1 Comparative 3D analysis with dense sampling offers a pre
2 SMA-11 PET/CT scanning results and underwent
comparative (
68)Ga-THP-PSMA scanning.
3 netic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine the
comparative acute effects of standard HD versus hemodiaf
4 Comparative analyses and phylogenetic reconstructions re
5 ons of intraspecific diversification because
comparative analyses have focused on species inhabiting
6 While multiple
comparative analyses have investigated variation in brai
7 Here, we consider recent
comparative analyses of extant species that are uncoveri
8 Here, we present
comparative analyses of mitochondrial proteomes, cellula
9 CDD also supports
comparative analyses of protein families via conserved d
10 Comparative analyses of the interactomes identified comm
11 ired for nucleosomal destabilization, and by
comparative analyses of the intercalator and salt induce
12 In psychiatry,
comparative analyses of therapeutic options and the aggr
13 Comparative analyses of transcriptional profiles from hu
14 se two closely related species, we performed
comparative analyses on 14 new S. gordonii and 5 S. sang
15 Based on phylogenetic
comparative analyses on 3,005 bird species, we demonstra
16 Comparative analyses proved that the nanoCT can depict t
17 tif has unusual direct-repeat structure, and
comparative analyses reveal sequence and structural simi
18 ork that integrates taxonomic and functional
comparative analyses to accurately quantify taxon-level
19 s question, we used psychoacoustic tests and
comparative analyses to investigate whether this distinc
20 Comparative analyses with previously available finished
21 rom public mappings and integrated tools for
comparative analyses.
22 thers in a given individual) in intrapatient
comparative analysis (IPCA) of nevi may help improve the
23 ndard nomenclature of defined cell types for
comparative analysis and biomarker discovery.
24 from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and perform a
comparative analysis between Asian and Caucasian patient
25 plement inhibitor, which was identified in a
comparative analysis between CSCs and non-CSCs in endome
26 A
comparative analysis for different gases reveals the hig
27 Comparative analysis identifies other catalysts that con
28 of the nascent peptide chain, we performed a
comparative analysis in bacteria, yeast, and mammalian c
29 Intrapatient
comparative analysis is of major importance to the effec
30 eporting biases in FAERS, and illustrate how
comparative analysis of ADRs can reveal underlying mecha
31 functional modules can be identified through
comparative analysis of biological networks.
32 nal annotation, disease gene prioritization,
comparative analysis of biological systems and predictio
33 psis as a host plant species, we conducted a
comparative analysis of cytokinin genes in response to t
34 Here we address this issue by a
comparative analysis of genital cortex.
35 We perform
comparative analysis of hydrogen jump mechanisms observe
36 Through molecular modeling and
comparative analysis of machines assembled with protein-
37 Here we report results from a phylogenetic
comparative analysis of over 1000 species of squamate re
38 thematical modeling of genome evolution with
comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes to estimate
39 ctural information in order to assist in the
comparative analysis of protein evolution and in the opt
40 The
comparative analysis of publically available transcripto
41 eatures have been investigated by means of a
comparative analysis of the frequency generation perform
42 ovides an interactive framework for a visual
comparative analysis of the given assemblies.
43 Our study is a
comparative analysis of the host innate immune response
44 A
comparative analysis of the molecular phenotypes of CA-M
45 Here we have performed a systematic and
comparative analysis of the p63 target gene network with
46 Comparative analysis of the prognostic power of gene exp
47 pplied a three-step process, starting with a
comparative analysis of the X-ray crystallographic struc
48 A
comparative analysis of transcriptional and chromatin fe
49 A
comparative analysis of wild-type and Map3k8(-/-) mice w
50 We tested these predictions with a
comparative analysis on the outcomes of 719 studies acro
51 Comparative analysis revealed an activated AKT-mTOR path
52 A
comparative analysis revealed that a majority of these m
53 With
comparative analysis to a reference-transcriptome-guided
54 We validated PaCeQuant by extensive
comparative analysis to manual segmentation and existing
55 In this study, we performed a
comparative analysis using 69 fully sequenced genomes be
56 A
comparative analysis was performed after the implementat
57 For the CBDB1-mediated dechlorination,
comparative analysis with Hirshfeld charges shows that t
58 From this
comparative analysis, we have identified a group of pred
59 monomicrobial cultures were included in the
comparative analysis.
