ライフサイエンスコーパス: evoked potential

1 ing (visual P1 and 25-Hz steady-state visual evoked potential).

2 spinal cerebrospinal fluid signal and motor evoked potentials).

3 assessed by P50 suppression of the auditory evoked potential.

4 l disparities were measured using the visual evoked potential.

5 ept, evidenced by changes in the N1 auditory evoked potential.

6 ry brainstem responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials.

7 d enhanced paired-pulse depression of visual evoked potentials.

8 ding of individual sound transients, such as evoked potentials.

9 nia-like decreases in amplitudes of auditory evoked potentials.

10 er reflected by distinct features of post-CI evoked potentials.

11 assessed using a limb motor score and motor-evoked potentials.

12 tical excitability were assessed using motor-evoked potentials.

13 ed on frequency-tagged steady-state visually evoked potentials.

14 y characterizing changes in firing rates and evoked potentials.

15 elay on full-field, pattern-reversal, visual-evoked potentials.

16 hippocampal gyrus activity was indicative of evoked potentials.

17 t nodes of Ranvier and reduced somatosensory-evoked potentials.

18 ent, an interhemispheric asymmetry in visual evoked potentials.

19 itoring frequency-tagged steady-state visual-evoked potentials.

20 onal bursts to modality-specific, localized, evoked potentials.

21 scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and visual evoked potentials.

22 he early cortical component of somatosensory evoked potentials.

23 ptic long-term potentiation (LTP) of C-fiber-evoked potentials.

24 lution and reduced the amplitude of visually evoked potentials.

25 nterval 40%-60%) for bilateral somatosensory evoked potential absence, both with a positive predictiv

26 electroencephalography, absent somatosensory-evoked potential, absent pupillary or corneal reflexes,

27 of motor cortex, but found no difference in evoked potentials across the levels of attentional load.

28 eedback pitch perturbations elicited average evoked potential (AEP) and event-related band power (ERB

29 on has been associated with a human auditory-evoked potential (AEP), the mismatch negativity, generat

30 The amplitude of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in the hippocampus increased tr

31 ge experience on sensory-obligatory auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) was investigated in native-Engl

32 Local field and auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded from primary audi

33 o test this hypothesis, we analysed auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) which were recorded from medica

34 tracortical facilitation (P < .01) and motor-evoked potential amplitude (P < .05) as well as a reduct

35 Late-positive evoked potential amplitude and theta-alpha oscillatory p

36 The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the basel

37 Uncaging-evoked potential amplitudes correlated inversely with sp

38 ignificantly higher postinjury somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes with longer latencies.

39 nscranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

40 nscranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

41 nscranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

42 We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential, an oscillatory response of the visual

43 hy, electroretinography analysis, and visual-evoked potential analysis.

44 ty to elicit a predefined amplitude of motor-evoked potential and EEG theta activity) and decreased L

45 grafts recovered transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potential and magnetic interenlargement reflex re

46 ociative stimulation induced change in motor-evoked potential and memory formation) after sleep depri

47 n1-deficient mice had deficits in vestibular-evoked potentials and balance assays.

48 entified those patients with lower extremity evoked potentials and better clinical recovery.

49 such as those measuring small fibre-related evoked potentials and corneal confocal microscopy, might

50 as shown by increased amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and decreased duration of the cortical

51 mans using source-imaged steady state visual evoked potentials and frequency-domain analysis over a w

52 hypomyelination resulted in markedly delayed evoked potentials and likely contributed to neurologic a

53 he trace fear paradigm as measured with tone-evoked potentials and single-unit activity.

54 ant increases of AC response including sound evoked potentials and the spike firing rates of AC neuro

55 e we used source-imaged, steady-state visual evoked potentials and visual psychophysics to determine

56 er clinical, neurophysiologic (somatosensory-evoked potential), and biochemical prognosticators.

57 evoked electroencephalographic, spinal (ChR2 evoked potential), and electromyographic responses revea

58 Visual function, visual evoked potential, and optic nerve magnetic resonance ima

59 iagnostic investigations include MRI, visual evoked potentials, and CSF examination.

60 ies detected with electroencephalography and evoked potentials, and physiological and biochemical der

61 ation, electroencephalography, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and serum neuron-specific enolase, is

62 uring therapeutic hypothermia, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and serum neuron-specific enolase.

63 trophysiologic testing, such as sweep visual-evoked potentials; and perceptual testing, allow for fur

64 trophy of brain microvasculature with visual evoked potential anomalies.

