ライフサイエンスコーパス: prick

1 using a drop of blood obtained from a finger prick.

2 hip ratio, current asthma, and specific skin prick and IgE sensitisation.

3 Standardized skin prick and intradermal tests were carried out with a pane

4 Skin prick and intradermal tests with cetuximab were clearly

5 ion in an unsupervised manner, based on skin prick and sIgE tests taken throughout childhood and adol

6 sensations of irritation, stinging, burning, pricking, and cooling using visual analog scales (VAS).

7 ks (89.3%, P = 0.03) or prepared from finger-prick blood and stored at ambient temperature for 2 week

8 ident adult (>/=16 y) was asked for a finger-prick blood sample, which was used to estimate HIV preva

9 ent assay) analyses were performed on finger-prick blood samples from a population-based survey in 3

10 Finger-prick blood samples from consenting individuals of all a

11 Matched urine and finger-prick blood samples from participants >/=2 years of age

12 Finger prick blood samples were collected using both volumetric

13 Using 100 microl finger-prick blood samples, the Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load

14 ed venous blood and a fifth card from finger-prick blood were prepared from 103 HIV patients with a m

15 cipants from just a drop (~40 mul) of finger prick blood.

16 owing detection of five stimulants in finger prick blood.

17 c tests, but these typically evaluate finger-prick capillary blood samples ( approximately 5 mul) and

18 to examine the influence of the location of pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test

19 ngle probe was assessed in an in vivo needle prick model to mimic sequelae of traumatic brain injury.

20 When performing PTPs, the apple should be pricked near the stalk rather than in the middle.

21 ve (SAW) biochips, to detect HIV in a finger prick of blood within 10 seconds (sample-in-result-out).

22 utomation for plasma extraction (from finger-prick of blood), metering and aliquoting into separate r

23 nd other environmental toxins using a finger prick of blood, thereby providing new insights into thei

24 lyze cell lysate in drug response studies or pricks of blood from small animal studies.

25 vity to a specific allergen by means of skin prick or in vitro testing.

26 organisms probably enter the body by a thorn prick or other lesions of the skin.

27 double sensation: an initial Adelta-related pricking pain is followed by a C-related prolonged burni

28 ng a simple microcentrifugation step, finger-prick PoC testing was a quick and accurate approach for

29 ) survey, we measured the prevalence of skin prick positivity to a panel of allergens, and geometric

30 Prick-prick skin testing revealed positive responses to

31 ive sample collection such as using a finger prick rather than a venous draw.

32 ed on ARC symptom severity and erythema skin prick reaction to short ragweed.

33 namic effects, including suppression of skin prick responses to allergen.

34 cessfully to the determination of DBS finger-prick samples from 47 paediatric patients and results co

35 off-label protocol using whole blood finger-prick samples tested with and without a simple three min

36 Younger participants had higher skin prick sensitivity prevalence, but not total IgE, than ol

37 ocation of pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test (PTP) results.

38 d at age 12 months: food sensitization (skin prick test >/= 2 mm) and allergy (oral food challenge) t

39 IgE (aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57, 0.91) and skin prick test (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.86).

40 IgE sensitization was assessed by skin prick test (inhalant allergens) and specific IgE levels

41 pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test (PTP) results.

42 We sought to develop skin prick test (SPT) and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) thresh

43 Food-specific serum IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and atopy patch test (APT) to foods inc

44 ze in last year, atopy assessed both by skin prick test (SPT) and by the measurement of allergen-spec

45 elease test (HR) (RefLab ApS, Denmark), skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT).

46 Skin prick test (SPT) and measurement of serum-specific IgE (

47 d the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and 0.77,

48 Skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) are often used

49 ht to determine the association between skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to egg proteins

50 nonallergic (n = 25) children underwent skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut and i

51 e, were all negative.The results of the skin prick test (SPT) for Citrus unshiu and specific IgE test

52 c sensitization was determined based on skin prick test (SPT) of five mites, three molds, and nine ot

53 of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test.

54 ws' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, placebo-co

55 Atopy was measured based on skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to 9 allergens at 36 months.

56 Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, olive, mu

57 Infants with a skin prick test (SPT) response to egg white (EW) of less than

58 n to egg, milk, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/or (2)

59 , milk allergy, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/or (2)

60 years of age and develop thresholds for skin prick test (SPT) results and specific IgE (sIgE) levels

61 peanut allergy, and the implications of skin prick test (SPT) screening before peanut introduction.

