ライフサイエンスコーパス: in comparison (to|with)

1 In comparison with 1 and 2, the KOP receptor affinity, s

2 ively hydrolyzes 9-hydroxy-octadecenoic acid in comparison to 13-hydroxy-octadecenoic acid from oxidi

3 uggable genes in 3-dimensional CSLC cultures in comparison to 2-dimensional bulk cultures of U87 glio

4 amnesia cases (ratio of 3:1, males:females), in comparison with 21 consecutively recruited neurologic

5 Among them 4f, analyzed in comparison with 3 by different paradigms in a rat mod

6 treatment bone marrow specimens (n = 127 ALL in comparison with 38 acute myeloid leukemia cases in a

7 among 4500 patients randomly assigned to CTA in comparison with 4602 patients randomly assigned to fu

8 .7%; sensitivity 98.9%; 95%CI, 97.5%-99.9%), in comparison with 56% without renal impairment (P<0.001

9 d 70.9% (95% CI, 67.5%-74.2%), respectively, in comparison with 62.4% (95% CI, 58.8%-65.9%) and 92.1%

10 n showed a response rate of 25% to docetaxel in comparison to 71.1% in men with wildtype BRCA2 (p = 0

11 59-60%, and 35-36% premolars 2D BSH remained in comparison to 75%, 50%, and 25% 3D BA-RSA preservatio

12 tein reduced parasite burdens by 76% to >99% in comparison to a variety of different controls and sig

13 tic cod (n=80) from those of haddock (n=90), in comparison with a FT-NIR benchtop spectrometer.

14 ce employees who are highly exposed to ticks in comparison with a residential population and a histor

15 e (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) modification in comparison with a round-edge (RE) PMMA IOL or an SE h

16 The kinetics of inhibition was assessed in comparison with acarbose.

17 significant increases in tumor cell velocity in comparison with ACM treatment of cells directly.

18 In comparison with AD subjects without psychosis, AD+P s

19 s in a higher attachment of particles on oil in comparison with adsorption, as commonly assumed.

20 Although the incidence is rising, in comparison with adults, this remains a relatively rar

21 etric thresholds and word recognition scores in comparison to age-matched control patients, spanning

22 iant-specific regions of interest identified in comparison to age-matched controls showed significant

23 re investigated by mRNA microarray profiling in comparison with age-matched wild-type controls (WTy/W

24 ppa (10 mg p.o. daily, four consecutive days in comparison with an initial baseline day).

25 Participants with a favorable in comparison with an unfavorable lifestyle (bottom vers

26 In comparison with animals, in plants there appears to h

27 In comparison to aqueous and organic electric double-lay

28 icine and its metabolite 2-aminopimelic acid in comparison to arginine.

29 re substantially more stable and less active in comparison to as-prepared metallic and electrochemica

30 rction (MI) risk and increases bleeding risk in comparison with aspirin alone.

31 In comparison with AtHY5, which does not cause any chang

32 uclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in comparison to authentic products.

33 sulted in the quenching of photoluminescence in comparison to bare PSi.

34 proteins were reduced in drug-eluting stents in comparison with bare-metal stents.

35 rtality rates and fewer ventilator-free days in comparison to both mild hyperoxia and normoxia for al

36 eed show differential DNA hydroxymethylation in comparison with both control and nonaddicted rats.

37 Girls had smaller tract volumes in comparison to boys (P = .013).

38 al breast, low-grade and luminal-type cancer in comparison with breast carcinoma, high-grade and basa

39 erve only small supercooling of the A phase, in comparison to bulk or when confined in aerogel, with

40 s) and theoretically to be noticeably higher in comparison with carbaryl and comparable with gallic a

41 ior results, in terms of catalytic activity, in comparison to catalysts generated in situ.

42 (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in comparison to CE-MRI performed at a higher sensitivit

43 and exhibited enhanced tumor growth in vivo in comparison with cells expressing a cleavable form of

44 ed for alpha-gal epitopes via immunoblot and in comparison with cetuximab and pork kidney by IgE reac

45 le differences in anion recognition behavior in comparison with chalcogen-free host analogues.