65 er frontocentral sustained negativity in the evoked potential as well as enhanced parietal alpha/low-

66 primary lateral sclerosis had abnormal motor-evoked potentials as assessed using transcranial magneti

67 33 mug/L (p = 0.029), but not somatosensory-evoked potentials, as independent predictors of poor out

68 detection of multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials associated with visual field stimulati

69 requency (30-90 Hz) power, but not in visual evoked potentials, associated with spatial attention sta

70 ce tomography, visual assessments and visual evoked potentials at presentation (median 16 days from o

71 objective was to examine brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in rat CS as a measure of poss

72 .38), and bilateral absence of somatosensory-evoked potentials between days 1 and 7 (false-positive r

73 of isoflurane on barrel cortex somatosensory-evoked potentials but failed to elicit spectral changes

74 The modulation of cortical evoked potentials by spinal cord stimulation was largest

75 been repeatedly reported that C-fiber laser-evoked potentials (C-LEPs) become detectable only when t

76 Recording of free-field cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) responses to speech tokens was i

77 he N1 and P2 components of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) evoked by 70, 80, 90, 100, and

78 Mismatch negativity (MMN), an evoked potential calculated by subtracting the response

79 In the optic nerve, visual evoked potentials can indicate demyelination and should

80 scalp EEG/SEEG findings and cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP).

81 larger motor cortex maps, and smaller motor evoked potentials compared to young subjects.

82 oth a clear reduction of the earliest visual evoked potential components, the C1 and the N1, and an a

83 (P1) at 60 ms, but no further somatosensory evoked potential components.

84 Robson contrast sensitivity, or sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

85 obson contrast sensitivity, and sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

86 xcitability and asynchrony in suprathreshold evoked potentials coupled with their normal thresholds s

87 Vestibular sensory-evoked potentials demonstrate severe to profound vestibu

88 Somatosensory evoked potentials demonstrated central slowing supportin

89 Whereas the status of brainstem-evoked potentials did not predict the recovery of sensor

90 ed to the C3-C5 level on (1) diaphragm motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magn

91 early postanoxic coma, whereas somatosensory-evoked potentials do not add any complementary informati

92 We recorded motor-evoked potentials during a faked-action discrimination (

93 by PKC inhibitor chelerythrine, and enhanced evoked potentials during costimulation of mGluR1 with 3,

94 In this study, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical (MEPs) and subcor

95 Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcortical s

96 y attenuated the amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by median nerve stimulation.

97 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stim

98 uring observation, MR was assessed via motor-evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magnetic st

99 the pattern and magnitude of corticocortical evoked potentials elicited within 500 ms after single-pu

100 nhibition was measured by conditioning motor evoked potentials, elicited by transcranial magnetic sti

101 e asked to discriminate time intervals while evoked potentials (EPs) elicited by the sound terminatin

102 paired stimulation as quantified by cortical evoked potentials (EPs) in the sensorimotor cortex of aw

103 e characterized electrically elicited visual evoked potentials (eVEPs) in Argus II retinal implant we

104 vation, comparable to the monosynaptic motor-evoked potential evoked by TMS of primary motor cortex.

105 circuit dynamics of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials extracted from concurrent EEG-fMRI dat

106 e conduction latency using full-field visual evoked potential (FF-VEP) versus the unaffected fellow e

107 00-140 ms, coinciding with the P100 visually evoked potential, followed by a driving effect in the fr

108 In contrast, a decrease in the somatosensory-evoked potential (forepaw-evoked potential, reflecting c

109 unexperienced observers by measuring visual evoked potentials from 64-channels.

110 cord stimulation caused lasting increases in evoked potentials from both sites, but only if the time

111 These infusions were sufficient to block evoked potentials from the lateral dorsal thalamus and l

112 etinography (full field and pattern), visual evoked potentials, fundus autofluorescence IRR, and opti

113 ic flash electroretinogram (FERG) and visual evoked potential (FVEP) also were recorded before lidoca

114 One index of such process is the heartbeat evoked potential (HEP), an ERP component related to the

115 Heartbeat evoked potentials (HEPs), an indicator of the cortical r

116 produced large augmentation in motor cortex evoked potentials if they were timed to converge in the

117 Photopic ERG, visual evoked potentials, IHC and cell counting indicated relat

118 motor cortex, we examined ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs) in a proximal arm muscle durin

