ライフサイエンスコーパス: prick test

1 ndard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test).

2 , and to be careful about negative result of prick test.

3 ants with allergic mothers positive for skin prick test.

4 ISA inhibition, basophil activation and skin prick test.

5 = 0.02), and with similar findings for skin prick tests.

6 tient's allergic triggers or performing skin prick tests.

7 thma Study completed questionnaires and skin prick tests.

8 Atopy was assessed by using skin prick tests.

9 Atopy was assessed using skin prick tests.

10 erved pasteurized raw egg challenge and skin prick tests.

11 atic reintroduction analysis but not by skin-prick tests.

12 6 years by specific IgE assessments and skin prick tests.

13 l examinations including serum IgEs and skin prick tests.

14 ne challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

15 ophils and elicit positive responses in skin prick tests.

16 tients assigned to immediate or delayed skin prick testing.

17 tatus were determined by spirometry and skin prick testing.

18 rat basophil leukaemia cell line and by skin prick testing.

19 th IL-31 and NaCl (negative control) by skin prick testing.

20 attend research clinics and consent to skin-prick testing.

21 erwent a clinical examination including skin prick testing.

22 hinitis but without positive results on skin prick testing.

23 were examined for eczema and underwent skin prick testing.

24 ic IgE was 10.1% (95% CI: 9.4-10.8) and skin prick test 2.7% (95% CI: 2.4-3.0), food challenge positi

25 Of the 1430 children with a valid skin prick test, 228 (16%) were positive (more boys (20%) tha

26 stic testing, 47.3% was assessed with a skin prick test, 39.9% with a serum specific IgE test, and 20

27 allergens: OR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.80-4.24; skin prick test/4+ allergens: OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.34-3.95).

28 Each child underwent skin prick testing (ALK-Abello) and serum IgE assays (ImmunoC

29 A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG4:IgE

30 , and allergic disease was evaluated by skin prick test and clinical examination at 12 months of age.

31 rant to food challenge, 159 negative on skin prick test and food challenge).

32 AID in history were tested first with a skin prick test and if negative challenged with the culprit N

33 sources, and latex was tested by using skin prick test and ImmunoCAP.

34 Skin prick test and sIgE display moderate agreement, but have

35 -demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evaluated yearly.

36 fied for eczema status and test method (skin prick test and specific IgE).

37 agnose food allergy, when compared with skin prick test and specific IgE.

38 Atopy was detected by skin prick test and/or serum specific-IgE in patients with LA

39 d for selected cases where the history, skin prick test and/or specific IgE are not definitive for th

40 vention (structured allergy history and skin prick testing and appropriate advice on allergy avoidanc

41 tervention (structured allergy history, skin prick testing and appropriate allergy avoidance advice)

42 Morphine skin prick testing and basophil activation were diminished in

43 ined as one or more positive results on skin prick testing and clinically relevant symptoms of rhinit

44 kers measured, small wheal diameters on skin-prick testing and increases in egg-specific IgG4 antibod

45 correlates included end point titration skin prick testing and measurement of CM-specific IgE and IgG

46 for a standardized physician exam with skin prick testing and parental interview at age 2 years.

47 IgE sensitization tests, such as skin prick testing and serum-specific IgE, have been used to

48 eroallergens was determined by means of skin prick testing and specific IgE measurement.

49 aking a structured allergy history with skin prick testing and tailored advice on allergy avoidance r

50 ensitivity to 65% compared with 20% for skin prick tests and 46% ImmunoCAP using kiwi extract.

51 lergic subjects (group 4) by performing skin prick tests and APTs with rBet v 1 and hypoallergenic rB

52 Skin prick tests and basophil activation test using cetuximab

53 Skin prick tests and basophil activation tests with N, P, or

54 We performed skin-prick tests and basophil degranulation tests using extra

55 aking a structured allergy history with skin prick tests and giving tailored advice on allergy avoida

56 ths, 18 months, 4 years, and 6 years by skin prick tests and IgE measurements.

57 dized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

58 Associations with allergic diseases, skin prick tests and lung function assessed at 12 and 18 year

59 Clinic evaluation, which consisted of skin prick tests and OFC where eligible, was undertaken if st

60 years, infants had FS/FA screening with skin prick tests and oral food challenges.

61 nts underwent a standardized interview, skin prick tests and pulmonary function tests.

62 d 5276 infants (74% participation) with skin prick tests and sensitized infants underwent food challe

63 Skin prick tests and sIgE were performed in 529 children.

64 Prick tests and specific IgE determinations were perform

65 ites was diagnosed longitudinally using skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements at (1/2), 1(1/

66 , because of the limited sensitivity of skin prick tests and specific IgE tests to meat extracts.