46 In comparison to characterized diiron proteins and synth

47 nd methane (CH4) emissions to manure (Org-M) in comparison to chemical fertilizers (Min-F) or non-fer

48 nhances the prediction of adult dyslipidemia in comparison to childhood lipid measures.

49 ficity of the bioelectronic detection method in comparison to classical molecular biological assays.

50 of tyrosinase and melanin expression levels, in comparison to control cells.

51 asation in inflamed cremaster muscle venules in comparison with control animals.

52 in embryonic day 13.5 Pax9-deficent embryos in comparison with control littermates.

53 anscriptional changes in HCV-infected livers in comparison with control, uninfected livers and HCC, a

54 processes that exhibited multiple swellings in comparison with control.

55 m untreated adult patients with Lyme disease in comparison to controls.

56 human patients with coronary artery disease in comparison with controls without coronary artery dise

57 nd P=0.02, respectively) in fetuses with CoA in comparison with controls, although aortic isthmus/art

58 appearance of phloretin in malolactic ciders in comparison to conventional ciders and the juices.

59 overall survival and has better specificity in comparison to conventional imaging.

60 In comparison with conventional SCCA, our proposed metho

61 In comparison with conventional transvenous single-chamb

62 In comparison to count-based tools, the new computationa

63 In comparison to CT, NT resulted in an overall increase

64 In comparison to CT, NT, for example, generated lower le

65 hat, under irrigation, M4 reduced water loss in comparison with cultivar Cabernet Sauvignon mostly th

66 nsor showed excellent analytical performance in comparison with current HER2 biosensors.

67 patients as significantly less severe at D5 in comparison with D1 by -0.66 [-1.03; -0.29] points.

68 In comparison with data from normal controls, 12 patient

69 In comparison with DCT measurements, these data suggest

70 Detection of SAI showed lower sensitivity in comparison to detection of HMH, but showed reasonable

71 A and visual fields at relatively older ages in comparison with DHDDS patients.

72 density of excited carriers at domain walls in comparison with domains.

73 ed their contractility and passive stiffness in comparison with donor heart muscle as a control.

74 In comparison with dynamic force spectroscopy performed

75 orrelate with the highest impact on survival in comparison with EMDC-dispatched professional first re

76 summary score (+1.13 versus -0.14; P<0.001) in comparison to enalapril group and significantly less

77 ith HFrEF is reduced by sacubitril/valsartan in comparison with enalapril.

78 electrode mediated direct electron transfer in comparison to enzyme regeneration by NADPH.

79 ins with distinct differences and advantages in comparison with established techniques.

80 tion mean, is widespread and relatively weak in comparison with estimates from other species.

81 In comparison to existing ligands proposed for targeted

82 ures, only scaffold merging can be evaluated in comparison to existing methods.

83 In comparison to existing shading correction tools, BaSi

84 anomalously low density of the Martian crust in comparison with expectations.

85 h humidity experiments, performed at RH 90%, in comparison with experiments done under dry conditions

86 ative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in comparison with eyes with nonexudative AMD and age-ma

87 ing is assumed to increase access to testing in comparison with face-to-face services, but the eviden

88 In comparison with formula-based bolus resuscitation, bo

89 ial species and seawater bacterial community in comparison with four commercial bioaerosol samplers.

90 light the opportunities this approach brings in comparison to frameworks that coerce trophic interact

91 r treatment in SKOV-3 xenograft mouse models in comparison with free drugs and their combinations, in

92 AMN@TA were tested on Listeria monocytogenes in comparison with free TA, showing similar bacteriostat

93 ric prostate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with full multiparametric contrast materia

94 Calcium Imaging and Selective CT Angiography in Comparison to Functional Testing for Suspected Corona

95 In comparison to genome-wide association studies (GWAS),

96 erstitial space were observed for metastases in comparison to HCCs (P < 0.05).

97 patients with suspected infectious diarrhea in comparison to healthy, non-hospitalized subjects (n =

98 s (UA), early RA, and established RA cohorts in comparison with healthy donors.