119 sed disrupted latent inhibition and auditory-evoked potential in mice and rats, respectively, two end

120 cortical engagement, the steady-state visual evoked potential in response to naturalistic angry, fear

121 litude of the N100 component of the auditory evoked potential in response to the target tone was smal

122 f this electrode reliably produced a diffuse evoked potential in the head and body of the ipsilateral

123 Noise exposure induced a decrease of sound evoked potential in the IC.

124 rve stimulation with recording somatosensory evoked potentials in 138 healthy subjects aged 17-86 yea

125 Visual acuity was measured by visual evoked potentials in 244 infants who completed the 12-mo

126 e subcortical auditory pathway, and cortical evoked potentials in 58 participants elicited to the syl

127 xcitability were assessed by measuring motor-evoked potentials in a small hand muscle before and afte

128 in the visual cortex, and measured visually evoked potentials in awake male and female mice before a

129 ection, 70% of OEG-treated rats showed motor-evoked potentials in hindlimb muscles after transcranial

130 gnificantly increased the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials in individuals with the SNP that encod

131 ding spinal cord pathways with somatosensory-evoked potentials in injured rats.

132 eased the amplitude of the earliest visually evoked potentials in lockstep with the behavioral effect

133 concentration-dependently depressed C-fiber-evoked potentials in rats receiving spinal nerve ligatio

134 dose-dependent suppression of somatosensory-evoked potentials in response to electrical stimulation

135 und that electrosensory stimulation elicited evoked potentials in the midbrain exterolateral nucleus

136 By recording motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in the PrG of patients undergoing brai

137 Under attention, amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials increased 50-60 ms after stimulation (

138 Human studies with auditory evoked potentials indicate that FXS is associated with a

139 Somatosensory evoked potentials indicated a cortical origin of the myo

140 ls to evaluate motor excitability with motor-evoked potentials, input-output (IOcurve) and short-late

141 The N1 peak in the late auditory evoked potential (LAEP) decreases in amplitude following

142 fter multivariate analysis, prolonged visual evoked potential latency and impaired color vision, at b

143 l dysfunction and demyelination (long visual evoked potential latency) during acute optic neuritis.

144 rmore, the observed reduction of N170 visual-evoked potentials may be a key mechanism underlying 5-HT

145 Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potential measures are suitable for detection of

146 The aim of this study was to compare visual evoked potential measures of contrast sensitivity and gr

147 Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, recruitment curve, and

148 lly limited to M1 through recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude.

149 n of behaving mice to show that the midbrain evoked potential (mEP) faithfully reflects the temporal

150 s (TS) was applied over M1 producing a motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the relaxed hand.

151 pheric) before acquisition of baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from each site as a me

152 s cortical excitability as measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) alters functional conne

153 EAE31, a locus controlling latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and clinical onset of experimen

154 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and motor threshold were record

155 vicomedullary stimulation, we examined motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intracortic

156 erve stimulation we examined in humans motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intracortic

157 ere traced by simultaneously recording motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked EEG potentials (

158 ospinal responsiveness was monitored via TMS-evoked potentials (MEPs) during a 25% MVC.

159 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but not b

160 e effect of ulnar nerve stimulation on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnet

161 this hypothesis in humans by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a left finger muscle during

162 corticospinal excitability by means of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in both the hand and the arm, b

163 uring the left limb movement to obtain motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the muscles of the right for

164 threshold test stimulus (TS) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right hand.

165 excitability and RT, such that larger motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured at rest were associate

166 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring can promptly detect

167 e dorsal cervical spinal cord in rats; motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from biceps.

168 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained by transcranial m

169 cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded before, and 10 ti

170 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right fi

171 hod for standardized quantification of motor evoked potentials (MEPs).

172 and sectoral multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials metrics to discriminate glaucomatous f

173 ns, stereophotographs, and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) data were collected at baseline

174 phrey visual fields (HVF), multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP), and optical coherence tomogra

175 rence tomography (OCT) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).

176 ervical level and were correlated with motor-evoked potentials (n = 34).

177 Diego, CA) and in the P100 latency of visual evoked potentials; no changes were detected in visual ac

178 old, the intensity needed to produce a motor evoked potential of 0.5 mV, and the amplitude of the N45

179 We found that the motor evoked potential of the effector that might need to be s

180 and OCA were confirmed with 5-channel visual evoked potentials (optic nerve misrouting).