62 Skin prick test (SPT) sensitivity to house dust mite allergen

63 ein levels in household dust and peanut skin prick test (SPT) sensitization and likely allergy.

64 ile atopic dermatitis and preceding egg skin prick test (SPT) sensitization, we found a strong and si

65 llergic sensitization was determined by skin prick test (SPT) to 17 aeroallergens.

66 276 one-year-old children who underwent skin prick test (SPT) to 4 food allergens and those with dete

67 A total of 433 patients with positive skin prick test (SPT) to birch pollen were analyzed regarding

68 Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens.

69 a, egg allergy, or both but 0-mm peanut skin prick test (SPT) wheal responses (n = 542); group III, p

70 Q-5D) health questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test (SPT), exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), smell tes

71 Patients with CMA and/or RA underwent skin prick test (SPT), intracutaneous test (ICT), and, when r

72 responsiveness of mast cells in vivo by skin prick test (SPT).

73 pid results were compared with those of skin prick test (SPT).

74 y underwent physical examinations and a skin prick test (SPT).

75 ic IgE was 10.1% (95% CI: 9.4-10.8) and skin prick test 2.7% (95% CI: 2.4-3.0), food challenge positi

76 A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG4:IgE

77 rant to food challenge, 159 negative on skin prick test and food challenge).

78 AID in history were tested first with a skin prick test and if negative challenged with the culprit N

79 sources, and latex was tested by using skin prick test and ImmunoCAP.

80 Skin prick test and sIgE display moderate agreement, but have

81 -demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evaluated yearly.

82 fied for eczema status and test method (skin prick test and specific IgE).

83 agnose food allergy, when compared with skin prick test and specific IgE.

84 Atopy was detected by skin prick test and/or serum specific-IgE in patients with LA

85 d for selected cases where the history, skin prick test and/or specific IgE are not definitive for th

86 itive ELISA results correlated with the skin prick test areas with the whole body and the setae extra

87 In two patients who showed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer of spe

88 Identical ISAAC questionnaire and skin prick test data were collected and compared at 10 years

89 The esophageal prick test deserves further exploration because it may g

90 ined in meals before the both episodes and a prick test for apple was positive.

91 ore completed a questionnaire and had a skin prick test for atopy.

92 A skin prick test for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (PGA) which is a

93 Our skin prick test for several kinds of edible jellyfish suggest

94 The prick test is one of the most common medical methods for

95 Inclusion criteria included a positive skin prick test of 6 mm or more (wheal diameter, above the ne

96 med challenge test in 41 cases with positive prick test of Glupearl 19S(R), a major allergic HWP foun

97 ding detection of milk-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay), diagnostic elimination diet,

98 ion, milk-specific IgE levels, and milk skin prick test performed at enrollment, 6 months, 12 months,

99 ed to measure geographical variation in skin prick test positivity and assess whether it was explaine

100 raphical variation in the prevalence of skin prick test positivity in Europe is unlikely to be explai

101 tted for allergic sensitization (either skin prick test positivity or serum-specific IgE >/= 0.35 kU/

102 Skin prick test positivity to any one of the measured allerge

103 The main outcome was atopy defined as skin prick test reaction >/=3 mm.

104 ociations of NVAS and atopy (defined as skin prick test reaction of >/=3 mm) were analysed using bino

105 Skin prick test reactions to pollen elicited larger weals whe

106 etween a chronic helminth infection and skin prick test reactivity even in a developed country.

107 ctions to peanut were reported in 1.5%, skin prick test reactivity in 2.0%, and IgE sensitization (>/

108 s measured by specific IgE in serum and skin prick test reactivity to aeroallergens.

109 es demonstrated that exercise increases skin prick test reactivity to and bioavailability of the alle

110 tal IgE, grass pollen-specific IgE, and skin prick test reactivity to grass pollen were all reduced c

111 dren with eczema, wheeze, or a positive skin prick test response before ending exclusive breast-feedi

112 (n = 38) was defined as specific IgE or skin prick test response positivity to Aspergillus fumigatus,

113 dependent anaphylaxis to LTPs, positive skin prick test response to LTPs, and serum LTP IgE.

114 Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specific Ig

115 POIT was associated with reduced peanut skin prick test responses and peanut-specific IgE levels and

116 Skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels against 12

117 hildhood2000 birth cohort by using both skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels.

118 ble by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this si

119 of atopic wheeze, total IgE levels, and skin prick test responses to cockroach.