99 In comparison with healthy subjects, the whole populatio

100 Mortality was high in comparison to high-income countries.

101 heterogeneous system capabilities are unique in comparison with homogenous systems and potentially ad

102 rapy and carries a relatively poor prognosis in comparison with HPV-positive disease, with decreased

103 ly reduced incidence ventricular arrhythmias in comparison to ICD (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence

104 and agreement of blood pressure in HealthLNK in comparison with in-person MESA examinations, and body

105 Moreover, in comparison with individual chemotherapy or PTT, the c

106 activity balance that is drastically altered in comparison to individuals living in more remote regio

107 ulted strikingly scarce in a cancer network, in comparison to its healthy counterpart.

108 The hydrolytic stability of SIFSIX-2-Cu-i in comparison to its structural counterparts is attribut

109 ident by a lower dissociation rate for Atg18 in comparison with its PIP binding deficient FTTG mutant

110 [95% CI: 3.56, 13.64]; P < .001) at baseline in comparison with KL grade of at least 2 (adjusted HR,

111 mes revealed key aspects of their metabolism in comparison to known anammox species.

112 communities experience more smoke exposures in comparison to less vulnerable communities.

113 the Schiff base nitrogen in the ground state in comparison to light-induced, cryotrapped K- and M-sta

114 Significantly enriched in high-risk MDS (in comparison to low-risk MDS), TP53, GATA2, KRAS, RUNX1

115 eaxanthin was found under blue 33% treatment in comparison to lower blue light dosages.

116 ms involving enhanced tissue oxygen delivery in comparison to Lowlander populations have been postula

117 increased in primary breast cancer specimens in comparison with matched-normal adjacent tissues.

118 Higher risk of post-MI death among women in comparison to men was restricted to patients with MI-

119 ignificantly lower burden of obstructive CAD in comparison with men but were not protected from CVD e

120 Although women in comparison with men had lower pretest clinical scores

121 l symptoms, and report worse quality of life in comparison with men.

122 experience sustained ventricular arrhythmias in comparison with men.

123 able cardioverter defibrillator implantation in comparison with men.

124 electric cardioversion, or catheter ablation in comparison with men.

125 In comparison with MESA, HealthLNK overestimated systoli

126 aminations, and body mass index in HealthLNK in comparison with MESA, we used Pearson correlation coe

127 In comparison with MEX1-44, MR-766 grows faster in NPCs

128 In comparison with mild, whole-pregnancy exposure to col

129 loped which offers O(T) theoretical speed-up in comparison to multi-threading and MPI techniques.

130 coverage of vaccine-induced immune responses in comparison with natural immunity, we used a panel of

131 heir growth in immunodeficient mice in vivo, in comparison with NIL alone.

132 of mice after discontinuation of treatment, in comparison with NIL alone.

133 In comparison to no DR, the eyes with mild, moderate, an

134 Glaucoma patients, in comparison to non-glaucoma patients, had a higher num

135 sed proteomics and mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) in comparison to non-infectious procyclic trypanosomes.

136 oxidase components p47 (phox) and p40 (phox) in comparison with non-CF MDMs.

137 efficiency was evaluated in binding studies in comparison with non-imprinted polymers.

138 ic heart disease, or dilated cardiomyopathy, in comparison to nonfailing hearts.

139 lso observed in human failing heart biopsies in comparison with nonfailing controls.

140 e persistence of the constructed mussel beds in comparison to nonorganized beds.

141 In comparison with normal cells, TRAK1-deficient fibrobl

142 presence of MDSCs in their peripheral blood, in comparison with normal controls.

143 severely abnormal, hazard ratios for events in comparison with normal tests increased proportionally

144 regenerative management of intrabony defects in comparison with open flap debridement (OFD).

145 nomes that encode limited number of proteins in comparison to other biological entities.

146 adiation doses associated with CT are higher in comparison to other imaging procedures.

147 find that GRAPE pathway scores perform well in comparison to other methods.

148 hemoattraction to and respiration of formate in comparison to other organic acids.

149 ecedented resolution showed major advantages in comparison to other techniques currently used to asse

150 In comparison with other clinically evaluated oncolytic

151 photooxidation inhibitors, is at high level in comparison with other cold-pressed oils.

