without certificates of need but were more likely to undergo rev

244 .001) relative to patients in states without certificates of need, although no differences in the lik

245 esearch using administrative data associated certificate-of-need (CON) regulation for open heart surg

246 certificates from the states, because death certificates often provide additional information and ai

247 lly diagnosed at autopsy or known from death certificates only.

248 or AF on hospital discharge records or death certificates or 12-lead ECGs performed during 3 triennia

249 identified relatives' medical records, death certificate, or cancer registry information were include

250 ase was obtained from hospital records/death certificates over 22 years of follow-up.

251 om medical records, cancer registries, death certificates, pathology reports, and review of histologi

252 f children younger than 5 years with a birth certificate, proportion younger than 5 years with up-to-

253 d agreement on cause of death from the death certificate, proxy, and adjudication, as well as sensiti

254 was adjudicated using medical records, death certificates, proxy interview, and autopsy reports.

255 pital admission, disease registry, and death certificate records from the CALIBER programme, which li

256 Deaths were confirmed by death certificates, referring physicians, and medical records.

257 ratios (PRs) of maternal smoking from birth certificate report and ASDs using logistic regression, a

258 idual cancer mortality rates from 2008 death certificate reporting from the Centers for Disease Contr

259 death among men and women from 2009 US death certificate reporting; (2) individual cancer mortality r

260 tinct strata and reduced the number of death certificate requests by 76%.

261 onable matches to reduce the number of death certificate requests to state offices.

262 hospital and ED discharge records and death certificates, respectively.

263 Regardless of birth certificate revision, the median, 10th, and 90th percent

264 and lower for postterm births for both birth certificate revisions.

265 rice were investigated and optimized using a certificated rice flour.

266 Cases were identified though a state death certificate search, Centers for Disease Control and Prev

267 nsitivity (sensitivity = 50%-89%) than death certificates (sensitivity = 31%-81%).

268 ing the reporting of cause of death on death certificates should improve national vital records data

269 ion spectroscopy (ICPES) and the analysis of certificate standard samples.

270 The new evidence includes the death certificate stating the man's occupation to have been 'm

271 iograms, hospital discharge codes, and death certificates), stroke, heart failure, CHD, and mortality

272 interview studies with physicians, and death certificate studies (the Netherlands and Belgium) were r

273 A nationwide death certificate study in Flanders, Belgium, was conducted in

274 3 using data from newly revised Oregon birth certificates that allowed for the disaggregation of hosp

275 To certificate this encroaching process, we employed the tr

276 sits, hospital discharge diagnosis, or death certificates through 2011.

277 pital transfers), and fetal and infant death certificates to assess neonatal mortality rates among 48

278 ned using the National Death Index and death certificates to characterize the mortality experience of

279 elopmental Services records with state birth certificates to identify all siblings and half siblings

280 cords, which were then linked to state birth certificates to identify full sibs and half-sibs and to

281 ves encourage internists with time-unlimited certificates to recertify.

282 These characters may be used as "certificates" to verify different branches in a phylogen

283 f registers of hospital discharges and death certificates) to identify definite CCM diagnoses first m

284 followed for mortality, identified by death certificate underlying or contributing causes, by linkag

285 Death certificates, utilized by previous reports, have poor co

286 ion that death by stroke reported on a death certificate was due to the index stroke if death occurre

287 women with available information, the birth certificate was fully concordant with respect to inferti

288 Information available on birth certificates was not sufficient to understand this dispa

289 Using death certificates, we analyzed trends in NYC-specific and US

290 Based on examination of US death certificates, we identified deaths in 26 states for whic

291 his population-based study, California birth certificates were identified for 508 (86%) neuroblastoma

292 ing respiratory causes listed on their death certificates were more affected by air pollution, as com

293 Death certificates were obtained for all but three of those wh

294 Death certificates were obtained for all participants who died

295 Death certificates were obtained.

296 Death certificates were reviewed by 2 physicians.

297 medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates were reviewed to identify cause of death.

298 registries of households, cancers, and death certificates were used to derive incidence and mortality

299 Birth certificates were used to select women who had vaginal s

300 g an expanded definition that included death certificates where CLD, viral hepatitis, or CLD-related