120 total IgE levels, specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses to common aeroallergens, and IgG4 a

121 ith allergic disease) but with negative skin prick test responses to common allergens at randomizatio

122 history of ragweed allergy and positive skin prick test responses to ragweed were randomized and rece

123 Histamine skin prick test responses were diminished in patients with AD

124 ure and sensitization (as determined by skin prick test responses) was analyzed in more than 1000 ref

125 eanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses, basophil activation, and TH2 cytok

126 but have peanut-specific IgE, positive skin prick test responses, or both represents a significant d

127 anut (>/=0.35 kU/L) had negative peanut skin prick test responses.

128 om sample of participants with negative skin prick test results attended a hospital-based food challe

129 Overall, clinical allergy and skin prick test results complied with the specific IgE result

130 tivenoms and cetuximab induced positive skin prick test results in patients with sIgE to alpha-gal.

131 llergy was positive in only 28% and positive prick test results were present in 55% of the 49 VKC-lik

132 Based on available clinical data and skin prick test results, 922 (73%) patients would have been i

133 er IgG4 values (P = .001) and lower egg skin prick test scores (P = .0002) over time and a lower medi

134 g M+ participants tracked the following skin prick test sensitization statuses: M+P+C- > M+P+C+ > M+P

135 A skin-prick test showed positive reactions for Inavir inhaler

136 Prick to prick test shows a strongly positive response to nattou.

137 peanut-specific basophil activation and skin prick test titration compared with nonresponders.

138 culture for varicella-zoster virus, and skin prick test to common food and animal allergens were nond

139 nts aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were exposed to

140 al allergic rhinitis (SAR) and positive skin prick test to grass and olive pollens and evaluate how k

141 action after peanut ingestion, positive skin prick test to peanuts, and positive by double-blind plac

142 Provided consent, a skin prick test was performed, and history of allergic sympto

143 The result of enokitake skin prick to prick test was positive.

144 A skin prick test was used to ascertain atopy.

145 Atopy was defined as any skin prick test weal to common aeroallergens >/=4 mm.

146 (siitake, simeji, and eringi) skin prick to prick test were all positive.

147 3 kUA /l (7.2-120.2), and median peanut skin prick test wheal 11.3 mm (6.5-18)]; four experienced no

148 allenges (OFCs) to egg, irrespective of skin prick test wheal sizes.

149 Prick test with erythritol was negative even at 300 mg/m

150 The negative predictive value of skin prick test with peanut extract and peanut butter and of

151 Prick test with the jelly product was negative, but the

152 atopy (grass, house dust mite, and cat skin prick test) and atopic vs. non-atopic asthma at the age

153 ndard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test).

154 Of the 1430 children with a valid skin prick test, 228 (16%) were positive (more boys (20%) tha

155 y outcomes were desensitization, peanut skin prick test, and specific IgE and specific IgG4 measureme

156 In addition to clinical history, skin prick test, and specific IgE determination, BAT can be a

157 -demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test, and specific IgE to aeroallergens were done

158 Specific IgE values, skin prick test, and T-cell subsets of STAT3-HIES patients we

159 sing the standard methodology (history, skin prick test, IgE assay).

160 We investigated whether an esophageal prick test, in which the esophageal mucosa is challenged

161 predictors of the original model: sex, skin prick test, peanut sIgE, and total IgE minus sIgE.

162 using 6 predictors: sex, age, history, skin prick test, peanut specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), and

163 Skin prick test, s-IgE and CRD to hazelnut, peanut, PR10 and

164 Skin prick test, sIgE measurements, and assessment of allergi

165 o initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60 month

166 which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test--one consisting of participants with no measu

167 , and to be careful about negative result of prick test.

168 ISA inhibition, basophil activation and skin prick test.

169 allergens: OR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.80-4.24; skin prick test/4+ allergens: OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.34-3.95).

170 of "atopic eczema," "any positive SPT [skin-prick test]," "sensitization to egg," and "sensitization

171 respiratory or cutaneous symptoms were skin-prick tested with GB extract.

172 Twelve-month-old infants were skin prick-tested to common food allergens, and sensitized in

173 blot and IgE-ELISA were complemented by Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and mediator release assay to determ

174 Skin prick testing (SPT) in combination with the clinical his

175 eta lactam testing with 17% undertaking skin prick testing (SPT) only, 77% SPT followed by intra-derm

176 y fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific serum

177 ated in a basophil activation assay and Skin Prick Testing (SPT).

178 llergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and perform skin prick testing (SPT).