152 However, in comparison with other Csk orthologs, Corallochytrium

153 salt treatment for achieving LF elimination, in comparison with other current and proposed drug regim

154 In comparison with other human calpains, CAPN14 has a un

155 In comparison with other neurological diagnoses, subarac

156 nanoliposomal omega3 PUFAs enriched samples in comparison with other samples.

157 medusae and H. atlanticus is discussed, also in comparison with other species of the Argonautoidea, a

158 In comparison with other widely used general and mitocho

159 In comparison with participants who received placebo, ur

160 IM, the GU may have a different healing rate in comparison to patients without IM.

161 n was determined by basophil activation test in comparison with patients suffering from IgE-mediated

162 levels was linked to a higher risk of death in comparison with patients who maintained or returned t

163 a significantly reduced heart rate recovery in comparison with patients with higher RV ejection frac

164 eated depression had higher 1-year mortality in comparison with patients without depression (10.8% ve

165 a 3-fold lower risk for RBC alloimmunization in comparison with patients without this mutation.

166 hly differentiated effector memory phenotype in comparison with peripheral blood and display increase

167 trap density at the perovskite/NiO interface in comparison with perovskites grown on poly(3,4-ethylen

168 Losartan did not significantly improve RV EF in comparison with placebo (+0.51%; 95% confidence inter

169 ary analysis of the effects of pioglitazone, in comparison with placebo, on acute coronary syndromes

170 al (CI)=-7.8 to -0.4] for air-filtration use in comparison with placebo.

171 At the 6-month follow-up, mean CDVA in comparison to preoperative levels improved significan

172 In comparison to previous quantification approaches, (1)

173 n limit which is reported for the first time in comparison to previously reported ACh sensors.

174 Our reported detection limit is superior in comparison with previously reported electrochemical D

175 dibular degree II furcation defect treatment in comparison with PRF and access therapy alone.

176 cence intensity can be enhanced and quenched in comparison with pristine monolayer MoS2.

177 xhibits remarkable activity and selectivity, in comparison to Pt/carbon, Pt@UiO-66, and Pd@UiO-66-NH2

178 their non-resonantly pumped emission spectra in comparison to quantum dots appearing in defect-free r

179 shows excellent performance of the RP panel in comparison to real-time PCR assays for the detection

180 In comparison to related bidentate phenylurea dihomooxac

181 In comparison with repetitive Env immunizations, sequent

182 th a better safety ratio of approximately 33 in comparison to reported leads.

183 90% without any mortality growth inhibition in comparison to reported leads.

184 In comparison with restricted visitation model patients,

185 d the sensitivity and specificity of the RDT in comparison to results of PCR for the detection of Pla

186 nformation in 47% of the sensitized children in comparison with results obtained by standard diagnost

187 n OC stocks among nonriverine sites was high in comparison with riverine and mixed geomorphic setting

188 velopment and preclinical evaluation of RYM1 in comparison with RP805, a commonly used pan-MMP tracer

189 ), which attributes to its higher Voc and ff in comparison to RSQ1.

190 as highest in junior physicians (p </= 0.015 in comparison to senior physicians and nurses), who also

191 rses and junior physicians (both p </= 0.001 in comparison to senior physicians), while emotional exh

192 hatic flow index was significantly increased in comparison with sex-matched controls.

193 osphorylation at early reperfusion with RIPC in comparison to sham revealed a relation to mitochondri

194 re of the infinite 1D material for siloxane, in comparison with silane and alkane, and show that the

195 In comparison with SIMA, BIMA grafting was associated wi

196 ed time of enrichment, and ease of operation in comparison to solid phase batch extraction.

197 In comparison to somatic cells, the oocyte transcriptome

198 cteristics of the EVOO Arbequina from Brazil in comparison with Spanish Arbequina from different regi

199 alue of generic early warning scores suffers in comparison to specialty-specific scores, and that the

200 In comparison to spoligotyping of acid-fast-positive MGI

201 le mutant additionally displayed alterations in comparison with ss4 and dpe2-1/phs1a The results clea

202 hnique, to predict 6 cardiovascular outcomes in comparison to standard cardiovascular risk scores.