60 ll facilitate future studies of function and
comparative anatomy of the SEZ.
61 Along with a recent flurry of research on
comparative and evolutionary genomics in different eusoc
62 Overall,
comparative and genomic analyses reveal the emergence of
63 We included both
comparative and noncomparative studies.
64 Specifically, we compiled
comparative and quantitative data essential to understan
65 ng into account experimental, developmental,
comparative,
and archaeological evidence.
66 is framework can motivate new developmental,
comparative,
and cross-cultural research about human coo
67 Here we address the question using a
comparative approach to contrast diversity patterns acco
68 We used a
comparative approach to show that the original life-hist
69 While such
comparative approaches will eventually succeed, I sugges
70 Comparative assessment of treatment results in paediatri
71 ted C statistics for the new model and did a
comparative assessment with six previously developed ris
72 Mixed methods
comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospita
73 erformed equivalence studies by conducting a
comparative biochemical and proteomics analysis of the f
74 Comparative bioinformatics, mutagenesis, and biochemical
75 Cross-sectional, prospective,
comparative case series.
76 Comparative case series.
77 Prospective consecutive, interventional,
comparative case series.
78 This protocol provides
comparative cell-type-specific telomere-length measureme
79 Fungi are ideally suited for
comparative chromatin biology because sequencing of nume
80 gnosis, and in scientific studies to improve
comparative data analysis.
81 cement might be a good alternative; however,
comparative data on different transcatheter heart valves
82 ogical studies is limited by the scarcity of
comparative data on the membrane lipid composition of cu
83 ere psoriasis in children is increasing, but
comparative data on their use and toxicities are limited
84 gle grapevine variety, so there is a lack of
comparative data representing different cultivars.
85 promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the
comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defin
86 addresses focused questions related to: (1)
comparative diagnostic performance of VCTE and MRE relat
87 s part of the North Carolina Prostate Cancer
Comparative Effectiveness & Survivorship Study, a popula
88 Sex-specific
comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants
89 IT in colorectal neoplasia detection and the
comparative effectiveness of FIT relative to other commo
90 We evaluated the
comparative effectiveness of high-dose vaccine in preven
91 mmended for definitive therapy; however, the
comparative effectiveness of individual beta-lactams is
92 rvational ROADMAP study (Risk Assessment and
Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Dev
93 udies published through December 2015 on the
comparative effectiveness of oral medications for type 2
94 The
comparative effectiveness of partial nephrectomy versus
95 The
comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary inter
96 We show that the
comparative effectiveness of symptom monitoring and quar
97 This study sought to investigate the
comparative effectiveness of the Food and Drug Administr
98 Further studies are needed to assess the
comparative effectiveness of these 2 strategies in diffe
99 an important and growing source of data for
comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies.
100 Prioritizing
comparative effectiveness research may contribute to obt
101 SCD treatment guidelines are warranted as is
comparative effectiveness research to strengthen the und
102 Further
comparative effectiveness research with inclusion of con
103 uence of selection bias on cost estimates in
comparative effectiveness research.
104 econdary analysis of a randomized, pragmatic
comparative effectiveness trial (Prospective Multicenter
105 24 week, open-label, randomised controlled,
comparative effectiveness trial at eight US community-ba
106 ) Trial and Follow-up Study was a randomized
comparative effectiveness trial comparing systemic thera
107 Preplanned secondary analysis of data from a
comparative effectiveness trial for center-involved DME
108 Comparative effectiveness was 24.0% (95% confidence inte
109 We then ranked the
comparative effects of all regimens with the surface und
110 rficial femoral artery disease; however, the
comparative efficacy of these interventional strategies
111 is triaL (ORAL) Strategy aimed to assess the
comparative efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacit
112 Comparative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with mono
113 Our
comparative epidemiological approach highlights the hete
114 ther possible cofactors, the small number of
comparative epidemiological studies, and the difficulty
115 mechanisms of these processes and present a
comparative evaluation and updated model of two related
116 free, and will allow researchers to perform
comparative evaluation of AAA using a standardised appro
117 ite an increasing number of RNA-seq studies,
comparative evaluation of bacterial rRNA depletion metho
118 his work, in which we report on an extensive
comparative evaluation of several tools.