179 vention (structured allergy history and skin prick testing and appropriate advice on allergy avoidanc

180 tervention (structured allergy history, skin prick testing and appropriate allergy avoidance advice)

181 Morphine skin prick testing and basophil activation were diminished in

182 ined as one or more positive results on skin prick testing and clinically relevant symptoms of rhinit

183 IgE sensitization tests, such as skin prick testing and serum-specific IgE, have been used to

184 eroallergens was determined by means of skin prick testing and specific IgE measurement.

185 aking a structured allergy history with skin prick testing and tailored advice on allergy avoidance r

186 Children completed skin prick testing at age 1 year.

187 Participants underwent skin prick testing for house dust mite, cat, grasses and moul

188 Skin prick testing for peanut sensitization was performed at

189 Skin prick testing is available in only half of the cases, wh

190 levant sensitizations are elucidated by skin prick testing or by the determination of specific IgE in

191 of 5276 one-year-old infants underwent skin prick testing to peanut, egg, sesame, and cow's milk or

192 rding to the clinical symptoms, and positive prick testing using black tiger shrimp.

193 In addition, skin prick testing was performed to six study foods (cow's mi

194 s pollen allergic individuals underwent skin prick testing with allergen alone, allergen plus Bet-APE

195 cted to topical cowhage provocation and skin prick testing with histamine and assessed for difference

196 onal healthy controls were subjected to skin prick testing with histamine.

197 Opishorchis felineus and specific IgE, skin prick testing, and atopic symptoms in Western Siberia, w

198 interviewer-administered questionnaire, skin prick testing, and measurement of lung function from the

199 ar in children positive and negative on skin prick testing, and were not appreciably altered by the e

200 Morphine skin prick testing, ImmunoCAP assays for allergen-specific Ig

201 Skin prick testing, lung function tests, exhaled nitric oxide

202 -bronchodilator spirometry (n = 1,389), skin prick testing, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity meas

203 or scorings of symptoms and medication, skin prick testing, total IgE, specific IgE, and Der p 1-spec

204 were examined for eczema and underwent skin prick testing.

205 tients assigned to immediate or delayed skin prick testing.

206 tatus were determined by spirometry and skin prick testing.

207 rat basophil leukaemia cell line and by skin prick testing.

208 th IL-31 and NaCl (negative control) by skin prick testing.

209 attend research clinics and consent to skin-prick testing.

210 hinitis but without positive results on skin prick testing.

211 eeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape in skin prick tests (SPT) and open food challenges.

212 Skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) against food a

213 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT), skin prick tests (SPT), BAT, and sIgE determination including

214 Skin prick tests (SPT), specific-IgE (sIgE), component-resolv

215 inst common allergens was determined by skin prick tests (SPT); specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) tite

216 All subjects with skin prick tests (SPTs) for birch pollen conducted during 199

217 hey answered a questionnaire, underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) for common aeroallergens, and provide

218 invited to a parental questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to ten airborne allergens, and 2148 (

219 eactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut solution

220 10-fold dilutions of milk protein, and skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to commercial milk ext

221 Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to gain attention for

222 al work-up included a detailed history, skin prick tests (SPTs) with IVIP, and basophil activation te

223 lowing outcomes at age 2 years: eczema, skin prick tests (SPTs), increased allergen-specific IgE leve

224 h mollusc tolerance) were studied using skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgEs (sIgEs) and SDS-PAGE i

225 ensitivity to 65% compared with 20% for skin prick tests and 46% ImmunoCAP using kiwi extract.

226 lergic subjects (group 4) by performing skin prick tests and APTs with rBet v 1 and hypoallergenic rB

227 Skin prick tests and basophil activation test using cetuximab

228 Skin prick tests and basophil activation tests with N, P, or

229 We performed skin-prick tests and basophil degranulation tests using extra

230 aking a structured allergy history with skin prick tests and giving tailored advice on allergy avoida

231 ths, 18 months, 4 years, and 6 years by skin prick tests and IgE measurements.

232 dized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

233 Associations with allergic diseases, skin prick tests and lung function assessed at 12 and 18 year

234 Clinic evaluation, which consisted of skin prick tests and OFC where eligible, was undertaken if st

235 years, infants had FS/FA screening with skin prick tests and oral food challenges.

236 nts underwent a standardized interview, skin prick tests and pulmonary function tests.

