ライフサイエンスコーパス: randomized controlled trial

1 ad calcium intakes of </=600 mg/d in a 12-mo randomized controlled trial.

2 A multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

3 nasal theophylline warrant confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.

4 Quasi-randomized controlled trial.

5 Cluster randomized controlled trial.

6 riority, prospective, multicenter, clustered randomized controlled trial.

7 Red study was a 90-d, pair-matched, cluster-randomized controlled trial.

8 is observation in a third primary prevention randomized controlled trial.

9 STUDY Randomized controlled trial.

10 Multicenter, noninferiority randomized controlled trial.

11 Prospective, single-center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial.

12 Retrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial.

13 and asthma exacerbations in the context of a randomized controlled trial.

14 Prospective randomized controlled trial.

15 h usual care using an independently designed randomized controlled trial.

16 ults compare favorably with outcomes seen in randomized controlled trials.

17 atory bowel disease, and most (87%) were non-randomized controlled trials.

18 tion technologies supported by evidence from randomized controlled trials.

19 ging but require confirmation in prospective randomized controlled trials.

20 ted to radiation therapy found no additional randomized controlled trials.

21 dary analyses using longitudinal data from 2 randomized controlled trials.

22 comparability among a sample of oral health randomized controlled trials.

23 These three recommendations are based on randomized controlled trials.

24 on remains to be tested by properly designed randomized controlled trials.

25 tus in infancy need further investigation in randomized controlled trials.

26 therapy (AIT) has been broadly documented in randomized controlled trials.

27 w and study-based meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

28 ime-to-event patient data meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials.

29 stabilizers need evidence from age-specific randomized controlled trials.

30 important knowledge gaps and impediments for randomized controlled trials.

31 Pragmatic parallel-group randomized, controlled trial.

32 Single, randomized, controlled trial.

33 In this randomized controlled trial, 128 young adults (71 male,

34 Direct comparisons from 41 randomized controlled trials (20,561 participants) were

35 four studies met the eligibility criteria: 1 randomized controlled trial, 4 nonrandomized controlled

36 In 33 eligible randomized controlled trials, 6072 patients were randomi

37 n (WS) and the risk of weight regain.In this randomized controlled trial, 61 healthy overweight or ob

38 We conducted a randomized controlled trial; 67 patients with severe end

39 METHODS AND We retrieved 19 randomized controlled trials (837 patients), 7 nonrandom

40 ic risk factors.In a multicenter, crossover, randomized controlled trial, 92 men and women with abdom

41 In this randomized-controlled trial, acute rejection rate was co

42 Based on data from randomized controlled trials, adult patients who undergo

43 Randomized controlled trials also support an expanded ro

44 e identified 64 meta-analyses, including 540 randomized controlled trials analyzing 137,957 patients.

45 Eighteen studies met one randomized controlled trial and 17 observational studies

46 not meet enrollment criteria for any studied randomized controlled trial and 30% (n = 28) were eligib

47 AND "therapeutic irrigation" or "lavage" AND randomized controlled trial and any derivatives of those

48 the CAP (Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity) randomized controlled trial and assessed at the Royal Wo

49 ach patient admitted to a study ICU for each randomized controlled trial and calculated rates of pote

50 he inclusion and exclusion criteria for each randomized controlled trial and then assessed the eligib

51 ions retrieved, 42 met inclusion criteria (5 randomized controlled trials and 37 observational studie

52 Of 13 eligible studies, 3 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies compar

53 Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have sho

54 no longer significant in placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials and disappeared in randomiz

55 Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials and observational ones.

56 g and Allied Health Literature) included all randomized controlled trials and observational studies c

57 ng to evidence based practice established by randomized controlled trials and published in IDSA guide

58 This study sets the stage for larger randomized controlled trials and testing in other emotio

59 ses that included a minimum of 5 oral health randomized controlled trials and used continuous outcome

60 guideline is based on a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials and observational studies

61 se recommendations on a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials and systematic reviews pub

62 ric surgeries have been performed, but large randomized controlled trials are lacking.