203 assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy (CCBT) in comparison to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy (

204 e-associated variants, thus maximizing power in comparison to standard variant-by-variant subgroup an

205 nstrated in both simulated and real datasets in comparison with state-of-art binning approaches such

206 total cardiovascular risk were nearly 2-fold in comparison with subjects who remained below CAC5y=400

207 variability in SUR by an RTRV factor of 0.9 in comparison to SUV.

208 Notably, in comparison to synthetic liposomes covalently coupled

209 orders of magnitude [from 10microM to 50nM] in comparison to ta-C thin film electrodes and (ii) the

210 In comparison to TBI group, TBI animals with TNS treatme

211 r density due to photogeneration is moderate in comparison to that due to doping, needs therefore to

212 A/B & RSV assay was prospectively evaluated in comparison to that of the Luminex xTAG respiratory vi

213 e probe increased by approximately 6-10-fold in comparison to that without the biothiols in aqueous s

214 ture from reference genotype panels performs in comparison with that from the original individual-lev

215 duced phantom was subject to further CT scan in comparison with that of the patient data for fidelity

216 for ocular hypertension (and thus glaucoma), in comparison with that reported previously.

217 at the 2M polymorph was dilute in Ce content in comparison to the 4M-zirconolite.

218 refractive values remained relatively stable in comparison to the 6-month follow-up, except for a min

219 rbed DNA on the graphene-modified electrodes in comparison to the adenine-enriched unmethylated DNA.

220 In comparison to the CAFC map, a regional map derived fr

221 r oxidation potentials of the nitronyl group in comparison to the classical alpha-phenyl-N-tert-butyl

222 proved the voltammetric process of capsaicin in comparison to the CNTs/GCE and bare GCE.

223 rformance after the perturbation was removed in comparison to the control participants.

224 agnesium in the obtained ice cream was lower in comparison to the control samples.

225 m(-2).d(-1) (p < 0.001), a 26.5% improvement in comparison to the control with single feeding, when g

226 tifying the differentially expressed modules in comparison to the existing methods.

227 n these movement characteristics, especially in comparison to the initial adaptation.

228 wider compound coverage, and high-throughput in comparison to the LC-MS based approach.

229 mechanism of action and increased stability in comparison to the lead structure.

230 .46 for the 64,498 XCMS determined features, in comparison to the less spectrally complex sample that

231 In comparison to the MHC class II region in other mammal

232 he grain size of the FSPS material is halved in comparison to the MQIII-F material, leading to a 14%

233 QE in the electrically-driven GaN:Eu devices in comparison to the optically-pumped GaN:Eu devices is

234 o-healthy compounds and antioxidant activity in comparison to the other three tested genotypes.

235 -1beta were detected in periodontitis groups in comparison to the periodontally HC group.

236 16.0 million USD per year, which is minimal in comparison to the projected annual capital costs of a

237 strong durability, with superior performance in comparison to the pure iron oxy-hydroxide (FeOOH) cat

238 es of LOD and LOQ are found to be unrivalled in comparison to the reported ones.

239 In comparison to the standard real-time RT-PCR method, t

240 In comparison to the unmodified trimer, structural diffe

241 fusion coefficient of 1.59 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s, in comparison to the value of 2.38 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s usin

242 However, in comparison to the well-understood sensing mechanisms,

243 erentiate most-DILI drugs from no-DILI drugs in comparison with the 2-class DILI model.

244 ghly significantly increased in basal tumors in comparison with the also-upregulated expression of ot

245 y reduced in the cross-disease meta-analysis in comparison with the analysis of GCA and TAK separatel

246 sferred films have essentially no difference in comparison with the as-grown films with respect to th

247 ecal excretions showed higher AgNPs contents in comparison with the AuNPs.

248 vitro selectivity for tau over beta-amyloid, in comparison with the benchmark compound (18)F-AV1451 (

249 to generate the opposite stereoconfiguration in comparison with the Catharanthus homologue CrISY.

250 for cocaine overdose as a successful example in comparison with the commonly used diazepam.

251 nting collagen fibers by 1 wk after surgery, in comparison with the control group showing the abundan

252 opanal levels for a nanoliposome formulation in comparison with the control sample.