237 d 5276 infants (74% participation) with skin prick tests and sensitized infants underwent food challe

238 Skin prick tests and sIgE were performed in 529 children.

239 Prick tests and specific IgE determinations were perform

240 ites was diagnosed longitudinally using skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements at (1/2), 1(1/

241 , because of the limited sensitivity of skin prick tests and specific IgE tests to meat extracts.

242 58% (95% CI 49-67) and 49% (40-58%) for skin prick tests and specific-IgE.

243 icity of Ory c 3 was confirmed by using skin prick tests and the basophil activation assay.

244 d consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; being abl

245 (5-17 years old) with asthma underwent skin prick tests at baseline and had clinical data collected

246 itization (FAS) was identified by using skin prick tests conducted between 1 and 18 years of age to a

247 Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactant foo

248 outperformed allergen-specific IgE and skin prick tests for predicting OFC outcomes.

249 etermine whether C+ assayed by means of skin prick tests influenced AR symptom severity in controlled

250 o hundred eighty-one children had valid skin prick tests performed, and 14% (39/281) were atopic.

251 ort study of 5276 infants who underwent skin prick tests to 4 allergens, including egg.

252 Subjects with positive skin prick tests to GOS (n = 30, 6.2%) underwent basophil act

253 structured questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests to GOS.

254 on between 10 loci and specific IgE and skin prick tests to individual allergens and poly-sensitizati

255 Because of the low sensitivity of skin prick tests to meat, we studied the possibility to perfo

256 Skin prick tests using wheat extract were performed on 3 pati

257 ements of eczema, asthma, rhinitis, and skin prick tests were available for all follow-ups.

258 In both cases, skin prick tests were negative for suspected seafoods.

259 ood-specific serum IgE measurements and skin prick tests were performed before initiating the diet.

260 E inhibition, ImmunoCAP inhibition, and skin prick tests were performed using samples from selected p

261 Skin prick tests were performed with commercial pollen extrac

262 Skin prick tests were performed with pollen extracts.

263 Skin prick tests were used to identify sensitization to invol

264 , we studied the possibility to perform skin prick tests with cetuximab, which carries the alpha-gal

265 Blinded, quadruplicate skin prick tests with concentrate and three serial half-log d

266 Skin prick tests with purified rAed a 3 and Ae. aegypti bite

267 es with standardized doses of rMal d 1, skin prick tests with recombinant allergens, and measurements

268 Questionnaires, skin prick tests, and basophil activation assays were perform

269 c immunoglobulin E-antibodies in serum, skin prick tests, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food c

270 c inhalation challenge to argan powder, skin prick tests, and immunoblotting analysis.

271 e of testing (specific IgE measurement, skin prick tests, and oral food challenges), and the timing a

272 allergic sensitization were measured by skin prick tests, and physician-diagnosed inhalant and food a

273 Patients underwent skin prick tests, and received 0.1ml of influenza vaccine, fo

274 ad undergone objective OFCs, concurrent skin prick tests, and specific IgE tests.

275 unction samples, we performed histamine skin prick tests, investigated the contribution of STAT3 to a

276 Skin prick tests, measurements of specific IgE to peanut and

277 ood allergy by standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

278 In contrast to positive skin prick tests, SE-IgE was more common in smokers (<15 pack

279 Clinical data, skin prick tests, specific IgE to aero- and food allergens, a

280 ophils and elicit positive responses in skin prick tests.

281 = 0.02), and with similar findings for skin prick tests.

282 tient's allergic triggers or performing skin prick tests.

283 thma Study completed questionnaires and skin prick tests.

284 Atopy was assessed by using skin prick tests.

285 Atopy was assessed using skin prick tests.

286 erved pasteurized raw egg challenge and skin prick tests.

287 6 years by specific IgE assessments and skin prick tests.

288 l examinations including serum IgEs and skin prick tests.

289 ne challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

290 ny offering blood tests obtained from finger prick (Theranos) and 2 major clinical testing services t

291 Prick to prick test shows a strongly positive response t

292 The result of enokitake skin prick to prick test was positive.

293 mushrooms (siitake, simeji, and eringi) skin prick to prick test were all positive.

294 of the location of pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test (PTP) results.

295 y standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

296 a "sample-to-answer" diagnosis from a finger-prick volume of human blood, within 45 min, with minimal

297 At Day 85, 6 weeks after the last dose, skin prick wheal responses to allergen were suppressed by > 9

298 rgen extracts are standardized based on skin prick wheal size in 20-30 allergic subjects.

299 In the field, we used finger-prick whole blood for the Determine and Vikia tests and

300 dleless syringe, the agrodrench method or by pricking with a toothpick.