119 Comparative evaluations are needed to assess the suitabi
120 Comparative evaluations of diagnostic performance for AN
121 ess were based on practical necessities, but
comparative evidence was not identified.
122 We performed
comparative evolutionary analysis and structural modelin
123 Here, we performed a
comparative evolutionary and structural study of represe
124 al basis of individual gates, we performed a
comparative experimental and computational analysis betw
125 Finally, we conduct a series of
comparative experiments which support our model.
126 shared programs of branching morphogenesis,
comparative expression studies on the developing mouse l
127 t mean square error of approximation = 0.06;
comparative fit index = 0.95; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94;
128 In our proof-of-principle study, we used
comparative flow cytometric screening to identify ICAM-1
129 Here, we develop a phylogenetic
comparative framework for testing if and how clade-wide
130 We also develop a
comparative framework to systematically explore tissue-
131 ross 'omics' data within an organism and for
comparative gene expression analysis across organisms.
132 Comparative gene expression analysis of neuronal derivat
133 enes and functional overlap revealed through
comparative gene ontology analysis in both species.
134 Here, we present a new
comparative genome analysis and a thorough genetic analy
135 MISAG and MIMAG will facilitate more robust
comparative genomic analyses of bacterial and archaeal d
136 Comparative genomic analyses revealed high similarities
137 omic underpinnings of CHKi hypersensitivity,
comparative genomic analysis was performed between hyper
138 New insights from molecular studies and
comparative genomic approaches have offered tantalising
139 ility to relate it to the larger genomic and
comparative genomic context is becoming increasingly cru
140 hat adapts to the supplied data to produce a
comparative genomic database or multi-layered annotation
141 On array-based
comparative genomic hybridization (n = 3), gain of 6p wa
142 e genome sequences, in both a population and
comparative genomic settings.
143 Our data provide a foundation for
comparative genomic studies that generate models for the
144 Comparative genomics analyses executed by powerful compu
145 combination with other approaches, including
comparative genomics and environmental field work, labor
146 The
comparative genomics and experimental study, presented h
147 genetic dissection of rubber related traits,
comparative genomics and marker-assisted selection for t
148 Here, using a combination of
comparative genomics and molecular clock analyses, we sh
149 In this study, we used
comparative genomics and transcriptome analysis of citra
150 rmorant species and applied a predictive and
comparative genomics approach to find candidate variants
151 l behavior, thus providing an example of how
comparative genomics can be used to test sociobiological
152 Comparative genomics data indicate that these loci, and
153 Comparative genomics is providing new opportunities to a
154 Leveraging
comparative genomics methods, we identify and experiment
155 Comparative genomics of two flatfish and transcriptomic
156 e gourd provides a useful resource for plant
comparative genomics studies and cucurbit improvement.
157 have significantly expanded the database for
comparative genomics studies in these bacteria.
158 Orthology analysis is a fundamental tool in
comparative genomics.
159 reveal biological variations among different
comparative groups.
160 ings may facilitate counseling regarding the
comparative harms of contemporary treatments for prostat
161 We investigated the
comparative hepatogenic potential of human bone marrow s
162 Comparative ImmunoCAP ISAC microarray was performed in p
163 Comparative infection with wild-type and epithelial cell
164 Comparative inferences with other East African and weste
165 es with sequence, phenotypes, functional and
comparative information, and their relationships to huma
166 Prospective, cross-sectional,
comparative instrument validation study.
167 This is a retrospective, non-
comparative interventional case series study, in which 2
168 Here, we report the
comparative investigation of spidroin NTDs originating f
169 Comparative label-free LC-MS/MS profiling of EVs indicat
170 Retrospective non-
comparative laboratory case series.
171 is a fundamental question for historical and
comparative linguistics.
172 g of quantitative traits, map-based cloning,
comparative mapping, and in marker-assisted wheat breedi
173 htforward strategy for such studies involves
comparative measurements during substrate turnover and i
174 A
comparative meta-analysis of 62 voxel-based morphometry
175 The multimodal
comparative meta-analysis shows shared and disorder-spec
176 ock-out (KO) male and female mice to conduct
comparative metabolic, imaging, and functional studies.
