ライフサイエンスコーパス: comparative sequence analysis

1 other artiodactyl species (cow and pig) for comparative sequence analysis.

2 r nearly matches the structure determined by comparative sequence analysis.

3 us in RNA secondary structures determined by comparative sequence analysis.

4 ved regions of biological importance through comparative sequence analysis.

5 s and paralogous genes and as a resource for comparative sequence analysis.

6 didates that are currently being revealed by comparative sequence analysis.

7 ucleotide microarrays, chemical mapping, and comparative sequence analysis.

8 enzymes could not be identified solely using comparative sequence analysis.

9 parable to the best accuracies achievable by comparative sequence analysis.

10 lex secondary structure model predicted from comparative sequence analysis.

11 ious phylogenies provide great resources for comparative sequence analysis.

12 uster containing the structure determined by comparative sequence analysis.

13 he genomic level we initiated a multispecies comparative sequence analysis.

14 tools, to determine base pairs supported by comparative sequence analysis.

15 To facilitate multispecies comparative sequence analysis, a robust and scalable str

16 structure and protein structure levels using comparative sequence analysis across vertebrates.

17 integrating experimental mapping data into a comparative sequence analysis algorithm for secondary st

18 Comparative sequence analysis allows us to identify pote

19 ction by missense variants is predictable by comparative sequence analysis alone.

20 Comparative sequence analysis also revealed regions of e

21 Comparative sequence analysis also revealed that sequenc

22 acids, mostly tyrosines, were identified by comparative sequence analysis and changed individually t

23 -structural model of this motif, inferred by comparative sequence analysis and comparison with nuclea

24 el of the CVB3 5'NTR, generated primarily by comparative sequence analysis and energy minimization, s

25 phasizes the basepairs that are supported by comparative sequence analysis and establishes minimal se

26 Here we present comparative sequence analysis and experimental data supp

27 Comparative sequence analysis and experimental DNA bindi

28 We used comparative sequence analysis and free energy calculatio

29 This phenomenon is usually detected via comparative sequence analysis and has been reported for

30 es were predicted by structural modeling and comparative sequence analysis and tested by introducing

31 Using comparative sequence analysis and transgenic-mouse exper

32 The predictions were based on comparative sequence analysis and, in some cases, on the

33 emphasis of base pairs that are supported by comparative sequence analysis, and a tabulation of tmRNA

34 Using expressed sequence databases, comparative sequence analysis, and experimental verifica

35 of chemical probing, RNA structure modeling, comparative sequence analysis, and functional assays to

36 ctive pressures requires far fewer data than comparative sequence analysis, and it measures selection

37 een identified, as assessed by multi-species comparative sequence analysis, and provide evidence for

38 between probes in various CaM-IQ complexes, comparative sequence analysis, and the previously determ

39 s; SeqComp and FamilyRelations, programs for comparative sequence analysis; and NetBuilder, an enviro

40 ses, thereby increasing the probability that comparative sequence analysis approaches will reveal the

41 Comparative sequence analysis based on the published cry

42 Comparative sequence analysis between SymL and GroEL was

43 This work demonstrates the power of comparative sequence analysis between the two Ciona spec

44 iple independent target regions (Multiplexed Comparative Sequence Analysis) by employing base-specifi

45 stributions with the structures predicted by comparative sequence analysis (comparative structures).

46 nd have been applied to gene identification, comparative sequence analysis, comparative gene mapping

47 rcuitry within which Elf-4 operates, we used comparative sequence analysis coupled with chromatin imm

48 As the opportunities to perform comparative sequence analysis emerge, it is important to

49 Here, we demonstrate how comparative sequence analysis facilitates genome-wide ba

50 Comparative sequence analysis for 10 bovine breeds deriv

51 Comparative sequence analysis for 10 bovine breeds revea

52 of the utility of rigorous computational and comparative sequence analysis for refining gene structur

53 To do so, we perform comparative sequence analysis for the single- and double

54 Comparative sequence analysis has become an essential co

55 he archael, eucaryal, or mitochondrial RNAs, comparative sequence analysis has established that these

56 Comparative sequence analysis has evolved as an essentia

57 Comparative sequence analysis has facilitated the discov

58 Comparative sequence analysis has successfully predicted

59 ity of the human SRP19 protein by the use of comparative sequence analysis, high-stringency structure