67 58% (95% CI 49-67) and 49% (40-58%) for skin prick tests and specific-IgE.

68 icity of Ory c 3 was confirmed by using skin prick tests and the basophil activation assay.

69 d consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; being abl

70 atopy (grass, house dust mite, and cat skin prick test) and atopic vs. non-atopic asthma at the age

71 y outcomes were desensitization, peanut skin prick test, and specific IgE and specific IgG4 measureme

72 In addition to clinical history, skin prick test, and specific IgE determination, BAT can be a

73 -demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test, and specific IgE to aeroallergens were done

74 Specific IgE values, skin prick test, and T-cell subsets of STAT3-HIES patients we

75 Opishorchis felineus and specific IgE, skin prick testing, and atopic symptoms in Western Siberia, w

76 interviewer-administered questionnaire, skin prick testing, and measurement of lung function from the

77 ar in children positive and negative on skin prick testing, and were not appreciably altered by the e

78 Questionnaires, skin prick tests, and basophil activation assays were perform

79 voluntary hyperpnea challenge, allergy skin prick tests, and bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsies.

80 c immunoglobulin E-antibodies in serum, skin prick tests, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food c

81 c inhalation challenge to argan powder, skin prick tests, and immunoblotting analysis.

82 e of testing (specific IgE measurement, skin prick tests, and oral food challenges), and the timing a

83 allergic sensitization were measured by skin prick tests, and physician-diagnosed inhalant and food a

84 Patients underwent skin prick tests, and received 0.1ml of influenza vaccine, fo

85 ad undergone objective OFCs, concurrent skin prick tests, and specific IgE tests.

86 IgE (aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57, 0.91) and skin prick test (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.86).

87 itive ELISA results correlated with the skin prick test areas with the whole body and the setae extra

88 Children completed skin prick testing at age 1 year.

89 (5-17 years old) with asthma underwent skin prick tests at baseline and had clinical data collected

90 In two patients who showed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer of spe

91 itization (FAS) was identified by using skin prick tests conducted between 1 and 18 years of age to a

92 Identical ISAAC questionnaire and skin prick test data were collected and compared at 10 years

93 The esophageal prick test deserves further exploration because it may g

94 ined in meals before the both episodes and a prick test for apple was positive.

95 ore completed a questionnaire and had a skin prick test for atopy.

96 A skin prick test for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (PGA) which is a

97 Our skin prick test for several kinds of edible jellyfish suggest

98 Participants underwent skin prick testing for house dust mite, cat, grasses and moul

99 Skin prick testing for peanut sensitization was performed at

100 Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactant foo

101 troduodenoscopies (EGDs), biopsies, and skin-prick tests for food and aeroallergens.

102 outperformed allergen-specific IgE and skin prick tests for predicting OFC outcomes.

103 outcomes examined: at least 1 positive skin prick test from the panel of 10 allergens (21.7% vs. 11.

104 d at age 12 months: food sensitization (skin prick test >/= 2 mm) and allergy (oral food challenge) t

105 sing the standard methodology (history, skin prick test, IgE assay).

106 Morphine skin prick testing, ImmunoCAP assays for allergen-specific Ig

107 ve set of recommendations on the use of skin prick tests in allergic rhinitis-conjunctivitis and asth

108 We investigated whether an esophageal prick test, in which the esophageal mucosa is challenged

109 etermine whether C+ assayed by means of skin prick tests influenced AR symptom severity in controlled

110 IgE sensitization was assessed by skin prick test (inhalant allergens) and specific IgE levels

111 unction samples, we performed histamine skin prick tests, investigated the contribution of STAT3 to a

112 The prick test is one of the most common medical methods for

113 Skin prick testing is available in only half of the cases, wh

114 Skin prick testing, lung function tests, exhaled nitric oxide

115 -bronchodilator spirometry (n = 1,389), skin prick testing, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity meas

116 Skin prick tests, measurements of specific IgE to peanut and

117 For the diagnosis of LAR, neither skin prick testing nor determination of the presence of serum

118 Inclusion criteria included a positive skin prick test of 6 mm or more (wheal diameter, above the ne

119 med challenge test in 41 cases with positive prick test of Glupearl 19S(R), a major allergic HWP foun

120 which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test--one consisting of participants with no measu

121 appear to contain factors that enhance skin prick test or atopy patch test responses to house dust m

122 ding detection of milk-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay), diagnostic elimination diet,

123 levant sensitizations are elucidated by skin prick testing or by the determination of specific IgE in

124 TG and DM allergen based on results of skin prick tests or nasal disk challenges (P < .01 and P < .0

125 predictors of the original model: sex, skin prick test, peanut sIgE, and total IgE minus sIgE.