253 yzed by the direct method presented here and in comparison with the established C18 extraction approa

254 and minorities-its overall impact was modest in comparison with the gaps present before the law's imp

255 n lymphoid progenitors, and a monocytic bias in comparison with the granulocytic bias in Npm1(cA/+);N

256 LVAS demonstrated greater freedom from HRAEs in comparison with the HMII LVAS at 6 months.

257 The net hemocompatibility score in the HM3 in comparison with the HMII patients was 101 (0.67+/-1.5

258 higher sodium and lower potassium excretion; in comparison with the lowest quartile of excretion, the

259 of stable carbon isotope ratio was evaluated in comparison with the method chosen in the past for the

260 increased As levels significantly (48-227%) in comparison with the original concentration in the ric

261 levels in the subsample of patients with HCV in comparison with the other subsamples with lower or no

262 Binding mode of the active compounds in comparison with the reference agent was studied using

263 no change related to large vessels (MaxBTP) in comparison with the remitted and control groups.

264 Besides, in comparison with the single gene-level analysis, our m

265 ate/close-up and far distances respectively, in comparison with the SN6AD3 group.

266 the absolute false rate is four times lower in comparison with the state-of-the-art predictor.

267 rmalized difference red edge, were evaluated in comparison with the top performing vegetation indices

268 In comparison with the wild type, growth of mutants lack

269 ene families, and our results indicated that in comparison with the X. laevis CSF-1-Mphis, the IL-34-

270 s massively and convergently reduce TE loads in comparison to their nonmangrove relatives; as a conse

271 radical changes in several of these lineages in comparison to their relatives with larger genomes.

272 ive-times higher exchange current densities, in comparison to their spontaneously formed analogues.

273 ved from affected individuals were decreased in comparison to those in control cells.

274 he levels of which were significantly higher in comparison to those in VC2- and mock-vaccinated anima

275 increased 5mC levels and reduced 5hmC levels in comparison to those of ABC type lines.

276 these pathways to be realistically rendered in comparison to those of other models.

277 cord or optic neuritis involvement at onset in comparison to those with an isolated supratentorial o

278 d a greater increase in mean platelet volume in comparison to those with LLH on sildenafil (P<0.001).

279 d by an extract of Calotropis procera leaves in comparison with those obtained by chymosin.

280 use of the nonionic linear GBCA gadodiamide in comparison with those of ionic linear or nonionic mac

281 rothermal-treated wood samples were measured in comparison with those of the control and heat-treated

282 systemic viral infections had poor survival in comparison with those with absent or resolved infecti

283 ith incident AF had a 3.5-fold risk of death in comparison with those without AF.

284 dent in ticks fed on immunodeficient animals in comparison to ticks fed on immunocompetent animals.

285 onstrate decreased fibrinogenolytic activity in comparison to ticks fed on immunocompetent animals.

286 In comparison to traditional imaging modalities, this te

287 We found that in comparison with UDCA, OCA+UDCA could decrease the 15-

288 was increased 20-fold [0.04192 (mug/mL)(-1)] in comparison with undiluted PBS.

289 es by 35- fold and large particles by 8-fold in comparison to unfocused flow.

290 siRNA-L2, in comparison with unmodified siRNA, exhibited a 5.7-fol

291 literature on slum health is underdeveloped in comparison to urban health, and poverty and health.

292 ered by the addition of image quantification in comparison with visual interpretation alone.

293 HPV8tg mice developed thicker skin in comparison with wild-type littermates consistent with

294 e tooth bud mesenchyme in Inhba(-/-) embryos in comparison with wild-type littermates.

295 sensory axon regeneration in the spinal cord in comparison to wildtype C3(+/+) mice.

296 ed risk of CVD (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.16-1.72) in comparison with women with a term delivery (>/=37 wee

297 In comparison with women with at least 2 pregnancies, al

298 day 1, markedly worsened AAA outcomes in XY in comparison with XX adult females.

299 les (based on a false discovery rate < 0.1), in comparison to zero of 18,055 autosomal and PAR genes

300 y (0.2% +/- 2.4%, P = 0.23) similar to CTAC, in comparison with ZTACUC (5.6% +/- 3.5%, P < 0.01) and