63 Ongoing structured training and the upcoming randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the te

64 Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the

65 Further large randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate th

66 Further data from randomized controlled trials are urgently needed because

67 Further studies of randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm th

68 To perform a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of ery

69 We did a parallel, open-label single-center randomized controlled trial at three intensive care unit

70 We undertook a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial at 31 French hospitals (NCT

71 rging evidence suggests that design flaws of randomized controlled trials can result in over- or unde

72 condary analysis of data from a double-blind randomized controlled trial carried out in northern Chin

73 entially beneficial mechanisms of fiber.This randomized controlled trial compared low-, habitual-, an

74 This randomized controlled trial compared the antischizontoci

75 The randomized controlled trial compared the impact on the n

76 utcomes of patients with TBM enrolled into a randomized controlled trial comparing a standard, 9-mont

77 s to investigate 3-year survival following a randomized controlled trial comparing minimally invasive

78 Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing administration of

79 We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing AL to non-ACTs th

80 A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing any antifungal us

81 rt failure with reduced ejection fraction in randomized controlled trials comparing beta-blockers and

82 ependently screened titles and abstracts for randomized controlled trials comparing bowel protocols t

83 literature review and identified more recent randomized controlled trials comparing dose-escalated ex

84 Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials comparing dynamic assessmen

85 Randomized controlled trials comparing IBD medical thera

86 The lack of randomized controlled trials comparing various routes an

87 atients on aspirin therapy (n=21 722) from 4 randomized controlled trials comparing VKAs and NOACs (n

88 21 randomized, controlled trials comparing BP targets or tr

89 Included were large (n>/=1000), randomized, controlled trials comparing manual thrombect

90 Of these, 6 were randomized and 2 were not randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 661 p

91 n 11 and 22 months of age were pooled from 5 randomized controlled trials conducted in Europe and the

92 cies from 13 studies (6 cohort studies and 7 randomized controlled trials) conducted in Africa and th

93 30 studies included, 14 (including 1 cluster randomized controlled trial [cRCT]) used live attenuated

94 Selected publications included randomized controlled trial data and observational studi

95 Cohort study using randomized controlled trial data.

96 In this nonblinded, randomized controlled trial, de novo SOTR received stand

97 A phase III randomized controlled trial demonstrated that adding ola

98 ctivity during a threat-attention task and a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate potential

99 th late closure (>12 weeks) in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, EASY including patients und

100 A systematic review of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials enrolled patients with nonv

101 This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and

102 METHODS AND Link4Health, a cluster-randomized controlled trial, evaluated the effectiveness

103 ction Specialized Register were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of

104 tics, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials evaluating use of probiotic

105 to identify all publicly available phase III randomized controlled trial evidence.

106 This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of a n

107 o our knowledge, this is the first cookstove randomized controlled trial examining prenatal BP.

108 tion of FA and focuses on recently published randomized controlled trials exploring the efficacy of o

109 et priorities for new systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials for managing diabetic retin

110 included; 11 were observational, seven were randomized controlled trials for other outcomes, and two

111 lled trials for other outcomes, and two were randomized controlled trials for sites.

112 is based on a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials for primary outcomes and o

113 In a randomized controlled trial from 1990 with 24 years of f

114 ane databases were searched for all relevant randomized controlled trials from 1965 through July 1, 2

115 ommendations based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from February 2014 to Decem

116 Randomized controlled trials from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTR

117 However, to date, no long-term, large-scale, randomized controlled trial has been conducted to assess

118 Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the

119 Recently, 3 randomized controlled trials have published contradictor

120 recent results from large cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials have provided conflicting

121 There were no randomized controlled trials identified.

122 The program was implemented as a randomized controlled trial in 121 villages, 60 of which

123 This randomized controlled trial in acute laparoscopic append

124 A single-blinded randomized controlled trial in children (aged 6-18 years

125 ne regimens for radical cure, we undertook a randomized controlled trial in Ethiopia.

126 We conducted a randomized controlled trial in infants with at least 1 f

127 We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Nigeria.

128 We performed a randomized controlled trial in the same population to st

129 A randomized controlled trial in Togo assigned microenterp

130 issue, we conducted a comprehensive 4-month randomized controlled trial in which 318 healthy, young

131 We identified the 15 most highly cited randomized controlled trials in critical care medicine p

132 generalizability of information gained from randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients

133 Randomized controlled trials in Europe and the United St

134 We conducted a matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled trial in 60 pairs of facilities a

135 We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in nondiabetic DIOS patient

136 respecified secondary renal outcomes of that randomized, controlled trial in which patients were assi

137 The randomized controlled trial included 533 women who were

138 This double-blind, randomized, controlled trial investigates the effects of

139 In this explorative randomized controlled trial involving mechanically venti

140 re employed as instruments to recapitulate a randomized controlled trial involving two groups (cannab

141 The lack of head-to-head randomized controlled trials makes choosing between them

142 ory Initiative [TCRI]) and a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial (MAKI), using adjusted mult

143 eight.We performed a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial [Maternal and Offspring outc

144 ial multiple-assignment randomized trial (or randomized controlled trial) may be inadequate.