126 using 6 predictors: sex, age, history, skin prick test, peanut specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), and

127 ion, milk-specific IgE levels, and milk skin prick test performed at enrollment, 6 months, 12 months,

128 o hundred eighty-one children had valid skin prick tests performed, and 14% (39/281) were atopic.

129 ed to measure geographical variation in skin prick test positivity and assess whether it was explaine

130 raphical variation in the prevalence of skin prick test positivity in Europe is unlikely to be explai

131 tted for allergic sensitization (either skin prick test positivity or serum-specific IgE >/= 0.35 kU/

132 Skin prick test positivity to any one of the measured allerge

133 and severity of atopic dermatitis, and skin-prick-test positivity at 6 mo of age were not different

134 Skin-prick testing predicted only 13% of foods associated wit

135 ood allergy by standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

136 pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test (PTP) results.

137 The main outcome was atopy defined as skin prick test reaction >/=3 mm.

138 ociations of NVAS and atopy (defined as skin prick test reaction of >/=3 mm) were analysed using bino

139 Skin prick test reactions to pollen elicited larger weals whe

140 etween a chronic helminth infection and skin prick test reactivity even in a developed country.

141 ctions to peanut were reported in 1.5%, skin prick test reactivity in 2.0%, and IgE sensitization (>/

142 s measured by specific IgE in serum and skin prick test reactivity to aeroallergens.

143 es demonstrated that exercise increases skin prick test reactivity to and bioavailability of the alle

144 tal IgE, grass pollen-specific IgE, and skin prick test reactivity to grass pollen were all reduced c

145 dren with eczema, wheeze, or a positive skin prick test response before ending exclusive breast-feedi

146 (n = 38) was defined as specific IgE or skin prick test response positivity to Aspergillus fumigatus,

147 greater airway hyperresponsiveness and skin prick test response positivity.

148 mold at age 1 year and child's positive skin prick test response to aeroallergens and molds at age 7

149 dependent anaphylaxis to LTPs, positive skin prick test response to LTPs, and serum LTP IgE.

150 Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specific Ig

151 POIT was associated with reduced peanut skin prick test responses and peanut-specific IgE levels and

152 Skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels against 12

153 hildhood2000 birth cohort by using both skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels.

154 ble by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this si

155 of atopic wheeze, total IgE levels, and skin prick test responses to cockroach.

156 total IgE levels, specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses to common aeroallergens, and IgG4 a

157 ith allergic disease) but with negative skin prick test responses to common allergens at randomizatio

158 For the incidence of AR, positive skin prick test responses to indoor allergens, parental histo

159 Positive skin prick test responses to outdoor allergens at baseline we

160 history of ragweed allergy and positive skin prick test responses to ragweed were randomized and rece

161 Histamine skin prick test responses were diminished in patients with AD

162 ure and sensitization (as determined by skin prick test responses) was analyzed in more than 1000 ref

163 eanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses, basophil activation, and TH2 cytok

164 but have peanut-specific IgE, positive skin prick test responses, or both represents a significant d

165 anut (>/=0.35 kU/L) had negative peanut skin prick test responses.

166 By the end of therapy, titrated CM skin prick test results and CD63 and CD203c expression decrea

167 om sample of participants with negative skin prick test results attended a hospital-based food challe

168 their judgment on clinical history and skin prick test results before and after obtaining the ISAC r

169 Overall, clinical allergy and skin prick test results complied with the specific IgE result

170 tivenoms and cetuximab induced positive skin prick test results in patients with sIgE to alpha-gal.

171 llergy was positive in only 28% and positive prick test results were present in 55% of the 49 VKC-lik

172 Based on available clinical data and skin prick test results, 922 (73%) patients would have been i

173 Skin prick test, s-IgE and CRD to hazelnut, peanut, PR10 and

174 er IgG4 values (P = .001) and lower egg skin prick test scores (P = .0002) over time and a lower medi

175 In contrast to positive skin prick tests, SE-IgE was more common in smokers (<15 pack

176 g M+ participants tracked the following skin prick test sensitization statuses: M+P+C- > M+P+C+ > M+P

177 of "atopic eczema," "any positive SPT [skin-prick test]," "sensitization to egg," and "sensitization

178 A skin-prick test showed positive reactions for Inavir inhaler

179 Prick to prick test shows a strongly positive response to nattou.

180 Skin prick test, sIgE measurements, and assessment of allergi

181 Skin prick test, specific IgE determinations, DBPCFC and immu

182 ctor enhanced food allergy, assessed by skin-prick tests, specific IgE and oral challenges.