177 g needs, such as the systematic and unbiased
comparative metabolite profiling of large numbers of com
178 Consistent with this,
comparative metabolite profiling utilizing a number of A
179 Using Biolog phenotype microarrays and
comparative metabolite profiling we demonstrate the impa
180 In this study, a large-scale
comparative metabolomics approach was applied to investi
181 ress this gap in our knowledge, we performed
comparative metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, a
182 Using state-of-the-art phylogenetic
comparative methods, we show that successful invaders ha
183 evolution in Agrodiaetus using phylogenetic
comparative methods.
184 n the same individuals with a view to obtain
comparative metrics for lifelong LTL attrition and learn
185 A
comparative microarray investigation of the EPiR respons
186 Here, using
comparative mitochondrial phosphoproteomics, analyses of
187 rsalis and Japananus hyalinus, and the first
comparative mitogenome analysis across the superfamily M
188 Ligands were predicted by docking against a
comparative model based on a eukaryotic homologue.
189 NSAID-binding site structure of SULT1A1 as a
comparative model, it appears that 11 of the 13 human SU
190 Comparative modeling of the DNA-binding domain of human
191 with unknown structure outside the range of
comparative modeling.
192 on and in the optimization of alignments for
comparative modelling and construct design.
193 RNases-S complex and its isolated partners,
comparative molecular dynamics simulations have been per
194 Na(+) bound in the Na2 site, by carrying out
comparative molecular dynamics simulations of the models
195 Comparative morphological analyses reveal that enlarged
196 hood framework for fitting Levy processes to
comparative morphological data.
197 Comparative morphology and some phylogenomic analyses su
198 ics and experimental data, ODG will create a
comparative,
multi-dimensional graph database.
199 This
comparative multimodal meta-analysis assessed shared and
200 twork querying algorithm based on the CUFID (
Comparative network analysis Using the steady-state netw
201 (c) 2016 The Authors The Journal of
Comparative Neurology Published by Wiley Periodicals, In
202 ses, randomized clinical trials, prospective
comparative observational studies, and retrospective stu
203 on, and mathematical biology; functional and
comparative OMICs; gene editing; expanded use of model o
204 rometry (LC-MS/MS), a widely used method for
comparative '
omics analysis, experiences challenges with
205 Through
comparative oncogenomics, we have found that KANK1 was a
206 In addition,
comparative optical mapping of two other inbred maize li
207 participants to conditions promoting either
comparative or integrative search.
208 Current
comparative outcomes among black and white patients trea
209 This multicenter (India and Africa),
comparative,
parallel-group trial enrolled 859 patients
210 Carnosol showed
comparative PARP inhibitory effects at 100 microM compar
211 Comparative pathogenomics analysis identified S. sanguin
212 Here, Grabowski and Jungers use
comparative phylogenetic analysis to reconstruct the lik
213 Independent
comparative phylogenomic analyses of fungal and bacteria
214 open collaboration framework for experts in
comparative phylogenomics and related research areas who
215 Here, we scale
comparative phylogeography up to the hemisphere level an
216 ic relationships are obscure, thus hampering
comparative physiological studies.
217 Comparative population genomics offers an excellent oppo
218 We validate
comparative predictions for xanthine derivatives with ne
219 The
comparative prevalence ratio of HIV among MSM relative t
220 Comparative proteome profiling regarding other cells dem
221 The results suggest that combining
comparative proteomic analyses of different tissues and
222 Comparative proteomic analysis and functional assays ind
223 and that may be involved in pathogenesis, a
comparative proteomic analysis was performed using the f
224 tive and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) based
comparative proteomics.
225 r machine (SVM) method is also presented for
comparative purposes.
226 (i) creates an extensive report with several
comparative quality metrics; (ii) constructs the most co
227 tion, annotation of unknown metabolites, and
comparative quantification.
228 In a
comparative,
randomized controlled, phase 4 study, outpa
229 Here, we describe the nature and
comparative reactivity of two low-spin heme-peroxo-Cu co
230 A
comparative reAdmix analysis, complemented by IBD sharin
231 Recent
comparative research in human and nonhuman primates has
232 We present
comparative results to the currently accepted method wit
233 We performed
comparative ribosome profiling in yeast and mice with va
234 Comparative RNA sequencing analyses showed reduced expre
235 A
comparative RNA sequencing approach unveiled the molecul
236 Here, we utilize
comparative S672R versus WT NMR analyses to show that th
237 Additionally, when participants adopt a
comparative search strategy, they also exhibit greater e
238 His proposal for
comparative semiotic analyses of how visible bodily acti
239 ses, thereby increasing the probability that
comparative sequence analysis approaches will reveal the
240 However,
comparative sequence analysis specifically targeting che
241 Further
comparative series may support our preliminary findings
242 f discordant sibling pairs (CDS) to derive a
comparative similarity score.