60 Comparative sequence analysis identified 33 novel SNPs,

61 Canine to human comparative sequence analysis identified 49 transcripts

62 of mutant aptamers, S1 nuclease probing, and comparative sequence analysis identified a simple, 45 nt

63 Long-range comparative sequence analysis identified conserved nonco

64 Comparative sequence analysis identifies regions of the

65 an, 55 months) were analyzed by longitudinal comparative sequence analysis in 8 patients progressing

66 ctional boundary determination and extensive comparative sequence analysis (including reselection of

67 These insights, together with comparative sequence analysis, indicate that tens if not

68 These results, coupled with prior comparative sequence analysis, indicate that this active

69 A comparative sequence analysis indicated that COP8 is hig

70 Comparative sequence analysis indicated that many of the

71 Comparative sequence analysis indicates that spartin sha

72 sites of tertiary interactions inferred from comparative sequence analysis, indicating that these mut

73 A common assumption in comparative sequence analysis is that the sequences have

74 matic; a sensitive new assay using automated comparative sequence analysis may be helpful.

75 structure prediction methods and indeed any comparative sequence analysis method.

76 e available for analysis and of contemporary comparative sequence analysis methods, highlighting both

77 Comparative sequence analysis of 170 closely related ent

78 Comparative sequence analysis of 3'-terminal structural

79 Based on primate comparative sequence analysis of 37 unique duplication-t

80 Comparative sequence analysis of 56 related receptors su

81 Comparative sequence analysis of a 38-kb segment reveals

82 Transposon mutagenesis and comparative sequence analysis of active clones identifie

83 Comparative sequence analysis of animal plasmins vs. clo

84 By performing a comparative sequence analysis of autosomal genes that ar

85 Comparative sequence analysis of both BnaABI1 promoters

86 Comparative sequence analysis of C. elegans and Caenorha

87 Comparative sequence analysis of candidate genes in the

88 Using comparative sequence analysis of characterized GSTs of t

89 Comparative sequence analysis of colicin E3 and cloacin

90 Complete comparative sequence analysis of cosmids from both loci

91 Here, we report the results of comparative sequence analysis of dissimilatory sulfite r

92 inish the human genome sequence, complicates comparative sequence analysis of duplicon families, and

93 Comparative sequence analysis of each of the four genes

94 Comparative sequence analysis of HS I between human and

95 Comparative sequence analysis of human SRP54 with homolo

96 ate that microarray-based assays allow rapid comparative sequence analysis of intra- and interspecies

97 Comparative sequence analysis of IS50 transposase-relate

98 Comparative sequence analysis of mammalian phospholipase

99 consensus approach to bacterial typing using comparative sequence analysis of multiple genetic loci a

100 In this study, comparative sequence analysis of NDPS1 and zFPS enzymes

101 Comparative sequence analysis of OAS, poly(A)-polymerase

102 Comparative sequence analysis of orthologous HS genes fr

103 novel cochlear gene, designated OTOR, from a comparative sequence analysis of over 4000 clones from a

104 Using comparative sequence analysis of pRA1 and pRAx with rece

105 Comparative sequence analysis of the 915-bp sic gene in

106 Comparative sequence analysis of the avirulent P2 strain

107 in mouse ZIC2 were mimicked and secondly, a comparative sequence analysis of the C-terminal was carr

108 variants among these pathogens, we performed comparative sequence analysis of the donor sites, as wel

109 Comparative sequence analysis of the entire genomes of t

110 A comparative sequence analysis of the human and mouse FGF

111 Comparative sequence analysis of the isolated ribozymes

112 Comparative sequence analysis of the mouse and human SOX

113 Comparative sequence analysis of the three homoeologous

114 Comparative sequence analysis of this group I intron sub

115 unctional experiments applied to DsbD, and a comparative sequence analysis of Trx-fold proteins to de

116 Comparative sequence analysis on a genomic scale has ope

117 lysis Tool (GOAT) is a program that performs comparative sequence analysis on ordered gene lists from

118 g partners on a molecular level and focusing comparative sequence analysis on the pathway-specific re

119 Comparative sequence analysis on three Coffea genomes/su

120 determining a secondary structure either by comparative sequence analysis or by the interpretation o