183 Clinical data, skin prick tests, specific IgE to aero- and food allergens, a

184 We sought to develop skin prick test (SPT) and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) thresh

185 Food-specific serum IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and atopy patch test (APT) to foods inc

186 ze in last year, atopy assessed both by skin prick test (SPT) and by the measurement of allergen-spec

187 elease test (HR) (RefLab ApS, Denmark), skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT).

188 Skin prick test (SPT) and measurement of serum-specific IgE (

189 d the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and 0.77,

190 Skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) are often used

191 ht to determine the association between skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to egg proteins

192 nonallergic (n = 25) children underwent skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut and i

193 e, were all negative.The results of the skin prick test (SPT) for Citrus unshiu and specific IgE test

194 iking of the ImmunoCAP, and size of the skin prick test (SPT) for hazelnut were determined, also in r

195 c sensitization was determined based on skin prick test (SPT) of five mites, three molds, and nine ot

196 of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test.

197 ws' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, placebo-co

198 bioactivity were predictive of allergen skin prick test (SPT) reactivity for infants at high risk of

199 ic IgE against aeroallergens (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT) reactivity for the most common local al

200 Atopy was measured based on skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to 9 allergens at 36 months.

201 Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, olive, mu

202 Infants with a skin prick test (SPT) response to egg white (EW) of less than

203 n to egg, milk, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/or (2)

204 , milk allergy, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/or (2)

205 years of age and develop thresholds for skin prick test (SPT) results and specific IgE (sIgE) levels

206 peanut allergy, and the implications of skin prick test (SPT) screening before peanut introduction.

207 Skin prick test (SPT) sensitivity to house dust mite allergen

208 ein levels in household dust and peanut skin prick test (SPT) sensitization and likely allergy.

209 ile atopic dermatitis and preceding egg skin prick test (SPT) sensitization, we found a strong and si

210 llergic sensitization was determined by skin prick test (SPT) to 17 aeroallergens.

211 276 one-year-old children who underwent skin prick test (SPT) to 4 food allergens and those with dete

212 A total of 433 patients with positive skin prick test (SPT) to birch pollen were analyzed regarding

213 Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens.

214 a, egg allergy, or both but 0-mm peanut skin prick test (SPT) wheal responses (n = 542); group III, p

215 o poly-sensitized athletes according to skin prick test (SPT) with different allergic phenotypes (ast

216 Q-5D) health questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test (SPT), exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), smell tes

217 Patients with CMA and/or RA underwent skin prick test (SPT), intracutaneous test (ICT), and, when r

218 A clinical questionnaire, skin prick test (SPT), spirometry, and serum total and specif

219 responsiveness of mast cells in vivo by skin prick test (SPT).

220 pid results were compared with those of skin prick test (SPT).

221 y underwent physical examinations and a skin prick test (SPT).

222 blot and IgE-ELISA were complemented by Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and mediator release assay to determ

223 Skin prick testing (SPT) in combination with the clinical his

224 Skin prick testing (SPT) is an important step in the diagnosi

225 Skin prick testing (SPT) is fundamental to the practice of cl

226 eta lactam testing with 17% undertaking skin prick testing (SPT) only, 77% SPT followed by intra-derm

227 infants (HealthNuts), infants underwent skin prick testing (SPT) to egg white at 12 months of age.

228 y fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific serum

229 ated in a basophil activation assay and Skin Prick Testing (SPT).

230 llergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and perform skin prick testing (SPT).

231 eeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape in skin prick tests (SPT) and open food challenges.

232 Skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) against food a

233 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT), skin prick tests (SPT), BAT, and sIgE determination including

234 Skin prick tests (SPT), specific-IgE (sIgE), component-resolv

235 inst common allergens was determined by skin prick tests (SPT); specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) tite

236 Skin prick tests (SPTs) and basophil activation tests (BATs)

237 All subjects with skin prick tests (SPTs) for birch pollen conducted during 199

238 hey answered a questionnaire, underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) for common aeroallergens, and provide

239 invited to a parental questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to ten airborne allergens, and 2148 (

240 eactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut solution

241 10-fold dilutions of milk protein, and skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to commercial milk ext

242 Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to gain attention for

243 al work-up included a detailed history, skin prick tests (SPTs) with IVIP, and basophil activation te

244 lowing outcomes at age 2 years: eczema, skin prick tests (SPTs), increased allergen-specific IgE leve

245 h mollusc tolerance) were studied using skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgEs (sIgEs) and SDS-PAGE i

246 s, including a structured interview and skin prick tests (SPTs).