181 with a decremental extrastimulus (decrement evoked potentials or DEEPs), are more likely to colocali

182 nce of cerebral electrical activity (EEG and evoked potentials) or cerebral circulatory arrest.

183 a linear decline over time, we identified an evoked potential over the anterior frontal region which

184 We simultaneously measured auditory evoked potentials over a large swath of primary and high

185 the detection threshold elicited a cortical evoked potential (P1) at 60 ms, but no further somatosen

186 he global BCI multifocal steady state visual-evoked potentials parameter was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96)

187 n FC was estimated using steady-state visual evoked potential partial coherence before and 90 minutes

188 Visual evoked potential plasticity might represent a reliable a

189 Simple bedside tests and somatosensory-evoked potentials predict poor neurologic outcome for su

190 FL), and monocular pattern reversal visually evoked potentials (prVEP).

191 Pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) was the most frequently studied

192 ectroretinography (ERG) and patterned visual evoked potentials (pVEPs).

193 nges in descending motor pathways with motor-evoked potentials recorded during cooling, we report her

194 re, we could increase the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials recorded from below or just above the

195 l mice displayed reduced responses to visual evoked potentials recorded from layer IV in the binocula

196 results show that the amplitude of the motor-evoked potentials recorded from the real hand is signifi

197 Analysis of motor-evoked potentials recorded from the thoracic spinal cord

198 isms, we used electroretinography and visual evoked potential recording in patients, and multi-unit r

199 eekly postinjury (up to 4 wks) somatosensory-evoked potential recordings and standard motor behaviora

200 ting to binocular activation during visually evoked potential recordings was also diminished.

201 ntrinsic signal imaging and chronic visually evoked potential recordings, we found that Arc(-/-) mice

202 he amplitude of the thalamocortical visually evoked potential recover following dark exposure and rev

203 he frequency-following response, a sustained evoked potential reflecting synchronous neural activity

204 the somatosensory-evoked potential (forepaw-evoked potential, reflecting cortical synaptic transmiss

205 vity and specificity of absent somatosensory evoked potential responses during the first 24 hrs were

206 s larger than bilateral absent somatosensory evoked potential responses.

207 urons, and it reconciles previously puzzling evoked potential results in humans and animals.

208 Moreover, in vivo auditory brainstem evoked potentials revealed delayed conduction of the ves

209 uced long-term potentiation (LTP) of C-fiber-evoked potentials, revealing a constituent role of both

210 Trauma significantly reduced sound-evoked potential (SEP) amplitudes and increased SEP late

211 nd secondary components of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) before and during movement.

212 The literature regarding somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) gating is commonly cited as a pot

213 gh signal intensity (HSI), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were analyzed by using a logistic

214 cycle of the N20 component of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and the area of high-frequency o

215 We decomposed somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) into three major components: P1,

216 microelectrode arrays recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) with an almost twice SNR (signal

217 three experiments we recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from 6.5-, 8-, and 10-month-old

218 ynapse, by measuring the extracellular sound-evoked potentials (SEPs) from the antennal nerve while m

219 detailed cortical recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in an ovine model.

220 nolase (NSE), and median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) to predict poor outcome in pati

221 We found that motor evoked potentials size increased in spinal cord injury a

222 thmic stimuli elicited multiple steady state-evoked potentials (SS-EPs) observed in the EEG spectrum

223 of the P25/N33, but not other somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components, was reduced during v

224 electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and serum neuron-specific enol

225 erve at the wrist, we examined somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs; P14/N20, N20/P25 and P25/N33 c

226 ed modulations of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEPs) as a measure of attentional t

227 y distributed pattern of steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses to flickering visual

228 lography (EEG) to assess steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) in human subjects and showed t

229 ssessed by recordings of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by each of the flick

230 nontargets and recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by these stimuli.

231 Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were recorded from action vid

232 was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

233 2-week-old infants using steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).

234 Cortico-cortical evoked potential studies were performed after repetitive

235 auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, suggesting fatigue of synaptic releas

236 term enhancement of cortico-pharyngeal motor evoked potentials, suggesting the feasibility of a cereb

237 The complete loss of visual evoked potentials supports the hypothesis that cell sign

238 al cortical function, swept parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) responses of healthy preterm inf

239 The swept parameter visual evoked potential (sVEP) was used to measure contrast sen

240 tive peak around 100 milliseconds in the TMS-evoked potential (TEP) after a single TMS pulse.