121 Long-range comparative sequence analysis/phylogenetic footprinting

122 Long-range comparative sequence analysis provides a powerful strate

123 Comparative sequence analysis revealed 33 conserved nonc

124 Comparative sequence analysis revealed a hypervariable r

125 Comparative sequence analysis revealed a total of 139 po

126 A comparative sequence analysis revealed differences and s

127 f homologous wheat genome locations based on comparative sequence analysis revealed numerous chromoso

128 Comparative sequence analysis revealed that HcDppIVA is

129 Comparative sequence analysis revealed that similar prot

130 Comparative sequence analysis reveals 92-96% nucleotide

131 Comparative sequence analysis reveals a coordinated set

132 Comparative sequence analysis reveals several noteworthy

133 Comparative sequence analysis reveals that four distinct

134 t harboring leucine-967, in conjunction with comparative sequence analysis, reveals that Vps54 has a

135 igher plants was constructed on the basis of comparative sequence analysis, secondary structure predi

136 Further comparative sequence analysis showed a number of conserv

137 Comparative sequence analysis showed SIAH-mediated prote

138 Comparative sequence analysis showed that human and rat

139 Comparative sequence analysis showed that residues 28 to

140 Comparative sequence analysis showed that the AgRP-ATP6V

141 Comparative sequence analysis shows that HipA is a membe

142 However, comparative sequence analysis specifically targeting che

143 e that uses a combination of free energy and comparative sequence analysis strategies.

144 IS6110 insertion site mapping and comparative sequence analysis strongly suggest a stepwis

145 Comparative sequence analysis suggested that SHFV ORFs 2

146 Comparative sequence analysis suggests that a subset of

147 Comparative sequence analysis suggests that fish CDKN2X

148 Comparative sequence analysis suggests that six genes in

149 Although comparative sequence analysis suggests that the 3' untra

150 rved between C. elegans and C. briggsae, and comparative sequence analysis supports the importance of

151 sures, to the secondary structure derived by comparative sequence analysis than that derived by the Z

152 Here, we show, using comparative sequence analysis, that some of those bacter

153 ity, the FCT regions of 13 strains underwent comparative sequence analysis, the gene content of the F

154 Together with comparative sequence analysis, these findings yielded a

155 e combined computational gene prediction and comparative sequence analysis to characterize an approxi

156 ture prediction was used in combination with comparative sequence analysis to construct models of fol

157 pertoire for each sequenced strain and use a comparative sequence analysis to deduce the least polymo

158 on by combining free energy minimization and comparative sequence analysis to find a low free energy

159 To facilitate the practical application of comparative sequence analysis to genetics and genomics,

160 dispar, and Entamoeba invadens, we performed comparative sequence analysis to identify and map all cl

161 neration curated proteome resource that uses comparative sequence analysis to predict constraint and

162 ghput sequencing (HTS) enhances the power of comparative sequence analysis to reveal details of how R

163 rinting, kinetic dissection of reactions and comparative sequence analysis to show that in self-splic

164 151,503 nt in 955 structures? determined by comparative sequence analysis was assembled to allow opt

165 ne protein 1 (LMP-1) in benign conditions, a comparative sequence analysis was done using samples fro

166 Comparative sequence analysis was employed to assess a p

167 uences were collected from multiple species, comparative sequence analysis was performed and software

168 Therefore, comparative sequence analysis was performed to search fo

169 Comparative sequence analysis was used to explore the se

170 Here, comparative sequence analysis was used to identify a sub

171 Multispecies comparative sequence analysis was used to identify conse

172 Comparative sequence analysis was used to reconstruct th

173 Finally, to facilitate comparative sequence analysis, we implemented several en

174 Using expression profiling and comparative sequence analysis, we show that selective ge

175 Secondary-structure models based on comparative sequence analysis were derived to characteri

176 This approach is independent of comparative sequence analysis, which has been the primar

177 This combination of long-range comparative sequence analysis with a high-throughput tra

178 Here we combine comparative sequence analysis with a modeling approach t

179 mouse genomic sequence from this region and comparative sequence analysis with HSA 21 and HSA 22 nar

180 ; (iii) combine a novel in silico method for comparative sequence analysis with in vitro functional a

181 Comparative sequence analysis with the functional alpha-

182 some-fission event as well as the results of comparative sequence analysis with the orthologous human

183 Comparative sequence analysis within the coding regions

184 Comparative sequence analysis yields a topological model