247 o initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60 month

248 o-controlled oral food challenge (OFC), skin prick test titration (SPTT), and basophil histamine rele

249 peanut-specific basophil activation and skin prick test titration compared with nonresponders.

250 culture for varicella-zoster virus, and skin prick test to common food and animal allergens were nond

251 nts aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were exposed to

252 al allergic rhinitis (SAR) and positive skin prick test to grass and olive pollens and evaluate how k

253 action after peanut ingestion, positive skin prick test to peanuts, and positive by double-blind plac

254 e and a sputum cell differential count; skin prick testing to both common aeroallergens and an extend

255 of 5276 one-year-old infants underwent skin prick testing to peanut, egg, sesame, and cow's milk or

256 ort study of 5276 infants who underwent skin prick tests to 4 allergens, including egg.

257 Subjects with positive skin prick tests to GOS (n = 30, 6.2%) underwent basophil act

258 structured questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests to GOS.

259 on between 10 loci and specific IgE and skin prick tests to individual allergens and poly-sensitizati

260 Prick tests to kidney were positive in 54% of patients.

261 anaphylaxis to pork or beef kidney underwent prick tests to meat and kidney.

262 Because of the low sensitivity of skin prick tests to meat, we studied the possibility to perfo

263 Twelve-month-old infants were skin prick-tested to common food allergens, and sensitized in

264 or scorings of symptoms and medication, skin prick testing, total IgE, specific IgE, and Der p 1-spec

265 Moreover, a skin prick test using the crude extract was positive for A. s

266 rding to the clinical symptoms, and positive prick testing using black tiger shrimp.

267 Skin prick tests using wheat extract were performed on 3 pati

268 Skin prick test was a better predictor for hazelnut allergy a

269 Provided consent, a skin prick test was performed, and history of allergic sympto

270 The result of enokitake skin prick to prick test was positive.

271 A skin prick test was used to ascertain atopy.

272 In addition, skin prick testing was performed to six study foods (cow's mi

273 Atopy was defined as any skin prick test weal to common aeroallergens >/=4 mm.

274 (siitake, simeji, and eringi) skin prick to prick test were all positive.

275 ements of eczema, asthma, rhinitis, and skin prick tests were available for all follow-ups.

276 Skin prick tests were carried out at ages 4, 10, and 18 years

277 orced midexpiratory flow (FEF(50)), and skin prick tests were measured at age 12 years.

278 Prick tests were negative and seven of the eight patient

279 In both cases, skin prick tests were negative for suspected seafoods.

280 Skin prick tests were performed at the ages of 6, 12, and 24

281 ood-specific serum IgE measurements and skin prick tests were performed before initiating the diet.

282 E inhibition, ImmunoCAP inhibition, and skin prick tests were performed using samples from selected p

283 Skin prick tests were performed with commercial pollen extrac

284 Skin prick tests were performed with pollen extracts.

285 Skin prick tests were used to identify sensitization to invol

286 3 kUA /l (7.2-120.2), and median peanut skin prick test wheal 11.3 mm (6.5-18)]; four experienced no

287 ubjects ingesting baked egg, EW-induced skin prick test wheal diameter and EW-, ovalbumin-, and ovomu

288 allenges (OFCs) to egg, irrespective of skin prick test wheal sizes.

289 Prick test with erythritol was negative even at 300 mg/m

290 The negative predictive value of skin prick test with peanut extract and peanut butter and of

291 Prick test with the jelly product was negative, but the

292 respiratory or cutaneous symptoms were skin-prick tested with GB extract.

293 Skin prick testing with a panel of aeroallergens and a microa

294 s pollen allergic individuals underwent skin prick testing with allergen alone, allergen plus Bet-APE

295 cted to topical cowhage provocation and skin prick testing with histamine and assessed for difference

296 onal healthy controls were subjected to skin prick testing with histamine.

297 , we studied the possibility to perform skin prick tests with cetuximab, which carries the alpha-gal

298 Blinded, quadruplicate skin prick tests with concentrate and three serial half-log d

299 Skin prick tests with purified rAed a 3 and Ae. aegypti bite

300 es with standardized doses of rMal d 1, skin prick tests with recombinant allergens, and measurements