241 We found that TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) changed differently according t

242 Indeed, the frequency profile of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) closely resembles that of oscil

243 raphy, 2% (one of 49) received somatosensory evoked potential testing, and 71% (35 of 49) received ne

244 Electroretinogram and visual evoked potential tests showed visual pathway involvement

245 ssociated with a reduction in the quality of evoked potentials that led to reduced performance on the

246 tude of the earliest component of the visual evoked potential, the C1.

247 ied a regularized multivariate classifier to evoked potentials to conspecific vocalizations.

248 We tracked steady-state visual evoked potentials to label distinct visual cortical resp

249 We used source imaging of visual evoked potentials to measure neural population responses

250 In the present study, human cortical evoked potentials to syllable and phoneme rate modulatio

251 Addition of somatosensory-evoked potentials to this model did not improve prognost

252 We found that in the PFC, evoked potentials to, and neural information about, exte

253 ospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulatio

254 this study was to investigate if the visual evoked potential (VEP) could be used as an unbiased, qua

255 n demonstrated that plasticity of the visual evoked potential (VEP) induced by repeated visual stimul

256 ciation of RNFL loss with a prolonged visual evoked potential (VEP) latency suggests that acute and p

257 re more demanding than for standard visually evoked potential (VEP) recordings, the eVEP has proven t

258 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual evoked potential (VEP), and grading of skin and hair pig

259 ic nerve function, assessed using the visual evoked potential (VEP).

260 find evidence of neural feedback in visually evoked potentials (VEP).

261 ation produces lasting enhancement of visual evoked potentials (VEP).

262 ed 1 and 2 weeks postinjection, and visually evoked potentials (VEPs) and single-cell activity were r

263 Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) following optic neuritis (ON) r

264 peak latency of pattern-reversal (PR) visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have been found to be a sensiti

265 ty by measuring visual behavior and visually evoked potentials (VEPs) in binocular visual cortex of t

266 neurons, ensembles of neurons, and visually-evoked potentials (VEPs) in response to task light cues,

267 RECENT FINDINGS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) may be useful as an objective m

268 Steady-state visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) to contrast reversing gratings

269 Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded over three occipi

270 Structural MRI, visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and optical coherence tomograp

271 multifocal electroretinography (ERG), visual evoked potentials (VEPs), spectral-domain optical cohere

272 s in visual acuity, visual field, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs).

273 Here we record steady-state visual evoked potentials via electrocorticography to directly a

274 trol formula had significantly poorer visual evoked potential visual acuity at 12 mo of age than did

275 multiple sclerosis (MS), and measurement of evoked potentials (visual, motor, or sensory) has been w

276 oma, including the electroretinogram, visual evoked potential, visual spatial acuity, and contrast se

277 We measured vestibular sensory evoked potentials (VsEPs) in alpha9 knockout (KO) mice,

278 Here, we measured vestibular sensory evoked potentials (VsEPs) to directly assess vestibular

279 However, the recovery of the somatosensory-evoked potential was significantly delayed compared with

280 e first clear effect of monovision on visual evoked potentials was the C1 amplitude reduction, indica

281 Evoked potential waveforms had progressively earlier pea

282 At approximately 3 months of age, vestibular evoked potentials were absent from the majority (12 of 1

283 Repeated measurements of pharyngeal motor-evoked potentials were assessed with transcranial magnet

284 Such memory-evoked potentials were characterized by early latencies

285 Visual evoked potentials were elicited by standard visual stimu

286 Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevant musc

287 electroencephalogram and daily somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded during the first 5 days

288 Motor evoked potentials were recorded in 29 typically developi

289 Cortical evoked potentials were recorded using 16 scalp electrode

290 Auditory evoked potentials were similar in OSAS and control subje

291 Visual evoked potentials were subjected to principal components

292 logical effects (change in heart rate, motor evoked potentials) were observed during any of the proce

293 brain magnetic resonance imaging and sensory evoked potentials, were performed.

294 Indeed, we found an enlarged N1 auditory evoked potential when subjects perceived illusion-ba, an

295 experimentally using the steady-state visual evoked potential where we stimulated the visual cortex w

296 ereby elicited separable steady-state visual-evoked potentials, which were used to examine the effect

297 transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked potentials while healthy humans watched videos of

298 he present study aimed to measure the visual evoked potentials with a high-density electrode array (6

299 , we stimulated and then recorded electrical evoked potentials within and between three large-scale n

300 ceptual learning of noise is associated with evoked potentials, without any salient physical disconti