243 Comparative simulations of S-protein in the presence and
244 Comparative statistics were employed to determine signif
245 tion with a buried surface area of 3094 A(2)
Comparative structural analysis of p59-p261C with the co
246 We use quantitative
comparative structural analysis to localize the origins
247 he importance of elaborated in vitro/in vivo
comparative studies and, when available, validation with
248 mas compared with anatomic imaging; however,
comparative studies are rare.
249 irtually precludes the possibility of making
comparative studies between human voice and other animal
250 ual-metric strategy by showing that previous
comparative studies corroborate the performance evaluati
251 However,
comparative studies focusing on early/embryonic stages d
252 These methods further pave the way for new
comparative studies in animal communication or the analy
253 underlying rice stem NSC and informs future
comparative studies in other agronomically vital grass s
254 Comparative studies of birds show a remarkable diversity
255 scuss the implications of these findings for
comparative studies of cognitive ability.
256 Comparative studies of morphologically different species
257 ource can be used to conduct a wide array of
comparative studies of plant metabolism.
258 No definitive
comparative studies of the efficacy of 'awake' deep brai
259 These results are relevant to
comparative studies related to the evolution of large br
260 Randomized and nonrandomized
comparative studies that enrolled children and adolescen
261 We also review
comparative studies that have revealed several important
262 Especial emphasis is made on existing
comparative studies that shed light on the effect of nan
263 To elucidate the precise role of graphene,
comparative studies were performed with carbon nanotube
264 rted on posttransplant survival rates and 10
comparative studies which reported on posttransplant rec
265 There were five
comparative studies which reported on posttransplant sur
266 Comparative studies with extracorporeal membrane oxygena
267 85.7%) compared to no therapy based on three
comparative studies.
268 We perform a
comparative study between (conventional) single-pulse la
269 A
comparative study for 62 toxic chemicals based on the si
270 A
comparative study is reported where folic acid (FA) and
271 Retrospective
comparative study of a consecutive cohort of patients.
272 In the present study, we report a
comparative study of azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (D
273 The
comparative study of cell types is a powerful approach t
274 A
comparative study of nanostructured PuO2 and Pu colloids
275 short- and long-germ development, ideal for
comparative study of PRGs.
276 A
comparative study of six different carbon nanomaterial-m
277 We also present a
comparative study of STO(001) and STO(110) bare surfaces
278 Our detailed
comparative study of the PrP(Sc) conformers has revealed
279 l stretching modes (1800-1700cm(-1)) and the
comparative study of the Raman-active CC (1660cm(-1)) an
280 Single-site
comparative study of UWF images and ETDRS photos.
281 We present a
comparative study on the diversity of dust-borne bacteri
282 This detailed experimental
comparative study represents a fundamental step to under
283 To evaluate the
comparative therapeutic value of all new cancer medicine
284 for calculating characterization factors or
comparative toxicity potentials (CTP) for nanoparticles
285 The
Comparative Toxicogenomics Database provides information
286 in and between plant species, we performed a
comparative transcriptomic and genomic analysis at the l
287 within these niches has largely depended on
comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of dif
288 Using a
comparative transcriptomic approach, we identify ZNF521/
289 the paradigm for insect development, whereas
comparative transcriptomic studies of embryonic stages o
290 Comparative transcriptomics across mutants and developme
291 To address this question, we performed
comparative transcriptomics analyses to identify candida
292 In total, the results of
comparative transcriptomics correctly predicted a 2AA-de
293 Here a comprehensive
comparative transcriptomics interrogation of gene expres
294 etinal vein occlusion (HRVO) in the Study of
COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCO
295 lication of the developed methodology to the
comparative uptake of Pt-species in cisplatin resistant
296 Bangerter foil goggles to simulate blur for
comparative validation.
297 ns and clinical complications can inform the
comparative value of different prediabetes definitions.
298 This
comparative whole-blood transcriptomics profiling of vir
299 This allowed a
comparative X-ray crystallographic study to delineate th
300 Comparative yield adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for stool s