145 A 2-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial measured the cost-effectiven

146 from professional societies supplemented by randomized, controlled trials; meta-analyses; and system

147 Seven pharmacotherapy randomized controlled trials (n=2809) and 17 behavioral

148 ials (n=2809) and 17 behavioral intervention randomized controlled trials (n=4666) met our inclusion

149 ardial infarction cohorts from 2 independent randomized controlled trials (n=738 and n=458 patients,

150 (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT01425281).

151 We performed a randomized controlled trial of 2245 employees to determi

152 In a randomized controlled trial of 230 infants with genetic

153 We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 53 children (age, 5-16 y)

154 -blind, parallel design, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial of 78 postmenopausal osteope

155 METHODS AND We reanalyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of a home-visiting program d

156 We conducted a randomized controlled trial of AF screening using an Ali

157 spective, investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of an AUC-based educational

158 We conducted a parallel group randomized controlled trial of children initially aged 2

159 In a randomized controlled trial of children with FC, PPT was

160 on dabigatran led to early termination of a randomized controlled trial of dabigatran versus phenpro

161 This was a prospective, multicenter 2:1 randomized controlled trial of EBVs plus standard of car

162 asthma aged 5 to 12 years participating in a randomized controlled trial of ICSs with longitudinal co

163 terature search used the following criteria: randomized controlled trial of manual-guided psychodynam

164 The authors performed a randomized controlled trial of nurse-coordinated referra

165 We performed a randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing crani

166 In a randomized controlled trial of patients with severe uppe

167 We studied participants from a randomized controlled trial of primary prevention with s

168 dies, two systematic reviews, and an updated randomized controlled trial of SLN biopsy, as well as tw

169 n; mean age, 63 years) who participated in a randomized controlled trial of surveillance vs radiofreq

170 We undertook the first randomized controlled trial of the effects of commercial

171 INAHL, and CENTRAL through July 1, 2016, for randomized controlled trials of CCT in older adults with

172 ntrolled trial of SLN biopsy, as well as two randomized controlled trials of CLND after positive SLN

173 4 meta-analyses of observational studies and randomized controlled trials of dietary risk factors and

174 We included randomized controlled trials of isoenergetic replacement

175 ed MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials of licensed biologic treatm

176 Observational studies and randomized controlled trials of menopausal hormone thera

177 Randomized controlled trials of noninvasive telemedical

178 Randomized controlled trials of recent US Food and Drug

179 Most randomized controlled trials of routine versus selective

180 ut significant improvement in systolic BP in randomized controlled trials of self-measured BP versus

181 A growing literature includes randomized controlled trials of tCS for major depression

182 However, no randomized controlled trials of the effect of dairy food

183 RATIONALE: Single-center randomized controlled trials of the Zephyr endobronchial

184 baseline plasma samples from participants of randomized, controlled trials of early (ACCORD) and adva

185 No randomized, controlled trials of screening colonoscopy h

186 AND This is a secondary analysis of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial on HF education of self-care

187 In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, once-daily inhaled placebo,

188 ls, Embase, CINAHL) and internet sources for randomized controlled trials, ongoing clinical trials, a

189 In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned

190 f Reducing Intake of Energy), a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.Participants were 218 nonobe

191 cular events were assessed over the 4.9-year randomized controlled trial phase and on mortality outco

192 Fourteen randomized controlled trials provide the evidence base;

193 Results Five randomized controlled trials provided the evidence for t

194 A systematic literature review identified 57 randomized controlled trials published between 1987 and

195 s, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 2006 through

196 Randomized controlled trials, published in any language,

197 Assessing surgery in randomized controlled trials raises several challenges.

198 Ideally, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) among US women would p

199 This randomized controlled trial (RCT) hypothesized that prol

200 f this study was to examine the effects of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of treatment summaries

201 uestion to conduct a postmarketing (phase 4) randomized controlled trial (RCT).

202 All randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational stu

203 ved searching 12 international databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality qua

204 ere conducted through October 2016 including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective coho

205 While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are based on strict

206 lowed by meta-analysis was conducted on: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect

207 The current systematic review includes five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted to determi

208 ystematically searched EMBASE and PubMed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating isoflavon

209 Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed the ef

210 ed in a meta-analysis, and the findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been inconsiste

211 We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which CAG and AMT

212 lts with overweight and obesity.We evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of isolated soluble

213 There has been a dramatic increase in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mindfulness inter

214 FS) versus placebo or observation in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with new

215 Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest calcium coul

216 Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggests the consump

217 medicine is guided by our interpretation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that address importa

218 eriod 2004-2017 for guidelines, reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the ou

219 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MBSR w

220 There are limited comprehensive analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigate the

221 als.A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was carried out.

222 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 6302

223 significant results) in published reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with statistically n

224 re, in part, based on methodologically sound randomized controlled trials (RCTs), demonstrating super

225 hed PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and

226 te ICH by analyzing data from several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

227 ice for cancer care and are complementary to randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

228 m meta-analyses of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

229 ecently, a propensity-matched analysis and a randomized controlled trial reported no survival benefit

230 clinical experience and outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials, results of efforts to diss

231 ar stroke in a post hoc analysis of a recent randomized controlled trial, Sedation versus Intubation

232 Hence, authors and journals publishing randomized controlled trials should pay attention that s

233 hors of systematic reviews using oral health randomized controlled trials should perform sensitivity

234 these limitations, the primary analysis (all randomized controlled trials) showed that cell therapy r

235 To our knowledge, this is the first large randomized controlled trial showing an improvement in se

236 This pilot randomized, controlled trial suggests that DHA + aspirin

237 d and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-a

238 se recommendations on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials; systematic reviews; large

239 se recommendations on a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials; systematic reviews; and l

240 to severe asthma were enrolled in a 12-month randomized controlled trial testing the use of insectici

241 ysterol concentrations, and demonstrate in a randomized controlled trial that atorvastatin treatment

242 iabetes, we conducted a double-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of

243 lic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) was a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of

244 IBIS-I was a randomized controlled trial that investigated the effect

245 Randomized controlled trials that compared high doses of

246 Randomized controlled trials that evaluated human LTBI t

247 In summary, randomized controlled trials that lowered intake of diet

248 key words and relevant subject headings for randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criter

249 In a randomized, controlled trial that compared liraglutide,

250 and full-text articles for English-language, randomized, controlled trials that had at least 6 months

251 mins B-12 and A, and essential fatty acids.A randomized controlled trial, the Lulun ("egg" in Kichwa)

252 Despite numerous randomized controlled trials, the clinical benefit of ph

253 Among the six approvals with a non-enriched randomized controlled trial, three featured a statistica

254 Meta-analysis (one randomized controlled trial; three nonrandomized studies

255 We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of

256 We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether Doppler

257 This is the first randomized controlled trial to examine a gaze-contingent

258 We conducted a randomized controlled trial to prove this.

259 We performed a randomized controlled trial to study the effects of preb

260 We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the impact of in-ho

261 We will also conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of

262 We performed a parallel-arm randomized controlled trial to test whether administrati

263 s support the need of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials to address evidence gaps.

264 esearch infrastructure and funding, with few randomized controlled trials to guide practice.

265 Randomized controlled trials to improve indoor air quali

266 We conducted an open-label, randomized, controlled trial to assess the duration of t

267 ouraging preliminary results, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine whether minocy

268 We conduct this parallel design, randomized-controlled trial to assess the effectiveness

269 This randomized controlled trial, undertaken in Changchun, Ch

270 All randomized controlled trials used pure/uncontaminated oa

271 ate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy is a randomized controlled trial using a multiarm, multistage

272 We present here a randomized, controlled trial using allogeneic MSC, which

273 Rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials, using commonly available o

274 A randomized controlled trial validated the 7 g/dL thresho

275 my formation using a polypropylene mesh in a randomized controlled trial versus conventional colostom

276 ts of primary student lunch orders.A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted that involved

277 A randomized controlled trial was conducted through Washin

278 A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess whet

279 om adult patients screened for a multicenter randomized controlled trial was determined by using 16S

280 Patients and Methods This multicenter, randomized controlled trial was undertaken within eight

281 nsumer food purchases.In this parallel-group randomized controlled trial, we enrolled household shopp

282 In a 28-week randomized, controlled trial, we assessed the effects of

283 In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we found that alcohol is n

284 f 79 of 152 children (52%) from the original randomized controlled trial were enrolled for follow-up

285 n: 51%; age range: 18-73 y) from the Food4Me randomized controlled trial were included in this analys

286 Only 2 randomized controlled trials were designed to examine fr

287 Three randomized controlled trials were identified from 48 pot

288 In total, 17 randomized controlled trials were identified, including

289 this study was to examine in a prospective, randomized controlled trial whether patient expectancy m

290 A randomized controlled trial will evaluate the impact of

291 the disease make it unlikely that data from randomized controlled trials will be available to guide

292 A multicentric, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial with two open parallel arms

293 Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with 2,751 patients were in

294 The analysis included 167 double-blind randomized controlled trials with 28,102 mainly chronic

295 Observational studies or randomized controlled trials with a long-term observatio

296 domized controlled trials and disappeared in randomized controlled trials with a low risk of bias.

297 yndrome (ARDS) subphenotypes in two separate randomized controlled trials with differential response

298 However, randomized controlled trials with symptomatic gallstone

299 Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial, with clustering by elder ca

300 The Eurotherm3235Trial was a randomized controlled trial, with standardized and blind